Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 755 G5 (Ryzen 7 2700U, Vega 10)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 456 cd/m²
Contraste: 735:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.15 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA BOE074E, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490 AUO133D, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 755 G4 Chi Mei, CMN15C3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -38% | -43% | -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 61.3 -8% | 39.69 -41% | 36.42 -46% | 56.3 -16% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.2 | 87.6 -3% | 59.2 -34% | 54.6 -39% | 84.2 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.1 | 62.3 -6% | 41 -38% | 37.62 -43% | 57.7 -13% |
| Response Times | 16% | -38% | 19% | -22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 35 ? 10% | 44 ? -13% | 30.4 ? 22% | 45 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 25 ? 22% | 34 ? -6% | 27.2 ? 15% | 18 ? 44% |
| PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 990 -95% | 1000 ? -95% | ||
| Screen | 30% | 1% | -14% | -34% | |
| Brightness middle | 456 | 421 -8% | 288.3 -37% | 200.6 -56% | 333 -27% |
| Brightness | 410 | 398 -3% | 281 -31% | 204 -50% | 306 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 86 2% | 86 2% | 87 4% | 82 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.27 56% | 0.21 66% | 0.16 74% | 0.89 -44% |
| Contrast | 735 | 1559 112% | 1373 87% | 1254 71% | 374 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.09 | 4.08 42% | 6.16 13% | 8.36 -18% | 11.69 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.64 | 7.48 41% | 18.99 -50% | 25.63 -103% | 20.57 -63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.15 | 2.92 68% | 6.3 31% | 7.7 16% | 13.7 -50% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.32 95% | 2.517 87% | 2.773 79% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 7195 90% | 7043 92% | 6886 94% | 6397 102% | 15194 43% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 57 -3% | 37.67 -36% | 34.5 -42% | 54 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 87 -3% | 58.9 -35% | 54.2 -40% | 84 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.51 | 4.6 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
21% | -25% /
-14% | -13% /
-16% | -23% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3186 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4495 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3087 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 5490 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -11% | 21% | -7% | 16% | |
| Write 4K | 119.9 | 119.5 0% | 105.8 -12% | 98.7 -18% | 114 ? -5% |
| Read 4K | 30.39 | 31.9 5% | 40.79 34% | 39.46 30% | 35.6 ? 17% |
| Write Seq | 558 | 351.1 -37% | 1204 116% | 564 1% | 684 ? 23% |
| Read Seq | 1689 | 1665 -1% | 1065 -37% | 764 -55% | 1612 ? -5% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 265.9 | 268.4 1% | 219.2 -18% | 443.3 67% | 401 ? 51% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 329.5 | 333.1 1% | 304.3 -8% | 268.8 -18% | 427 ? 30% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 710 | 351.8 -50% | 1267 78% | 796 12% | 830 ? 17% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2984 | 2705 -9% | 3303 11% | 875 -71% | 2950 ? -1% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2792 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8819 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1554 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (33 - 45.9, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G4 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (8.3 - 16.4, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G4 | |
| Thief | |
| 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (34 - 36, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (9.7 - 10, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 86 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Thief (2014) | 34 | 0 | 0 | 9.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 33 | 0 | 12 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.5 / 35 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.4 °C / -6.1 F).
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.48 / 0.85 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 10.6 / 12.9 Watt |
| Carga |
40.6 / 46.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 33% | 19% | 4% | 16% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.9 2% | 3.1 38% | 3.9 22% | 7 -40% | 4.73 ? 5% | 4.46 ? 11% |
| Idle Average * | 10.6 | 8.1 24% | 6.4 40% | 6.2 42% | 10.9 -3% | 7.61 ? 28% | 7.42 ? 30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.9 | 10.6 18% | 9.4 27% | 7.7 40% | 11 15% | 9.63 ? 25% | 8.9 ? 31% |
| Load Average * | 40.6 | 32.2 21% | 29.8 27% | 43.9 -8% | 30.5 25% | 33.3 ? 18% | 42 ? -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 46.6 | 42.3 9% | 31.2 33% | 47.7 -2% | 36.1 23% | 45.1 ? 3% | 61.6 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 51 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 499 | 394 -21% | 541 8% | 695 39% | 259 -48% | 608 ? 22% |
Pro
Contra
A HP oferece uma atualização de geração cultivada para os compradores do EliteBook 755 G5. O desempenho da CPU AMD Ryzen 7-2700U é bom, mas poderia ter sido ainda melhor com um resfriamento otimizado. A tampa inferior removível oferece aos usuários acesso ao interior, permitindo que eles executem tarefas de manutenção. A boa cobertura do espaço de cores é levemente diminuída pelo alto valor de preto e baixo contraste.
O HP EliteBook 755 G5 é um atraente portátil empresarial com desempenho suficiente também para tarefas mais exigentes e uma duração de bateria que dura um dia inteiro de trabalho.
Os usuários recebem um dispositivo que é apresentável com seu design atraente e oferece duração de bateria suficiente para um dia útil. O fato de que o consumo de energia é maior do que em outros dispositivos não tem consequências graves e, além disso, dificilmente há razões que falem contra a compra do HP EliteBook 755 G5.
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
- 07/24/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
