Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 755 G4 (AMD PRO A12-9800B)

Name: HP EliteBook 755 G4
Brand: HP

Desempenho adequado? ? A série EliteBook da HP representa aparelhos empresariais para clientes exigentes. Você descobrirá nesta análise do EliteBook 755 G4, se este empreendimento é bem sucedido e se o desempenho pode fazer justiça.

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/21/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Business Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 755 G4 (EliteBook 700 Serie)

Processador

AMD PRO A12-9800B 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Bristol Ridge

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Análises do: 758 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 21.19.153.1536

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2400

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei, CMN15C3, TN LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

K15.6 IMC

Disco rígido

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB

, M.2 SSD, 200 GB livre

Placa de Som

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: stereo, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Broadcom BCM5762 NetXtreme PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.4 x 383.6 x 257.7

Bateria

51 Wh, 4420 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

1.834 kg, Suprimento de energia: 288 g

Preço

1460 EUR

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET HP EliteBook 755 G4 Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington Lock, fan vents, VGA, USB 3.0 (charging connector), smartcard reader

Right: USB Type-C, DisplayPort, SD-card reader, 3.5-mm audio, USB 3.0, RJ-45, docking port, Micro-SIM, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	74 MB/s +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	73.6 MB/s +34%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	73.2 MB/s +33%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET	57.3 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 755 G4	55 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE	89.5 MB/s +8%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET	85.4 MB/s +3%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757	82.6 MB/s 0%
HP EliteBook 755 G4	82.6 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP EliteBook 755 G4 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	648 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	561 MBit/s -13%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	523 MBit/s -19%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	522 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	660 MBit/s +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	639 MBit/s +27%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	588 MBit/s +17%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	504 MBit/s


309 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
274 cd/m²	333 cd/m²	289 cd/m²
302 cd/m²	334 cd/m²	299 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei, CMN15C3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 334 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 305.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 333 cd/m²
Contraste: 374:1 (Preto: 0.89 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 Chi Mei, CMN15C3, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE N156HCA-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET AUO35ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-22%	1%	8%	-7%
Display P3 Coverage	56.3	44.08 -22%	56.8 1%	65.8 17%	52.1 -7%
sRGB Coverage	84.2	65.6 -22%	83.7 -1%	84.8 1%	78.3 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	57.7	45.66 -21%	58.7 2%	62 7%	53.7 -7%
Response Times		832%	-23%	-14%	-40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	45 ?(27, 18)	41.6 ?(22, 19.6) 8%	47.2 ?(26.8, 20.4) -5%	36 ?(17.2, 18.8) 20%	41 ?(23, 18) 9%
Response Time Black / White *	18 ?(14, 4)	20.8 ?(6.8, 14) -16%	15.2 ?(10, 5.2) 16%	26.4 ?(15.6, 10.8) -47%	27 ?(10, 17) -50%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(90)	26040 ?(40) 2504%	199.2 ?(50) -80%		200 ?(90) -80%
Screen		37%	6%	46%	7%
Brightness middle	333	262 -21%	338 2%	313 -6%	313 -6%
Brightness	306	245 -20%	341 11%	294 -4%	296 -3%
Brightness Distribution	82	89 9%	90 10%	84 2%	90 10%
Black Level *	0.89	0.24 73%	0.81 9%	0.27 70%	0.59 34%
Contrast	374	1092 192%	417 11%	1159 210%	531 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	11.69	4.5 62%	10.9 7%	4.5 62%	11.89 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.57	10.5 49%	18.7 9%	10.5 49%	20.81 -1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.7	3.5 74%	13.3 3%	4 71%	12.95 5%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.24 ^98%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	15194 ^43%	6524 ^100%	16030 ^41%	6387 ^102%	15063 ^43%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	42.04 -22%	53.8 0%	55.3 2%	50 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84	65.4 -22%	83.4 -1%	84.74 1%	78 -7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		282% / 175%	-5% / -0%	13% / 30%	-13% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points +71%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points +71%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points +68%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points +55%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	75 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points +49%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points +49%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points +31%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	222 Points

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	0.9 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	2.7 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	201.8 Points +58%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	197.5 Points +55%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U	183 Points +43%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	127.7 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U	112.6 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	30924 Points +68%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	29647 Points +61%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	18435 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B	2152 ms *
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U	1231 ms * +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U	1168 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4680

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

7257

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2564

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

4562 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

10237 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

3499 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.7 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

18.07 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.9 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

222 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

75 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

22.88 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3542 Points +124%
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3523 Points +123%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	3320 Points +110%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006	3234 Points +105%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B, 2700 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	1579 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4606 Points +22%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4330 Points +15%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B, 2700 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3765 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4380 Points +33%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B, 2700 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3292 Points

PCMark 7
Productivity
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B, 2700 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3547 Points
Score
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD PRO A12-9800B, 2700 MHz, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	7184 Points

PCMark 7 Score		7184 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1579 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3292 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3765 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		2332 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		132%	78%	36%	14%
Read Seq	800	1318 65%	1245 56%	509 -36%	475 -41%
Write Seq	774	1166 51%	298.6 -61%	488.4 -37%	435 -44%
Read 512	583	933 60%	673 15%	414.3 -29%	280.4 -52%
Write 512	580	860 48%	298.8 -48%	321.7 -45%	265.5 -54%
Read 4k	31.42	56.6 80%	41.79 33%	36.43 16%	32.71 4%
Write 4k	49.86	130.6 162%	138.4 178%	88.4 77%	98.7 98%
Read 4k QD32	141.2	510 261%	495 251%	402.8 185%	347.2 146%
Write 4k QD32	99.1	426.4 330%	297.5 200%	256.7 159%	154.1 55%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP

Sequential Read: 800 MB/s

Sequential Write: 774 MB/s

512K Read: 583 MB/s

512K Write: 580 MB/s

4K Read: 31.42 MB/s

4K Write: 49.86 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 141.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 99.1 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7030 Points +33%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6840 Points +30%
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B	5278 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B	962 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	822 Points -15%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	792 Points -18%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP EliteBook 755 G4 AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD PRO A12-9800B	1820 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1431 Points -21%
HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1417 Points -22%
Fujitsu LifeBook U757 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1309 Points -28%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1220 Points -33%

3DMark 11 Performance		1737 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		37561 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3897 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		833 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		417 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		358 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	46.2	27.9	22.5	7.8
Battlefield 4 (2013)	32.5	22.8	15.2	5.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	11.9	7.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	20.6	12.4	6.2

Barulho

Ocioso		29.9 / 29.9 / 29.9 dB
Carga		30.9 / 32.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520
Noise		-5%	2%	2%	-6%
off / environment *	29.9	29.3 2%	29 3%	28.2 6%	30.5 -2%
Idle Minimum *	29.9	29.3 2%	29 3%	28.2 6%	30.5 -2%
Idle Average *	29.9	29.3 2%	29 3%	28.2 6%	31.6 -6%
Idle Maximum *	29.9	31.2 -4%	29 3%	28.2 6%	31.9 -7%
Load Average *	30.9	35.1 -14%	31 -0%	33.3 -8%	34.7 -12%
Load Maximum *	32.8	38.7 -18%	33.4 -2%	34 -4%	34.5 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.5 °C	34 °C	35 °C
32 °C	35.7 °C	32 °C
27.2 °C	27.1 °C	28.1 °C

Máximo: 35.7 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C


31.8 °C	31.2 °C	31.4 °C
31.3 °C	29.9 °C	31.4 °C
26.6 °C	26.1 °C	26.3 °C

Máximo: 31.8 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520
Heat		-6%	5%	-4%	-9%
Maximum Upper Side *	35.7	39.5 -11%	37 -4%	42 -18%	39.6 -11%
Maximum Bottom *	31.8	48.3 -52%	41.1 -29%	38.8 -22%	41.8 -31%
Idle Upper Side *	30.9	24.5 21%	23.2 25%	29.2 6%	31.6 -2%
Idle Bottom *	31.8	25.3 20%	23.2 27%	26.3 17%	29.7 7%

* ... smaller is better

HP EliteBook 755 G4 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.58 / 0.65 Watt
Ocioso	7 / 10.9 / 11 Watt
Carga	30.5 / 36.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		15%	25%	22%	28%
Idle Minimum *	7	3.6 49%	3.58 49%	3.96 43%	3.4 51%
Idle Average *	10.9	7.7 29%	5.97 45%	7.74 29%	7.5 31%
Idle Maximum *	11	8.2 25%	6.81 38%	8.64 21%	7.6 31%
Load Average *	30.5	30.8 -1%	29.4 4%	28.8 6%	28.4 7%
Load Maximum *	36.1	46.1 -28%	39.7 -10%	32 11%	28.4 21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 16min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38.14393.1066.0)		4h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 53min

	HP EliteBook 755 G4 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 51 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20H90002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh	Fujitsu LifeBook U757 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		82%	82%	70%	64%
Reader / Idle	736	1167 59%	1081 47%
H.264	272	587 116%	637 134%
WiFi v1.3	259	454 75%	530 105%	440 70%	424 64%
Load	113	201 78%	160 42%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta

+ Design elegante

+ Muito bom acabamento

+ Muito silencioso até mesmo sob carga pesada de trabalho)

+ SSD veloz

+ Módulo LTE presente

+ Boas conexões

+ Qualidade do som acima da média

+ Conector docking

Contra

- Painel TN (ângulos de visão estáveis)

- Alto consumo de energia durante o modo inativo

- O desempenho da CPU permanece um pouco atrás das expectativas

- Duração da bateria é muito curta.

- Sem escotilha de manutenção

HP EliteBook 755 G4, provided by HP Germany

O HP EliteBook 755 G4 é um portátil empresarial no formato de 15 polegadas. O processador AMD é suficiente para os usos previstos, embora também tenha algumas desvantagens. Além disso, o portátil fornecido está equipado com 8 GB de RAM DDR4 e um veloz SSD de 256 GB no formato M.2-2280 e pode ser adquirido atualmente por 1460 Euros (~ $1650). Gostamos muito do acabamento limpo que não mereceu qualquer reclamação. Nós também gostamos do visual que parece muito discreto e elegante. Graças à seleção de bons materiais, a base é muito estável e, portanto, bastante adequada para uso diário.

O HP EliteBook 755 G4 é um bom aparelho empresarial que traz muitos recursos de segurança em um aparelho de nível de entrada. Com o HP EliteBook 755 G4, qualquer pessoa para quem o desempenho do processador AMD seja suficiente recebe um bom aparelho de trabalho equipado com conexões modernas.

Nossas queixas mais fortes vão para a tela, que o torna um pacote menos completo. A qualidade simplesmente não combina com a série EliteBook. O fabricante deve verificar se esse nível de qualidade faz justiça ao objetivo real. Outra reclamação resulta do processador um pouco voraz, que resulta em uma duração curta da bateria.

Estamos um pouco divididos sobre a falta de uma escotilha de manutenção, dado que a parte inferior da carcaça pode ser removida com um pouco de tempo. Uma escotilha de manutenção seria mais amigável para o cliente em nossa opinião. Nós gostamos da qualidade do som, do teclado e do SSD rápido que beneficiam mais o sistema.

HP EliteBook 755 G4 - 07/12/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

90 / 98 → 92%

Teclado

92%

Mouse

90%

Conectividade

59 / 80 → 73%

Peso

65 / 20-67 → 96%

Bateria

77%

Pantalha

77%

Desempenho do jogos

50 / 68 → 73%

Desempenho da aplicação

68 / 92 → 74%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

95%

Audio

69%

Camera

45 / 85 → 53%

Médio

75%

85%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 755 G4 (AMD PRO A12-9800B)

Sebastian Bade, 2017-07-21 (Update: 2017-07-31)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

HP EliteBook 755 G4 audio analysis

HP EliteBook 850 G4-Z2W86ET audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison