Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 735 G5 (7 2700U, Vega 10)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 461 cd/m²
Contraste: 1105:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 6.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA BOE074A, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS B156HAK02.0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA BOE074E, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 JDI LPM139M422A, , 3000x2000, 13.9" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -46% | -6% | -4% | -4% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.1 | 36.94 -48% | 66.9 -6% | 65.8 -7% | 67.5 -5% | 67.8 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.3 | 55.3 -43% | 90.2 -6% | 97.7 1% | 94.5 -2% | 95.1 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.4 | 38.16 -47% | 66.1 -7% | 67.5 -5% | 68.7 -4% | 67.8 -5% |
| Response Times | 11% | -2% | 6% | -35% | 2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 33.2 ? 21% | 39 ? 7% | 42 ? -0% | 43 ? -2% | 36.8 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 27.6 ? 1% | 32 ? -14% | 25 ? 11% | 29 ? -4% | 30.4 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 20500 ? | 21000 ? 2% | 217 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | -41% | -24% | 28% | 9% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 464 | 254.5 -45% | 456 -2% | 550 19% | 344 -26% | 303.8 -35% |
| Brightness | 426 | 238 -44% | 410 -4% | 512 20% | 320 -25% | 289 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 84 -1% | 88 4% | 77 -9% | 86 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.27 36% | 0.62 -48% | 0.32 24% | 0.31 26% | 0.31 26% |
| Contrast | 1105 | 943 -15% | 735 -33% | 1719 56% | 1110 0% | 980 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.49 | 4.58 -2% | 7.09 -58% | 2.28 49% | 2.72 39% | 2.9 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.77 | 17.99 -105% | 12.64 -44% | 4.36 50% | 5.92 32% | 5.79 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.27 | 4.34 -242% | 0.8 37% | 1.72 -35% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.44 | 3.3 49% | 9.15 -42% | 3.27 49% | 2.74 57% | 3.7 43% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.403 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.38 92% | 2.118 104% |
| CCT | 6922 94% | 6355 102% | 7195 90% | 6819 95% | 6794 96% | 6323 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 35 -44% | 59 -6% | 62 -2% | 61 -3% | 63 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 55 -43% | 90 -6% | 98 2% | 94 -2% | 95 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-36% | -11% /
-17% | 10% /
19% | -10% /
-2% | 0% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20500 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3402 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4666 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3354 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -2% | 6% | -25% | -0% | |
| Read Seq | 1052 | 1701 62% | 1317 25% | 464.9 -56% | 947 ? -10% |
| Write Seq | 719 | 523 -27% | 459.9 -36% | 401 -44% | 728 ? 1% |
| Read 512 | 859 | 859 0% | 628 -27% | 320.2 -63% | 680 ? -21% |
| Write 512 | 643 | 550 -14% | 461.4 -28% | 335.2 -48% | 607 ? -6% |
| Read 4k | 42.83 | 20.23 -53% | 33.79 -21% | 26.45 -38% | 42.9 ? 0% |
| Write 4k | 79.6 | 63.2 -21% | 117.5 48% | 79.8 0% | 90.2 ? 13% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 318.8 | 306 -4% | 360 13% | 246.5 -23% | 291 ? -9% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 158 | 220.3 39% | 273.6 73% | 277.2 75% | 204 ? 29% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2950 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8140 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1581 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (33 - 45.9, n=6) | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (8.3 - 16.4, n=6) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
| Thief | |
| 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (34 - 36, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (9.7 - 10, n=2) | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 82 | 14 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 36 | 10 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 37 | 12 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.25 / 30.25 / 30.25 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.3 / 37.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.25 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.38 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.5 / 9.4 / 11.6 Watt |
| Carga |
39 / 45.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -4% | 10% | 39% | 23% | 13% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.5 | 4.7 15% | 5 9% | 4.7 15% | 2.4 56% | 3.3 40% | 4.73 ? 14% | 4.46 ? 19% |
| Idle Average * | 9.4 | 7.9 16% | 10.6 -13% | 8.7 7% | 5.5 41% | 5.9 37% | 7.61 ? 19% | 7.42 ? 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.6 | 11.4 2% | 12.9 -11% | 9.8 16% | 6 48% | 6.2 47% | 9.63 ? 17% | 8.9 ? 23% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 47.2 -21% | 40.6 -4% | 39.4 -1% | 31 21% | 43.2 -11% | 33.3 ? 15% | 42 ? -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.6 | 48.1 -5% | 46.6 -2% | 40.4 11% | 32.6 29% | 45.2 1% | 45.1 ? 1% | 61.6 ? -35% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 56 Wh | Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | 32% | 83% | 70% | 100% | 82% | |
| Reader / Idle | 550 | 715 30% | 1160 111% | 1167 112% | 1234 ? 124% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 332 | 252 -24% | 499 50% | 506 52% | 506 52% | 664 100% | 608 ? 83% |
| Load | 85 | 99 16% | 157 85% | 123 45% | 117.4 ? 38% | ||
| H.264 | 433 | 716 ? |
Pro
Contra
O EliteBook 735 G5 da HP impressiona particularmente com seu design atraente, que é adequado para todos os ambientes de negócios. A configuração de hardware é boa o suficiente para aplicativos de escritório não diários e os desenvolvedores podem fazer a manutenção eles mesmos no dispositivo com um pouco de esforço.
Os compradores do HP EliteBook 735 G5 podem esperar um portátil empresarial de 13 polegadas de alto desempenho. Embora a HP pudesse ter tirado mais do hardware.
Com o EliteBook 735 G5, embora a HP ofereça um dispositivo de 13 polegadas de alto desempenho, a configuração de hardware fica aquém de suas capacidades. Sob uso intenso, o desempenho cai cerca de 15% após um curto período de tempo e o portátil de negócios experimenta um afogamento considerável durante o teste de estresse. Isso não importa para o uso diário no escritório, já que o sistema executa todas as suas tarefas sem problemas. Isso ainda faz com que o EliteBook 735 G5 receba uma recomendação.
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
- 09/13/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
