Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q)

Name: HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Brand: HP

Premium Business-Multimedia Combination.

O XPS 15 da Dell recebe a atenção que outros fabricantes também gostariam de obter. É claro que a HP também gostaria de competir com o portátil premium da Dell. Por isso, a HP lançou um dispositivo que visa impressionar com uma carcaça monobloco, recursos empresariais e componentes poderosos, no mercado. Descubra em nossa análise, se o novo EliteBook 1050 G1 consegue isso.

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/22/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Coffee Lake Laptop / Notebook Geforce Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (EliteBook 1050 G1 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1139 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 391.48, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-2666, 2 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AUO30EB, IPS LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel CM246

Disco rígido

Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, 2048 GB

, Dois SSDs M.2 2280 (o segundo SSD também é um KXG50PNV2T04), 3610 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta combinada de áudio, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões 3-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 360 x 254

Bateria

96 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Câmera infravermelha de 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Disco de recuperação, HP Thunderbolt 3 Dock 230 W G2, HP Client Security Manager, HP Device Access Manager, HP Connection Optimizer, HP Client Security Manager, HP Jumpstart, HP Power Manager, HP Support Assistant, HP Workwise, Microsoft Office Trial, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

2.06 kg, Suprimento de energia: 319 g

Preço

3799 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD card reader, audio-combo port, HDMI, 2x USB-C / Thunderbolt 3, power

Left: 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock slot

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	185 MB/s +22%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	174 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	152.1 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years)	96 MB/s -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77.8 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	210.7 MB/s 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	210 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years)	133.2 MB/s -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.4 MB/s -59%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	649 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Broadcom 802.11ac	602 (543^min - 628^max) MBit/s -7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	575 MBit/s -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	480 MBit/s -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	162 MBit/s -75%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Broadcom 802.11ac	817 (664^min - 835^max) MBit/s +126%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	638 MBit/s +76%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	632 MBit/s +75%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	525 MBit/s +45%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	362 MBit/s


380 cd/m²	414 cd/m²	373 cd/m²
368 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	363 cd/m²
383 cd/m²	420 cd/m²	364 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO30EB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 440 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 389.4 cd/m² Minimum: 37 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 440 cd/m²
Contraste: 1294:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.04
ΔE Greyscale 4.98 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6"	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4"	Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA SHP1445, , 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA AUO24ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE LEN40BD, B156ZAN02.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6"
Display		13%	27%	-1%	24%	-6%	26%
Display P3 Coverage	67.8	79.1 17%	98.7 46%	69.2 2%	82.6 22%	63.4 -6%	86.3 27%
sRGB Coverage	94.1	98.8 5%	99.9 6%	90.7 -4%	98.9 5%	88.8 -6%	99.5 6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.9	79.2 17%	86.6 28%	66.3 -2%	98 44%	64.4 -5%	99.3 46%
Response Times		4%	8%	4%	9%	20%	20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	56 ?(26, 30)	46.4 ?(22.8, 23.6) 17%	43.2 ?(20.4, 22.8) 23%	51.2 ?(24.4, 26.8) 9%	44.8 ?(22, 22.8) 20%	42 ?(20, 22) 25%	40.8 ?(20.8, 20) 27%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(14, 15)	32 ?(18, 14) -10%	31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8) -8%	29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4) -2%	30 ?(17.2, 12.8) -3%	25 ?(14, 11) 14%	25.2 ?(14, 11.2) 13%
PWM Frequency		980 ?(25)	117000 ?(75, 150)	952 ?(99)	1497 ?(50)
Screen		-4%	32%	4%	15%	-20%	10%
Brightness middle	440	494 12%	520 18%	310 -30%	324 -26%	402 -9%	317 -28%
Brightness	389	457 17%	492 26%	283 -27%	338 -13%	383 -2%	309 -21%
Brightness Distribution	83	88 6%	88 6%	87 5%	78 -6%	88 6%	89 7%
Black Level *	0.34	0.34 -0%	0.39 -15%	0.24 29%	0.3 12%	0.41 -21%	0.36 -6%
Contrast	1294	1453 12%	1333 3%	1292 0%	1080 -17%	980 -24%	881 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.04	5.2 -3%	1.2 76%	3.1 38%	1.6 68%	5.25 -4%	2.7 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.99	17.5 -150%	2.3 67%	7.6 -9%	4.6 34%	8.65 -24%	4.1 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.04			2.2 -8%		5.19 -154%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.98	2.7 46%	1.3 74%	2.3 54%	2.5 50%	4 20%	3 40%
Gamma	2.48 ^89%	2.1 ^105%	2.18 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.68 ^82%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7777 ^84%	7038 ^92%	6738 ^96%	6876 ^95%	6273 ^104%	6756 ^96%	6077 ^107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61	71.2 17%		59.1 -3%	85.7 40%	58 -5%	87.6 44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	98.8 5%		90.1 -4%	98.9 5%	89 -5%	99.5 6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / 1%	22% / 27%	2% / 3%	16% / 16%	-2% / -13%	19% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1015 (972-1114)

Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1019-1128)

Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)

Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=88, last 2 years)	257 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H	177 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H	177 Points
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points -3%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	170 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Intel Core i7-8550U	163 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=91, last 2 years)	2439 Points +116%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H	1251 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H	1215 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Intel Core i7-8750H	1217 Points +8%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H	1131 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H	1064 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H	1057 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H	971 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H	953 Points -16%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	737 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Intel Core i7-8550U	660 Points -42%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6811

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

33110

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6643

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6829 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

41831 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8665 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.99 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.35 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

74.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

1.77 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

11.42 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

73.9 fps

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

109.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1131 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

177 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years)	5126 Points +49%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4093 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3959 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	3735 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3669 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	3631 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	3433 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	3433 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3145 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5329 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years)	5081 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4643 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	4643 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4575 Points -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	4418 Points -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4408 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4063 Points -12%

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9244 Points +88%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5605 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4920 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	4920 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4473 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4348 Points -12%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	3926 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3116 Points -37%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	2807 Points -43%
Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8957 Points +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	7569 Points +12%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7037 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	6770 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	6770 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6649 Points -2%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	6561 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5795 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5079 Points -25%
Essentials
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10539 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	8894 Points +7%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	8514 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	8429 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8298 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	8281 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	8281 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	7262 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6891 Points -17%
Score
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6816 Points +46%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	4966 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	4805 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	4666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	4666 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4428 Points -5%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4323 Points -7%
HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3517 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3425 Points -27%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3433 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4643 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4666 pontos
Ajuda

	HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Apple SSD AP0512	Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	Average Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-11%	1%	3%	51%	-9%	4%
Read Seq	1733	1805 4% 1805 4%	1511 -13%	944 -46%	2229 29%	2069 19%	1714 ?(1695 - 1733, n=2) -1%
Write Seq	1030	523 -49% 523 -49%	1466 42%	924 -10%	1562 52%	393.4 -62%	1039 ?(1030 - 1048, n=2) 1%
Read 512	547	807 48% 807 48%	1015 86%	555 1%	391.4 -28%	914 67%	600 ?(547 - 652, n=2) 10%
Write 512	802	499.7 -38% 499.7 -38%	1166 45%	565 -30%	1279 59%	284.9 -64%	922 ?(802 - 1042, n=2) 15%
Read 4k	27.81	29.02 4% 29.02 4%	10.97 -61%	63.9 130%	56.5 103%	31.76 14%	27.2 ?(26.5 - 27.8, n=2) -2%
Write 4k	112.4	79.4 -29% 79.4 -29%	19.53 -83%	135.3 20%	182 62%	99.2 -12%	108.2 ?(104 - 112.4, n=2) -4%
Read 4k QD32	415.8	279 -33% 279 -33%	525 26%	336.2 -19%	645 55%	282 -32%	437 ?(416 - 458, n=2) 5%
Write 4k QD32	345.2	351.9 2% 351.9 2%	212.4 -38%	264.9 -23%	595 72%	338.5 -2%	372 ?(345 - 400, n=2) 8%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04

Sequential Read: 1733 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1030 MB/s

512K Read: 547 MB/s

512K Write: 802 MB/s

4K Read: 27.81 MB/s

4K Write: 112.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 415.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 345.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | 3DMark Vantage | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years)	20419 Points +197%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	9079 Points +32%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T	7831 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H	7590 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (6874 - 7385, n=4)	7142 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	6874 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	6115 Points -11%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	5515 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	4392 Points -36%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	57741 Points +65%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T	37975 Points +9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	34926 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (27059 - 36630, n=4)	33618 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H	32449 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	31396 Points -10%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	26860 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	18916 Points -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years)	14688 Points +159%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	7428 Points +31%
Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN51050 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i5-7500T	6066 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H	5699 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	5677 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (5616 - 5792, n=4)	5677 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	4843 Points -15%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	4118 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	3291 Points -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years)	5544 Points +247%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	2278 Points +43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (1596 - 1634, n=2)	1615 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) AMD Radeon Pro 560X, Intel Core i7-8850H	1614 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	1596 Points

3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P GPU no PhysX
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	33189 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia (23042 - 41091, n=2, last 2 years)	32067 Points +25%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	25577 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (25008 - 25577, n=2)	25293 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	21687 Points -15%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Sala GPUs-only
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	2100 Samples/s +23%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	1712 Samples/s
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (1692 - 1712, n=2)	1702 Samples/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	1260 Samples/s -26%
Average of class Multimedia (801 - 1529, n=3, last 2 years)	1238 Samples/s -28%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	852 Samples/s -50%
Room GPUs-only
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	1167 Samples/s +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (967 - 968, n=2)	968 Samples/s 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	967 Samples/s
Average of class Multimedia (603 - 1235, n=3, last 2 years)	908 Samples/s -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Core i7-8750H	713 Samples/s -26%
HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA NVIDIA Quadro M1200, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6	656 Samples/s -32%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		29687 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		26117 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		7396 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		51461 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		14739 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5114 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		1709 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite | The Witcher 3 | Battlefield 1

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	74.6 fps +20%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	62.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (59 - 62.1, n=4)	60.9 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	51.3 fps -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	48.8 fps -21%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=74, last 2 years)	102.1 fps +200%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	48.2 fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (34 - 41, n=3)	36.5 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	34 (29^min - 38^max) fps 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	34 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	29.9 fps -12%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=81, last 2 years)	54.6 fps +195%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	26 fps +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (18.5 - 30, n=3)	23.1 fps +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	19.7 (16^min - 22^max) fps +6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	18.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 Quadro P1000, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	15.7 fps -15%

Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	51.7 fps +15%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04	45 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q ()	45 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512	39.2 (36^min - 46^max) fps -13%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	285.1	172.6	150.4	62.1
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	79.7	71.8	48.7	21.87
GTA V (2015)	118.7	112.9	62.1	27	26.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	103.2	59.3	34	18.5	12
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	149.5	134.1	115.5	104.1	37.1
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	108	93.5	67.5	62.8	22.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	105.5	56	33.9	30.3	12.9
The Division (2016)	109.9	69.8	32.3	24.8	10.9
Overwatch (2016)	256.9	160	80.5	48.9	26
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	71.5	52.6	28.3	20.3	9
Battlefield 1 (2016)	144.7	89.2	45	41.3	15.9
Civilization VI (2016)	141	82.7	35	28.6	23
For Honor (2017)	140.5	53.5	49.8	38.1	14.7
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	80.6	35.7	32.5	17.1	10.5
Rocket League (2017)	240.3	155.4	98.8		36.7
Dirt 4 (2017)	191.1	88	47.1	26.2	15.4
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	136	128	120	118	55
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)			51.4	33.6	11.3
FIFA 18 (2017)	254.7	153.2	127.5	127	55.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	97	44	31	24	10
Destiny 2 (2017)	82.2	57.4	51.6	38.1	13.5
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	59	40	35	28	11
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	144.8	99.6	46.7	36.7	16.1
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	82.5	56.5	48.8	32.7	7.4
Fortnite (2018)	142.8	111.8	49.4	36.5	9.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	56.9	29.3	20.6		7.9
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	82.1	36.8	29.5	21.5	6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	88.8	80.9	65.1		30.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	66	35	33	30	10
The Crew 2 (2018)		42	37	33.4	10.4
Monster Hunter World (2018)	73.7	32	24	20	5.8
F1 2018 (2018)	104	63	47	29	13

Barulho

Ocioso		30.25 / 30.25 / 31.8 dB
Carga		44.7 / 42 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.25 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


33.5 °C	44.4 °C	42.6 °C
33.2 °C	39.7 °C	38.4 °C
28 °C	26 °C	29.3 °C

Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 35 °C


39.3 °C	46.4 °C	36.2 °C
34.7 °C	40.3 °C	33.1 °C
28.3 °C	27.9 °C	27.2 °C

Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 39 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.3 °C / 84.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 1.4 Watt
Ocioso	6.1 / 10.2 / 13.4 Watt
Carga	82 / 122 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4"	HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-32%	11%	-50%	12%	17%	45%	13%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	6.1	9.48 -55%	3.4 44%	12.6 -107%	4.02 34%	5.3 13%	2.7 56%	4.48 ?(2.3 - 6.8, n=4) 27%	6.96 ?(2.2 - 21.1, n=85, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Average *	10.2	16.1 -58%	11 -8%	17.1 -68%	7.2 29%	10.2 -0%	8.1 21%	9.58 ?(8 - 10.3, n=4) 6%	11.3 ?(4.6 - 30, n=85, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Maximum *	13.4	16.9 -26%	14.9 -11%	19.3 -44%	11.46 14%	13.6 -1%	10.1 25%	11.6 ?(10.6 - 13.4, n=4) 13%	13.5 ?(5.6 - 30.4, n=85, last 2 years) -1%
Load Average *	82	90.8 -11%	78.9 4%	88.3 -8%	76.3 7%	58.3 29%	39 52%	77.3 ?(74 - 82, n=4) 6%	72.3 ?(14.3 - 147, n=83, last 2 years) 12%
Load Maximum *	122	134.4 -10%	91.2 25%	147.3 -21%	154 -26%	65.3 46%	37.2 70%	105.5 ?(89 - 122, n=4) 14%	119.2 ?(47.7 - 270, n=84, last 2 years) 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *				74.8	74	47.8

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		17h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 41min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 08min

	HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 105 Wh	HP ZBook Studio G4-Y6K17EA E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 64 Wh	HP EliteBook 850 G5 3JX58EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 96 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-1%	19%	9%	-61%	20%	15%	11%
Reader / Idle	1027			1181 15%	410 -60%	1066 4%	1519 48%	1146 ?(612 - 2760, n=18, last 2 years) 12%
H.264	581	738 27%	701 21%	565 -3%		627 8%	733 26%	793 ?(319 - 1481, n=51, last 2 years) 36%
WiFi v1.3	523	576 10%	614 17%	522 0%	201 -62%	556 6%	637 22%	613 ?(279 - 1204, n=84, last 2 years) 17%
Load	128	76 -41%		158 23%	50 -61%	207 62%	79 -38%	98.3 ?(39 - 212, n=66, last 2 years) -23%
Witcher 3 ultra		62	88					76.3 ?(57 - 96, n=4, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Carcaça metálica de muito alta qualidade

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Tela 4K mate com bom brilho

+ Equipamento de conexão sólido

+ Webcam infravermelho com apertura de privacidade

+ Boas opções de expansão: dois slots SSD M.2

+ A carcaça permanece fria inclusive sob uso intenso

+ Bom alto-falantes

+ Capacidades de alto desempenho

+ Apto para jogos

Contra

- Preço alto

- O modelo maior e mais pesado em sua classe

- GPU mais fraca que no Dell XPS 15

- Afogamento significante no teste de estresse

- Os ventiladores funcionam com muita frequência

- Má distribuição do brilho da tela

- Barulho da bobina muito perceptível

- Mal posicionamento das aberturas de ventilação

- A melhor tela DreamColor permanece reservada para o ZBook similar

- Menos recursos empresariais que o EliteBook 850 G5

- Limites do desempenho no modo de bateria

Modelos de portátil completamente novos sem um predecessor, como o HP EliteBook 1050 G1, são sempre interessantes. A HP teve sucesso com seu primeiro modelo multimídia real da série EliteBook, e será que é um concorrente digno para o Dell XPS 15?

A HP definitivamente teve sucesso com a carcaça e o design do EliteBook 1050: qualidade extremamente alta, muito resistente e visualmente atraente - adequado para a faixa de preço. Também não há nada que reclamar dos dispositivos de entrada. A HP usa um touchpad de vidro que pode ser operado de forma confortável e um bom teclado (mesmo que não seja perfeito). Quanto à tela, a HP oferece um LCD UHD 4K, que é uma opção que nenhum dos concorrentes pode oferecer. Esta tela também possui bons valores de brilho de quase 400 cd / m². O equipamento de conexão é sólido e significativamente mais extenso do que, por exemplo, no Apple MacBook Air 15. Embora a webcam não seja melhor que a do Dell XPS 15, pelo menos está posicionada corretamente acima do monitor. Ele também oferece mais funções com sua abertura de privacidade e sensores infravermelhos. Graças a um segundo slot M.2-2280, o EliteBook 1050 G1 também é mais expansível do que o Dell XPS 15. Além disso, o EliteBook permanece significativamente mais frio em comparação, e também possui bons alto-falantes (para um portátil).

No entanto, isso é suficiente para enfrentar os concorrentes? Provavelmente não, dado que o EliteBook 1050 G1 não só é consideravelmente mais caro, mas também tem alguns pontos fracos. Estes incluem, por exemplo, o fato de que, embora a carcaça seja bastante resistente, ela também é relativamente pesada e há grandes marcos acima e abaixo da tela. O EliteBook 1050 G1 não é apenas o modelo mais pesado da sua classe, também não é tão compacto como o Dell XPS 15. Além disso, seu desempenho geral é mais baixo que o do concorrente da Dell: Embora o GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q em combinação com o processador hexacore da Intel o torna basicamente apto para jogos, o Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q no Dell XPS 15é notoriamente mais rápido. Além disso, o EliteBook é significativamente afogado no teste de estresse - a desvantagem de manter as temperaturas baixas. Também não gostamos do nível de ruído do EliteBook. O ventilador funciona muito frequentemente e com um ruído de frequência muito alta, e é relativamente barulhento; há também alguns ruídos de bobina no topo, e os ventiladores sopram o ar quente nas mãos dos usuários do mouse, devido ao posicionamento não ideal das aberturas de ventilação.

Também temos algumas reclamações sobre a tela, como a distribuição de brilho que é bastante desigual. Mas o que é mais sério é que a HP retém a tela DreamColor 4K-UHD consideravelmente mais brilhante e vibrante do EliteBook 1050 G1, apesar de ser oferecida no HP ZBook Studio G5, equipado de forma idêntica. Esta decisão é incompreensível para um portátil tão caro. No geral, também gostaríamos de ter mais recursos empresariais, como um PointStick, um leitor de cartões smart, ou Ethernet. Esta é uma chance perdida de transformar o EliteBook 1050 G1 em um verdadeiro poli funcional empresarial.

Muito bom às vezes não é bom o suficiente: O HP EliteBook 1050 G1 é um portátil multimídia empresarial de alta qualidade que, no entanto, é inferior ao Dell XPS 15 em geral.

Finalmente, o HP EliteBook 1050 G1 consegue um resultado muito bom de 89% em nossa avaliação. Embora isso possa parecer surpreendente à primeira vista, considerando nossas reclamações, é claro que nossos pontos críticos estão em um nível alto. Afinal, o preço é correspondentemente alto e os concorrentes são muito fortes. O Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 alcança uma avaliação de 90% e o Dell XPS 15 9570 alcança até 92% – e isso como uma variante mais acessível. Enquanto o HP EliteBook 1050 G1 recebe nossa recomendação, não há muitas razões claras para preferi-lo sobre os concorrentes. O Dell XPS 15, em particular, oferece simplesmente uma melhor relação preço-desempenho. Então, enquanto a Dell não precisa temer o EliteBook, pode se tornar interessante nesta categoria, já que o Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme alcançará o mercado em breve. A nossa próxima análise provavelmente irá dizer se ele pode se tornar mais perigoso para o XPS 15.

HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA - 2019-10-25 10/25/2019 v7 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento

90 / 98 → 92%

Teclado

86%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

67 / 80 → 83%

Peso

63 / 20-72 → 82%

Bateria

83 / 95 → 87%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

71 / 90 → 79%

Desempenho da aplicação

83 / 90 → 92%

Temperatura

90%

Ruído

85 / 95 → 89%

Audio

76%

Camera

37 / 85 → 44%

Médio

77%

86%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 1050 G1 (i7-8750H, 4K, GTX 1050 Max-Q)

Benjamin Herzig, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)