Breve Análise do Portátil HP 250 G7 (Core i5-8265U, 8 GB RAM, FHD, SSD de 512 GB)
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES
Processador
Intel Core i5-8265U 4 x 1.6 - 3.9 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 24.20.100.6222
Memória
8 GB
, 1 slot SO-DIMM
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE0687, TN, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB
, 480 GB livre
peso
1.898 kg, Suprimento de energia: 289 g
Preço
655 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (257-287)
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø269 (182-363)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE0687 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 217 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 204.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13.2 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 198 cd/m²
Contraste: 394:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.98
ΔE Greyscale 12.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.93% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.61% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES BOE BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE LG Philips LP156WFB-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) BOE07C5 (NV156FHM-N42), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 54% | 0% | -11% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.61 | 39.11 -1% | 65 64% | 39.85 1% | 35.37 -11% | 40.21 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.5 | 58.8 -1% | 85.9 44% | 58.8 -1% | 53.2 -11% | 59.6 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.93 | 40.41 -1% | 62.8 53% | 41.17 1% | 36.54 -11% | 41.54 1% |
| Response Times | -33% | -59% | 26% | -59% | -98% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 42 ? -2% | 44 ? -7% | 44 ? -7% | 38 ? 7% | 46 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 13 ? -8% | 30 ? -150% | 31 ? -158% | 27 ? -125% | 34 ? -183% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 2500 ? -90% | 20000 ? -20% | 86000 ? 244% | 60 ? -100% | |
| Screen | 1% | 44% | 19% | 23% | 50% | |
| Brightness middle | 205 | 184 -10% | 290 41% | 283 38% | 260 27% | 280 37% |
| Brightness | 205 | 178 -13% | 249 21% | 252 23% | 241 18% | 267 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 80 -9% | 78 -11% | 75 -15% | 87 -1% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.38 27% | 0.38 27% | 0.63 -21% | 0.39 25% | 0.2 62% |
| Contrast | 394 | 484 23% | 763 94% | 449 14% | 667 69% | 1400 255% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.15 | 11.29 -1% | 4.35 61% | 4.02 64% | 5.23 53% | 5 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.08 | 19.48 -2% | 11.06 42% | 8.77 54% | 7.73 59% | 7.9 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.98 | 4.03 -35% | 4.2 -41% | 3.6 -21% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.62 | 12.43 2% | 3.01 76% | 0.8 94% | 4.22 67% | 3.7 71% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.44 90% | 2.35 94% | 2.62 84% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 14189 46% | 13823 47% | 7198 90% | 6552 99% | 6104 106% | 7309 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37 -3% | 56 47% | 38 0% | 34 -11% | 38.09 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 59 0% | 86 46% | 58 -2% | 53 -10% | 59.26 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-6% | 13% /
27% | 15% /
17% | -16% /
7% | -16% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES: Ø486 (482.38-503.85)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (1.3 - 3.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (1.73 - 1.88, n=6) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (5.59 - 25.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (5.22 - 7.22, n=6) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (5904 - 15443, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (7705 - 7975, n=4) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (22075 - 76704, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (18924 - 25361, n=4) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=24) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3132 - 4927, n=23) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3254 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4542 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3573 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Apple SSD AP0256 | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -59% | -56% | -59% | -63% | -60% | -7% | ||
| Write 4K | 179.3 | 81 -55% | 80.1 -55% | 72.1 -60% | 77.3 -57% | 138.5 ? -23% | ||
| Read 4K | 47.7 | 31.48 -34% | 32.05 -33% | 25 -48% | 29.77 -38% | 44.2 ? -7% | ||
| Write Seq | 1265 | 452.1 -64% | 505 -60% | 158.1 -88% | 413.2 -67% | 442.5 -65% | 1265 ? 0% | |
| Read Seq | 1184 | 486.5 -59% | 528 -55% | 892 -25% | 488.9 -59% | 442.7 -63% | 1237 ? 4% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.6 | 184.6 -59% | 204.9 -55% | 162.2 -64% | 161.5 -64% | 173.8 -61% | 404 ? -10% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 556 | 203.9 -63% | 226.6 -59% | 320.4 -42% | 184.8 -67% | 233.6 -58% | 421 ? -24% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1455 | 483.2 -67% | 533 -63% | 160.2 -89% | 432.3 -70% | 510 -65% | 1491 ? 2% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1717 | 537 -69% | 551 -68% | 933 -46% | 531 -69% | 530 -69% | 1741 ? 1% | |
| AS SSD | -68% | -76% | -492% | -76% | -69% | -86% | 2% | |
| Seq Read | 1477 | 491.6 -67% | 513 -65% | 95.9 -94% | 494.3 -67% | 489 -67% | 1056 -29% | 1363 ? -8% |
| Seq Write | 1339 | 460.5 -66% | 493.3 -63% | 78.9 -94% | 341.5 -74% | 458 -66% | 651 -51% | 1227 ? -8% |
| 4K Read | 46.26 | 31.19 -33% | 30.36 -34% | 2.25 -95% | 23.9 -48% | 30.24 -35% | 16.4 -65% | 40.8 ? -12% |
| 4K Write | 143.9 | 66.6 -54% | 78.8 -45% | 54.9 -62% | 65.9 -54% | 81.6 -43% | 22.1 -85% | 127.3 ? -12% |
| 4K-64 Read | 937 | 366.7 -61% | 366.8 -61% | 43.28 -95% | 236.1 -75% | 271.8 -71% | 509 -46% | 957 ? 2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1190 | 309 -74% | 156.1 -87% | 116.6 -90% | 258.3 -78% | 163 -86% | 283 -76% | 1081 ? -9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.097 -111% | 0.129 -180% | 2.127 -4524% | 0.115 -150% | 0.092 -100% | 0.186 -304% | 0.07744 ? -68% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.024 | 0.055 -129% | 0.046 -92% | 0.045 -88% | 0.057 -138% | 0.044 -83% | 0.03671 ? -53% | |
| Score Read | 1131 | 447 -60% | 448 -60% | 55 -95% | 309 -73% | 351 -69% | 1134 ? 0% | |
| Score Write | 1468 | 422 -71% | 284 -81% | 179 -88% | 358 -76% | 290 -80% | 1331 ? -9% | |
| Score Total | 3181 | 1106 -65% | 971 -69% | 262 -92% | 827 -74% | 830 -74% | 3046 ? -4% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 765 | 322.7 -58% | 311.7 -59% | 253 -67% | 545 -29% | 1169 ? 53% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 239.9 | 129.6 -46% | 149.6 -38% | 108.8 -55% | 446 ? 86% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 528 | 222.4 -58% | 229.6 -57% | 154.4 -71% | 874 ? 66% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -64% /
-65% | -66% /
-68% | -276% /
-339% | -70% /
-71% | -65% /
-66% | -86% /
-86% | -3% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read:
1147 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1291 MB/s
512K Read:
701 MB/s
512K Write:
849 MB/s
4K Read:
38.03 MB/s
4K Write:
116.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
326.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
244.7 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1803 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7229 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 956 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187) | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52 | 28.4 | 23.6 | 7.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.5 | 12.1 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 45.7 | 22.6 | 15.2 |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES HD Graphics 520, 6006U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U | Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN | Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) GeForce MX110, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 2% | -1% | -1% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 30.4 1% | 30.6 -0% | 30.5 1% | 30.3 1% | 29.9 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.9 | 31.6 -2% | 31.4 -2% | 30.9 -0% | 30.3 2% | 29.9 3% |
| Idle Average * | 31.6 | 31.6 -0% | 31.4 1% | 30.9 2% | 30.3 4% | 30.6 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 31.7 -0% | 31.5 -0% | 31.3 1% | 30.3 4% | 35 -11% |
| Load Average * | 34.3 | 33.1 3% | 31.9 7% | 34.1 1% | 37 -8% | 38.8 -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 33 2% | 31.4 7% | 36.5 -8% | 36.9 -9% | 45.3 -34% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.9 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
| DVD |
| 36 / dB |
| Carga |
| 34.3 / 33.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.18 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.2 / 5.7 / 6.1 Watt |
| Carga |
36.5 / 37.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES 6006U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 SED 256GB MTFDDAK256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | -17% | -18% | -3% | -48% | -21% | -40% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 3.4 -6% | 3.8 -19% | 5 -56% | 3.65 -14% | 5.6 -75% | 3.81 ? -19% | 4.52 ? -41% |
| Idle Average * | 5.7 | 5.9 -4% | 7.7 -35% | 7.6 -33% | 6.8 -19% | 8.6 -51% | 6.94 ? -22% | 7.45 ? -31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 6.3 -3% | 9.3 -52% | 8.6 -41% | 6.9 -13% | 8.7 -43% | 8.75 ? -43% | 9.03 ? -48% |
| Load Average * | 36.5 | 23 37% | 31 15% | 25.6 30% | 29.1 20% | 39.9 -9% | 35 ? 4% | 42.3 ? -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.5 | 24.3 35% | 34.6 8% | 34 9% | 34 9% | 59.9 -60% | 47.5 ? -27% | 61.9 ? -65% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.2 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP 250 G7 6HM85ES i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | HP 250 G6 2UB93ES 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.6 Wh | Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) i5-8250U, GeForce MX110, 40 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 21% | -14% | 6% | 39% | -6% | 59% | |
| Reader / Idle | 833 | 754 -9% | 613 -26% | 1304 ? 57% | |||
| H.264 | 426 | 465 9% | 716 ? 68% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 339 | 409 21% | 291 -14% | 350 3% | 471 39% | 340 0% | 612 ? 81% |
| Load | 91 | 113 24% | 117.4 ? 29% |
Pro
+ Econômico
+ Mais compacto que o seu predecessor
+ Bom teclado
+ SSD muito veloz
+ Sólido desempenho
Contra
- Painel TN
- A carcaça range quando é manipulada
- Portas antigas
- Desmontagem complicada
- Trackpad pequeno
- Ventilador agressivo
O HP 250 G7 não é fácil de avaliar. Por um lado, trata-se de um portátil de escritório com preço razoável, surpreendentemente bem equipado em algumas áreas pelo preço, mas a decisão da HP de incluir uma tela TN é imperdoável.
Claro, as portas poderiam ser mais diversificadas e modernas, assim como o trackpad. Da mesma forma, pode ser mais fácil manter, mas esperamos alguns compromissos de um portátil de nível básico.
O HP 250 G7 tem muito a oferecer, considerando seu preço. No entanto, o seu painel TN é indesculpável, mesmo para um portátil empresarial de nível de entrada.
No entanto, nós não vimos uma tela tão fraca em um portátil por um longo tempo, ou pelo menos desde que analisamos seu predecessor. Tudo sobre ela é fraco e inferior, e é por isso que não podemos recomendar que você compre o 250 G7. A HP deveria pelo menos oferecer a opção de um painel IPS, o que tornaria o 250 G7 uma proposta mais convincente. Do mesmo modo, se você ignorar a tela terrível ou se planeja usar principalmente conectado a um monitor externo, você não encontrará muitos portáteis de escritório melhores por €599 do que o HP 250 G7. No entanto, recomendamos que você procure outra coisa, se você usa muito o seu portátil em movimento, dado que a tela TN é horrível.
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES
- 04/10/2019 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
