Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD)

Barato e lento. A CPU Celeron 6 W fornece uma experiência de Windows 10 inferior, inclusive quando equipado com um SSD. Operação silenciosa e longa duração da bateria são os principais benefícios para uma configuração tão fraca.
Laptop / Notebook Windows
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (250 G6 Serie)
Processador
Intel Celeron N3060 2 x 1.6 - 2.5 GHz, Braswell
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) - 1024 MB VRAM, Análises do: 360 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, DDR3, 20.19.15.4474
Memória
4 GB 
, DDR3, PC3-12800, 11-11-11-28, Single-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, Brilhante: não
Disco rígido
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, 128 GB 
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cherry Trail / Braswell SoC - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: SD reader
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2 w/ WiDi
Unidade ótica
hp DVDRW DU8A6SH
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.3 x 384.3 x 254.5
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, DTS Audio Control, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.96 kg
Preço
300 USD
Links
HP página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
384.3 mm 254.5 mm 24.3 mm 2 kg384.3 mm 254.6 mm 24.3 mm 2.1 kg381.4 mm 251.5 mm 25.4 mm 1.9 kg381.6 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg380 mm 262 mm 24.7 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader, USB 2.0, Optical drive, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, VGA-out, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
 
121 MB/s +433%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
22.7 MB/s 0%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
22.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15-9550 i7
 
211 MB/s +693%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
 
27.5 MB/s +3%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
 
26.6 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
531 MBit/s +219%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
166.7 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
550 MBit/s +121%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
248.4 MBit/s
214.2
cd/m²		198.1
cd/m²		182.2
cd/m²
206.4
cd/m²		199.8
cd/m²		181.5
cd/m²
213.2
cd/m²		205.6
cd/m²		187.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LGD0504 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 214.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 198.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 199.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 281:1 (Preto: 0.712 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
53.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
53.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.69
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
LG Philips LGD0504, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
ChiMei N156BGE-E32, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768		Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768		Asus F540SA-XX087T
Chi Mei N156BGE-E42, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768		HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
ChiMei, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
AU Optronics AUO38ED, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
15%
13%
13%
23%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
35.43
40.71
15%
40.21
13%
40.17
13%
43.63
23%
36.51
3%
sRGB Coverage
53.3
61.1
15%
60.1
13%
60
13%
65.1
22%
55
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
36.6
42.07
15%
41.56
14%
41.54
13%
45.1
23%
37.72
3%
Response Times
-16%
33%
42%
9%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.4 ?(14.8, 27.6)
52 ?(28, 24)
-23%
28 ?(13, 15)
34%
20 ?(10, 10)
53%
42 ?(22, 20)
1%
40 ?(20, 20)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
28.8 ?(10.8, 18)
31 ?(14, 17)
-8%
20 ?(10, 10)
31%
20 ?(12, 8)
31%
24 ?(8, 16)
17%
22 ?(6, 16)
24%
PWM Frequency
1000
200 ?(90)
200 ?(90)
806 ?(90)
Screen
20%
29%
39%
22%
18%
Brightness middle
199.8
211
6%
245
23%
215
8%
220
10%
219
10%
Brightness
199
200
1%
230
16%
200
1%
203
2%
222
12%
Brightness Distribution
85
83
-2%
84
-1%
87
2%
83
-2%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.712
0.43
40%
0.46
35%
0.26
63%
0.49
31%
0.39
45%
Contrast
281
491
75%
533
90%
827
194%
449
60%
562
100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
13.24
10.53
20%
8.34
37%
13.07
1%
8.95
32%
12.67
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
21.52
17.79
17%
12.31
43%
16.06
25%
15.89
26%
20.99
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.33
11.85
11%
9.48
29%
4.34
67%
10.59
21%
13.82
-4%
Gamma
1.69 130%
2.25 98%
2.38 92%
2.48 89%
2.51 88%
2.63 84%
CCT
15879 41%
13758 47%
10624 61%
7212 90%
12049 54%
15633 42%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
33.8
39
15%
38
12%
38
12%
41
21%
35
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
53.4
61
14%
57
7%
60
12%
65
22%
55
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 14%
25% / 26%
31% / 34%
18% / 21%
12% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
116 Points +214%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points +192%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
96 Points +159%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points +138%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
87 Points +135%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
40 Points +8%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
37 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
33 Points -11%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
28 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points +324%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
261 Points +284%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points +278%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
228 Points +235%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points +203%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
151 Points +122%
VOYO VBook V3
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
94 Points +38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
68 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
61 Points -10%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points +212%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.13 Points +176%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points +139%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.41 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points +227%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.48 Points +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points +164%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
0.86 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
9080 Points +302%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points +284%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
7614 Points +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
6994 Points +210%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
4454 Points +97%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
2256 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1978 Points -12%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel Atom Z3735F
822 Points -64%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points +240%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
3712 Points +205%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel Core i5-6200U
3505 Points +188%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
3286 Points +170%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel Atom Z3735F
1829 Points +50%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel Pentium N3540
1340 Points +10%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1216 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel Celeron N3050
1019 Points -16%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1361 s *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
788 s * +42%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel Celeron N3060
1566 s *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
898 s * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
2510
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2256
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
1216
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
10.12 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.41 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
37 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.08 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
68 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3317 Points +100%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3237 Points +95%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
2834 Points +71%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2674 Points +61%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1598 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1419 Points -15%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1413 Points -15%
Medion Akoya S2218
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1027 Points -38%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4343 Points +197%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
4249 Points +190%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3468 Points +137%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1464 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1426 Points -3%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1269 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1224 Points -16%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
3735 Points +110%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3605 Points +103%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
GeForce 840M, 4200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2804 Points +58%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1779 Points
Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1624 Points -9%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1265 Points -29%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1661 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
1779 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1464 pontos
Ajuda
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Toshiba MQ01ABF050		Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142		Asus F540SA-XX087T
Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142		HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-83%
-84%
-85%
-82%
141%
Read Seq
484.4
104.7
-78%
103.5
-79%
98.3
-80%
101
-79%
509
5%
Write Seq
139.2
95.7
-31%
91.1
-35%
89.8
-35%
99.6
-28%
322.1
131%
Read 512
338.1
33
-90%
33.74
-90%
20.79
-94%
38.12
-89%
321.2
-5%
Write 512
134.7
38.3
-72%
38.77
-71%
34.84
-74%
42.22
-69%
289.4
115%
Read 4k
17.21
0.375
-98%
0.374
-98%
0.335
-98%
0.522
-97%
20.99
22%
Write 4k
31.52
0.782
-98%
0.649
-98%
0.619
-98%
1.29
-96%
88
179%
Read 4k QD32
94.6
0.675
-99%
0.818
-99%
0.789
-99%
1.116
-99%
141.3
49%
Write 4k QD32
31.08
0.769
-98%
0.648
-98%
0.641
-98%
1.287
-96%
228.5
635%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Sequential Read: 484.4 MB/s
Sequential Write: 139.2 MB/s
512K Read: 338.1 MB/s
512K Write: 134.7 MB/s
4K Read: 17.21 MB/s
4K Write: 31.52 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 94.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 31.08 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
2335 Points +511%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1834 Points +380%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1257 Points +229%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1162 Points +204%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
384 Points +1%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
382 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
200 Points -48%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
181 Points -53%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
1774 Points +329%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
1525 Points +268%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
1196 Points +189%
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
915 Points +121%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
424 Points +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
414 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
239 Points -42%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
207 Points -50%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
8813 Points +362%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
6314 Points +231%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
5592 Points +193%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
2117 Points +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
1907 Points
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1290 Points -32%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
1190 Points -38%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
14334 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
12233 Points
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
5530 Points +310%
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
5123 Points +279%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
4643 Points +244%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
1497 Points +11%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1378 Points +2%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
1350 Points
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
1140 Points -16%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U
3086 Points +362%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U
2913 Points +336%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4200U
2401 Points +259%
Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540
1815 Points +172%
Acer One 10 S1002-17HU
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F
994 Points +49%
Asus F540SA-XX087T
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050
740 Points +11%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
668 Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
8087 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
422 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
18104 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
1350 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
35.6 fps +97%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
33.1 fps +83%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L
27.7 fps +53%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg
HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB
24 fps +33%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
22.2 fps +23%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
18.1 fps
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
16 fps -12%
Dell Latitude 11 3150
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR
14.24 fps -21%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
18.8 fps +96%
Samsung ATIV Book 9 900X3G-K01
HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Samsung PM851 Series MZMTE256HMHP
17.6 fps +83%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg
HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB
12.9 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Helix
HD Graphics 4000, 3317U, Intel SSD 525 Series SSDMCEAC180A3L
12.7 fps +32%
Acer TravelMate B117-M-P16Q
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), N3710, Liteonit CV3-8D256
11.4 fps +19%
Acer Aspire Switch 10V SW5-014-1742
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
10.01 fps +4%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
9.6 fps
Dell Latitude 11 3150
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR
7.08 fps -26%
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 18.1 9.6
Overwatch (2016) 15.1 9.7

Barulho

Ocioso
/ / dB
Carga
/ dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050		Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142		Asus F540SA-XX087T
HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142		HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Noise
off / environment *
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.2
31.6
Idle Minimum *
31.5
33.5
31.7
33.2
34.5
Idle Average *
31.9
33.5
31.7
33.2
34.5
Idle Maximum *
31.9
33.5
31.7
34.6
34.5
Load Average *
34.2
33.5
37.2
45
39
Load Maximum *
36.8
33.5
35.3
45.2
38.3

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.6 °C35 °C25.2 °C 
 32.8 °C38 °C25.2 °C 
 33.4 °C31.4 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 31.3 °C
25.4 °C31.4 °C37.2 °C
25.4 °C42.8 °C38.7 °C
25.8 °C29.8 °C32.6 °C
Máximo: 42.8 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-5.7 °C / -10.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.82536.835.13134.134.44033.836.65033.533.56334.133.98038.837.510035.835.312531.733.11603335.720030.143.225030.355.131530.162.340028.963.250027.462.363025.868.88002569100024.161.312502459.8160024.163.3200023.663.3250023.259.331502359.6400022.969.150002368.5630022.970.6800022.968.41000022.968.1125002368.21600023.965.5SPL36.678.4N2.943.9median 24.1median 63.2Delta38.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP 250 G5 Y1V08UTApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.25 / 0.51 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 6.4 / 6.5 Watt
Carga midlight 11.1 / 13.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
-102%
-28%
-29%
-91%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
5.8
-49%
4.8
-23%
3.8
3%
4
-3%
3.6
8%
Idle Average *
6.4
12.6
-97%
7.5
-17%
6.9
-8%
6.5
-2%
6
6%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
12.8
-97%
9.2
-42%
7.14
-10%
7
-8%
6.4
2%
Load Average *
11.1
27.6
-149%
16
-44%
20
-80%
36
-224%
26
-134%
Load Maximum *
13.8
30
-117%
15.4
-12%
20.7
-50%
43.6
-216%
28.1
-104%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 56min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 16min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 45min
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh		Acer Extensa 2520-59CD
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh		Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE
N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh		Asus F540SA-XX087T
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh		HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh		HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
-16%
-45%
-12%
-22%
-24%
Reader / Idle
716
667
-7%
634
-11%
WiFi v1.3
376
315
-16%
207
-45%
329
-12%
342
-9%
347
-8%
Load
225
115
-49%
109
-52%

Pro

+ Sem afogamento da CPU; baixas temperaturas de funcionamento
+ Longas durações da bateria; baixo consumo de energia
+ Bateria Li-Ion removível
+ HD e RAM atualizáveis
+ HDMI e VGA
+ Econômico
+ Silencioso

Contra

- Teclas barulhentas; sem iluminação do teclado
- Ângulos de visão e gama estreitos
- Desempenho lento do sistema
- Tampa suscetível a flexões
- Textura de plástico barato
- Iluminação de fundo escura
- Acessibilidade difícil
- Sem USB Tipo C
In review: HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
In review: HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT

Portáteis convencionais mais antigos comumente possuem processadores capazes com HDs lentos que normalmente são os gargalos de garrafa para o desempenho do sistema. Nosso SKU Celeron N3060 HP configurado é a mesma história dado que está combinado com um processador fraco com um veloz SSD. O resultado final é o mesmo: Baixo desempenho destinado apenas para o processamento de texto, navegação, reprodução de vídeo, e outras atividades pouco exigentes, não diferentes de um netbook baseado em Atom.

As vantagens incluem a operação silenciosa, preço inicial barato, e longas durações da bateria. O chassi é ordinário e sugerimos fortemente investir em um SKU mais potente com um processador Core ix e tela FHD para aqueles que estiverem considerando o 250 G5. Uma rápida calibragem também é recomendada para obter o máximo da tela, e, se o preço for uma preocupação, o antigo 250 G4 não é significantemente diferente e se desempenhará ainda mais veloz se for configurado de forma apropriada.

Evite o o SKU da gama mais baixa com o Celeron N3060 e o HP 250 G5 se torna uma recomendação mais fácil para tarefas básicas.

HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT - 10/30/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
73 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
71%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
46 / 80 → 57%
Peso
63 / 20-67 → 91%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
70%
Desempenho do jogos
33 / 68 → 49%
Desempenho da aplicação
47 / 92 → 51%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
53%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Impressão
-1%
Médio
62%
76%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT (Celeron N3060, HD)
Allen Ngo, 2016-11- 9 (Update: 2020-06- 8)