Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15z-ba000

Name: HP 15z-ba000
Brand: HP

Enroscado em azul. O HP 15z é um portátil de15,6-polegadas feito para cobrir necessidades básicas. Embora não consiga se destacar da multidão, ele oferece desempenho "apenas suficiente" para tarefas do dia a dia e não apresenta deficiências muito significantes além um preço um pouco elevado.

Bernhard Pechlaner (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇨🇳 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP 15z-ba000 (15z Serie)

Processador

AMD A6-7310 4 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Carrizo-L

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), Análises do: 800 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 15.301.2301.1002

Memória

8 GB

, DDR3L-1600

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:10, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, no, BOE06A4, TN, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

AMD K16.3 IMC

Disco rígido

Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, 128 GB

Placa de Som

ATI/AMD Kaveri - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio combo-jack, Card Reader: SD multi-formato, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8101 (10/100MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HP DVDRW GUD1N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.1 x 384 x 254.5

Bateria

31 Wh, 2831 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.048 kg, Suprimento de energia: 252 g

Preço

520 USD

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ HP 250 G4 T6P08ES HP 15z-ba000 Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power, RJ-45, HDMI, USB 3.0, USB 2.0

Right side: SD card reader, USB 2.0, DVD-RW, Kensington lock slot

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE	57.8 MB/s +130%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ	26.6 MB/s +6%
HP 15z-ba000	25.1 MB/s
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES	19.8 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	16.5 MB/s -34%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE	89.2 MB/s +163%
HP 15z-ba000	33.9 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ	28.07 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	26 MB/s -23%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES	25.6 MB/s -24%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s +1178%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	276 MBit/s +519%
HP 15z-ba000 Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	44.6 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s +697%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	334 MBit/s +571%
HP 15z-ba000 Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	49.8 MBit/s


247.5 cd/m²	243.6 cd/m²	237.6 cd/m²
242.1 cd/m²	244.5 cd/m²	226.2 cd/m²
216 cd/m²	232.9 cd/m²	197.8 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

BOE06A4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 247.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 232 cd/m² Minimum: 14.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.385 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.71% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.58% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP 15z-ba000 BOE06A4, TN, 15.6", 1366x768	Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ AU Optronics AUO38ED / AUO B156HTN03.8, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES ChiMei, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 156AT37-T01 (SDC4141), TN, 15.6", 1366x768
Display		-4%	13%	-4%	-5%
Display P3 Coverage	38.58	37.21 -4%	43.63 13%	37.06 -4%	36.7 -5%
sRGB Coverage	57.7	56 -3%	65.1 13%	55.8 -3%	55.3 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.86	38.44 -4%	45.1 13%	38.29 -4%	37.92 -5%
Response Times		11%	21%	-8%	7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.2 ?(18.4, 22.8)	42.4 ?(21.2, 21.2) -3%	42 ?(22, 20) -2%	27 ?(7, 20) 34%	22 ?(12, 10) 47%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(14.8, 18.8)	25.6 ?(8.4, 17.2) 24%	24 ?(8, 16) 29%	22 ?(11, 11) 35%	20 ?(8, 12) 40%
PWM Frequency	595 ?(99)		806 ?(90) 35%	50 ?(80) -92%	200 ?(90) -66%
Screen		-14%	-6%	-3%	-21%
Brightness middle	244.5	213.4 -13%	220 -10%	200 -18%	251 3%
Brightness	232	209 -10%	203 -12%	198 -15%	236 2%
Brightness Distribution	80	86 8%	83 4%	83 4%	85 6%
Black Level *	0.385	0.351 9%	0.49 -27%	0.28 27%	0.44 -14%
Contrast	635	608 -4%	449 -29%	714 12%	570 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.62	13.35 -55%	8.95 -4%	10.63 -23%	14.58 -69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.38	21.79 -25%	15.89 9%	15.69 10%	24.59 -41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.8	13.59 -39%	10.59 -8%	11.19 -14%	16.8 -71%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.7 ^81%	2.51 ^88%	1.78 ^124%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	11391 ^57%	18870 ^34%	12049 ^54%	11258 ^58%	27039 ^24%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39.86	38.44 -4%	41 3%	35 -12%	35 -12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.71	56.01 -3%	65 13%	56 -3%	56 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -8%	9% / 3%	-5% / -4%	-6% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

595 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 595 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 595 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	10902 Points +149%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	10803 Points +147%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points +98%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	6897 Points +58%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	4373 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	4984 Points +183%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	4984 Points +183%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points +135%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	3113 Points +77%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	1761 Points

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	1.5 Points +159%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points +121%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	0.92 Points +59%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	0.58 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	3.57 Points +72%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points +35%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	2.28 Points +10%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	2.08 Points

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +198%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	131 Points +198%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points +145%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	81 Points +84%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	44 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	321 Points +170%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points +162%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points +116%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Intel Core i3-5005U	206 Points +73%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	119 Points

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
HP 15z-ba000 AMD A6-7310	1430 s *
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Core i5-6267U	710 s * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

2657

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

4373

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1761

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

15.2 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.08 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.58 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

15.93 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

119 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

44 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	3665 Points +87%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points +78%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3237 Points +65%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	2752 Points +40%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	2437 Points +24%
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	1960 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	4408 Points +49%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	4281 Points +45%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	4249 Points +44%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3410 Points +16%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	3272 Points +11%
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	2952 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	4403 Points +109%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3825 Points +82%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	3735 Points +78%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	2969 Points +41%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024	2496 Points +19%
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	2104 Points

PCMark 7 Score		3288 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1960 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2104 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		2952 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	HP 15z-ba000 Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE Toshiba MQ01ABD100
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-89%	-85%	-82%	-87%
Read Seq	397.9	100.8 -75%	101 -75%	115.9 -71%	105.6 -73%
Write Seq	171.4	57.4 -67%	99.6 -42%	113.3 -34%	93.4 -46%
Read 512	367.5	31.19 -92%	38.12 -90%	39.02 -89%	31.7 -91%
Write 512	172.3	38.67 -78%	42.22 -75%	55.6 -68%	27.54 -84%
Read 4k	26.11	0.509 -98%	0.522 -98%	0.44 -98%	0.374 -99%
Write 4k	52.3	0.615 -99%	1.29 -98%	1.188 -98%	0.72 -99%
Read 4k QD32	164.3	0.351 -100%	1.116 -99%	1.125 -99%	0.694 -100%
Write 4k QD32	132.8	0.605 -100%	1.287 -99%	1.245 -99%	0.646 -100%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 222.3 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 329.4 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 295.8 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 0.108 ms

Índice de Explosão: 196.2 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 13 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	2421 Points +217%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6500U	1835 Points +140%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1834 Points +140%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U	1666 Points +118%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310	763 Points
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U	757 Points -1%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U	641 Points -16%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	2157 Points +183%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6500U	1598 Points +110%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1525 Points +100%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U	1422 Points +87%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310	761 Points
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U	721 Points -5%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U	701 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	11093 Points +262%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U	7453 Points +143%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	5592 Points +82%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U	4844 Points +58%
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U	4015 Points +31%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310	3068 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 5005U	1172 Points +125%
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Intel Iris Graphics 550, 6267U	1114 Points +114%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1010 Points +94%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X Intel HD Graphics 4400, 4500U	575 Points +11%
HP 15z-ba000 AMD Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310	520 Points
Lenovo G70-80 80FF00H0GE Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell), 3825U	463 Points -11%

3DMark 11 Performance		837 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		2459 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		493 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite | Tomb Raider | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Metro: Last Light | Anno 2070

BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	5.1 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	8.9 fps +75%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	3.4 fps -33%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	15 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	38.2 fps +155%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	23.3 fps +55%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	34.8 fps +132%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	29.89 fps +99%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	10.1 fps -33%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	17.7 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	44.8 fps +153%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	28.1 fps +59%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	41.8 fps +136%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	35.31 fps +99%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	12.1 fps -32%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	32.9 fps
Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	74.2 fps +126%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	49.2 fps +50%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	76.9 fps +134%
Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	62.4 fps +90%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	24.9 fps -24%

Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	6.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	5 fps -19%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	13.9 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	23.9 fps +72%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	9.3 fps -33%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	18.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	31.7 fps +70%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	16.5 fps -12%
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	35.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	63.1 fps +77%
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	35.4 fps -1%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	6.7 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	12.6 fps +88%
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	11.9 fps
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	20.6 fps +73%

Metro: Last Light
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	4 fps
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	8.2 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	18.4 fps +124%
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	11.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	32.4 fps +187%
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	26.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	42.9 fps +63%

Anno 2070
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:on AF:4x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	5.1 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	7.1 fps +39%
1366x768 High Preset AA:on AF:2x (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	13.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	14.8 fps +12%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:on (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	20.9 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	23.1 fps +11%
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	47.2 fps
Toshiba Portege Z30t-A-10X HD Graphics 4400, 4500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GMCU	43.1 fps -9%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Anno 2070 (2011)	47.2	20.9	13.2	5.1
Tomb Raider (2013)	35.7	18.7	13.9	6.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)	32.9	17.7	15	5.1
Metro: Last Light (2013)	26.3	11.3	8.2	4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	11.9	6.7

Barulho

Ocioso		31.6 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB
Carga		37.2 / 38.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)

	HP 15z-ba000 Radeon R4 (Beema), A6-7310, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ Iris Graphics 550, 6267U, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Radeon R5 M330, 5200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE GeForce 920M, 5005U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Noise		-1%	-11%	-6%	-3%
off / environment *	28.6	28.8 -1%	31.2 -9%	31.2 -9%	31.3 -9%
Idle Minimum *	31.6	31 2%	33.2 -5%	32.6 -3%	32.1 -2%
Idle Average *	31.6	31 2%	33.2 -5%	32.6 -3%	32.1 -2%
Idle Maximum *	31.6	31 2%	34.6 -9%	33.8 -7%	33.1 -5%
Load Average *	37.2	39.1 -5%	45 -21%	40.2 -8%	37.8 -2%
Load Maximum *	38.2	41 -7%	45.2 -18%	40.4 -6%	37.7 1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


27.6 °C	28.6 °C	20 °C
26.6 °C	28.4 °C	20 °C
25.8 °C	28.6 °C	20.2 °C

Máximo: 28.6 °C
Médio: 25.1 °C


24.2 °C	26.6 °C	38.8 °C
24.4 °C	29.2 °C	37.2 °C
24.6 °C	28 °C	43.2 °C

Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).

HP 15z-ba000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.13 / 0.48 Watt
Ocioso	5.22 / 5.67 / 7.82 Watt
Carga	19.67 / 26.72 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP 15z-ba000 A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, TN, 1366x768, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES 5200U, Radeon R5 M330, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1366x768, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-120%	-26%	-55%	-23%
Idle Minimum *	5.22	11.84 -127%	4 23%	7 -34%	4.2 20%
Idle Average *	5.67	14.16 -150%	6.5 -15%	8 -41%	6.6 -16%
Idle Maximum *	7.82	14.46 -85%	7 10%	8.4 -7%	7.5 4%
Load Average *	19.67	51.69 -163%	36 -83%	38.8 -97%	36.3 -85%
Load Maximum *	26.72	46.56 -74%	43.6 -63%	52.8 -98%	36.5 -37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 31min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 55min

	HP 15z-ba000 A6-7310, Radeon R4 (Beema), 31 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-574-53YZ 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 37 Wh	HP 250 G4 T6P08ES 5200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh	Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE 5005U, GeForce 920M, 44 Wh
Battery Runtime		-40%	23%	34%	49%
Reader / Idle	511	273 -47%	667 31%
WiFi v1.3	247	180 -27%	342 38%	332 34%	367 49%
Load	115	61 -47%	115 0%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho para o "home office"

+ Unidade SSD

+ Baixo peso

+ Tela TN acima da média

+ Não esquenta e não se torna muito barulhento

+ Duração da bateria suficientemente boa, apesar da bateria pequena

+ Bateria substituível

Contra

- Apenas uma porta USB 3.0

- Se sente bastante barato ao toque

- As dobradiças da tela não são suficientemente rígidas

- A tela refletiva limita o uso em exteriores

- Tampa propensa a manchas

- Não exatamente uma barganha

In review: HP 15z-ba000. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O HP 15z tem um visual atraente, funciona frio, a duração da bateria é razoável para uma carga e - graças ao SSD - oferece desempenho perceptível bom o suficiente, apesar das pontuações dos núcleos sintéticos. A APU AMD não é muito veloz - por isso estamos agradecidos pelos 8 GB de RAM e o SSD, que fazem sua parte para melhorar o desempenho. A tela TN é, de fato, surpreendentemente boa e bastante brilhante, para começar. O teclado também não decepciona, mas leva um pouco de tempo se acostumar ao touchpad. No entanto, quase qualquer placa de vídeo integrada da Intel superaria a Radeon R4 - e inclusive GPUs dedicada de nível de entrada, como a GeForce 920M no Toshiba Satellite C55-C-1NE oferece o dobro de taxas de fotogramas que o chip integrado Radeon.

Para tarefas básicas como o processamento de texto ou assistir vídeos, o Hp 15z não é uma má escolha. Os "power users" e inclusive os jogadores muito casuais deveriam procurar outra coisa.

Versões do Aspire E5-575G, que acabamos de analisar - por exemplo com CPU Core i5-6200U, 8GB de memória, HD de 1 TB, e GPU GeForce 940MX dedicada - pode ser encontrada por cerca de $500. A menos que a HP ou os revendedores diminuam o preço de forma significante, o 15z não é exatamente uma barganha.

HP 15z-ba000 - 2016-10-02 10/02/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Bernhard Pechlaner

Acabamento

50 / 98 → 51%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

53%

Conectividade

31 / 81 → 39%

Peso

63 / 20-67 → 91%

Bateria

76%

Pantalha

72%

Desempenho do jogos

51 / 85 → 60%

Desempenho da aplicação

57 / 92 → 62%

Temperatura

95%

Ruído

90 / 95 → 95%

Audio

50%

Camera

58 / 85 → 68%

Médio

63%

69%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15z-ba000

Bernhard Pechlaner, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2020-06- 8)