Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15-bw075ax (A12-9720P, Radeon R7)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 212.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 760:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| HP 15-bw075ax BOE06A4, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | HP 15-bw077ax BOE BOE06A4, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Chi Mei N156BGE-EA2, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AU Optronics B140XTN02.E, TN LED, 14", 1366x768 | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Chi Mei, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | 6% | -10% | 6% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.07 | 35.12 -8% | 40.21 6% | 34.15 -10% | 40.35 6% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.3 | 52.7 -8% | 60.1 5% | 51.4 -10% | 60.3 5% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.34 | 36.29 -8% | 41.56 6% | 35.28 -10% | 41.71 6% | |
| Response Times | 6% | 9% | 20% | -37% | 9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 42.4 ? -1% | 42 ? -0% | 28 ? 33% | 70 ? -67% | 41 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 22.4 ? 18% | 22.4 ? 18% | 20 ? 26% | 29 ? -7% | 23 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 198.4 ? 0% | 200 ? 1% | |||
| Screen | -3% | 3% | 2% | -19% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 212.9 | 194.1 -9% | 242.7 14% | 245 15% | 242 14% | 240 13% |
| Brightness | 206 | 192 -7% | 232 13% | 230 12% | 224 9% | 228 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 73 -10% | 88 9% | 84 4% | 88 9% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.27 4% | 0.52 -86% | 0.46 -64% | 0.62 -121% | 0.49 -75% |
| Contrast | 760 | 719 -5% | 467 -39% | 533 -30% | 390 -49% | 490 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.1 | 9.9 2% | 4.9 51% | 8.34 17% | 13.03 -29% | 10.96 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.3 | 23.4 -5% | 20.3 9% | 12.31 45% | 18.79 16% | 18.36 18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12 | 11.6 3% | 2.7 77% | 9.48 21% | 14.6 -22% | 11.34 5% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.34 94% | 2.38 92% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 12551 52% | 11981 54% | 6876 95% | 10624 61% | 18869 34% | 12292 53% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 37 0% | 33.5 -9% | 38 3% | 33 -11% | 39 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 58 0% | 52.5 -9% | 57 -2% | 52 -10% | 60 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-1% | 1% /
2% | 9% /
6% | -22% /
-20% | 3% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L570 20J80020PB | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L570 20J80020PB | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L570 20J80020PB | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2722 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3111 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2891 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP 15-bw075ax WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | HP 15-bw077ax WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 27% | 22% | 24% | 8206% | 6190% | |
| Read Seq | 63.3 | 91.3 44% | 106.9 69% | 103.5 64% | 434.6 587% | 503 695% |
| Write Seq | 62.2 | 90.2 45% | 97.5 57% | 91.1 46% | 207.7 234% | 316.6 409% |
| Read 512 | 22.96 | 29.02 26% | 32.28 41% | 33.74 47% | 356.3 1452% | 261.9 1041% |
| Write 512 | 32.08 | 39.51 23% | 35.39 10% | 38.77 21% | 195.6 510% | 281.2 777% |
| Read 4k | 0.29 | 0.34 17% | 0.373 29% | 0.374 29% | 26.71 9110% | 17.04 5776% |
| Write 4k | 0.79 | 0.94 19% | 0.636 -19% | 0.649 -18% | 56.8 7090% | 46.55 5792% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.68 | 0.83 22% | 0.694 2% | 0.818 20% | 176.3 25826% | 125 18282% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.78 | 0.96 23% | 0.682 -13% | 0.648 -17% | 163.3 20836% | 131.4 16746% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3162 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 667 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L570 20J80020PB | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L570 20J80020PB | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
| Alien: Isolation | |
| 1024x768 (Very) Low, Off, Shadow Map 512 AF:1x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| 1366x768 Medium, On (AA & SSAO Off), Shadow Map 1024 AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Metro: Last Light | |
| 1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| 1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset AF:1x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
| HP 15-bw075ax | |
| HP 15-bw077ax | |
| Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST | |
| HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batman: Arkham City (2011) | 36 | 29 | 15 | |
| The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 28 | 19 | 13 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43 | 26 | ||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 16 | 12 | ||
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 11 | 11 | 6 | |
| Batman: Arkham Origins (2013) | 48 | 29 | 15 | |
| Thief (2014) | 13 | 10 | 8 | |
| Alien: Isolation (2014) | 32 | 20 | ||
| Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014) | 16 | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 9 | 3 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 18 | 11 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 8 | |||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 10 | 7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.9 / 31.2 / 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 35 / 36.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP 15-bw075ax Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | HP 15-bw077ax Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9420, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142 | Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410 | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Radeon R8 M445DX, A10-9600P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -1% | -3% | 4% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 27.8 -0% | 28.9 -4% | 31.2 -12% | 30.4 -9% | 31.2 -12% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.9 | 31.8 -3% | 31.6 -2% | 33.5 -8% | 30.4 2% | 31.7 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 31.2 | 33.2 -6% | 32 -3% | 33.5 -7% | 30.4 3% | 31.9 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 34 -6% | 32.4 -1% | 33.5 -5% | 30.4 5% | 31.9 -0% |
| Load Average * | 35 | 33.3 5% | 33.3 5% | 33.5 4% | 31.3 11% | 41 -17% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.4 | 36.4 -0% | 35.5 2% | 33.5 8% | 33.3 9% | 42.7 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8 °C / -14.4 F).
HP 15-bw075ax audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus X555DA-BB11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.16 / 0.54 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 6.6 / 10.4 Watt |
| Carga |
28.2 / 37.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP 15-bw075ax A12-9720P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP 15-bw077ax A9-9420, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), , TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX, , TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -36% | 17% | 15% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 8 -90% | 8.3 -98% | 4.8 -14% | 3.9 7% | 5.5 -31% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 9.4 -42% | 8.6 -30% | 7.5 -14% | 7.4 -12% | 8.2 -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 13.9 -34% | 13.1 -26% | 9.2 12% | 9.4 10% | 9.5 9% |
| Load Average * | 28.2 | 18.5 34% | 31.2 -11% | 16 43% | 19.2 32% | 44.5 -58% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 23 39% | 43.9 -17% | 15.4 59% | 22.5 40% | 58 -54% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP 15-bw075ax A12-9720P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 31 Wh | HP 15-bw077ax A9-9420, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 31 Wh | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh | Lenovo B50-10 80QR0013GE N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | -3% | -7% | 70% | 31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 467 | 540 16% | 435 -7% | 847 81% | 560 20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 222 | 206 -7% | 176 -21% | 207 -7% | 325 46% | 260 17% |
| Load | 61 | 65 7% | 72 18% | 112 84% | 95 56% |
Pro
Contra
Enquanto o HP 15 (A9) que analisamos recentemente, foi um exercício de paciência devido aos seus componentes e operação lenta, o HP 15 (A12) é um teste devido à sua instabilidade. O processador é muito mais rápido do que o dual-core A9 em nossa unidade anterior, mas devido ao suporte pobre dos controladores, à má otimização de software ou a algum outro fator não visto, o sistema é quase inutilizável devido às probabilidades insondáveis de uma falha no sistema. Por enquanto, não podemos recomendar o HP 15 (A12) até que a estabilidade do sistema melhore.
Isso é uma pena, dado que o HP 15 (A12) é uma melhoria em relação à variante A9 em cada um dos testes de desempenho. Enquanto ainda encontramos reclamações com a tela pobre e o teclado esponjoso, os componentes internos foram muito melhorados (quando eles realmente conseguirem funcionar). No entanto, observamos um afogamento intenso sob estresse, apesar do amplo espaço livre para que a APU estique os músculos.
Mesmo sem levar em consideração as falhas do sistema, o HP 15 (A12) ainda é um portátil econômico comum, que não traz nada atraente para as prateleiras das lojas. Como mencionamos com o HP 15 (A9), existem opções muito melhores nessa faixa de preços.
HP 15-bw075ax
- 07/15/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
