Breve Análise do Portátil HP 15-ay116ng
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (jseb) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (jseb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA (jseb) | |
HP 15-ay116ng (jseb) |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 241 cd/m²
Contraste: 566:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.71 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.34% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
HP 15-ay116ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15-3570 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 9% | 0% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.34 | 36.51 -2% | 40.71 9% | 37.24 0% | 40.61 9% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.2 | 55 -2% | 61.1 9% | 56 0% | 61.1 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.58 | 37.72 -2% | 42.07 9% | 38.48 0% | 41.96 9% |
Response Times | 2% | -33% | -31% | -27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 40 ? -0% | 52 ? -30% | 58 ? -45% | 37 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22 ? 4% | 31 ? -35% | 27 ? -17% | 37 ? -61% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 | ||||
Screen | -4% | -0% | -7% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 249 | 219 -12% | 211 -15% | 204 -18% | 202 -19% |
Brightness | 234 | 222 -5% | 200 -15% | 198 -15% | 211 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 83 -7% | 85 -4% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.39 11% | 0.43 2% | 0.48 -9% | 0.62 -41% |
Contrast | 566 | 562 -1% | 491 -13% | 425 -25% | 326 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.71 | 12.67 -8% | 10.53 10% | 11.62 1% | 12.35 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.51 | 20.99 -8% | 17.79 9% | 19.97 -2% | 19.9 -2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.13 | 13.82 -5% | 11.85 10% | 12.3 6% | 13.46 -3% |
Gamma | 2.57 86% | 2.63 84% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 15273 43% | 15633 42% | 13758 47% | 13244 49% | 15217 43% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 35 -3% | 39 8% | 36 0% | 39 8% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 55 -2% | 61 9% | 56 0% | 61 9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-3% | -8% /
-3% | -13% /
-9% | -10% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGE |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ACZ | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
HP 15-ay116ng |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 4977 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3315 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4338 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4587 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
HP 15-ay116ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB) | Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -21% | -92% | -92% | -56% | |
Read Seq | 501 | 509 2% | 104.7 -79% | 102.5 -80% | 453.2 -10% |
Write Seq | 483.9 | 322.1 -33% | 95.7 -80% | 90.7 -81% | 137.7 -72% |
Read 512 | 413.8 | 321.2 -22% | 33 -92% | 32.58 -92% | 308.5 -25% |
Write 512 | 294.9 | 289.4 -2% | 38.3 -87% | 35.65 -88% | 134.1 -55% |
Read 4k | 34.91 | 20.99 -40% | 0.375 -99% | 0.426 -99% | 19.06 -45% |
Write 4k | 95.7 | 88 -8% | 0.782 -99% | 0.64 -99% | 21.31 -78% |
Read 4k QD32 | 370.9 | 141.3 -62% | 0.675 -100% | 0.987 -100% | 93.5 -75% |
Write 4k QD32 | 243.6 | 228.5 -6% | 0.769 -100% | 0.645 -100% | 23.3 -90% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8012 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1511 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49743 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5542 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 744 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Extensa 2520-59CD | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP ProBook 470 G3 | |
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng | |
HP 15-ay116ng | |
Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 67.6 | 33.9 | 19.5 | 9.6 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 45.3 | 25.3 | 20.9 | 6.5 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31.1 | 24.9 | 16.4 | 5 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.3 dB |
DVD |
| 38.4 / dB |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 36.15 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -1% | -1% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 30.5 | 31.6 -4% | 31.2 -2% | 31.2 -2% | 31 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.5 -1% | 32.5 -4% | 31 1% |
Idle Average * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.9 -2% | 32.5 -4% | 31 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 34.5 -10% | 31.9 -2% | 32.7 -4% | 31 1% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 39 -10% | 34.2 4% | 34.2 4% | 34.2 4% |
Load Maximum * | 36.15 | 38.3 -6% | 36.8 -2% | 34.6 4% | 34.3 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -14% | -5% | -27% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 33.8 | 31.1 8% | 33.2 2% | 34.6 -2% | 36.1 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 36.6 | 31.8 13% | 37.3 -2% | 35.6 3% | 47 -28% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.6 | 22.9 3% | 28.7 -22% | 26.7 -13% | 31.7 -34% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.8 | 22.6 5% | 32 -34% | 26 -9% | 32.9 -38% |
* ... smaller is better
HP 15-ay116ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.34 / 0.35 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 6.3 / 7.4 Watt |
Carga |
24 / 29 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -54% | -20% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 3.6 -13% | 5.8 -81% | 5.5 -72% | 4.9 -53% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 6 5% | 12.6 -100% | 7.6 -21% | 7.2 -14% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 6.4 14% | 12.8 -73% | 8.5 -15% | 7.5 -1% |
Load Average * | 24 | 26 -8% | 27.6 -15% | 24.5 -2% | 25.4 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 29 | 28.1 3% | 30 -3% | 25.4 12% | 28 3% |
* ... smaller is better
HP 15-ay116ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Acer Extensa 2520-59CD 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh | Lenovo B50-50 80S2000QGE 5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | -24% | -28% | 43% | |
Reader / Idle | 869 | 634 -27% | 1024 18% | ||
H.264 | 430 | 313 -27% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 412 | 347 -16% | 315 -24% | 295 -28% | 542 32% |
Load | 87 | 109 25% | 157 80% |
Pro
Contra
O portátil de 15,6 polegadas da HP deixou uma boa impressão geral. Graças ao processador Kaby Lake, o portátil está equipado para todos os cenários de uso comuns - por enquanto e para os anos vindouros. O portátil permanece relativamente frio apesar da CPU bastante poderosa. Um veloz SSD faz com o sistema rode bem. Seria possível substituir o SSD, mas isso requereria abrir a carcaça. O teclado instalado preenche os requerimentos do uso doméstico. Também vem com uma muito boa duração da bateria. A tela mate agrada com uma resolução Full HD, mas é escura demais e tem contraste baixo. Além disso, ela não conta com ângulos de visão estáveis. No entanto, a tela é aceitável considerando o preço do portátil.
Com o 15-ay116ng, a HP adiciona um portátil de escritório poli funcional à sua linha que possui uma boa razão de preço-desempenho.
A HP cobra 500 Euros (~$532) por este portátil. Uma grande parte do orçamento é gasta no processador, tela e SSD. Isso significa que os recortes devem ter sido feitos em outro lugar: O portátil vem com uma garantia de apenas um ano. Inclusive no setor de portáteis econômicos, dois anos são padrão hoje em dia. Além disso, o portátil somente tem uma porta Fast Ethernet. Se o Gigabit Ethernet for indispensável, deverá buscar alternativas. O portátil também não possui um módulo WLAN que suporta o padrão AC rápido.
HP 15-ay116ng
- 11/25/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck