Breve Análise do Portátil HP 14 (i5-8250U, Intel Optane Memory, HD Display)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 229 cd/m²
Contraste: 429:1 (Preto: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 12.71
ΔE Greyscale 14.89 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.31% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
| HP 14-ma0312ng TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | 5% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.31 | 37.96 -3% | 41.65 6% | 38.82 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 56.5 -5% | 61.8 4% | 58.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.61 | 39.22 -3% | 43.03 6% | 40.11 -1% |
| Response Times | -40% | -50% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 42 ? -5% | 42 ? -5% | 42 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 16 ? | 28 ? -75% | 31 ? -94% | 13 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 352 ? | 200 ? | ||
| Screen | 60% | 38% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 240 | 250 4% | 274 14% | 215 -10% |
| Brightness | 216 | 240 11% | 253 17% | 208 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 81 -4% | 85 1% | 81 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.13 77% | 0.31 45% | 0.4 29% |
| Contrast | 429 | 1923 348% | 884 106% | 538 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 13.14 | 5.54 58% | 5.74 56% | 9.37 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.06 | 10.5 50% | 8.26 61% | 15.84 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 12.71 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.89 | 5.2 65% | 4.61 69% | 10.52 29% |
| Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.29 96% | 2.14 103% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 19625 33% | 5796 112% | 7281 89% | 11214 58% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 36 -5% | 39 3% | 37 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 56 -5% | 61 3% | 58 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
34% | -2% /
19% | 6% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (10893 - 13553, n=18) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3148 - 3503, n=18) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (10751 - 13486, n=19) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3924 - 4243, n=19) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG (Edge 42) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (986 - 1532, n=59) | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 1966, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Office (22414 - 93596, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (22772 - 35817, n=54) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG (Edge 42) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Office (294 - 544, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T (Edge 41) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Edge 42) | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (151.5 - 256, n=78) | |
| Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG (Edge 42) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 5603 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3709 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4053 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4909 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3447 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD | Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1002 | Average Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -7% | 29% | 3% | 0% | |
| Read Seq | 855 | 425.2 -50% | 991 16% | 480.1 -44% | 855 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 157.3 | 377.3 140% | 792 403% | 440.3 180% | 157.3 ? 0% |
| Read 512 | 797 | 280.3 -65% | 482.2 -39% | 277.5 -65% | 797 ? 0% |
| Write 512 | 154.6 | 346.6 124% | 138.5 -10% | 300.6 94% | 154.6 ? 0% |
| Read 4k | 147.9 | 19.78 -87% | 28.11 -81% | 28.18 -81% | 147.9 ? 0% |
| Write 4k | 81.6 | 62.4 -24% | 79 -3% | 52.6 -36% | 81.6 ? 0% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 474.2 | 148.7 -69% | 320.9 -32% | 273.4 -42% | 474 ? 0% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 162.1 | 123 -24% | 124.8 -23% | 192.4 19% | 162.1 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1838 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 58047 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8196 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1053 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 89.4 | 46.2 | 29.8 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 64.9 | 34.1 | 28.7 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.7 | 12.5 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 39 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 13.1 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.5 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 13 | |||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 19.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.5 / 33.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.25 dB(A) | ||
| HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Pentium 4415U, HD Graphics 610 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -6% | 2% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 30.25 | 30.2 -0% | 29 ? 4% | 24.4 ? 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 31.1 1% | 30.2 4% | 29.1 ? 7% | 24.7 ? 21% |
| Idle Average * | 31.4 | 31.1 1% | 30.2 4% | 29.1 ? 7% | 25 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 31.1 2% | 31.3 1% | 29.7 ? 6% | 26 ? 18% |
| Load Average * | 31.5 | 34.8 -10% | 40.1 -27% | 33.5 ? -6% | 34.5 ? -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.7 | 33.7 -0% | 40.4 -20% | 36.1 ? -7% | 40.3 ? -20% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
| HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605 | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Pentium 4415U, HD Graphics 610 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -4% | 4% | -10% | -11% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 36.6 | 36.5 -0% | 34.3 6% | 42.2 -15% | 41.1 ? -12% | 41.1 ? -12% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 31.8 | 39.7 -25% | 30.1 5% | 39.4 -24% | 44.3 ? -39% | 44 ? -38% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.4 | 26.6 6% | 28.1 1% | 28.1 1% | 26.8 ? 6% | 27.4 ? 4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28 | 26.8 4% | 27.5 2% | 28.1 -0% | 27.7 ? 1% | 28.7 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
HP 14-ma0312ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.7 / 6.3 / 6.8 Watt |
| Carga |
15 / 30.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605 | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Pentium 4415U, HD Graphics 610 | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | 0% | -28% | -42% | -65% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3.4 28% | 3.4 28% | 3.7 21% | 3.81 ? 19% | 4.46 ? 5% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 5.9 6% | 6.3 -0% | 5.6 11% | 6.94 ? -10% | 7.42 ? -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 7.5 -10% | 6.7 1% | 7.6 -12% | 8.75 ? -29% | 8.9 ? -31% |
| Load Average * | 15 | 14.5 3% | 24.5 -63% | 37.4 -149% | 35 ? -133% | 42 ? -180% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.4 | 15 51% | 20.2 34% | 33 -9% | 47.5 ? -56% | 61.6 ? -103% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41.7 Wh | Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 53.9 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 320s-14IKB Pentium 4415U, HD Graphics 610, 30 Wh | Asus VivoBook S14 S406UA-BV023T i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 39 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 66% | 3% | 7% | 32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 937 | 1234 ? 32% | |||
| H.264 | 399 | 716 ? 79% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 445 | 740 66% | 460 3% | 476 7% | 608 ? 37% |
| Load | 150 | 117.4 ? -22% |
Pro
Contra
O HP 14-ma0312ng é um portátil de escritório de 14 polegadas que é poderoso o suficiente para todos os aplicativos típicos de escritório e baseados na Internet, graças ao seu processador quad-core Core i5-8250U. Além disso, o dispositivo funciona no modo de canal duplo e está equipado com uma unidade de memória Intel Optane que a distingue da concorrência.
Enquanto o teclado é bom o suficiente para o uso diário, a falta de luz de fundo é uma vergonha. O 14-ma0312ng não quebrará nenhum registro de duração da bateria, mas é suficiente para a maioria dos usos.
O HP 14-ma0312ng é um bom dispositivo de escritório que é prejudicado por alguns componentes de hardware desatualizados.
O hardware restante não inspira. A tela é um painel TN escuro, com baixo contraste e tela com ângulos de visão ruins. A tela também tem uma baixa resolução de 1366 x 768. Além disso, as velocidades de Wi-Fi são lentas e não há suporte para ac Wi-Fi 802.11, que deve ser um problema padrão para dispositivos lançados em 2018. Até mesmo o leitor de cartões de memória é lento.
HP 14-ma0312ng
- 09/01/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
