Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Guru Mars K (Clevo P775DM3-G)

Pico de energia. Embora haja uma tendência para portáteis de jogos mais leves e mais finos (mas muitas vezes também muito barulhento e quente), a Gaming Guru agora apresenta um sério substituto de desktop com o Mars K, que oferece todas as virtudes de um PC de desktop. Será que o portátil de 17 polegadas tem alguma chance em contra dos rivais estabelecidos da Acer, MSI, e Asus?
Guru Mars K
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700 4 x 3.6 - 4.2 GHz, Kaby Lake, Sockel 1151
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1582 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, MXM, ForceWare 382.64
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/4 Slots em uso, até 64 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LGD046E, IPS, FullHD, G-Sync, 75 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe, 500 GB 
, + Seagate Barracuda ST2000LM015, 2 TB HDD @5400 rpm. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 (SATA-III or PCIe/NVMe) & 2x 2.5"
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC899 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones, Microfone, Linha de saída, Linha de entrada, Card Reader: MMC,RSMMC,SD,SDHC,SDXC,Mini-SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 41 x 418 x 295
Bateria
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 14.8V, 0.43 kg
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP (FHD)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1 (Sound Blaster X-Fi MB5), Teclado: RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 330-W-PSU, Manual, Driver DVD, Windows 10 key, 2.5" accessories, SSD box, Control Center, Killer Performance Suite, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
4.22 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.268 kg
Preço
2954 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg428 mm 308 mm 47 mm 5 kg423 mm 322 mm 45 mm 4.3 kg429 mm 309 mm 38 mm 4 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Guru Mars K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
168 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s -14%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s -57%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s +1%
Guru Mars K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -57%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -57%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
584 MBit/s +44%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s +37%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
406 MBit/s
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
354 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s +80%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
683 MBit/s +76%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s +75%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
675 MBit/s +74%
Guru Mars K
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
389 MBit/s
316
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD046E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 329.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1072:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.03 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Guru Mars K
LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3"
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
35%
3%
30%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
67.3
86.6
29%
68.8
2%
90.3
34%
66
-2%
sRGB Coverage
85.1
99.9
17%
87.7
3%
99.6
17%
83.7
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.3
99.5
60%
64.1
3%
86.8
39%
61.2
-2%
Response Times
-12%
12%
6266%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
44 ?(14, 30)
-17%
38 ?(13, 25)
-1%
11.6 ?(6.4, 5.2)
69%
45 ?(18, 27)
-20%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
28 ?(6, 22)
-6%
20 ?(4, 16)
24%
6.8 ?(4.8, 2)
74%
28 ?(6, 22)
-6%
PWM Frequency
133.3 ?(95)
25000 ?(15)
18655%
Screen
15%
-3%
22%
-5%
Brightness middle
343
362
6%
306
-11%
274
-20%
380
11%
Brightness
330
344
4%
299
-9%
262
-21%
362
10%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
87
-4%
91
0%
Black Level *
0.32
0.35
-9%
0.27
16%
0.26
19%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1072
1034
-4%
1133
6%
1054
-2%
1027
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.61
2.46
32%
3.98
-10%
1.36
62%
4.12
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.16
4.26
48%
7.29
11%
4.1
50%
8.19
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.03
2.9
4%
4.15
-37%
0.64
79%
3.95
-30%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.31 95%
2.45 90%
2.19 100%
2.47 89%
CCT
6568 99%
6120 106%
7386 88%
6551 99%
6539 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
88
57%
58
4%
77
38%
55
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85
100
18%
89
5%
100
18%
84
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 15%
4% / 0%
2106% / 1194%
-7% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 133.3 Hz ≤ 95 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 133.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 133.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
193 Points +8%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points +3%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points +3%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
178 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
958 Points +12%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
899 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points +2%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
857 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points -12%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.18 Points +8%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points +3%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points +3%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
2.02 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Intel Core i7-7700K
10.59 Points +11%
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.91 Points +4%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points 0%
Guru Mars K
Intel Core i7-7700
9.52 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points -12%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.52 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
178 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
857 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points +2%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5847 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5662 Points -3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4902 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points +2%
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
6015 Points
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5846 Points -3%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4972 Points -17%
PCMark 10 - Score
Guru Mars K
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5856 Points
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5211 Points -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5847 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6015 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5856 pontos
Ajuda
Guru Mars K
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
41%
Read Seq Q32T1
3375
3407
1%
Write Seq Q32T1
1756
2944
68%
Read 4K Q32T1
635
625
-2%
Write 4K Q32T1
509
548
8%
Read Seq
1330
3377
154%
Write Seq
1448
2612
80%
Read 4K
46.76
55.9
20%
Write 4K
174.6
165
-5%
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3375 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1756 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 635 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1330 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1448 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.76 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 174.6 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
23091 Points +6%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
22566 Points +4%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21778 Points
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21534 Points -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21366 Points -2%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
31412 Points +6%
Guru Mars K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29615 Points
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29426 Points -1%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29109 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28595 Points -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
20487 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
180239 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32819 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16980 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
baixomédiaaltoultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 145 75.9 52.6
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 105 61.6 40.9
Prey (2017) 141 140 68.2
Rocket League (2017) 239 110
Dirt 4 (2017) 167 97.2
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 116 93.4 34.8
F1 2017 (2017) 141 112 58
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 66 44.7 17.2
FIFA 18 (2017) 309 301 198

Barulho

Ocioso
36 / 37 / 40 dB
Carga
45 / 55 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Guru Mars K
i7-7700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Noise
4%
6%
-1%
6%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
Idle Minimum *
36
31
14%
30
17%
33
8%
33
8%
Idle Average *
37
34
8%
31
16%
34
8%
35
5%
Idle Maximum *
40
37
7%
36
10%
38
5%
37
7%
Load Average *
45
44
2%
47
-4%
44
2%
40
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
51
-2%
56
-12%
Load Maximum *
55
52
5%
56
-2%
62
-13%
50
9%

* ... smaller is better

 46 °C44 °C37 °C 
 42 °C45 °C38 °C 
 32 °C35 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
45 °C46 °C42 °C
43 °C44 °C35 °C
24 °C28 °C29 °C
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
Guru Mars K
i7-7700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Heat
-10%
2%
-11%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
47.5
-3%
50.9
-11%
46
-0%
44.2
4%
Maximum Bottom *
46
56
-22%
44.6
3%
57
-24%
43
7%
Idle Upper Side *
32
34.5
-8%
29.9
7%
34
-6%
32.4
-1%
Idle Bottom *
31
33.6
-8%
28.8
7%
35
-13%
32.8
-6%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.535.82529.829.23127294028.731.25024.926.26325.327802538.110023.452.11252350.616022.860.920021.164.225020.665.331519.265.44001964.85001862.463017.162.980016.869.710001765.812501763.5160016.561.1200016.963.1250017.163.4315017.466400017.566.9500017.263.2630017.364.9800017.365.6100001864.81250017.965.7160001758.2SPL29.577.1N1.244median 17.4median 64.2Delta12.340.253.133.156.829.258.330.657.727.557.925.559.626.56125.762.323.764.123.167.52273.822.276.720.379.318.681.218.277.517.476.217.279.217.180.417.283.217.486.517.388.817.39017.388.217.288.417.386.817.581.517.277.717.77717.873.417.270.429.797.91.3130.6median 17.4median 79.31.85.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGuru Mars KMSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Guru Mars K audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31 / 37 / 44 Watt
Carga midlight 116 / 312 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Guru Mars K
i7-7700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Power Consumption
-12%
13%
-5%
13%
Idle Minimum *
31
32
-3%
24
23%
34
-10%
27
13%
Idle Average *
37
43
-16%
31
16%
41
-11%
32
14%
Idle Maximum *
44
51
-16%
38
14%
50
-14%
41
7%
Load Average *
116
138
-19%
98
16%
106
9%
102
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
259
279
-8%
257
1%
Load Maximum *
312
350
-12%
320
-3%
320
-3%
248
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 47min
Guru Mars K
i7-7700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017
i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 89 Wh
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 93 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh
Battery Runtime
1%
25%
-17%
25%
Reader / Idle
200
222
11%
342
71%
182
-9%
313
57%
H.264
153
148
-3%
204
33%
Load
107
97
-9%
83
-22%
65
-39%
90
-16%
WiFi v1.3
168
241
144
251

Pro

+ Overclocking opcional via Control Center
+ Muitas portas (incluindo Thunderbolt 3)
+ CPU e GPU substituíveis
+ Teclado com iluminação RGB de três zonas
+ Temperaturas moderadas do chassi
+ Excelente desempenho
+ Configurações individuais
+ Manutenção simples
+ Bom painel IPS
+ Som rico
+ SSD NVMe
+ G-Sync

Contra

- A CPU e GPU podem esquentar muito
- Controle medíocre da ventoinha durante o modo inativo
- Sem opções QHD/UHD ainda
- Alto consumo de energia
- Bastante barulhento sob estresse
- Durações escassas da bateria
- Enorme adaptador de força
- Peso alto
- Chassis grosso
In review: Guru Mars K. Test model courtesy of Gaming Guru.
In review: Guru Mars K. Test model courtesy of Gaming Guru.

O Guru Mars K é a escolha certa se você estiver procurando um substituto de desktop poderoso com excelente capacidade de manutenção/atualização e se o chassi volumoso e pesado não for um problema.

O portátil de jogos de 17 polegadas está cheio de hardware de gama alta. Uma combinação de Core i7-7700GeForce GTX 1080, e SSD PCIe lida com qualquer aplicativo convencional com facilidade. Você também recebe bons dispositivos de entrada (teclado de três zonas com iluminação RGB!), sistema de som poderoso e muitas portas.

A tela IPS também é convincente, pelo menos se você pode viver com a resolução e a frequência (apenas 1080p @75 Hz). Não encontramos problemas com os ângulos de visão, precisão de cores, luminância ou contraste.

Os inconvenientes incluem o enorme consumo de energia e a limitada duração da bateria, mas estes não são pontos tão negativos para um substituto de desktop. O controle da ventoinha e o alto ruído do sistema sob as cargas de trabalho 3D são muito mais irritantes.

O Mars K ainda assegurará uma boa posição em nossa próxima atualização do Ranking dos Top 10.

Guru Mars K - 10/09/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
73 / 81 → 90%
Peso
47 / 10-66 → 67%
Bateria
65%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
81 / 95 → 85%
Ruído
54 / 90 → 60%
Audio
85%
Médio
78%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Guru Mars K (Clevo P775DM3-G)
Florian Glaser, 2017-10-27 (Update: 2017-11- 1)