Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Sabre 17 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GP72VR 7RFX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GP72VR 7RFX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| MSI GP72VR 7RFX | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| MSI GP72VR 7RFX | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: 1207:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.62
ΔE Greyscale 11.17 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 Chi Mei CMN1747, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF FX705GM AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GP72VR 7RFX CMN1747, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -22% | 0% | -21% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 89.9 | 62.4 -31% | 90 0% | 64 -29% | 89.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 88.8 -11% | 100 0% | 89.7 -10% | 99.7 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.1 | 63.8 -25% | 84.8 0% | 64.9 -24% | 86.5 2% |
| Response Times | -4% | 4% | -337% | -53% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9 ? | 7.4 ? 18% | 8.8 ? 2% | 36.8 ? -309% | 21.6 ? -140% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 10 ? -25% | 7.4 ? 7% | 37.2 ? -365% | 9.4 ? -18% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 25510 ? 2% | 25000 ? 0% | ||
| Screen | 18% | 10% | 13% | -72% | |
| Brightness middle | 326 | 234 -28% | 297.8 -9% | 367.4 13% | 309 -5% |
| Brightness | 309 | 228 -26% | 285 -8% | 363 17% | 290 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 85 4% | 84 2% | 86 5% | 88 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.2 26% | 0.33 -22% | 0.32 -19% | 0.22 19% |
| Contrast | 1207 | 1170 -3% | 902 -25% | 1148 -5% | 1405 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.11 | 2.16 76% | 3.68 60% | 3.8 58% | 7.2 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.14 | 3.39 76% | 7.71 45% | 10.4 26% | 12.8 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.62 | 2.02 23% | 2.71 -3% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.17 | 2 82% | 5 55% | 3.5 69% | 98 -777% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.46 89% | 2.06 107% | 2.18 101% | 1.96 112% |
| CCT | 12475 52% | 6394 102% | 6728 97% | 6467 101% | 10963 59% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76 | 58 -24% | 84.77 12% | 58.1 -24% | 77 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 89 -11% | 99.97 0% | 89.3 -11% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
8% | 5% /
7% | -115% /
-41% | -41% /
-54% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (8472 - 8665, n=5) | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (33944 - 46384, n=5) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4231 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5340 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5049 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | MSI GP72VR 7RFX Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 9% | 2% | -3% | 51% | 11% | |
| Write 4K | 104.7 | 104.2 0% | 87.8 -16% | 155.1 48% | 186 78% | 107.5 ? 3% |
| Read 4K | 37.39 | 41.46 11% | 38.41 3% | 44.22 18% | 55.6 49% | 38.8 ? 4% |
| Write Seq | 866 | 1295 50% | 1177 36% | 311.2 -64% | 1599 85% | 625 ? -28% |
| Read Seq | 944 | 1325 40% | 868 -8% | 1247 32% | 999 6% | 733 ? -22% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 293.3 | 282.8 -4% | 266.5 -9% | 310.3 6% | 493.3 68% | 466 ? 59% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 374.3 | 321.3 -14% | 307.1 -18% | 551 47% | 556 49% | 636 ? 70% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1064 | 1301 22% | 1212 14% | 311.5 -71% | 1674 57% | 1109 ? 4% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2616 | 1704 -35% | 3006 15% | 1560 -40% | 3083 18% | 2504 ? -4% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12678 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30202 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10404 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 framerate graph
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (130.2 - 207, n=17) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=41, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (91.7 - 138.7, n=16) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (52.6 - 80.6, n=49) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| MSI GP72VR 7RFX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (105.7 - 203, n=15) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (82.2 - 140, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (65.3 - 82, n=24) | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (51 - 68.8, n=37) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 | |
| Doom | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (121.4 - 155.3, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (115.5 - 146.4, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (72.3 - 110, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (68.6 - 102.2, n=6) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (66 - 103.3, n=17) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131.3 | 91.7 | 53.9 | 24 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 113.4 | 82.2 | 74.4 | 60.9 |
| Doom (2016) | 121.4 | 115.5 | 68.6 | 66 |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | MSI GP72VR 7RFX GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | 4% | 9% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 29 5% | 28.6 6% | 28.1 8% | 28.3 7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32.1 | 32 -0% | 29.4 8% | 29.5 8% | 29.2 9% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 33 -3% | 29.4 8% | 29.6 8% | 29.2 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.3 | 44 -36% | 33.7 -4% | 29.6 8% | 37 -15% |
| Load Average * | 42.9 | 46 -7% | 41.2 4% | 31.6 26% | 43.7 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 50 -2% | 48.3 1% | 51.8 -6% | 46.4 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 47.3 | 46 | 45.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.1 / 32.1 / 32.3 dB |
| HDD |
| 32.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.9 / 48.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP | MSI GP72VR 7RFX GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -27% | -27% | -8% | -35% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 35 | 54 -54% | 54.6 -56% | 48.2 -38% | 53.8 -54% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 34.3 | 53 -55% | 41.2 -20% | 43.2 -26% | 52.2 -52% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.1 | 30 -0% | 35 -16% | 25.4 16% | 37.2 -24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 35.2 -15% | 25.8 15% | 34 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.68 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9.3 / 14.8 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
63 / 187 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GP72VR 7RFX i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -26% | -54% | -1% | -31% | -17% | 22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.3 | 13 -40% | 18.88 -103% | 10.6 -14% | 17.3 -86% | 12.7 ? -37% | 6.96 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 14.8 | 17 -15% | 24.36 -65% | 16 -8% | 22.5 -52% | 17.5 ? -18% | 11.3 ? 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22 | 24 -9% | 32.27 -47% | 16.4 25% | 22.5 -2% | 21.8 ? 1% | 13.5 ? 39% |
| Load Average * | 63 | 106 -68% | 107.74 -71% | 75.9 -20% | 85.1 -35% | 91.7 ? -46% | 72.3 ? -15% |
| Load Maximum * | 187 | 179 4% | 160.28 14% | 163.8 12% | 151.3 19% | 156.4 ? 16% | 119.2 ? 36% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 151 | 142 | 111.2 | 141.7 |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh | Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | MSI GP72VR 7RFX i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 41 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 321 | 272 -15% | 213 -34% | 419 31% | 128 -60% | 613 ? 91% |
| Battery Runtime | -5% | -20% | 31% | 24% | 115% | |
| Reader / Idle | 411 | 380 -8% | 320 -22% | 721 75% | 39 -91% | 1146 ? 179% |
| H.264 | 320 | 260 -19% | 793 ? 148% | |||
| Load | 84 | 95 13% | 70 -17% | 72 -14% | 201 139% | 98.3 ? 17% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-7% | -27% /
-24% | 31% /
31% | -18% /
-4% | 103% /
109% |
Pro
Contra
Tudo somado, o Sabre Gigabyte 17 WV8 é um bom substituto de desktop que pode lidar com quase qualquer tarefa. Ele faz muitas coisas certas, mas se descuida em uma área crucial - o desempenho dos jogos.
A tela é claramente projetada para jogos e oferece tempos de resposta muito bons, embora em troca os usuários tenham que ficar sem cores brilhantes. Em quase todos os aspectos, o desempenho do portátil é mais do que satisfatório - exceto em termos de jogos, onde seus rivais diretos têm um desempenho melhor. O Sabre supera a concorrência em outras aplicações, por exemplo, nos benchmarks Cinebench. Seu balanço energético também é bom. Mesmo sob carga, o Gigabyte permanece sempre frio e silencioso. Ele marca pontos adicionais em termos de consumo de energia e duração da bateria. As muitas conexões para monitores externos também são um ótimo recurso.
O Sabre merece críticas por seu fraco desempenho em jogos e seus alto-falantes muito pequenos e fracos. O Sabre 17 perde desnecessariamente alguns pontos nesta primeira contagem. O portátil pode ser comprado por cerca de 1500 Euros (~$1700).
Os compradores em potencial que procuram por um substituto de desktop silencioso, frio e comparativamente economizador de energia, estão no lugar certo com o Sabre 17. Mas se o desempenho dos jogos for uma prioridade, seria melhor procurar uma alternativa.
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
-
11/01/2018 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze