Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Sabre 15 (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1050)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 248.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 828:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 117% | 64% | 63% | 21% | 53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.97 | 89.7 130% | 65.2 67% | 65.8 69% | 47.11 21% | 63.9 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 100 72% | 92.5 59% | 90.9 56% | 70.4 21% | 83.1 43% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.3 | 100 148% | 66.5 65% | 66.5 65% | 48.71 21% | 60.8 51% |
Response Times | -76% | -10% | -29% | -19% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32 ? | 57.2 ? -79% | 42.8 ? -34% | 43.2 ? -35% | 38.8 ? -21% | 37 ? -16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 39.2 ? -53% | 32 ? -25% | 31.2 ? -22% | 33.6 ? -31% | 25 ? 2% |
PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 962 -95% | 26000 ? 30% | 19230 ? -4% | ||
Screen | 43% | 28% | 40% | 2% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 248.4 | 370.1 49% | 320 29% | 304 22% | 255.9 3% | 310 25% |
Brightness | 241 | 356 48% | 316 31% | 289 20% | 249 3% | 311 29% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 90 7% | 86 2% | 90 7% | 85 1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.37 -23% | 0.36 -20% | 0.26 13% | 0.48 -60% | 0.3 -0% |
Contrast | 828 | 1000 21% | 889 7% | 1169 41% | 533 -36% | 1033 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.5 | 5.3 29% | 4.62 38% | 3.46 54% | 5.9 21% | 4.82 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 25.2 | 9.9 61% | 9.75 61% | 7.72 69% | 18.9 25% | 10.14 60% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 4.6 29% | 6 8% | 2.46 62% | 5.6 14% | 3.94 39% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.46 89% | 2.38 92% | 2.21 100% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 7852 83% | 6284 103% | 6761 96% | 6915 94% | 7250 90% | 6877 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 88.3 139% | 60 62% | 59 59% | 44.8 21% | 54 46% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.9 | 100 73% | 92 59% | 91 57% | 70.1 21% | 83 43% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 28% /
35% | 27% /
28% | 25% /
35% | 1% /
2% | 25% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 20000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3431 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4274 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5063 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4364 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Aorus X5 v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 195% | 106% | 25% | 98% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 323.5 | 540 67% | 240.5 -26% | 377.8 17% | 1073 232% |
Copy Program MB/s | 195.3 | 411.5 111% | 299.5 53% | 199 2% | 351.5 80% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 446.8 | 1272 185% | 1560 249% | 354.7 -21% | 351.1 -21% |
Score Total | 752 | 2810 274% | 1592 112% | 1019 36% | 1630 117% |
Score Write | 234 | 1022 337% | 376 61% | 304 30% | 514 120% |
Score Read | 337 | 1206 258% | 852 153% | 472 40% | 756 124% |
Access Time Write * | 0.073 | 0.034 53% | 0.031 58% | 0.037 49% | 0.025 66% |
Access Time Read * | 0.141 | 0.034 76% | 0.066 53% | 0.1 29% | 0.367 -160% |
4K-64 Write | 132.2 | 789 497% | 176.4 33% | 171.6 30% | 272.5 106% |
4K-64 Read | 257 | 962 274% | 564 119% | 383.4 49% | 521 103% |
4K Write | 53.8 | 112.2 109% | 124.1 131% | 104 93% | 131.3 144% |
4K Read | 28.3 | 41.34 46% | 44.75 58% | 37.2 31% | 44.6 58% |
Seq Write | 479.8 | 1207 152% | 752 57% | 288.2 -40% | 1099 129% |
Seq Read | 516 | 2026 293% | 2433 372% | 510 -1% | 1904 269% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 7609 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 73178 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20270 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5582 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2702 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Batman: Arkham Knight | |
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x | |
EVGA SC15 | |
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
EVGA SC15 | |
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
EVGA SC15 | |
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
EVGA SC15 | |
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS | |
Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 130 | 61 | ||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 79 | 44 | ||
Thief (2014) | 69.2 | 42.8 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 41 | 22 | ||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 78 | 46 | 25 | |
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 53.2 | ||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 42.8 | 35.5 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 38.6 | 34.2 | ||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 34.1 | 29.4 | ||
Doom (2016) | 48 | 42 | ||
Overwatch (2016) | 59 | |||
Mafia 3 (2016) | 38.3 | |||
Prey (2017) | 62.2 | 54.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33 / 33.3 / 34.7 dB |
Carga |
| 44.5 / 52.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 4% | 4% | 7% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.4 -1% | 31 -10% | 30 -6% | 28.1 -0% | 30 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 29 12% | 32 3% | 30 9% | 28.1 15% | 34 -3% |
Idle Average * | 33.3 | 29 13% | 33 1% | 33 1% | 29.1 13% | 35 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.7 | 32.2 7% | 34 2% | 37 -7% | 29.1 16% | 36 -4% |
Load Average * | 44.5 | 47.1 -6% | 39 12% | 41 8% | 49.2 -11% | 40 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.2 | 52 -6% | 43 13% | 42 15% | ||
Load Maximum * | 52.8 | 47.1 11% | 50 5% | 50 5% | 49.2 7% | 46 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Gigabyte Sabre 15G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.37 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 8 / 10.9 / 11 Watt |
Carga |
76.7 / 106.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -35% | -41% | -78% | 3% | -104% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8 | 11.9 -49% | 12 -50% | 18 -125% | 6.7 16% | 20 -150% |
Idle Average * | 10.9 | 17.1 -57% | 15 -38% | 23 -111% | 8.9 18% | 24 -120% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 17.3 -57% | 20 -82% | 30 -173% | 10.8 2% | 29 -164% |
Load Average * | 76.7 | 94.7 -23% | 82 -7% | 85 -11% | 81.8 -7% | 82 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 94.9 | 104.8 -10% | 111 -17% | 96 -1% | 92.2 3% | |
Load Maximum * | 106.4 | 122 -15% | 161 -51% | 158 -48% | 122.7 -15% | 193 -81% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Samsung Odyssey NP800G5M-X01US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 56% | 45% | -23% | 8% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 493 | 831 69% | 638 29% | 256 -48% | 612 24% | 377 -24% |
WiFi v1.3 | 261 | 434 66% | 422 62% | 198 -24% | 263 1% | 246 -6% |
Load | 77 | 103 34% | 112 45% | 80 4% | 76 -1% | 98 27% |
Pro
Contra
O novo Sabre 15 da Gigabyte traz muitos recursos para um portátil de jogos de nível de entrada. O profundo deslocamento das teclas de 2 mm, a iluminação de fundo RGB de três zonas, três portas de saída de vídeo, duas baias de armazenamento, e design energético, todos são motivos atraentes para adquirir o Sabre em vez dos portáteis de jogos econômicos, como o Pavilion 15 Power, Samsung Odyssey, ou Asus FX553 na mesma faixa de preços. É uma primeira impressão forte que acreditamos que é chave ao apresentar um novo modelo e série.
Ainda há muito espaço para melhorias, especialmente em termos de de ruído da ventoinha e áudio. O GTX 1050 é menos poderoso que o GTX 1050 Ti e GTX 1060, porém, o Sabre 15 funciona de forma mais barulhenta que portáteis com GPUs mais poderosos. Combine o forte ruído da ventoinha com a pobre reprodução de baixos e você tem uma experiência inferior se não utilizar um bom par de fones. A base é sólida e mais firme que no Asus FX553 e no Odyssey, mas a tampa definitivamente poderia ser melhor reduzindo o bleeding da iluminação de fundo desregular e resolvendo o problema dos marcos internos sobressalientes. Esperamos que no futuro sejam adicionadas mais opções de hardware como 120 Hz, tempo de atualização de 5 ms, G-Sync, e Thunderbolt 3.
Se o formato pequeno é indispensável, então o Sabre 15 é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos disponível, com o seu respeitável conjunto de recursos. Portáteis de jogos de 15 polegadas mais finos como o GT62VR ainda são recomendados para um ruído de ventoinha mais baixo e melhores alto-falantes.
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
- 07/24/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo