Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57X v7 Gaming
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 441.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1003:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | 0% | -4% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 87.8 | 68 -23% | 86.9 -1% | 90.6 3% | 87.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 87.5 -12% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.9 | 64 -35% | 99.4 1% | 84.7 -14% | 98.8 0% |
| Response Times | 43% | 41% | 69% | 16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 33.6 ? 40% | 37 ? 33% | 26 ? 53% | 45.6 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 46.8 ? | 25.6 ? 45% | 24 ? 49% | 7 ? 85% | 35.2 ? 25% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 1042 ? 4% | |||
| Screen | -11% | 9% | -30% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle | 441.3 | 329.2 -25% | 336 -24% | 307 -30% | 399.1 -10% |
| Brightness | 408 | 321 -21% | 320 -22% | 284 -30% | 360 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 93 8% | 88 2% | 85 -1% | 81 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.267 39% | 0.25 43% | 0.25 43% | 0.4 9% |
| Contrast | 1003 | 1233 23% | 1344 34% | 1228 22% | 998 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 5.93 -16% | 3.61 29% | 9.65 -89% | 4.78 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.8 | 11.07 -13% | 6.02 39% | 16.36 -67% | 7.65 22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 6.72 -56% | 4.78 -11% | 10.07 -134% | 3.8 12% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.32 95% | 2.12 104% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 7345 88% | 7611 85% | 6185 105% | 12145 54% | 7288 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87 | 57 -34% | 88 1% | 75 -14% | 86.9 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 87 -13% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-6% | 17% /
12% | 12% /
-12% | 6% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 36.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 37.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3569 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5161 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4218 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -2% | 352% | 174% | |
| Read Seq | 517 | 481.7 -7% | 3219 523% | 1658 221% |
| Write Seq | 305.7 | 315.4 3% | 2572 741% | 1249 309% |
| Read 512 | 315 | 303.1 -4% | 1776 464% | 1044 231% |
| Write 512 | 306.1 | 314.4 3% | 2445 699% | 1254 310% |
| Read 4k | 26.04 | 25.93 0% | 51.1 96% | 51.6 98% |
| Write 4k | 82.3 | 84.6 3% | 141.3 72% | 145.2 76% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 281.3 | 273.9 -3% | 658 134% | 601 114% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 296 | 274.9 -7% | 554 87% | 386.8 31% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 28053 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16753 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24337 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13444 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 7498 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mafia 2 (2010) | 156.3 | ||||
| Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 116.3 | ||||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 130 | ||||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 47 | ||||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 42 | ||||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 43 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 45.6 / 51.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -7% | -6% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29.7 -2% | 31 -7% | 30 -3% | 29.2 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 33.2 -9% | 33 -9% | 34 -12% | 33.9 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 33.2 -3% | 34 -6% | 35 -9% | 33.9 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.1 | 33.2 -3% | 40 -25% | 37 -15% | 33.9 -6% |
| Load Average * | 45.6 | 47.5 -4% | 44 4% | 39 14% | 43.8 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.5 | 52.5 -2% | 50 3% | 56 -9% | 53.4 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).
Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt |
| Carga |
184.6 / 233.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -31% | -38% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.7 | 18.4 -17% | 25 -59% | 29 -85% | 27.3 -74% |
| Idle Average * | 23.4 | 22.8 3% | 35 -50% | 35 -50% | 34.9 -49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.5 | 24 -2% | 46 -96% | 40 -70% | 37.6 -60% |
| Load Average * | 184.6 | 175.5 5% | 103 44% | 94 49% | 164.4 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 233.1 | 229.5 2% | 223 4% | 315 -35% | 202.5 13% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74.48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 33% | 10% | 3% | -15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 256 | 418 63% | 278 9% | 242 -5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 155 | 201 30% | 200 29% | 160 3% | 160 3% |
| Load | 98 | 103 5% | 89 -9% | 55 -44% |
Pro
Contra
Na verdade, não muito mudou entre o P57X v6 e o mais recente v7 que estamos analisando hoje. Ambos possuem carcaças iguais (plástico, relativamente portátil), layouts componentes internos similares, a mesma seleção de portas, e inclusive a mesma GPU e SSD. As maiores diferenças (e talvez apenas notórias) com o v7 são a inclusão de uma CPU Core i7-7700HQ Kaby Lake, uma maior resolução, tela 4K de maior resolução, e o dobro de RAM (com velocidades de memória mais rápidas, também).
No geral, embora existam máquinas para jogos mais rápidas e melhor construídas, o Gigabyte P57X v7 ainda é uma opção poderosa com uma bela tela.
Tudo isto contribui a níveis de ruído da ventoinha mais baixos, menos aquecimento (porém, ainda bastante quente em algumas áreas), e uma experiência visual muito mais bela, graças à tela muito melhorada (melhor brilho, cores médias, e, é claro, resolução). No entanto, muitas das mesmas queixas ainda se aplicam em algum outro lugar. A carcaça não é nada surpreendente, e a tampa da tela parece ser um pouco frágil. Também, ainda é bastante barulhento (embora conte com um software de controle da ventoinha fácil de usar), e o touchpad permanece pobre. A duração da da bateria também deu diminuída curiosa desde o último modelo, o que realmente não seria uma surpresa, dado o pulo na resolução/brilho da tela e e quantidade de RAM, se não fosse pelo fato de que nossas medidas de consumo de energia parecem sugerir o contrário. Mesmo assim, é um portátil para jogos, por isso vamos tomar o que podemos que se aplique às durações da bateria e nos focar no que realmente importa.
Os tempos de resposta para a tela são realmente o único ponto negativo aqui, e isso pode ser problemático para aqueles que realmente estão nos jogos FPS e outras experiências de reflexos rápidos. Para outros tipos de jogos, isto pode não ser um problema (dado que seria similar a jogar na televisão). Escolher o painel de 1080p provavelmente mitigaria esses problemas (dado que os tempos de resposta foram melhores no painel do v6), mas parece você não pode ter o melhor de ambos mundos.
No geral, embora existam máquinas para jogos mais rápidas e melhor construídas, o Gigabyte P57X v7 ainda é uma opção poderosa com uma bela tela. Ele lida com cargas pesadas em passo e apresenta muitos recursos de expansão ou melhoria para aqueles interessados em alguma personalização após a compra. Assumindo que esteja planejando ficar longe da tomada e que não se importa pelas deficiências da carcaça e do touchpad, não é uma má escolha.
Gigabyte P57X v7
- 04/25/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
