Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57X v6

Name: Gigabyte P57X v6
Brand: Gigabyte

Simples, porém, Pascal. A Gigabyte não mudou muito em sua última atualização da série de máquinas para jogos P57, mas aqui a grande notícia é a introdução das mais recentes GPUs com arquitetura Pascal da NVIDIA. Com uma GTX 1070 à cargo, será que o P57X v6 chamará a atenção?

Steve Schardein (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/04/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P57X v6 (P57 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1645 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, 10.18.13.6871, Yes; Intel HD Graphics 530

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4 2133 MHz

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, não, LGD0469, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Sunrise Point HM170

Disco rígido

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB

, + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 secundário

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones + Microfone, Card Reader: SD

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 + LE

Unidade ótica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 31 x 418 x 296

Bateria

75.81 Wh, 6830 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 Watts x 2, montados na frente/inferior, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

3.246 kg, Suprimento de energia: 938 g

Preço

1999 Euro

Links

Gigabyte página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 Gigabyte P57X v6 EVGA SC17 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	136.5 MB/s +79%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K	76 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	75.3 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	195.2 MB/s +117%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	93.8 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K	86 MB/s -4%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	518 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	532 MBit/s +7%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	497 MBit/s


311.3 cd/m²	322.4 cd/m²	331.9 cd/m²
312.5 cd/m²	329.2 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
309.4 cd/m²	317.5 cd/m²	321.5 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LGD0469 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 320.9 cd/m² Minimum: 9.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 329.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1233:1 (Preto: 0.267 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.72 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	EVGA SC17 IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P57W LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		-1%	-1%	32%	33%	-3%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	68	67.4 -1%	67.6 -1%	86.9 28%	87.6 29%	66.9 -2%	66.5 -2%
sRGB Coverage	87.5	86.3 -1%	86.2 -1%	100 14%	100 14%	85.2 -3%	84.4 -4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	63.2 -1%	63 -2%	99.4 55%	99 55%	62.3 -3%	61.7 -4%
Response Times		-2%	-3%	-2%	-82%	1%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	33.6 ?(14, 19.6)	34.8 ?(14, 20.8) -4%	34.4 ?(14.8, 19.6) -2%	37 ?(13, 24) -10%	69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2) -107%	38 ?(14, 24) -13%	37 ?(13, 24) -10%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)	25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8) -0%	26.4 ?(4.4, 22) -3%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%	40 ?(10, 30) -56%	22 ?(4, 18) 14%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%
PWM Frequency					1000 ?(29)
Screen		2%	7%	20%	6%	8%	0%
Brightness middle	329.2	344.9 5%	351.7 7%	336 2%	394.1 20%	328 0%	286 -13%
Brightness	321	329 2%	339 6%	320 0%	368 15%	317 -1%	274 -15%
Brightness Distribution	93	86 -8%	91 -2%	88 -5%	83 -11%	88 -5%	87 -6%
Black Level *	0.267	0.349 -31%	0.37 -39%	0.25 6%	0.439 -64%	0.3 -12%	0.31 -16%
Contrast	1233	988 -20%	951 -23%	1344 9%	898 -27%	1093 -11%	923 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.93	4.49 24%	3.71 37%	3.61 39%	5.79 2%	3.74 37%	4.49 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.07	8.72 21%	8.48 23%	6.02 46%	8.44 24%	8.97 19%	7.83 29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.72	4.63 31%	2.46 63%	4.78 29%	4.23 37%	2.67 60%	4.76 29%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.11 ^104%	2.29 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.41 ^91%	2.47 ^89%
CCT	7611 ^85%	6905 ^94%	6849 ^95%	6185 ^105%	7479 ^87%	6861 ^95%	6843 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	56.7 -1%	56.6 -1%	88 54%	86.6 52%	56 -2%	55 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	87	86.4 -1%	86.1 -1%	100 15%	100 15%	85 -2%	84 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-0% / 1%	1% / 4%	17% / 19%	-14% / -0%	2% / 5%	-2% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.77 Points +18%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.75 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.67 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.67 Points +11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.59 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.63 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.73 Points +4%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.72 Points +4%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.46 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.4 Points -1%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	160 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points +9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	139 Points -1%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	136 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K Intel Core i7-6820HK	789 Points +24%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	710 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	669 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	374.4 s *
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	233.1 s * +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	229.2 s * +39%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.8 s * +40%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	636 s * -15%
EVGA SC17 Intel Core i7-6820HK	569 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	556 s * -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	553 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.5 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.44 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

67.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

635 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

102 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5575 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4952 Points +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4551 Points +8%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -3%
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	3946 Points -6%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	3441 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5778 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	5533 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	4935 Points -2%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4906 Points -2%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4129 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8531 Points +64%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	6871 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	6609 Points +27%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	4754 Points -8%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	4740 Points -9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -56%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4206 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5192 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5014 pontos
Ajuda

	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	EVGA SC17 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Gigabyte P57W Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		159%	220%	210%	6%
Read Seq	481.7	1559 224%	2247 366%	1718 257%	491.6 2%
Write Seq	315.4	1254 298%	1534 386%	1305 314%	391.1 24%
Read 512	303.1	850 180%	1113 267%	1250 312%	352.8 16%
Write 512	314.4	1228 291%	1490 374%	1438 357%	371.7 18%
Read 4k	25.93	49.32 90%	52.1 101%	44.42 71%	29.89 15%
Write 4k	84.6	140.3 66%	149.2 76%	154.4 83%	37.75 -55%
Read 4k QD32	273.9	539 97%	635 132%	744 172%	338.7 24%
Write 4k QD32	274.9	345.3 26%	422 54%	578 110%	278 1%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)

Sequential Read: 481.7 MB/s

Sequential Write: 315.4 MB/s

512K Read: 303.1 MB/s

512K Write: 314.4 MB/s

4K Read: 25.93 MB/s

4K Write: 84.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 273.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 274.9 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8357 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	8104 Points -3%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points -34%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4663 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4650 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	16757 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	15718 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9888 Points
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9820 Points
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7489 Points

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	23356 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	22282 Points -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	21228 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	13168 Points -44%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	12890 Points -45%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points -45%
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9713 Points -58%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus G752VS-XB78K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	9914 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9842 Points +18%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9256 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8366 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57W NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	8175 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7795 Points -7%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		25589 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		16231 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		85198 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		23781 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7559 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	123.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	90.2 fps -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.5 fps -15%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	90.2 fps -27%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	137.1 (34.5^min - 271.3^max) fps +11%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	99 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	66.8 fps -33%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	82.1 fps -17%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	69.7 fps -30%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	88.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	62.1 fps -30%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	72.4 fps -18%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	63.7 fps -28%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	101.6 (73.9^min - 128.7^max) fps +15%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	78 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	51 fps -35%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	62 fps -21%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	50 fps -36%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	117 fps +50%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	96 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	57.4 fps -40%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	71.6 fps -25%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	55.5 fps -42%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	90 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	50.6 fps -44%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	63.5 fps -29%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	85.5 fps -5%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	54.7 fps -39%
Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	92.8 (80^min - 103^max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G	37.6 fps -58%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	104 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	82.3 fps -21%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	96.5 fps -7%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)				123.8
Metro: Last Light (2013)				99
Thief (2014)				88.5
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				78
Fallout 4 (2015)				96
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				90
Doom (2016)				104

Barulho

Ocioso		33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB
Carga		47.5 / 52.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A)

	Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Noise		-2%	-2%	6%	4%
off / environment *	29.7	28.8 3%	31 -4%	30 -1%	30 -1%
Idle Minimum *	33.2	29.4 11%	33 1%	31 7%	32 4%
Idle Average *	33.2	32.4 2%	34 -2%	32 4%	33 1%
Idle Maximum *	33.2	48 -45%	40 -20%	33 1%	37 -11%
Load Average *	47.5	42.5 11%	44 7%	40 16%	37 22%
Load Maximum *	52.5	48.5 8%	50 5%	47 10%	47 10%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.6 °C	59 °C	50 °C
30.9 °C	44.4 °C	48.6 °C
25.8 °C	26.2 °C	23.6 °C

Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C


44.2 °C	66 °C	37.2 °C
39.2 °C	37.6 °C	26.8 °C
25 °C	27.6 °C	27.2 °C

Máximo: 66 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).

Gigabyte P57X v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	4.5 / 4.6 Watt
Ocioso	18.4 / 22.8 / 24 Watt
Carga	175.5 / 229.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Gigabyte P57W 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-5%	-28%	-12%	29%
Idle Minimum *	18.4	24.3 -32%	25 -36%	24 -30%	11 40%
Idle Average *	22.8	29.6 -30%	35 -54%	31 -36%	17 25%
Idle Maximum *	24	29.9 -25%	46 -92%	36 -50%	22 8%
Load Average *	175.5	110.1 37%	103 41%	94 46%	85 52%
Load Maximum *	229.5	171.4 25%	223 3%	204 11%	178 22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 21min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 43min

	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh	EVGA SC17 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	Gigabyte P57W 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 75.81 Wh
Battery Runtime		13%	-8%	-16%	-17%	-13%	24%
Reader / Idle	418	349 -17%	323 -23%	278 -33%	310 -26%	311 -26%	460 10%
WiFi v1.3	201	248 23%	221 10%	200 0%	206 2%	210 4%	334 66%
Load	103	136 32%	93 -10%	89 -14%	76 -26%	84 -18%	99 -4%

Pro

+ Excelente desempenho da GPU

+ Desempenho geral do sistema sólido

+ Relativamente acessível dadas suas capacidades

+ Tela com bom contraste e brilho

+ Útil software de gerenciamento do sistema

+ mais leve e menor que a média de sua classe

+ Baia de expansão conveniente para uma terceira unidade de armazenamento

Contra

- Aquecimento desafortunado sob estresse moderado

- Os botões integrados do touchpad são praticamente inutilizáveis

- Carcaça inteira de plástico

- Tela com resolução de apenas 1080p

- Operação relativamente barulhenta

Embora seja quase igual ao seu predecessor P57W, o Gigabyte P57X v6 sai como um foguete para o topo das listas de jogos com a ajuda da excelente GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070. Por relativamente acessíveis $1.999, temos um dos portáteis de jogos mais veloz do planeta (pelo menos quando se trata de exigência nos jogos), capaz de lidar com jogos modernos a 1080p com as configurações mais altas com taxas de fotogramas fluentes, e via sua conectividade HDMI 2.0, capaz de impulsionar jogos em 4K em um monitor externo compatível, zm muita dificuldade.

Além de tudo isso, ainda temos a mesma configuração poderosa rodeando a a nova GPU, incluindo uma CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQquad-core , 16 GB de RAM DDR4-2133, uma configuração de dois armazenamentos com um SSD M.2 de 256 GB e uma unidade de armazenamento de 1 TB a 7200 RPM, e finalmente, uma tela IPS 1080p anti-refletiva. A Gigabyte também tornou as manutenções e atualizações mais fáceis, com quase todos os componentes substituíveis desde o lado inferior. Os usuários que precisem de ainda mais velocidade podem optar por um SSD NVMe para substituir o M.2 convencional com o qual a máquina é entregue, e eles inclusive podem adicionar uma terceira unidade de armazenamento com o adaptador de HD incluso, que pode ser trocado para a baia de expansão montada na frente, de forma rápida e fácil, substituindo a unidade pré-instalada DVD-RAM.

O P57X também faz um ótimo trabalho ao incluir útil software para facilitar o controle sobre o sistema de resfriamento da máquina e do overclock da GPU, junto com o prático software de atualização e alguns outros bônus (controles da temperatura da LCD, criação de recuperação de mídia USB, etc.).

Obviamente, quando você comprime um portátil de jogos tão poderosos — e trabalha para manter o preço abaixo dos $2.000, para começar — haverá alguns compromissos. Estes se manifestam na forma da predominância do plástico do P57Xe no desafortunado aquecimento, que surge rapidamente na metade direita do teclado durante sessões de jogos inclusive moderadas e independentemente da configuração da velocidade da ventoinha. Também é um aparelho bastante barulhento, embora ambas as ventoinhas estejam montadas na traseira (o que ajuda um pouco). O consumo de energia é previsivelmente muito mais elevado do que o do P57W, e a duração da bateria (tão marginal seja sua importância em um portátil de jogos) sofre consequentemente.

Finalmente, o touchpad é positivamente ruim para tudo, menos para as tarefas mais triviais, por isso sempre tenha à mão o seu mouse externo.

Alguns também poderão chorar pela exclusão de uma opção de tela 4K, mas finalmente, não será um fato muito decisivo para a compra. É bom ter um portátil que lidará bem com quaisquer tarefas que você precise fazer, com uma resolução nativa, e baseado em nossos benchmarks, isso provavelmente não mude muito em breve. Os jogos em 4K ainda são possíveis através de monitores externos (como mencionamos antes).

Finalmente, o P57X é um portátil para jogos que faz muito sentido que foca seus esforços principalmente na funcionalidade, portabilidade e acessibilidade (relativamente). Se o preço não for um problema e se o peso não o incomoda, não encontrará algo melhor. De outra forma, apesar de seus dispositivos de entrada deficientes, o desenvolvimento térmico abaixo do ideal, e a omissão de uma tela 4K, o P57X é uma besta absoluta, que vai ser capaz de rodar os jogos nas mais altas configurações e resolução nativa por um bom tempo.

Gigabyte P57X v6 - 2016-10-03 10/03/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Steve Schardein

Acabamento

74 / 98 → 76%

Teclado

79%

Mouse

67%

Conectividade

68 / 81 → 84%

Peso

55 / 10-66 → 80%

Bateria

73%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

96%

Desempenho da aplicação

91%

Temperatura

81 / 95 → 85%

Ruído

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

60%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Médio

75%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57X v6

Steve Schardein, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2020-06- 8)