Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57X v6

Simples, porém, Pascal. A Gigabyte não mudou muito em sua última atualização da série de máquinas para jogos P57, mas aqui a grande notícia é a introdução das mais recentes GPUs com arquitetura Pascal da NVIDIA. Com uma GTX 1070 à cargo, será que o P57X v6 chamará a atenção?
Gigabyte P57X v6 (P57 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1645 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, 10.18.13.6871, Yes; Intel HD Graphics 530
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4 2133 MHz
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, não, LGD0469, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Disco rígido
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB 
, + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 secundário
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones + Microfone, Card Reader: SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 + LE
Unidade ótica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 31 x 418 x 296
Bateria
75.81 Wh, 6830 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 Watts x 2, montados na frente/inferior, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.246 kg, Suprimento de energia: 938 g
Preço
1999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 333 mm 51 mm 4.5 kg428 mm 294 mm 48 mm 3.8 kg427 mm 318 mm 36 mm 4.4 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.2 kg423 mm 305 mm 27.95 mm 3.6 kg418 mm 296 mm 31 mm 3.2 kg408 mm 295.5 mm 26.6 mm 4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
136.5 MB/s +79%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
78 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
76.4 MB/s
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
76 MB/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
75.3 MB/s -1%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
195.2 MB/s +117%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
 
93.8 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v6
 
89.9 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
 
88 MB/s -2%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
 
86 MB/s -4%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
518 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
532 MBit/s +7%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
497 MBit/s
311.3
cd/m²
322.4
cd/m²
331.9
cd/m²
312.5
cd/m²
329.2
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
309.4
cd/m²
317.5
cd/m²
321.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD0469 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 332 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 320.9 cd/m² Minimum: 9.74 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 329.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1233:1 (Preto: 0.267 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.72 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Gigabyte P57X v6
LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
EVGA SC17
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Asus G752VS-XB78K
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Gigabyte P57W
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-1%
-1%
32%
33%
-3%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
68
67.4
-1%
67.6
-1%
86.9
28%
87.6
29%
66.9
-2%
66.5
-2%
sRGB Coverage
87.5
86.3
-1%
86.2
-1%
100
14%
100
14%
85.2
-3%
84.4
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64
63.2
-1%
63
-2%
99.4
55%
99
55%
62.3
-3%
61.7
-4%
Response Times
-2%
-3%
-2%
-82%
1%
-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
33.6 ?(14, 19.6)
34.8 ?(14, 20.8)
-4%
34.4 ?(14.8, 19.6)
-2%
37 ?(13, 24)
-10%
69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2)
-107%
38 ?(14, 24)
-13%
37 ?(13, 24)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4)
25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8)
-0%
26.4 ?(4.4, 22)
-3%
24 ?(5, 19)
6%
40 ?(10, 30)
-56%
22 ?(4, 18)
14%
24 ?(5, 19)
6%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(29)
Screen
2%
7%
20%
6%
8%
0%
Brightness middle
329.2
344.9
5%
351.7
7%
336
2%
394.1
20%
328
0%
286
-13%
Brightness
321
329
2%
339
6%
320
0%
368
15%
317
-1%
274
-15%
Brightness Distribution
93
86
-8%
91
-2%
88
-5%
83
-11%
88
-5%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.267
0.349
-31%
0.37
-39%
0.25
6%
0.439
-64%
0.3
-12%
0.31
-16%
Contrast
1233
988
-20%
951
-23%
1344
9%
898
-27%
1093
-11%
923
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.93
4.49
24%
3.71
37%
3.61
39%
5.79
2%
3.74
37%
4.49
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.07
8.72
21%
8.48
23%
6.02
46%
8.44
24%
8.97
19%
7.83
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.72
4.63
31%
2.46
63%
4.78
29%
4.23
37%
2.67
60%
4.76
29%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.11 104%
2.29 96%
2.32 95%
2.11 104%
2.41 91%
2.47 89%
CCT
7611 85%
6905 94%
6849 95%
6185 105%
7479 87%
6861 95%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
56.7
-1%
56.6
-1%
88
54%
86.6
52%
56
-2%
55
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
86.4
-1%
86.1
-1%
100
15%
100
15%
85
-2%
84
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-0% / 1%
1% / 4%
17% / 19%
-14% / -0%
2% / 5%
-2% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.77 Points +18%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.75 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.67 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.67 Points +11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.59 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.63 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.73 Points +4%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.72 Points +4%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.46 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.44 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.4 Points -1%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
160 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
152 Points +9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
140 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
139 Points -1%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
136 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
789 Points +24%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
710 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
669 Points +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
656 Points +3%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
374.4 s *
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
233.1 s * +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
229.2 s * +39%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.8 s * +40%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
636 s * -15%
EVGA SC17
Intel Core i7-6820HK
569 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Intel Core i7-6820HK
556 s * -1%
Gigabyte P57X v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
553 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
67.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
635 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5575 Points +33%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4952 Points +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4551 Points +8%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4206 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4060 Points -3%
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
3946 Points -6%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
3441 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5778 Points +15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5533 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5014 Points
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
4935 Points -2%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4906 Points -2%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4129 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8531 Points +64%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
6871 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
6609 Points +27%
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
5192 Points
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
4754 Points -8%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
4740 Points -9%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
2303 Points -56%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4206 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5192 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5014 pontos
Ajuda
Gigabyte P57X v6
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
EVGA SC17
Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
Asus G752VS-XB78K
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte P57W
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
159%
220%
210%
6%
Read Seq
481.7
1559
224%
2247
366%
1718
257%
491.6
2%
Write Seq
315.4
1254
298%
1534
386%
1305
314%
391.1
24%
Read 512
303.1
850
180%
1113
267%
1250
312%
352.8
16%
Write 512
314.4
1228
291%
1490
374%
1438
357%
371.7
18%
Read 4k
25.93
49.32
90%
52.1
101%
44.42
71%
29.89
15%
Write 4k
84.6
140.3
66%
149.2
76%
154.4
83%
37.75
-55%
Read 4k QD32
273.9
539
97%
635
132%
744
172%
338.7
24%
Write 4k QD32
274.9
345.3
26%
422
54%
578
110%
278
1%
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Sequential Read: 481.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 315.4 MB/s
512K Read: 303.1 MB/s
512K Write: 314.4 MB/s
4K Read: 25.93 MB/s
4K Write: 84.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 273.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 274.9 MB/s
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
8357 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
8104 Points -3%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
5541 Points -34%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4650 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
16757 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
15718 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
11957 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9888 Points
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7489 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
23356 Points
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
22282 Points -5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
21228 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
13168 Points -44%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points -45%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
12731 Points -45%
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9713 Points -58%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus G752VS-XB78K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
9914 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9842 Points +18%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points +11%
Gigabyte P57X v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
8366 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ
8338 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
8175 Points -2%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
7795 Points -7%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
25589 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
16231 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85198 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
23781 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7559 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
123.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
90.2 fps -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps -15%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
90.2 fps -27%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
137.1 (34.5min - 271.3max) fps +11%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
99 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
66.8 fps -33%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps -17%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
69.7 fps -30%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
88.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
62.1 fps -30%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps -18%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
63.7 fps -28%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
101.6 (73.9min - 128.7max) fps +15%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
78 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
51 fps -35%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps -21%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
50 fps -36%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
117 fps +50%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
96 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
57.4 fps -40%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps -25%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
55.5 fps -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
90 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
50.6 fps -44%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps -29%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
85.5 fps -5%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps -39%
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
92.8 (80min - 103max) fps +3%
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
37.6 fps -58%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
104 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
82.3 fps -21%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps -7%
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 123.8
Metro: Last Light (2013) 99
Thief (2014) 88.5
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 78
Fallout 4 (2015) 96
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 90
Doom (2016) 104

Barulho

Ocioso
33.2 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB
Carga
47.5 / 52.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.7 dB(A)
Gigabyte P57X v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus G752VS-XB78K
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte P57W
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Noise
-2%
-2%
6%
4%
off / environment *
29.7
28.8
3%
31
-4%
30
-1%
30
-1%
Idle Minimum *
33.2
29.4
11%
33
1%
31
7%
32
4%
Idle Average *
33.2
32.4
2%
34
-2%
32
4%
33
1%
Idle Maximum *
33.2
48
-45%
40
-20%
33
1%
37
-11%
Load Average *
47.5
42.5
11%
44
7%
40
16%
37
22%
Load Maximum *
52.5
48.5
8%
50
5%
47
10%
47
10%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 32.6 °C59 °C50 °C 
 30.9 °C44.4 °C48.6 °C 
 25.8 °C26.2 °C23.6 °C 
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C
44.2 °C66 °C37.2 °C
39.2 °C37.6 °C26.8 °C
25 °C27.6 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 66 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.1362536.4373134.735.74034.5345033.633.8633234.18030.53410032.332.412530.233.616029.838.420030.14325028.245.131527.747.840026.651.550026.552.163025.753.480026.254.3100024.957.8125024.757160025.555.7200024.15525002460.8315023.761.9400023.663.3500023.658.9630023.563.6800023.4651000023.564.71250023.764.41600023.655.5SPL36.872.7N2.829.4median 24.9median 55.5Delta1.5835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte P57X v6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Gigabyte P57X v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 4.5 / 4.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18.4 / 22.8 / 24 Watt
Carga midlight 175.5 / 229.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
-5%
-28%
-12%
29%
Idle Minimum *
18.4
24.3
-32%
25
-36%
24
-30%
11
40%
Idle Average *
22.8
29.6
-30%
35
-54%
31
-36%
17
25%
Idle Maximum *
24
29.9
-25%
46
-92%
36
-50%
22
8%
Load Average *
175.5
110.1
37%
103
41%
94
46%
85
52%
Load Maximum *
229.5
171.4
25%
223
3%
204
11%
178
22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 21min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 43min
Gigabyte P57X v6
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh
EVGA SC17
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 74.48 Wh
Asus G752VS-XB78K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh
Gigabyte P57W
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, 75.81 Wh
Battery Runtime
13%
-8%
-16%
-17%
-13%
24%
Reader / Idle
418
349
-17%
323
-23%
278
-33%
310
-26%
311
-26%
460
10%
WiFi v1.3
201
248
23%
221
10%
200
0%
206
2%
210
4%
334
66%
Load
103
136
32%
93
-10%
89
-14%
76
-26%
84
-18%
99
-4%

Pro

+ Excelente desempenho da GPU
+ Desempenho geral do sistema sólido
+ Relativamente acessível dadas suas capacidades
+ Tela com bom contraste e brilho
+ Útil software de gerenciamento do sistema
+ mais leve e menor que a média de sua classe
+ Baia de expansão conveniente para uma terceira unidade de armazenamento

Contra

- Aquecimento desafortunado sob estresse moderado
- Os botões integrados do touchpad são praticamente inutilizáveis
- Carcaça inteira de plástico
- Tela com resolução de apenas 1080p
- Operação relativamente barulhenta
The Gigabyte P57X v6
The Gigabyte P57X v6

Embora seja quase igual ao seu predecessor P57W, o Gigabyte P57X v6 sai como um foguete para o topo das listas de jogos com a ajuda da excelente GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070. Por relativamente acessíveis $1.999, temos um dos portáteis de jogos mais veloz do planeta (pelo menos quando se trata de exigência nos jogos), capaz de lidar com jogos modernos a 1080p com as configurações mais altas com taxas de fotogramas fluentes, e via sua conectividade HDMI 2.0, capaz de impulsionar jogos em 4K em um monitor externo compatível, zm muita dificuldade.

Além de tudo isso, ainda temos a mesma configuração poderosa rodeando a a nova GPU, incluindo uma CPU Intel Core i7-6700HQquad-core , 16 GB de RAM DDR4-2133, uma configuração de dois armazenamentos com um SSD M.2 de 256 GB e uma unidade de armazenamento de 1 TB a 7200 RPM, e finalmente, uma tela IPS 1080p anti-refletiva. A Gigabyte também tornou as manutenções e atualizações mais fáceis, com quase todos os componentes substituíveis desde o lado inferior. Os usuários que precisem de ainda mais velocidade podem optar por um SSD NVMe para substituir o M.2  convencional com o qual a máquina é entregue, e eles inclusive podem adicionar uma terceira unidade de armazenamento com o adaptador de HD incluso, que pode ser trocado para a baia de expansão montada na frente, de forma rápida e fácil, substituindo a unidade pré-instalada DVD-RAM.

O P57X também faz um ótimo trabalho ao incluir útil software para facilitar o controle sobre o sistema de resfriamento da máquina e do overclock da GPU, junto com o prático software de atualização e alguns outros bônus (controles da temperatura da LCD, criação de recuperação de mídia USB, etc.).

Obviamente, quando você comprime um portátil de jogos tão poderosos — e trabalha para manter o preço abaixo dos $2.000, para começar — haverá alguns compromissos. Estes se manifestam na forma da predominância do plástico do P57Xe no desafortunado aquecimento, que surge rapidamente na metade direita do teclado durante sessões de jogos inclusive moderadas e independentemente da configuração da velocidade da ventoinha. Também é um aparelho bastante barulhento, embora ambas as ventoinhas estejam montadas na traseira (o que ajuda um pouco). O consumo de energia é previsivelmente muito mais elevado do que o do P57W, e a duração da bateria (tão marginal seja sua importância em um portátil de jogos) sofre consequentemente.

Finalmente, o touchpad é positivamente ruim para tudo, menos para as tarefas mais triviais, por isso sempre tenha à mão o seu mouse externo.

Alguns também poderão chorar pela exclusão de uma opção de tela 4K, mas finalmente, não será um fato muito decisivo para a compra. É bom ter um portátil que lidará bem com quaisquer tarefas que você precise fazer, com uma resolução nativa, e baseado em nossos benchmarks, isso provavelmente não mude muito em breve. Os jogos em 4K ainda são possíveis através de monitores externos (como mencionamos antes).

Finalmente, o P57X é um portátil para jogos que faz muito sentido que foca seus esforços principalmente na funcionalidade, portabilidade e acessibilidade (relativamente). Se o preço não for um problema e se o peso não o incomoda, não encontrará algo melhor. De outra forma, apesar de seus dispositivos de entrada deficientes, o desenvolvimento térmico abaixo do ideal, e a omissão de uma tela 4K, o P57X é uma besta absoluta, que vai ser capaz de rodar os jogos nas mais altas configurações e resolução nativa por um bom tempo.

Gigabyte P57X v6 - 10/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
67%
Conectividade
68 / 81 → 84%
Peso
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Bateria
73%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
81 / 95 → 85%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
60%
Camera
69 / 85 → 81%
Médio
75%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57X v6
Steve Schardein, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2020-06- 8)