Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P57W
Gigabyte P57W (P57 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M - 3 GB VRAM, Análises do: 924 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 359.00, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 2 of 2 slots used, max. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469), IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Disco rígido
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G, 256 GB
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1000 GB HDD @7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 NVMe/PCIe Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
peso
3.16 kg, Suprimento de energia: 638 g
Preço
1700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 290 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 274.2 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 286 cd/m²
Contraste: 923:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.76 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
| Gigabyte P57W LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469) | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 Chi Mei N173HGE-E11 (CMN1735) | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469) | Gigabyte P37X v5 LP173WF4-SPF1 (LGD0469) | SCHENKER XMG P706 LG LP173WF4-SPD1 | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 9% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 67 1% | 66.7 0% | 67.4 1% | 66.9 1% | 66.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.4 | 97.3 15% | 84.7 0% | 85 1% | 84.6 0% | 83.9 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.7 | 67.6 10% | 62 0% | 62.2 1% | 61.8 0% | 61.4 0% |
| Response Times | 9% | -15% | 8% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 37 ? -0% | 45 ? -22% | 33 ? 11% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 20 ? 17% | 26 ? -8% | 23 ? 4% | ||
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 4% | -1% | 3% | 1% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 286 | 172 -40% | 337 18% | 306 7% | 306 7% | 360 26% |
| Brightness | 274 | 161 -41% | 303 11% | 294 7% | 302 10% | 336 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 85 -2% | 89 2% | 90 3% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.26 16% | 0.26 16% | 0.42 -35% | 0.34 -10% | 0.44 -42% |
| Contrast | 923 | 662 -28% | 1296 40% | 729 -21% | 900 -2% | 818 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.49 | 2.06 54% | 5.92 -32% | 3.51 22% | 5.49 -22% | 4.76 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.83 | 8.39 -7% | 10.8 -38% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.76 | 2.42 49% | 7.55 -59% | 2.23 53% | 3.97 17% | 3.69 22% |
| Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.45 90% | 2.42 91% | 2.51 88% | 2.15 102% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6843 95% | 6855 95% | 7270 89% | 6346 102% | 6163 105% | 6091 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 62 13% | 56 2% | 56 2% | 55.5 1% | 55 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 97 15% | 85 1% | 85 1% | 84.5 1% | 84 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
5% | 3% /
1% | -4% /
0% | 1% /
1% | 2% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5955 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3946 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4754 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4935 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G
Sequential Read:
491.6 MB/s
Sequential Write:
391.1 MB/s
512K Read:
352.8 MB/s
512K Write:
371.7 MB/s
4K Read:
29.89 MB/s
4K Write:
37.75 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
338.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
278 MB/s
| Gigabyte P57W Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV Lite-On CV1-8B256 | Gigabyte P37X v5 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG P706 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -24% | -25% | 151% | |||
| Seq Read | 486.7 | 501 3% | 483.6 -1% | 1863 283% | ||
| Seq Write | 406.2 | 109.7 -73% | 332.9 -18% | 1273 213% | ||
| 4K Read | 28.77 | 20.85 -28% | 15.09 -48% | 39.93 39% | ||
| 4K Write | 55.5 | 55 -1% | 33.45 -40% | 95.3 72% | ||
| Score Total | 911 | 718 -21% | 769 -16% | 2278 150% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9363 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 86161 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21461 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6619 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
| Gigabyte P37X v5 | |
| Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) | |
| MSI GS70-6QE16H21 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV | |
| Gigabyte P57W | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 96.7 | 94.9 | 57.5 | 50.8 |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 79.9 | 73.8 | 47.9 | 19.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 107.1 | 76.8 | 46.3 | 37.6 |
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 88.9 | 54.3 | 35.7 | 16.5 |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 94 | 56 | 49 | 35 |
| The Division (2016) | 117.2 | 87.6 | 43.9 | 33.6 |
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 61.6 | 58.6 | 33.6 | 31.7 |
| Need for Speed 2016 (2016) | 95.7 | 89.8 | 57.8 | 44.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 37 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| DVD |
| 38 / dB |
| Carga |
| 37 / 47 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P37X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -5% | -3% | 3% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | ||||
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30.8 4% | 32 -0% | 32 -0% | 30.9 3% | 31 3% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 31.2 5% | 33 -0% | 34 -3% | 31.2 5% | 32 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 36.6 1% | 37 -0% | 36 3% | 31.2 16% | 33 11% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 41.8 -13% | 44 -19% | 40 -8% | 40.5 -9% | 38 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 47 | 53 -13% | 49 -4% | 51 -9% | 47 -0% | 50 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.1 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
| Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P37X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -17% | 17% | -9% | 8% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55.1 | 53.8 2% | 41.7 24% | 52.7 4% | 44 20% | 51.1 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55.2 | 65.4 -18% | 41.6 25% | 70 -27% | 42.3 23% | 53.2 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.8 | 36.3 -18% | 27.2 12% | 30.9 -0% | 31.7 -3% | 31.7 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 36.3 -34% | 25 8% | 31 -14% | 29.9 -10% | 32.2 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.7 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 11 / 17 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
85 / 178 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte P57W GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P37X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -1% | -26% | -7% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 11 | 16.5 -50% | 11 -0% | 16 -45% | 12 -9% | 12 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 17 | 23.1 -36% | 17 -0% | 21 -24% | 17.9 -5% | 18 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22 | 26.1 -19% | 22 -0% | 28 -27% | 19.3 12% | 26 -18% |
| Load Average * | 85 | 95.8 -13% | 96 -13% | 96 -13% | 97.7 -15% | 95 -12% |
| Load Maximum * | 178 | 146.4 18% | 164 8% | 215 -21% | 213 -20% | 188 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte P57W 75.81 Wh | MSI GS70-6QE16H21 56 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-791-75PV Wh | Gigabyte P37X v5 76 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P706 60 Wh | Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935) 92 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -44% | 31% | -6% | -24% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 460 | 238 -48% | 702 53% | 383 -17% | 297 -35% | 758 65% |
| H.264 | 296 | 154 -48% | 456 54% | 334 13% | 220 -26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 334 | 180 -46% | 358 7% | 254 -24% | 220 -34% | 444 33% |
| Load | 99 | 64 -35% | 109 10% | 103 4% | 97 -2% | 105 6% |
Pro
+ replaceable drive bay
+ always cool palm rest
+ decent battery life
+ keyboard with backlight
+ graphics switch
+ good IPS display
+ SSD / HDD combo
+ slim case
+ handy tools
+ USB 3.1 Type C
+ high performance
Contra
- quite sensitive surfaces
- Clickpad yields heavily
- modest speakers
- only 3 GB of VRAM
- unstable lid
A primeira vista, você poderia pensar que o Gigabyte P57W era uma variante grande do P55W v5. Esta impressão é, de fato, verdadeira na maioria dos aspectos, mas há algumas adaptações. Por exemplo, o aparelho de 17-polegadas ganha pontos com um melhor layout da interface e ventoinhas traseiras.
Além disso, há uma baia de unidade substituível e a bateria tem uma capacidade maior (75 vs. 61 Wh), que, no entanto, compensa pelo consumo de energia um pouco mais alto. A temperatura e o ruído do sistema são comparáveis, embora o P57W seja marginalmente melhor.
Além do ClickPad inferior, o aparelho de 17-polegadas não precisa se esconder atrás da concorrência. O visual, a tela, a conectividade, e as emissões são atuais. O mesmo é verdade para o desempenho, que se beneficia muito do Solid State Drive e das modernas CPU e GPU. No entanto, a Gigabyte deveria melhorar o som.
Considerando tudo, o P57W demonstra ser um bom portátil de gama alta, que pode encarar até o MSI GS70, o Acer Predator 17, e o Schenker XMG P706. Os gamers mais robustos de 17-polegadas Alienware 17 R3, Asus G752 e MSI GT72S puderam alcançar pontuações um pouco mais altas - sem importar a placa de vídeo.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Gigabyte P57W
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
