Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte P55W v6
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 609:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Gigabyte P55W v6 LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P55W v5 LG Philips LP156WF4-SPH1, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -14% | 3% | 15% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.2 | 50.1 -21% | 64.5 2% | 67.8 7% | 63.6 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 80.6 | 73.5 -9% | 83.4 3% | 97.4 21% | 83.9 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 59 | 51.2 -13% | 60.9 3% | 69.7 18% | 61.3 4% |
| Response Times | 17% | 24% | 16% | 28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 44 ? 21% | 40 ? 29% | 35 ? 37% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 27 ? 13% | 25 ? 19% | 26 ? 16% | 25 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 202 ? | ||||
| Screen | 6% | 10% | 14% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 280 | 254 -9% | 321 15% | 293 5% | 273 -2% |
| Brightness | 294 | 267 -9% | 296 1% | 279 -5% | 267 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 88 7% | 84 2% | 83 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.28 39% | 0.33 28% | 0.33 28% | 0.27 41% |
| Contrast | 609 | 907 49% | 973 60% | 888 46% | 1011 66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.48 | 4.28 4% | 4.42 1% | 3.59 20% | 3.77 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.16 | 10.6 -4% | 9.78 4% | 5.79 43% | 10.64 -5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.69 | 2.77 -3% | 3.34 -24% | 3.86 -43% | 2.48 8% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.4 92% | 2.53 87% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6455 101% | 6284 103% | 6213 105% | 7229 90% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 53 | 47 -11% | 55 4% | 63 19% | 55 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 80 | 73 -9% | 83 4% | 97 21% | 84 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
3% | 12% /
10% | 15% /
14% | 15% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 7 Score | 5715 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4014 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4897 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4784 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte P55W v6 Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800) | Gigabyte P55W v5 Samsung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q LiteOn CV1-8B512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 166% | 53% | 298% | 50% | 55% | |
| Read Seq | 511 | 1356 165% | 462.5 -9% | 1973 286% | 494.2 -3% | 517 1% |
| Write Seq | 161.1 | 657 308% | 462.7 187% | 1292 702% | 449.6 179% | 449.7 179% |
| Read 512 | 338 | 1044 209% | 335 -1% | 1279 278% | 348.1 3% | 355.3 5% |
| Write 512 | 160.8 | 642 299% | 407.1 153% | 1288 701% | 418.2 160% | 433.7 170% |
| Read 4k | 26.2 | 50.8 94% | 25.61 -2% | 52.3 100% | 16.97 -35% | 27.69 6% |
| Write 4k | 76.7 | 142.7 86% | 86.3 13% | 153.2 100% | 38.36 -50% | 72.9 -5% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 264.7 | 588 122% | 246.7 -7% | 464.4 75% | 394.9 49% | 290.9 10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 160.3 | 236.3 47% | 301.5 88% | 384.4 140% | 317.4 98% | 273.8 71% |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12433 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22706 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9527 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4963 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v5 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 189 | 176.2 | 151.7 | 99.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 166.1 | 127.2 | 63.3 | 37.8 |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 116.1 | 98.4 | 54.6 | 28 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 36 / 37 dB |
| HDD |
| 37 dB |
| DVD |
| 39 / dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 3% | 8% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 31 -0% | 30 3% | 30 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 33 6% | 32 9% | 32 9% | 31 11% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 34 6% | 33 8% | 33 8% | 35 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 35 5% | 34 8% | 34 8% | 38 -3% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 43 -5% | 44 -7% | 37 10% | 43 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 49 6% | 53 -2% | 46 12% | 49 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.3 °C / -29.4 F).
| Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -17% | 5% | 18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47.7 | 50 -5% | 65.3 -37% | 45.3 5% | 40.5 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.2 | 57.7 -13% | 64.4 -26% | 62.6 -22% | 42 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.1 | 25.7 20% | 35.4 -10% | 25.3 21% | 28.2 12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32.8 | 27.2 17% | 31.6 4% | 27.3 17% | 24.3 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte P55W v6 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 13 / 17 Watt |
| Carga |
71 / 165 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -34% | -56% | -65% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 9 -13% | 16 -100% | 18 -125% | 18 -125% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 13 -0% | 19 -46% | 22 -69% | 24 -85% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17 | 17 -0% | 23 -35% | 30 -76% | 29 -71% |
| Load Average * | 71 | 81 -14% | 68 4% | 77 -8% | 86 -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 165 | 152 8% | 157 5% | 165 -0% | 201 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte P55W v6 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 63 Wh | Gigabyte P55W v5 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, 61 Wh | Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 64 Wh | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, 65 Wh | Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | -31% | -30% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 610 | 604 -1% | 315 -48% | 358 -41% | |
| H.264 | 338 | 332 -2% | 235 -30% | 271 -20% | 298 -12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 352 | 348 -1% | 220 -37% | 210 -40% | 285 -19% |
| Load | 95 | 93 -2% | 87 -8% | 76 -20% | 114 20% |
Pro
Contra
As diversas edições do Gigabyte P55W sempre conseguiram dar no alvo entre desempenho e preço - e na versão 6 infelizmente não é diferente. A mudança da GeForce GTX 970 para uma GTX 1060 resulta em um ameno de 50 % no desempenho 3D, embora o preço não tenha mudado (1600 Euro / ~$1710). O slogan "Mais valor pelo seu dinheiro" acerta em cheio.
A aparência externa não mudou nada - o chassi e a boa seleção de portas físicas, os muito bons dispositivos de entrada e os alto falantes regulares permanecem iguais. Mais uma vez, a Gigabyte usa uma CPU Skylake CPU com 16 GB de RAM, assim o sistema tem poder para poupar e consegue lidar com tarefas exigentes sem diminuir muito sua velocidade. A duração da bateria também não foi realmente afetada.
Em comparação com o predecessor, parece que os novos portáteis devem dar uns passos para trás em algumas áreas. A tela tem uma razão de contraste muito inferior e a distribuição do brilho deu um giro para pior. Isto é notável principalmente porque os painéis - pelo menos de acordo com seu número de modelo e tipo - são iguais. O ultrarrápido SSD Samsung com o qual o P55W v5 foi equipado teve que abrir caminho para uma unidade muito mais lenta de Transcend. As emissões de ruído também são piores agora - particularmente perturbantes são as flutuações com uso intenso.
Considerando tudo, o P55W v6 é uma evolução boa e bem sucedida da série para jogos - e a 1600 Euro (~$1710), o usuários recebe muito desempenho 3D pelo dinheiro. O Asus ROG Strix GL502VM equipado de forma similar é o único outro sistema com a mesma razão preço-desempenho. Os usuários que não precisem tanto desempenho para jogos podem economizar muito dinheiro dando uma olhada no Acer Aspire VX5-591G por cerca de 1000 Euros (~$1070). Os gamers que precisem ainda de mais desempenho do que o P55W v6 pode oferecer precisam se preparar para gastar muito dinheiro: o Acer Predator 15 G9-593, por exemplo, é vendido por cerca de 2.500 Euros (~$2670).
Gigabyte P55W v6
- 01/31/2017 v6 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Price comparison
