Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aorus 15-SA (Core i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti, 144 Hz FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 950:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 3.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Aorus 15-SA LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 Base Model BOE NV156FHM-N61, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH LG Display LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | -1% | -2% | 1% | -2% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 66.3 3% | 64.9 1% | 62.5 -3% | 66.2 3% | 63.5 -1% | 65.3 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.6 | 86.6 -7% | 90.1 -4% | 93 -1% | 92.1 -2% | 89.4 -4% | 95.5 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 63.3 -4% | 65.8 0% | 63.8 -3% | 67.2 2% | 64.5 -2% | 66.5 1% |
Response Times | -163% | 35% | 9% | -7% | -5% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 39.2 ? -151% | 7 ? 55% | 15 ? 4% | 17.6 ? -13% | 18 ? -15% | 15.2 ? 3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 35.2 ? -175% | 11 ? 14% | 11 ? 14% | 12.8 ? -0% | 12 ? 6% | 11.2 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 21190 ? | 23580 ? | |||||
Screen | -17% | -2% | -16% | 10% | -14% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 266 | 273.6 3% | 323 21% | 305 15% | 254 -5% | 353.6 33% | 266 0% |
Brightness | 254 | 262 3% | 309 22% | 284 12% | 262 3% | 346 36% | 248 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 93 3% | 83 -8% | 89 -1% | 86 -4% | 89 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.3 -7% | 0.29 -4% | 0.52 -86% | 0.22 21% | 0.3 -7% | 0.31 -11% |
Contrast | 950 | 912 -4% | 1114 17% | 587 -38% | 1155 22% | 1179 24% | 858 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.11 | 3.22 -4% | 4.33 -39% | 3.63 -17% | 2.37 24% | 4.55 -46% | 2.78 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.84 | 7.61 -30% | 7.64 -31% | 8.18 -40% | 4.71 19% | 7.91 -35% | 5.96 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.37 | 4.1 -199% | 1.31 4% | 1.84 -34% | 3.37 -146% | 0.91 34% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 1.4 64% | 4.12 -5% | 4.77 -21% | 1.58 60% | 4.1 -4% | 3.58 9% |
Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.24 98% | 2.43 91% | 2.54 87% | 2.48 89% | 2.27 97% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 6210 105% | 6636 98% | 7427 88% | 7500 87% | 6785 96% | 7434 87% | 7186 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 56.4 -6% | 59 -2% | 59 -2% | 60 0% | 57.9 -3% | 62 3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 86.2 -7% | 90 -3% | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 88.9 -4% | 96 3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -61% /
-33% | 11% /
3% | -3% /
-11% | 1% /
6% | -7% /
-11% | 4% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Aorus 15-SA (Edge 44) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Edge 44) | |
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Edge 44) | |
Aorus 15-SA (Edge 44) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Edge 42.17134.1.0) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Edge 44) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM (Edge 44) | |
Aorus 15-SA (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 7445 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5081 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6075 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5913 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5761 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Aorus 15-SA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 Base Model Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -6% | -26% | -11% | -8% | -23% | 6% | |
Write 4K | 104 | 112.5 8% | 100.8 -3% | 108.9 5% | 95.3 -8% | 107.4 3% | 115.5 11% |
Read 4K | 55.1 | 43.09 -22% | 48.75 -12% | 40.23 -27% | 40.13 -27% | 42.91 -22% | 58 5% |
Write Seq | 1519 | 1450 -5% | 975 -36% | 1390 -8% | 1883 24% | 467.5 -69% | 1555 2% |
Read Seq | 2486 | 1392 -44% | 1344 -46% | 964 -61% | 1322 -47% | 2335 -6% | 2590 4% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 320.5 | 356.1 11% | 283.7 -11% | 314.2 -2% | 309.9 -3% | 289.7 -10% | 369.3 15% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 431.8 | 406.9 -6% | 330.3 -24% | 369.2 -14% | 353.7 -18% | 354.4 -18% | 441.7 2% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1498 | 1451 -3% | 986 -34% | 1506 1% | 1919 28% | 460.9 -69% | 1547 3% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2868 | 3272 14% | 1579 -45% | 3446 20% | 2466 -14% | 3111 8% | 2969 4% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38166 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17701 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 167159 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33672 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13409 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5944 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
World of Tanks enCore - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TSSAA HQ | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Aorus 15-SA |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 331.2 | 287.2 | 252 | 140.3 |
GTA V (2015) | 152.7 | 142.5 | 123.7 | 68.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 257.1 | 180.8 | 104.3 | 57.1 |
World of Warships (2015) | 220.1 | 179.7 | 148.2 | 141.1 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 105.3 | 95 | 79.8 | |
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 559 | 247.6 | 119.3 | |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 161 | 134 | 125 | 99 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 104 | 90 | 86 | 78 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 123.9 | 64.1 | 48.7 | 39.6 |
Rage 2 (2019) | 162.7 | 81.6 | 69.5 | 67.9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32 / 35 / 41 dB |
Carga |
| 54 / 56 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 11% | 16% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 3% | 19% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 27.8 4% | 30.3 -4% | 30.2 -4% | 30 -3% | 28.6 1% | 30 -3% | 24 ? 17% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 31 3% | 30.3 5% | 30.9 3% | 30 6% | 28.6 11% | 31 3% | 25.5 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 31.2 11% | 33.2 5% | 30.9 12% | 31 11% | 28.6 18% | 34 3% | 27.2 ? 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 41 | 31.3 24% | 33.2 19% | 31.6 23% | 34 17% | 28.6 30% | 39 5% | 30.2 ? 26% |
Load Average * | 54 | 47.2 13% | 32.3 40% | 42.3 22% | 43 20% | 40.8 24% | 46 15% | 42.5 ? 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 51.3 1% | 42 19% | 49.6 5% | 53 -2% | |||
Load Maximum * | 56 | 44.3 21% | 39 30% | 40 29% | 44 21% | 49.6 11% | 55 2% | 53.4 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 12% | 10% | 7% | -1% | -8% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 45.2 -3% | 47.7 -8% | 48.4 -10% | 49 -11% | 52 -18% | 58 -32% | 46.1 ? -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 46.4 20% | 46.1 21% | 48 17% | 63 -9% | 55.6 4% | 64 -10% | 49.2 ? 15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 27.2 9% | 26.2 13% | 26.7 11% | 24 20% | 29.8 1% | 30 -0% | 31.2 ? -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 32.8 4% | 27.1 20% | 26.9 21% | 25 26% | 31 9% | 31 9% | 32.2 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus 15-SA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.6 / 1 Watt |
Ocioso | 20 / 23 / 29 Watt |
Carga |
87 / 173 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 26% | 14% | 30% | 22% | 22% | -10% | -2% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 10.2 49% | 13.8 31% | 7.3 63% | 7 65% | 7.6 62% | 21 -5% | 13.5 ? 32% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 13.2 43% | 20.9 9% | 11.1 52% | 11 52% | 13.8 40% | 23 -0% | 18.9 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 17.6 39% | 26 10% | 12.6 57% | 20 31% | 14.6 50% | 32 -10% | 26.7 ? 8% |
Load Average * | 87 | 99.5 -14% | 89 -2% | 109 -25% | 98 -13% | 97.6 -12% | 97 -11% | 106.6 ? -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 136 | 113.6 16% | 132 3% | 145.8 -7% | 148 -9% | |||
Load Maximum * | 173 | 133.3 23% | 131 24% | 168 3% | 182 -5% | 172.5 -0% | 213 -23% | 249 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Base Model i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 53 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 52 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 99% | 14% | 31% | 85% | 120% | 126% | 103% | |
Reader / Idle | 208 | 690 232% | 495 138% | 507 144% | 627 201% | 545 162% | 565 ? 172% | |
H.264 | 166 | 356 114% | 408 146% | 408 ? 146% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 169 | 330 95% | 193 14% | 228 35% | 362 114% | 463 174% | 421 149% | 376 ? 122% |
Load | 122 | 87 -29% | 26 -79% | 81 -34% | 103 -16% | 181 48% | 85.3 ? -30% |
Pro
Contra
A Gigabyte equipou o Aorus 15-SA com uma combinação avançada de hardware. Seu processador Core i7-9750H e a GPU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lidam com todos os jogos triple-A sem problemas e fazem uso pleno da tela de 15-SA de 144 Hz. Não subestime a GTX 1660 Ti, pois ela quase alcança o desempenho da GeForce RTX 2060. No entanto o Aorus 15-SA não é um portátil frio e silencioso para jogos.
O Gigabyte Aorus 15-SA é o artigo genuíno: Um verdadeiro portátil de jogos de 15,6 polegadas que lida bem com todos os jogos modernos. No entanto, o dispositivo não está livre de falhas.
A Gigabyte também equipou o dispositivo com um SSD NVMe rápido, que garante que o sistema sempre funcione fluentemente. Se 512 GB de armazenamento não forem suficientes, você pode sempre adicionar uma segunda unidade M.2 2280 e até uma unidade de 2,5 polegadas.
A tela IPS de 144 Hz deixa uma impressão confusa. Por um lado, tem ângulos de visão estáveis e tempos de resposta rápidos. No entanto, sua relação de contraste e brilho máximo deveriam ser maiores para um portátil de jogos desse preço. O teclado retroiluminado RGB nos impressionou e é agradável de digitar. No entanto, a duração da bateria não é digna de ser mencionada.
Além disso, não podemos entender por que a Gigabyte incluiu apenas uma porta USB 3.1 Gen2 tipo C em vez de uma porta Thunderbolt 3 mais versátil. A inclusão de apenas um leitor de cartão microSD também é decepcionante, especialmente porque há espaço para a Gigabyte ter incluído um de tamanho completo. No geral, o Gigabyte Aorus 15-SA é um excelente portátil para jogos, que é prejudicado pela sua tela escura, seleção limitada de portas e baixa duração da bateria.
Aorus 15-SA
- 06/16/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck