Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 17 XA HDR: Este *realmente* é um bom portátil de 17 polegadas
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 667.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1451:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.79
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 AU Optronics B173ZAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV AU Optronics AUO B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -26% | -22% | 0% | -25% | -26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.8 | 60.6 -30% | 65.3 -25% | 86.4 0% | 62.9 -28% | 62.9 -28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 89 -11% | 91.2 -9% | 99.9 0% | 87.8 -12% | 87.2 -13% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.5 | 62.1 -38% | 66.3 -33% | 99.1 0% | 63.9 -36% | 63.8 -36% |
| Response Times | 77% | 61% | 15% | 76% | 73% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 6.8 ? 85% | 18 ? 61% | 35.6 ? 22% | 7.2 ? 84% | 6.8 ? 85% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 9.6 ? 68% | 12 ? 61% | 28 ? 8% | 9.6 ? 68% | 12 ? 61% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -32% | -10% | -61% | -4% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle | 667.3 | 299.3 -55% | 297 -55% | 357.9 -46% | 288 -57% | 312.3 -53% |
| Brightness | 633 | 294 -54% | 281 -56% | 347 -45% | 287 -55% | 297 -53% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 84 -7% | 94 4% | 91 1% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.29 37% | 0.23 50% | 0.33 28% | 0.2 57% | 0.21 54% |
| Contrast | 1451 | 1032 -29% | 1291 -11% | 1085 -25% | 1440 -1% | 1487 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.53 | 2.55 28% | 2.19 38% | 6.57 -86% | 2.33 34% | 3.6 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.88 | 4.73 31% | 4.81 30% | 9.86 -43% | 5.34 22% | 6.74 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.79 | 2.9 23% | 6.74 -78% | 2.47 35% | 3.95 -4% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 3.5 -289% | 1.31 -46% | 4.3 -378% | 1.19 -32% | 3.1 -244% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.42 91% | 2.6 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6533 99% | 7101 92% | 6464 101% | 6403 102% | 6710 97% | 7002 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87.1 | 57 -35% | 59 -32% | 88.4 1% | 57 -35% | 56.6 -35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 88.7 -11% | 91 -9% | 100 0% | 88 -12% | 86.6 -13% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-17% | 10% /
-3% | -15% /
-40% | 16% /
2% | 5% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (181 - 215, n=13) | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (1327 - 1930, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3841 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4668 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5955 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 66% | 8% | 9% | 91% | 0% | |
| Seq Read | 1812 | 1831 1% | 2182 20% | 1835 1% | 911 -50% | 940 -48% |
| Seq Write | 1512 | 1744 15% | 1342 -11% | 1121 -26% | 2347 55% | 921 -39% |
| 4K Read | 32.68 | 45.16 38% | 23.28 -29% | 23.98 -27% | 53 62% | 48.05 47% |
| 4K Write | 107.7 | 107.1 -1% | 89.9 -17% | 100 -7% | 122.5 14% | 104.3 -3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 504 | 1240 146% | 817 62% | 687 36% | 1577 213% | 320.1 -36% |
| 4K-64 Write | 534 | 1695 217% | 757 42% | 776 45% | 1734 225% | 703 32% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.05 | 0.064 -28% | 0.136 -172% | 0.047 6% | 0.08 -60% | 0.079 -58% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.227 | 0.037 84% | 0.044 81% | 0.053 77% | 0.031 86% | 0.046 80% |
| Score Read | 718 | 1468 104% | 1058 47% | 895 25% | 1721 140% | 462 -36% |
| Score Write | 793 | 1977 149% | 981 24% | 988 25% | 2091 164% | 900 13% |
| Score Total | 1871 | 4197 124% | 2539 36% | 2306 23% | 4771 155% | 1616 -14% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 946 | 2086 121% | 773 -18% | 1416 50% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 414.3 | 425.5 3% | 493 19% | 569 37% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1263 | 555 -56% | 647 -49% | 971 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19651 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28855 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15412 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6722 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
| Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| Asus G752VY | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI RTX 2070 Gaming Z 8G | |
| Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 353.5 | 315.2 | 290.2 | 155.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 285.7 | 212.1 | 131.6 | 66.5 | 46.9 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 137 | 99 | 89 | 79 | 28 |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Aorus X7 DT v8 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -8% | 2% | 0% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 29.3 | 28.2 4% | 29 1% | 28.2 4% | 29 1% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 28.2 15% | 35 -6% | 28.2 15% | 29 12% | 29.5 11% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 28.2 15% | 36 -9% | 28.2 15% | 32 3% | 30.3 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 30.8 7% | 41 -24% | 31 6% | 33 -0% | 31.9 3% |
| Load Average * | 42.5 | 42 1% | 43 -1% | 50.8 -20% | 47 -11% | 50.4 -19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 51 -21% | 53 -26% | 50.8 -21% | 49 -17% | 50.1 -19% |
| Load Maximum * | 59.6 | 53 11% | 54 9% | 50.8 15% | 51 14% | 50.1 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 33 / 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.5 / 59.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.2 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.42 / 0.91 Watt |
| Ocioso | 13.9 / 24.3 / 35.5 Watt |
| Carga |
127.6 / 237.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -26% | 2% | 3% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13.9 | 16.2 -17% | 23 -65% | 19 -37% | 16.2 -17% | 18.2 -31% |
| Idle Average * | 24.3 | 20.4 16% | 33 -36% | 22 9% | 24.8 -2% | 23 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35.5 | 26.1 26% | 37 -4% | 30 15% | 28.6 19% | 33.1 7% |
| Load Average * | 127.6 | 96.5 24% | 115 10% | 104 18% | 127.6 -0% | 124.8 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 158 | 182.9 -16% | 225 -42% | 167 -6% | 147.1 7% | 180.8 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 237.5 | 214.3 10% | 281 -18% | 203 15% | 212.7 10% | 263 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -41% | -35% | -51% | -37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 711 | 295 -59% | 296 -58% | 543 -24% | 298 -58% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 431 | 280 -35% | 228 -47% | 296 -31% | 230 -47% | 270 -37% |
| Load | 98 | 86 -12% | 80 -18% | 49 -50% | 52 -47% |
Pro
Contra
O Aero 17 tona o Aorus X7 DT do ano passado, obsoleto. É notoriamente mais leve, mais forte, mais brilhante, mais silencioso, mais rápido, mais frio, mais duradouro e mais eficiente, tudo ao mesmo tempo. Se você está pensando em um portátil Aorus X, quase não há razão para não optar pelo Aero 17.
Quando comparado a outros portáteis ultrafinos de alto desempenho em sua categoria de tamanho, o Aero 17 combina quatro recursos notáveis não encontrados em outros lugares: Thunderbolt 3, um leitor de cartão SD, NumPad em tamanho normal e uma tela HDR400 Pantone pré-calibrada extremamente brilhante. Modelos concorrentes como o MSI GS75, MSI P75, Asus Zephyrus GX701, ou inclusive o Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro (17)/Blade Studio cada um, não possui pelo menos um desses recursos. O Aero 17 parece mais um pacote completo para criadores de conteúdo e jogadores, em vez de um portátil criado principalmente para gamers com recursos profissionais lançados aleatoriamente.
Ainda há muito que a Gigabyte pode fazer para tornar o Aero 17 uma máquina melhor. A resposta do teclado e do clickpad em particular poderia ter sido mais firme e os símbolos das teclas não iluminadas são um descuido. O posicionamento da webcam é ruim e o IV não é uma opção, o que é uma pena para um portátil voltado para profissionais. É preferível um leitor SD de mola e o RJ-45 de 2,5 Gbit e o USB Type-C PD se sentiriam bem na série Aero. Para um portátil tão caro, esperamos tudo e a pia da cozinha para a próxima iteração.
O Aero 17 de alto desempenho é mais silencioso que seus concorrentes, oferecendo mais recursos de hardware projetados para criadores de conteúdo, profissionais e jogadores. Ele oferece ao Razer Blade Pro 17 uma corrida pelo dinheiro, com sua tela HDR400 extremamente brilhante e o teclado numérico integrado em tamanho normal que não é encontrado em muitos outros portáteis finos.
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
- 09/02/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
