Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Super Max-Q no início

Upgrade de hardware.

Embora o Aero 17 HDR corresponda ao seu antecessor externamente, muita coisa aconteceu sob o capô. Além da nova CPU, o portátil para jogos de 17 polegadas também oferece uma GPU atualizada. Descubra aqui como esses componentes novos podem funcionar entre si.
Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Aero 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, all slots occupied, 64 GB max.
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, X-Rite Pantone, UHD/4K, Brilhante: não, HDR, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB 
, NVMe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21 x 396 x 270
Bateria
94 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2W, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 Watts, guia de início rápido, pad térmico, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.656 kg, Suprimento de energia: 724 g
Preço
2600 EUR
Links
Gigabyte página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87 %
v7 (old)
04/2020
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.7 kg21 mm17.30"3840x2160
86.1 %
v7 (old)
09/2019
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.5 kg21.4 mm17.30"3840x2160
84.2 %
v7 (old)
03/2020
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.6 kg20.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.9 %
v7 (old)
07/2019
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.2 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.7 kg18.7 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.7 %
v7 (old)
06/2019
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 270 mm 21.4 mm 2.5 kg396 mm 270 mm 21 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200.8 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s -16%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
238.3 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s -17%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1110 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
924 MBit/s -34%
ColorChecker
21.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: 11.47 ∆E min: 4.76 - max: 27.46 ∆E
475
cd/m²		474
cd/m²		477
cd/m²
464
cd/m²		487
cd/m²		484
cd/m²
466
cd/m²		481
cd/m²		470
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 487 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 475.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 487 cd/m²
Contraste: 1282:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.2, IPS, 3840x2160		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
0%
-16%
-23%
-17%
-26%
Display P3 Coverage
86.5
86.8
0%
70.8
-18%
62.6
-28%
70
-19%
60.6
-30%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
98.5
-1%
93.5
-6%
96.6
-3%
89
-11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
100
99.5
0%
72.2
-28%
64.7
-35%
72.3
-28%
62.1
-38%
Response Times
0%
64%
75%
81%
76%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4)
45.6 ?(24.4, 21.2)
17%
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
69%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
87%
5.6 ?(2.4, 3.2)
90%
6.8 ?(3.4, 3.4)
88%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(9.2, 16.8)
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-17%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
58%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
62%
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
71%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
63%
PWM Frequency
26320 ?(25)
25510 ?(17)
Screen
-86%
-25%
-19%
-43%
-86%
Brightness middle
487
667.3
37%
384.2
-21%
366
-25%
288
-41%
299.3
-39%
Brightness
475
633
33%
357
-25%
343
-28%
276
-42%
294
-38%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
90
-5%
91
-4%
93
-2%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.46
-21%
0.29
24%
0.29
24%
0.24
37%
0.29
24%
Contrast
1282
1451
13%
1325
3%
1262
-2%
1200
-6%
1032
-20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.19
3.53
-197%
1.35
-13%
1.51
-27%
1.92
-61%
2.55
-114%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.43
6.88
-183%
3.45
-42%
3.22
-33%
4.57
-88%
4.73
-95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.5
3.79
-658%
1.42
-184%
0.71
-42%
1.14
-128%
2.9
-480%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.45
0.9
38%
1.2
17%
1.93
-33%
3.08
-112%
3.5
-141%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
2.42 91%
2.28 96%
CCT
6557 99%
6533 99%
6580 99%
6881 94%
7055 92%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
87.1
-1%
65.5
-26%
60
-32%
65
-26%
57
-35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
98.5
-1%
94
-6%
96
-4%
88.7
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-29% / -59%
8% / -12%
11% / -8%
7% / -23%
-12% / -55%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
 
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1328 (1301.11-1593.37)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1481 Points -11%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1233 Points -26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1097 Points -34%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
487 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
422 Points -15%
CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points +21%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3104 Points -10%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
2723 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
2357 Points -31%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6835
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7803
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
44805
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
18.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
88.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1671 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
499 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3431 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6049 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5955 Points -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points -12%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5502 Points -15%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1933 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-6%
1%
-26%
-27%
Write 4K
123.4
169.6
37%
110.6
-10%
95.5
-23%
96.1
-22%
100.7
-18%
Read 4K
45.59
58
27%
41.46
-9%
42.59
-7%
40.86
-10%
41.03
-10%
Write Seq
2320
1516
-35%
2378
3%
2851
23%
1317
-43%
1146
-51%
Read Seq
2013
2362
17%
2114
5%
2696
34%
1030
-49%
1115
-45%
Write 4K Q32T1
489.3
481.8
-2%
445.4
-9%
402.6
-18%
350.4
-28%
384.6
-21%
Read 4K Q32T1
559
506
-9%
509
-9%
443.9
-21%
404.1
-28%
429.5
-23%
Write Seq Q32T1
2979
1530
-49%
2735
-8%
3420
15%
2396
-20%
1859
-38%
Read Seq Q32T1
3432
2645
-23%
3206
-7%
3514
2%
3194
-7%
3179
-7%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3432 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2979 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 559 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 489.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2013 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2320 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 123.4 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard Score
43406 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
65101 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
24130 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38593 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18582 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7650 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø76.2 (70-80)
3DMark | 3DMark 11 | SPECviewperf 13
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
23032 Points +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
22391 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20917 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20914 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20119 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16658 Points -20%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8844 Points +18%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8479 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8036 Points +8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7923 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7468 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6479 Points -13%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5148 Points +15%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
5092 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4713 Points +5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4545 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
4477 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3668 Points -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
30910 Points +8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29220 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29052 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28555 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27204 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21464 Points -25%
SPECviewperf 13
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
181.2 fps
Catia (catia-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
128.9 fps
Creo (creo-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
172 fps
Energy (energy-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
18.47 fps
Maya (maya-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
221.5 fps
Medical (medical-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
52.6 fps
Showcase (showcase-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
94.1 fps
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20.06 fps
Solidworks (sw-04)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
91.3 fps
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
87.4 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
80.7 fps +7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
78 fps +4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
76.9 fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.3 (63min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
66.5 fps -12%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
49.7 (44min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
46.9 fps -6%
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182 175 160 89.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 240 142 75.3 49.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 163.9 146.6 139.5 131.4
Fortnite (2018) 133 132 108 86.2 43
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 104 80 33
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 127 108 75.9 54.4 27.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 119 104 87.6
Monster Hunter World (2018) 113 102 84.2 55.7 27.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 118 110 99 68 36
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 99 81 62 47 32
Hitman 2 (2018) 89.2 83.2 79.7 76.1 41.5
Battlefield V (2018) 144 135 125 99.4 56.8
Darksiders III (2018) 135 118 107 71.6 36.4
Just Cause 4 (2018) 137 101 93.4 63.6 34.5
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 143 109 61.1
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 98 92 83 70 43
Metro Exodus (2019) 92 72 57.7 49.1 26.5
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 183 155 85.8 66
The Division 2 (2019) 123 113 81 60 29
Anno 1800 (2019) 112 85.5 47.4 36.6 21.1
Rage 2 (2019) 119 99.5 97.1 62.8 30.1
F1 2019 (2019) 191 159 143 107 61
Control (2019) 92.6 68.4 43.9 21.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 112 78 59.6 41.7 22.2
FIFA 20 (2019) 271 259 257 253 186
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 101 89 66 49 28
GRID 2019 (2019) 131 104 71.1 60.6 39.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 134 126 104 72.3 41
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 103 94 82.6 60.5 33.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 109 104 94.1 71.3 35.9
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 91.3 61.8 40.2 32 20.5
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 116 107 79.8 36.8
Hunt Showdown (2020) 109 96.8 56.8 27.4
Doom Eternal (2020) 157 139 135 99.6 51.2
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.632.738.335.230.637.82535.238.340.440.438.541.9313233.433.332.729.9334036.633.433.233.228.335.15033.530.431.529.927.238.76330.928.630.330.826.936.18027.225.826.626.324.233.510028.127.427.827.124.632.512528.826.726.327.623.933.816029.127.829.827.723.434.420029.624.224.22521.73225031.324.72425.320.53431532.927.326.224.619.937.540033.728.827.425.618.639.850035.829.728.927.418.741.163034.42725.724.417.939.380035.626.825.724.817.640.6100035.226.425.324.417.342125036.227.625.923.919.342.7160036.927.525.823.918.744200036.626.824.823.317.544.5250035.425.824.626.717.343.2315035.326.5232117.342400035.322.5212017.441.8500032.321.319.81917.542.563002919.418.418.417.338.4800024.718.117.917.917.433.51000021.417.917.917.917.330.61250020.317.9181817.326.21600020.81817.918.217.322.2SPL46.637.736.235.330.153.7N5.62.82.52.31.39.3median 32.9median 26.5median 24.8median 24.4median 17.6median 39.3Delta4.33.43.23.71.75hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 38 dB
Carga
47 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Noise
6%
7%
5%
7%
11%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
29.1
3%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
35
33
6%
29.4
16%
31
11%
32
9%
28.2
19%
Idle Average *
36
33
8%
29.4
18%
32
11%
33
8%
28.2
22%
Idle Maximum *
38
33
13%
31.5
17%
38
-0%
34
11%
30.8
19%
Load Average *
47
42.5
10%
49.7
-6%
47
-0%
40
15%
42
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
42
14%
49.5
-1%
48
2%
49
-0%
51
-4%
Load Maximum *
54
59.6
-10%
53.3
1%
49
9%
50
7%
53
2%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 45 °C53 °C46 °C 
 37 °C44 °C42 °C 
 34 °C36 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 41.3 °C
59 °C59 °C46 °C
57 °C57 °C40 °C
36 °C38 °C35 °C
Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 47.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Heat
-4%
-20%
-9%
-3%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
46.8
12%
54.2
-2%
55
-4%
50
6%
43
19%
Maximum Bottom *
59
62.2
-5%
61.4
-4%
65
-10%
47
20%
47.2
20%
Idle Upper Side *
27
29
-7%
37.8
-40%
30
-11%
33
-22%
27.2
-1%
Idle Bottom *
29
34
-17%
38.6
-33%
32
-10%
34
-17%
30
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.635.32538.538.93129.931.74028.336.25027.237.26326.940.18024.235.610024.637.912523.947.216023.444.720021.754.925020.559.131519.960.240018.668.150018.769.463017.977.180017.679100017.376.8125019.373.8160018.773.2200017.571.5250017.370.1315017.372.5400017.474.5500017.572.7630017.373.9800017.466.51000017.360.81250017.364.51600017.369SPL30.185.6N1.366.8median 17.6median 69.4Delta1.76.844.442.144.442.240.442.240.83840.84038.74036.736.636.738.539.138.535.737.335.736.73536.741.934.141.954.432.754.460.733.160.76232626732.36771.931.371.973.630.173.677.529.677.579.228.379.273.429.173.470.928.770.97428.27478.328.178.372.728.172.772.92872.971.427.871.465.227.665.262.927.762.968.727.668.772.227.672.268.127.668.166.327.466.385.840.685.867.8467.8median 70.9median 28.3median 70.95.11.45.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 17 HDR XBAlienware m17 R2 P41E
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware m17 R2 P41E audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 1.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 16 / 19 / 30 Watt
Carga midlight 109 / 246 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Power Consumption
-7%
-52%
12%
-26%
3%
Idle Minimum *
16
13.9
13%
24.7
-54%
13
19%
32
-100%
16.2
-1%
Idle Average *
19
24.3
-28%
35.9
-89%
17
11%
34
-79%
20.4
-7%
Idle Maximum *
30
35.5
-18%
69.6
-132%
25
17%
36
-20%
26.1
13%
Load Average *
109
127.6
-17%
141.8
-30%
96
12%
95
13%
96.5
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
167
158
5%
185.8
-11%
156
7%
155
7%
182.9
-10%
Load Maximum *
246
237.5
3%
235.4
4%
239
3%
187
24%
214.3
13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 52min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 20min
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime
2%
-43%
-24%
-53%
-38%
Reader / Idle
592
711
20%
426
-28%
461
-22%
246
-58%
295
-50%
WiFi v1.3
372
431
16%
290
-22%
357
-4%
182
-51%
280
-25%
Load
140
98
-30%
31
-78%
74
-47%
69
-51%
86
-39%
H.264
410
168

Pro

+ Vantagens da tela 4K: brilho, espaço de cores, precisão
+ Carcaça robusta e elegante
+ Conexões modernas
+ Muito bom desempenho
+ Bateria poderosa

Contra

- Desvantagens da tela 4K: tempos de resposta, apenas 60 Hz
- Funções secundárias não iluminadas
- Posicionamento das portas abaixo do ideal
- Mal posicionamento da webcam
- Bastante barulhento sob operação 3D
Aero 17 HDR, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany
Aero 17 HDR, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany

A atualização do Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR deve satisfazer quase todos os tipos de usuários.

Enquanto os criadores de conteúdo apreciam uma tela 4K brilhante com cores precisas, graças à CPU ao octa-core eGPU de gama alta, os gamers também recebem o que precisam. A Gigabyte também pensou em (quase) tudo o resto. A robusta carcaça com bons dispositivos de entrada e uma ampla quantidade de equipamentos de conexão, incluindo Thunderbolt 3. A duração da bateria também é impressionante para um portátil de jogos.

Se não fosse pelo desenvolvimento de alto ruído sob carga e alguns detalhes (posição desafortunada da webcam, falta de iluminação para funções secundárias e um posicionamento de porta que não é o ideal), gostaríamos muito de tudo sobre o Aero 17 HDR.

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB - 04/21/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
68 / 80 → 85%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
70 / 95 → 73%
Pantalha
94%
Desempenho do jogos
95%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Workstation
84%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
81%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB: Super Max-Q no início
Florian Glaser, 2020-04-23 (Update: 2024-11- 4)