Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)

Name: Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Brand: Gigabyte

Now with six cores. With Intel’s new Coffee-Lake architecture now being released, manufacturers upgrade their existing models. Gigabyte’s new Aero 15X v8 inherits the predecessor's slim bezel, but adds a 144 Hz panel and a hex-core processor.

Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/09/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Aero 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.92, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Single-Channel, 1 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB

, M.2-SSD

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Combinado fones/microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 356 x 250

Bateria

94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 215 W, DVD de controladores, guia do usuário, informação de garantia, ferramentas adicionais, Adobe Reader XI, MS Office Trial, XSplit Broadcaster Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.077 kg, Suprimento de energia: 566 g

Preço

2500 EUR

Links

Gigabyte página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

Acer Predator Triton 700 Asus Zephyrus M GM501 MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Gigabyte Aero 15X Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 DIN A4 ❌

Left: RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.1 Gen2, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5 mm audio jack

Right: SD card reader, Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB-A 3.0, DC-in, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	191 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	181 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -50%
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	204 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s -50%
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89 MB/s -63%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	585 MBit/s +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	551 MBit/s +45%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	524 MBit/s +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	354 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	698 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	684 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	682 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s


310 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	338 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	313 cd/m²	319 cd/m²
265 cd/m²	271 cd/m²	288 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 338 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 300.4 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 948:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-0%	28%	2%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	63.6	64.7 2%	91.6 44%	66.1 4%	62.5 -2%
sRGB Coverage	93.8	90.4 -4%	100 7%	92.7 -1%	88.7 -5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.9	65.7 1%	86.6 33%	67.2 4%	63.5 -2%
Response Times		-156%	40%	34%	-166%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)	43.2 ?(22.8, 20.4) -157%	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) 38%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 61%	44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6) -167%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 ?(6, 5.2)	28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8) -154%	6.6 ?(4.4, 2.2) 41%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 7%	29.6 ?(15.6, 14) -164%
PWM Frequency		26000 ?(20)	25510 ?(25)
Screen		-179%	-58%	-157%	-155%
Brightness middle	313	338 8%	269 -14%	307 -2%	291 -7%
Brightness	300	324 8%	254 -15%	296 -1%	277 -8%
Brightness Distribution	78	88 13%	85 9%	89 14%	84 8%
Black Level *	0.33	0.34 -3%	0.21 36%	0.25 24%	0.22 33%
Contrast	948	994 5%	1281 35%	1228 30%	1323 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.29	5.92 -359%	3 -133%	5.74 -345%	5.52 -328%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.04	11.77 -477%	5.62 -175%	11.32 -455%	10.72 -425%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.69	7.45 -980%	3.18 -361%	6.44 -833%	6.59 -855%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.58 ^85%	2.25 ^98%	2.48 ^89%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	6550 ^99%	6366 ^102%	7274 ^89%	8395 ^77%	7816 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	59 -2%	77 28%	60 0%	58 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	90 -4%	100 6%	93 -1%	89 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *				1.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-112% / -140%	3% / -28%	-40% / -100%	-108% / -126%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +59%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	158 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +202%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1168 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1133 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points -35%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -35%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points -35%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +68%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +188%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	13.29 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.93 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.21 Points -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.13 Points -37%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.93 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1133 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5277 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4910 - 5728, n=9)	5223 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5194 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5059 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4933 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4542 Points -10%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5160 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4627 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4393 - 5130, n=10)	4599 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4504 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4394 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4193 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5676 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5662 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (5323 - 5818, n=10)	5628 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5211 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5195 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5176 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4504 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5676 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5059 pontos
Ajuda

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD		39%	48%	37%	42%	6%
Seq Read	2213	2508 13%	2382 8%	2091 -6%	2517 14%	2096 ?(1794 - 2261, n=8) -5%
Seq Write	1163	1124 -3%	1281 10%	1580 36%	2372 104%	1175 ?(958 - 1342, n=8) 1%
4K Read	23.36	46.56 99%	51 118%	43.42 86%	41.47 78%	31 ?(19.5 - 41.4, n=8) 33%
4K Write	80.4	113.8 42%	124.7 55%	90.2 12%	93 16%	101.7 ?(60.8 - 133.8, n=8) 26%
Score Read	1092	1522 39%	1795 64%	1471 35%	1350 24%	1069 ?(962 - 1118, n=8) -2%
Score Write	939	1333 42%	1185 26%	1446 54%	1243 32%	869 ?(557 - 981, n=8) -7%
Score Total	2536	3570 41%	3848 52%	3649 44%	3282 29%	2444 ?(1979 - 2581, n=8) -4%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2627 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1375 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 332.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 268.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1404 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1335 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 37.65 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.4 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +107%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18120 Points +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17046 Points +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15156 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (14146 - 16165, n=16)	14910 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14607 Points -4%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14394 Points -5%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +129%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23694 Points +24%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21925 Points +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19162 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (17680 - 20829, n=18)	19016 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18689 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18205 Points -5%

3DMark 11 Performance		15502 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		152533 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34461 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13281 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +145%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	62.9 fps +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	59.4 fps +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	52.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (46 - 55.3, n=19)	51.5 fps -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	50.2 fps -4%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	92.8	52.4
FIFA 18 (2017)	153	152
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017)	89.4	83
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	88.9	78.5
Fortnite (2018)	122	101
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	51.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	64.8	50.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	79	75

Barulho

Ocioso		30 / 31 / 35 dB
Carga		49 / 54 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	4%	2%	0%	3%	12%
off / environment *	29	30 -3%	30 -3%	29 -0%	31 -7%	29.4 ?(28 - 30.7, n=15) -1%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	30	31 -3%	31 -3%	30 -0%	33 -10%	30.5 ?(28.5 - 33, n=16) -2%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	31	32 -3%	34 -10%	31 -0%	34 -10%	31.8 ?(28.5 - 37, n=16) -3%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Maximum *	35	36 -3%	35 -0%	33 6%	40 -14%	34.6 ?(28.6 - 43, n=16) 1%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 13%
Load Average *	49	39 20%	42 14%	49 -0%	41 16%	43.2 ?(35.2 - 49, n=16) 12%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	44 14%	44 14%	50 2%	43 16%
Load Maximum *	54	52 4%	46 15%	52 4%	48 11%	48.2 ?(40.2 - 54.2, n=16) 11%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48 °C	53 °C	52 °C
38 °C	44 °C	39 °C
36 °C	38 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C


65 °C	65 °C	53 °C
56 °C	57 °C	43 °C
39 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 65 °C
Médio: 50.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


25 °C	25 °C	24 °C
26 °C	25 °C	24 °C
26 °C	24 °C	24 °C

Máximo: 26 °C
Médio: 24.8 °C


26 °C	26 °C	27 °C
26 °C	28 °C	30 °C
24 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 26.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48 °C	50 °C	49 °C
35 °C	43 °C	38 °C
32 °C	37 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 40.8 °C


61 °C	61 °C	48 °C
54 °C	54 °C	41 °C
38 °C	39 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 48 °C

alimentação elétrica 43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Heat		9%	7%	1%	-10%	1%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	51 4%	47 11%	52 2%	61 -15%	52.1 ?(46.6 - 58, n=16) 2%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 13%
Maximum Bottom *	65	58 11%	63 3%	49 25%	69 -6%	57.3 ?(41.2 - 65, n=16) 12%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Upper Side *	26	25 4%	25 4%	31 -19%	29 -12%	29.2 ?(24 - 33, n=16) -12%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Bottom *	30	25 17%	27 10%	31 -3%	32 -7%	29.9 ?(25 - 34, n=16) -0%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) -8%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	14 / 18 / 22 Watt
Carga	91 / 173 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		17%	9%	-16%	-52%	6%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	14	10 29%	12 14%	16 -14%	28 -100%	11.4 ?(7 - 19.1, n=16) 19%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Average *	18	13 28%	16 11%	19 -6%	33 -83%	15.7 ?(11 - 20.8, n=16) 13%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	22	20 9%	21 5%	26 -18%	41 -86%	20.7 ?(13.7 - 29, n=16) 6%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -21%
Load Average *	91	79 13%	85 7%	103 -13%	94 -3%	98.1 ?(73.7 - 143, n=16) -8%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	142	120 15%	128 10%	164 -15%	160 -13%
Load Maximum *	173	165 5%	162 6%	223 -29%	222 -28%	173.8 ?(150.3 - 211, n=16) -0%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		12h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 36min

	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-3%	-57%	-65%	-72%	-29%
Reader / Idle	762	781 2%	340 -55%	237 -69%	150 -80%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) -26%
H.264	504	456 -10%	229 -55%	159 -68%	106 -79%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -19%
WiFi v1.3	513	491 -4%	232 -55%	164 -68%	144 -72%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -27%
Load	156	157 1%	61 -61%	70 -55%	70 -55%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -45%

Pro

+ Certificação X-Rite Pantone

+ Carcaça fina e leve

+ Ótima duração da bateria

+ Alta qualidade de construção

+ Marcos finos

+ Teclado RGB

+ Design discreto

+ Bom software adicional

+ Painel de 144 Hz

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Barulhento sob cargas 3D

- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso

- O som poderia ser melhor

- Brilho não perfeitamente distribuído

Aero 15X v8 test model provided by Gigabyte Germany

Quando se trata de portáteis finos e de alta qualidade, o Gigabyte Aero 15X e o Asus GM501 estão em uma disputa acirrada. Cada um traz consigo suas fortalezas e fraquezas individuais.

Enquanto o ROG Zephyrus M oferece um som relativamente bom e - apesar de uma GPU mais potente - menor temperatura e ruído, o portátil Gigabyte impressiona com uma melhor entrada, mais conexões e uma duração de bateria muito mais longa. O marco estreito da tela e o painel de cores precisas também o diferenciam da multidão.

No entanto, a Gigabyte deveria ter o ruído sob controle. Atualmente, o novo Aero 15X é bastante audível durante a carga 3D, o que pode impedir que usuários sensíveis ao ruído o comprem. O chip de seis núcleos da Intel leva o sistema de refrigeração ao limite com muito mais rapidez e frequência do que a CPU quad-core de seu antecessor.

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 - 04/04/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

87 / 98 → 89%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

70 / 81 → 86%

Peso

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

96%

Desempenho da aplicação

97%

Temperatura

75 / 95 → 79%

Ruído

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

74%

Médio

81%

88%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)

Florian Glaser, 2018-04- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison