Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)

Now with six cores. With Intel’s new Coffee-Lake architecture now being released, manufacturers upgrade their existing models. Gigabyte’s new Aero 15X v8 inherits the predecessor's slim bezel, but adds a 144 Hz panel and a hex-core processor.
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Aero 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.92, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Single-Channel, 1 de 2 slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB 
, M.2-SSD
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Combinado fones/microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 356 x 250
Bateria
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 215 W, DVD de controladores, guia do usuário, informação de garantia, ferramentas adicionais, Adobe Reader XI, MS Office Trial, XSplit Broadcaster Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.077 kg, Suprimento de energia: 566 g
Preço
2500 EUR
Links
Gigabyte página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

❌
393 mm 266 mm 18.9 mm 2.4 kg384 mm 261 mm 20 mm 2.5 kg380 mm 249 mm 17.7 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19.9 mm 2.2 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)
95.7 MB/s -50%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years)
119.6 MB/s -51%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s +45%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
524 MBit/s +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
354 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
698 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
684 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s
310
cd/m²		315
cd/m²		338
cd/m²
285
cd/m²		313
cd/m²		319
cd/m²
265
cd/m²		271
cd/m²		288
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 338 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 300.4 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 948:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 0.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15X
Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-0%
28%
2%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
63.6
64.7
2%
91.6
44%
66.1
4%
62.5
-2%
sRGB Coverage
93.8
90.4
-4%
100
7%
92.7
-1%
88.7
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.9
65.7
1%
86.6
33%
67.2
4%
63.5
-2%
Response Times
-156%
40%
34%
-166%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
43.2 ?(22.8, 20.4)
-157%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
38%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
61%
44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6)
-167%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-154%
6.6 ?(4.4, 2.2)
41%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
7%
29.6 ?(15.6, 14)
-164%
PWM Frequency
26000 ?(20)
25510 ?(25)
Screen
-179%
-58%
-157%
-155%
Brightness middle
313
338
8%
269
-14%
307
-2%
291
-7%
Brightness
300
324
8%
254
-15%
296
-1%
277
-8%
Brightness Distribution
78
88
13%
85
9%
89
14%
84
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.34
-3%
0.21
36%
0.25
24%
0.22
33%
Contrast
948
994
5%
1281
35%
1228
30%
1323
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.29
5.92
-359%
3
-133%
5.74
-345%
5.52
-328%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.04
11.77
-477%
5.62
-175%
11.32
-455%
10.72
-425%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.69
7.45
-980%
3.18
-361%
6.44
-833%
6.59
-855%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.58 85%
2.25 98%
2.48 89%
2.44 90%
CCT
6550 99%
6366 102%
7274 89%
8395 77%
7816 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
77
28%
60
0%
58
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
90
-4%
100
6%
93
-1%
89
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-112% / -140%
3% / -28%
-40% / -100%
-108% / -126%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
Latency
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=193, last 2 years)
277 Points +58%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=196, last 2 years)
3402 Points +200%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points -35%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points -35%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +68%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +188%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.29 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.21 Points -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points -37%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.93 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1133 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7775 Points +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5277 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4910 - 5728, n=9)
5223 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4933 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4542 Points -10%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4393 - 5130, n=10)
4599 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4394 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4193 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5323 - 5818, n=10)
5628 Points -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5195 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5176 Points -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4504 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5676 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5059 pontos
Ajuda
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Gigabyte Aero 15X
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)		Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
 
AS SSD
39%
48%
37%
42%
6%
Seq Read
2213
2508
13%
2382
8%
2091
-6%
2517
14%
2096 ?(1794 - 2261, n=8)
-5%
Seq Write
1163
1124
-3%
1281
10%
1580
36%
2372
104%
1175 ?(958 - 1342, n=8)
1%
4K Read
23.36
46.56
99%
51
118%
43.42
86%
41.47
78%
31 ?(19.5 - 41.4, n=8)
33%
4K Write
80.4
113.8
42%
124.7
55%
90.2
12%
93
16%
101.7 ?(60.8 - 133.8, n=8)
26%
Score Read
1092
1522
39%
1795
64%
1471
35%
1350
24%
1069 ?(962 - 1118, n=8)
-2%
Score Write
939
1333
42%
1185
26%
1446
54%
1243
32%
869 ?(557 - 981, n=8)
-7%
Score Total
2536
3570
41%
3848
52%
3649
44%
3282
29%
2444 ?(1979 - 2581, n=8)
-4%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2627 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1375 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 332.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 268.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1404 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1335 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 37.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.4 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31337 Points +107%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18120 Points +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17046 Points +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (14146 - 16165, n=16)
14910 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14607 Points -4%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14394 Points -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=184, last 2 years)
43666 Points +128%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23694 Points +24%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
21925 Points +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (17680 - 20829, n=18)
19016 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18689 Points -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18205 Points -5%
3DMark 11 Performance
15502 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
152533 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34461 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13281 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years)
127.4 fps +143%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
62.9 fps +20%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
59.4 fps +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
52.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
52.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (46 - 55.3, n=19)
51.5 fps -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
50.2 fps -4%
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 92.8 52.4
FIFA 18 (2017) 153 152
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 89.4 83
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 88.9 78.5
Fortnite (2018) 122 101
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 51.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 64.8 50.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 79 75

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 31 / 35 dB
Carga
49 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
4%
2%
0%
3%
12%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
31
-7%
29.4 ?(28 - 30.7, n=15)
-1%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=155, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
31
-3%
30
-0%
33
-10%
30.5 ?(28.5 - 33, n=16)
-2%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=156, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
31
32
-3%
34
-10%
31
-0%
34
-10%
31.8 ?(28.5 - 37, n=16)
-3%
27.3 ?(23 - 37.5, n=156, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
35
36
-3%
35
-0%
33
6%
40
-14%
34.6 ?(28.6 - 43, n=16)
1%
30.3 ?(23 - 47, n=156, last 2 years)
13%
Load Average *
49
39
20%
42
14%
49
-0%
41
16%
43.2 ?(35.2 - 49, n=16)
12%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=156, last 2 years)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
44
14%
44
14%
50
2%
43
16%
Load Maximum *
54
52
4%
46
15%
52
4%
48
11%
48.2 ?(40.2 - 54.2, n=16)
11%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=156, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 48 °C53 °C52 °C 
 38 °C44 °C39 °C 
 36 °C38 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C
65 °C65 °C53 °C
56 °C57 °C43 °C
39 °C40 °C38 °C
Máximo: 65 °C
Médio: 50.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
7%
1%
-10%
1%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
51
4%
47
11%
52
2%
61
-15%
52.1 ?(46.6 - 58, n=16)
2%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years)
13%
Maximum Bottom *
65
58
11%
63
3%
49
25%
69
-6%
57.3 ?(41.2 - 65, n=16)
12%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years)
24%
Idle Upper Side *
26
25
4%
25
4%
31
-19%
29
-12%
29.2 ?(24 - 33, n=16)
-12%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Bottom *
30
25
17%
27
10%
31
-3%
32
-7%
29.9 ?(25 - 34, n=16)
-0%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.144.62535.6403128.430.44033.537.75026.428.56325.527.48029.23010028.932.312524.532.916021.141.520020.748.525020.955.931519.561.240018.465.150018.366.463017.567.68001867.9100018.665.3125017.469.2160016.765.8200017.264.5250017.365.9315017.268400017.257.3500017.256.4630017.261.1800017.3661000017.262.21250017.259.6160001754.1SPL29.777.5N1.342.2median 17.4median 62.2Delta1.86.935.935.83030.626.127.431.6312627.124.830.326.535.725.238.623.629.522.335.921.94320.752.820.360.119.364.61966.818.772.11876.218.184.6188618.279.917.974.61869.618.169.917.963.61862.31869.817.963.717.860.317.757.317.657.930.3901.467.4median 18.1median 64.61.16.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15X v8MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 22 Watt
Carga midlight 91 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
17%
9%
-16%
-52%
6%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
14
10
29%
12
14%
16
-14%
28
-100%
11.4 ?(7 - 19.1, n=16)
19%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
18
13
28%
16
11%
19
-6%
33
-83%
15.7 ?(11 - 20.8, n=16)
13%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
22
20
9%
21
5%
26
-18%
41
-86%
20.7 ?(13.7 - 29, n=16)
6%
26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years)
-21%
Load Average *
91
79
13%
85
7%
103
-13%
94
-3%
98.1 ?(73.7 - 143, n=16)
-8%
106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
142
120
15%
128
10%
164
-15%
160
-13%
Load Maximum *
173
165
5%
162
6%
223
-29%
222
-28%
173.8 ?(150.3 - 211, n=16)
-0%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=155, last 2 years)
-44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 36min
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh		MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh		Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
-57%
-65%
-72%
-29%
Reader / Idle
762
781
2%
340
-55%
237
-69%
150
-80%
566 ?(155 - 1290, n=68, last 2 years)
-26%
H.264
504
456
-10%
229
-55%
159
-68%
106
-79%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
513
491
-4%
232
-55%
164
-68%
144
-72%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=155, last 2 years)
-27%
Load
156
157
1%
61
-61%
70
-55%
70
-55%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=119, last 2 years)
-45%

Pro

+ Certificação X-Rite Pantone
+ Carcaça fina e leve
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ Alta qualidade de construção
+ Marcos finos
+ Teclado RGB
+ Design discreto
+ Bom software adicional
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Barulhento sob cargas 3D
- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso
- O som poderia ser melhor
- Brilho não perfeitamente distribuído
Aero 15X v8 test model provided by Gigabyte Germany
Aero 15X v8 test model provided by Gigabyte Germany

Quando se trata de portáteis finos e de alta qualidade, o Gigabyte Aero 15X e o Asus GM501 estão em uma disputa acirrada. Cada um traz consigo suas fortalezas e fraquezas individuais.

Enquanto o ROG Zephyrus M oferece um som relativamente bom e - apesar de uma GPU mais potente - menor temperatura e ruído, o portátil Gigabyte impressiona com uma melhor entrada, mais conexões e uma duração de bateria muito mais longa. O marco estreito da tela e o painel de cores precisas também o diferenciam da multidão.

No entanto, a Gigabyte deveria ter o ruído sob controle. Atualmente, o novo Aero 15X é bastante audível durante a carga 3D, o que pode impedir que usuários sensíveis ao ruído o comprem. O chip de seis núcleos da Intel leva o sistema de refrigeração ao limite com muito mais rapidez e frequência do que a CPU quad-core de seu antecessor.

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 - 04/04/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
70 / 81 → 86%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
96%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
75 / 95 → 79%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
74%
Médio
81%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-04- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)