Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 |
|
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 313 cd/m²
Contraste: 948:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 0.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 28% | 2% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.6 | 64.7 2% | 91.6 44% | 66.1 4% | 62.5 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.8 | 90.4 -4% | 100 7% | 92.7 -1% | 88.7 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.9 | 65.7 1% | 86.6 33% | 67.2 4% | 63.5 -2% |
Response Times | -156% | 40% | 34% | -166% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 43.2 ? -157% | 10.4 ? 38% | 6.6 ? 61% | 44.8 ? -167% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 28.4 ? -154% | 6.6 ? 41% | 10.4 ? 7% | 29.6 ? -164% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | 25510 ? | |||
Screen | -179% | -58% | -157% | -155% | |
Brightness middle | 313 | 338 8% | 269 -14% | 307 -2% | 291 -7% |
Brightness | 300 | 324 8% | 254 -15% | 296 -1% | 277 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 78 | 88 13% | 85 9% | 89 14% | 84 8% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.34 -3% | 0.21 36% | 0.25 24% | 0.22 33% |
Contrast | 948 | 994 5% | 1281 35% | 1228 30% | 1323 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.29 | 5.92 -359% | 3 -133% | 5.74 -345% | 5.52 -328% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.04 | 11.77 -477% | 5.62 -175% | 11.32 -455% | 10.72 -425% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.69 | 7.45 -980% | 3.18 -361% | 6.44 -833% | 6.59 -855% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.58 85% | 2.25 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6550 99% | 6366 102% | 7274 89% | 8395 77% | 7816 83% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 59 -2% | 77 28% | 60 0% | 58 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 90 -4% | 100 6% | 93 -1% | 89 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.94 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -112% /
-140% | 3% /
-28% | -40% /
-100% | -108% /
-126% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4504 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5676 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5059 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 39% | 48% | 37% | 42% | 6% | |
Seq Read | 2213 | 2508 13% | 2382 8% | 2091 -6% | 2517 14% | 2096 ? -5% |
Seq Write | 1163 | 1124 -3% | 1281 10% | 1580 36% | 2372 104% | 1175 ? 1% |
4K Read | 23.36 | 46.56 99% | 51 118% | 43.42 86% | 41.47 78% | 31 ? 33% |
4K Write | 80.4 | 113.8 42% | 124.7 55% | 90.2 12% | 93 16% | 101.7 ? 26% |
Score Read | 1092 | 1522 39% | 1795 64% | 1471 35% | 1350 24% | 1069 ? -2% |
Score Write | 939 | 1333 42% | 1185 26% | 1446 54% | 1243 32% | 869 ? -7% |
Score Total | 2536 | 3570 41% | 3848 52% | 3649 44% | 3282 29% | 2444 ? -4% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 15502 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 152533 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34461 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13281 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (46 - 55.3, n=19) | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 92.8 | 52.4 | ||
FIFA 18 (2017) | 153 | 152 | ||
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 89.4 | 83 | ||
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 88.9 | 78.5 | ||
Fortnite (2018) | 122 | 101 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.7 | |||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 64.8 | 50.2 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 79 | 75 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30 / 31 / 35 dB |
Carga |
| 49 / 54 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 4% | 2% | 0% | 3% | 12% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 29.4 ? -1% | 24 ? 17% |
Idle Minimum * | 30 | 31 -3% | 31 -3% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% | 30.5 ? -2% | 25.4 ? 15% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 32 -3% | 34 -10% | 31 -0% | 34 -10% | 31.8 ? -3% | 27.1 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 36 -3% | 35 -0% | 33 6% | 40 -14% | 34.6 ? 1% | 30.1 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 49 | 39 20% | 42 14% | 49 -0% | 41 16% | 43.2 ? 12% | 42.4 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 44 14% | 44 14% | 50 2% | 43 16% | ||
Load Maximum * | 54 | 52 4% | 46 15% | 52 4% | 48 11% | 48.2 ? 11% | 53.4 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 9% | 7% | 1% | -10% | 1% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 51 4% | 47 11% | 52 2% | 61 -15% | 52.1 ? 2% | 46.2 ? 13% |
Maximum Bottom * | 65 | 58 11% | 63 3% | 49 25% | 69 -6% | 57.3 ? 12% | 49.2 ? 24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 25 4% | 25 4% | 31 -19% | 29 -12% | 29.2 ? -12% | 31.1 ? -20% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 25 17% | 27 10% | 31 -3% | 32 -7% | 29.9 ? -0% | 32.2 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.5 / 0.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 14 / 18 / 22 Watt |
Carga |
91 / 173 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 9% | -16% | -52% | 6% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 14 | 10 29% | 12 14% | 16 -14% | 28 -100% | 11.4 ? 19% | 13.5 ? 4% |
Idle Average * | 18 | 13 28% | 16 11% | 19 -6% | 33 -83% | 15.7 ? 13% | 19 ? -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 20 9% | 21 5% | 26 -18% | 41 -86% | 20.7 ? 6% | 26.7 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 91 | 79 13% | 85 7% | 103 -13% | 94 -3% | 98.1 ? -8% | 106.7 ? -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 142 | 120 15% | 128 10% | 164 -15% | 160 -13% | ||
Load Maximum * | 173 | 165 5% | 162 6% | 223 -29% | 222 -28% | 173.8 ? -0% | 251 ? -45% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -57% | -65% | -72% | -29% | |
Reader / Idle | 762 | 781 2% | 340 -55% | 237 -69% | 150 -80% | 565 ? -26% |
H.264 | 504 | 456 -10% | 229 -55% | 159 -68% | 106 -79% | 408 ? -19% |
WiFi v1.3 | 513 | 491 -4% | 232 -55% | 164 -68% | 144 -72% | 375 ? -27% |
Load | 156 | 157 1% | 61 -61% | 70 -55% | 70 -55% | 85.3 ? -45% |
Pro
Contra
Quando se trata de portáteis finos e de alta qualidade, o Gigabyte Aero 15X e o Asus GM501 estão em uma disputa acirrada. Cada um traz consigo suas fortalezas e fraquezas individuais.
Enquanto o ROG Zephyrus M oferece um som relativamente bom e - apesar de uma GPU mais potente - menor temperatura e ruído, o portátil Gigabyte impressiona com uma melhor entrada, mais conexões e uma duração de bateria muito mais longa. O marco estreito da tela e o painel de cores precisas também o diferenciam da multidão.
No entanto, a Gigabyte deveria ter o ruído sob controle. Atualmente, o novo Aero 15X é bastante audível durante a carga 3D, o que pode impedir que usuários sensíveis ao ruído o comprem. O chip de seis núcleos da Intel leva o sistema de refrigeração ao limite com muito mais rapidez e frequência do que a CPU quad-core de seu antecessor.
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
-
04/04/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser