Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15X (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 338 cd/m²
Contraste: 994:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eurocom Q5 ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | 1% | -5% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.7 | 48.21 -25% | 65.2 1% | 62.1 -4% | 63 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.4 | 72.6 -20% | 92.5 2% | 85.6 -5% | 92.7 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 49.81 -24% | 66.5 1% | 62.4 -5% | 64.4 -2% |
| Response Times | -14% | -4% | 12% | 12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 28 ? 35% | 42.8 ? 1% | 33.2 ? 23% | 32.4 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.4 ? | 23.6 ? 17% | 32 ? -13% | 28 ? 1% | 28.8 ? -1% |
| PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | 1351 ? -95% | 26000 ? 0% | ||
| Screen | -22% | 4% | 11% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 338 | 274.2 -19% | 320 -5% | 307.1 -9% | 287.5 -15% |
| Brightness | 324 | 263 -19% | 316 -2% | 309 -5% | 279 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 92 5% | 90 2% | 86 -2% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.44 -29% | 0.36 -6% | 0.35 -3% | 0.65 -91% |
| Contrast | 994 | 623 -37% | 889 -11% | 877 -12% | 442 -56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.92 | 8 -35% | 4.62 22% | 3.4 43% | 4.5 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.77 | 14.6 -24% | 9.75 17% | 8.2 30% | 8.9 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.45 | 9.1 -22% | 6 19% | 1.4 81% | 4.6 38% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% | 2.19 100% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 6366 102% | 5020 129% | 6761 96% | 6558 99% | 7393 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 45.7 -23% | 60 2% | 55.6 -6% | 59 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 72.1 -20% | 92 2% | 85 -6% | 92.3 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-21% | 0% /
2% | 6% /
8% | 1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
| Eurocom Q5 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6288 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4394 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5546 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5195 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4933 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15 Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 19% | 13% | |
| Read Seq | 1381 | 2141 55% | 1769 28% |
| Write Seq | 1546 | 1621 5% | 1133 -27% |
| Read 512 | 418 | 499.7 20% | 891 113% |
| Write 512 | 1277 | 1531 20% | 1069 -16% |
| Read 4k | 51.3 | 54.2 6% | 44.7 -13% |
| Write 4k | 131 | 158.2 21% | 123.3 -6% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 544 | 632 16% | 645 19% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 480.2 | 527 10% | 490.5 2% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27822 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14847 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 130556 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27624 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12166 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6378 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4575 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 478.7 | 439.3 | 371.5 | 185.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 249 | 210.1 | 194.4 | 123.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 232.8 | 164.8 | 94.5 | 52.4 |
| For Honor (2017) | 203.9 | 128.6 | 122.7 | 96 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 148.4 | 86 | 78.6 | 43.7 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 132 | 114 | 90 | 69 |
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 88.5 | 53.3 | 54 | 53.8 |
| ELEX (2017) | 122.5 | 107.3 | 86.7 | 66.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 36 dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 15X i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 0% | 0% | 9% | -10% | -9% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 28.5 5% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 33.1 -7% | 30 3% | 32 -3% | 28.5 8% | 33 -6% | 35 -13% | 34 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 33.1 -3% | 33 -3% | 33 -3% | 28.5 11% | 35 -9% | 36 -13% | 35 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 34 6% | 37 -3% | 34 6% | 30.1 16% | 40 -11% | 40 -11% | 39 -8% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 37.2 5% | 41 -5% | 39 -0% | 35.2 10% | 48 -23% | 43 -10% | 39 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 46.1 -5% | 42 5% | 43 2% | 41.7 5% | 50 -14% | 49 -11% | 48 -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 47.1 9% | 50 4% | 50 4% | 48.8 6% | 55 -6% | 55 -6% | 49 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
| Gigabyte Aero 15X i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -16% | -22% | -3% | -3% | -6% | -15% | -27% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47 8% | 56 -10% | 54.4 -7% | 48 6% | 64 -25% | 65 -27% | |
| Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 54 7% | 61 -5% | 41.2 29% | 47 19% | 56 3% | 71 -22% | |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 28.4 -14% | 36 -44% | 25 -0% | 31.2 -25% | 29 -16% | 29 -16% | 35 -40% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 29.6 -18% | 40 -60% | 24 4% | 27.6 -10% | 33 -32% | 30 -20% | 30 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 5.2 / 5.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 13 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
79 / 165 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -32% | -5% | -28% | -24% | -81% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 14.5 -45% | 18 -80% | 12 -20% | 19.1 -91% | 11 -10% | 26 -160% | 13 -30% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 17.3 -33% | 23 -77% | 15 -15% | 20.8 -60% | 16 -23% | 31 -138% | 17 -31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 17.4 13% | 30 -50% | 20 -0% | 21.8 -9% | 21 -5% | 36 -80% | 22 -10% |
| Load Average * | 79 | 93 -18% | 85 -8% | 82 -4% | 73.7 7% | 92 -16% | 93 -18% | 85 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 120 | 128.8 -7% | 96 20% | 111 7% | 130.2 -9% | 185 -54% | 176 -47% | 154 -28% |
| Load Maximum * | 165 | 158 4% | 161 2% | 173.1 -5% | 224 -36% | 240 -45% | 208 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte Aero 15X i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Razer Blade (2017) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | -52% | 11% | -57% | -15% | -70% | |
| Reader / Idle | 781 | 501 -36% | 386 -51% | 256 -67% | 638 -18% | 229 -71% | |
| H.264 | 456 | 224 -51% | 464 2% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 491 | 357 -27% | 232 -53% | 545 11% | 198 -60% | 422 -14% | 147 -70% |
| Load | 157 | 144 -8% | 75 -52% | 80 -49% | 112 -29% | 49 -69% |
Pro
Contra
Graças ao seu poderoso hardware, o fino e elegante Aero 15X consegue rodar todos os jogos atuais com facilidade, com detalhes altos ou mesmo máximos na tela FHD mate.
Apesar do hardware poderoso, a duração da bateria é surpreendentemente decente.
Embora o Aero 15X seja principalmente um portátil de multimídia/jogos, a Gigabyte não esqueceu os cenários de uso diário. Equipado com um teclado decente, o portátil é capaz de funcionar silenciosamente e acabou por ser surpreendentemente portátil graças à sua bateria de alta capacidade que conseguiu manter o aparelho funcionando durante 8:11 horas em nosso teste Wi-Fi realista.
O desempenho global do sistema é muito rápido graças ao SSD NVMe, que pode ser substituído pelo usuário. O espaço de armazenamento adicional pode ser instalado no segundo slot M.2, no entanto, não há espaço para um disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas. A tela FHD mate oferece ângulos de visão decentes, brilho adequado e uma relação de contraste muito boa. Infelizmente, os tempos de resposta estão no lado lento e poderiam ser um pouco mais rápidos.
Gigabyte Aero 15X
- 11/01/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
