Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 350 cd/m²
Contraste: 1207:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.62
ΔE Greyscale 1.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB), IPS, 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | -22% | -22% | -22% | -21% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 86.8 | 63.5 -27% | 66.2 -24% | 66.7 -23% | 64.2 -26% | 65.3 -25% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 93.1 -7% | 92.1 -8% | 91.2 -9% | 92.6 -7% | 94.9 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.7 | 64.5 -35% | 67.2 -33% | 66.7 -33% | 65.7 -34% | 66.3 -34% |
Response Times | 63% | 64% | 77% | 74% | 66% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 16.4 ? 73% | 17.6 ? 71% | 7.4 ? 88% | 8 ? 87% | 16.8 ? 72% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 13.6 ? 53% | 12.8 ? 56% | 10 ? 65% | 11.2 ? 61% | 11.6 ? 60% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -27% | -62% | -75% | -143% | -81% | |
Brightness middle | 350 | 250 -29% | 254 -27% | 294 -16% | 304 -13% | 314.7 -10% |
Brightness | 337 | 235 -30% | 262 -22% | 275 -18% | 299 -11% | 312 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 89 -3% | 90 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.29 -0% | 0.22 24% | 0.24 17% | 0.27 7% | 0.38 -31% |
Contrast | 1207 | 862 -29% | 1155 -4% | 1225 1% | 1126 -7% | 828 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.93 | 1.46 -57% | 2.37 -155% | 2.57 -176% | 4.66 -401% | 2.56 -175% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.43 | 2.47 -73% | 4.71 -229% | 4.88 -241% | 9.65 -575% | 4.89 -242% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.62 | 1.84 -197% | 2.14 -245% | 1.72 -177% | 1.71 -176% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.21 | 1.27 -5% | 1.58 -31% | 2.41 -99% | 5.53 -357% | 3.4 -181% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.5 88% | 2.5 88% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6672 97% | 6749 96% | 6785 96% | 6370 102% | 8028 81% | 6435 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88 | 60 -32% | 60 -32% | 59 -33% | 60 -32% | 60.7 -31% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 93 -7% | 92 -8% | 91 -9% | 93 -7% | 94.6 -5% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
-14% | -7% /
-39% | -7% /
-46% | -30% /
-93% | -12% /
-51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise | |
↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Edge 44) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=181, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Edge 44) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 6905 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3944 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5164 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4775 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5743 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | -6% | -20% | 14% | -6% | |
Write 4K | 109.4 | 97.1 -11% | 95.3 -13% | 98.2 -10% | 93.6 -14% | 93.9 -14% |
Read 4K | 56.6 | 53.7 -5% | 40.13 -29% | 39.43 -30% | 38.82 -31% | 40.56 -28% |
Write Seq | 1508 | 1526 1% | 1883 25% | 1386 -8% | 2455 63% | 1468 -3% |
Read Seq | 2427 | 2020 -17% | 1322 -46% | 1100 -55% | 2107 -13% | 1540 -37% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 307 | 285.6 -7% | 309.9 1% | 270.3 -12% | 298.7 -3% | 293.5 -4% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 351.3 | 321.8 -8% | 353.7 1% | 340.3 -3% | 338.7 -4% | 346 -2% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1523 | 1533 1% | 1919 26% | 1454 -5% | 2902 91% | 1941 27% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2825 | 2351 -17% | 2466 -13% | 1681 -40% | 3536 25% | 3266 16% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38435 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 19220 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 66387 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29945 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16020 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6399 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 280.1 | 197.5 | 187.8 | 137.6 | |
GTA V (2015) | 140 | 135.3 | 115.4 | 62.6 | 74 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 255 | 192.7 | 117.3 | 65.7 | 39.6 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 91 | 80.5 | 67.2 | 51.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 114 | 94 | 88 | 84 | 34 |
Darksiders III (2018) | 137 | 103.5 | 94.3 | 84.8 | 29.8 |
Apex Legends (2019) | 143.7 | 137.1 | 111.8 | 109.9 | 36 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 101 | 88 | 82 | 74 | 36 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 116.7 | 77.7 | 58.2 | 47.8 | 20.9 |
Anthem (2019) | 84.5 | 73.7 | 72.1 | 67.4 | 26.4 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 157.8 | 116.1 | 101.1 | 66.3 | 31.2 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 132 | 97 | 84 | 69 | 26 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite | |||
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | 137.6 | 127.7 -7% | 118.9 ? -14% |
X-Plane 11.11 | |||
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | 67.2 | 61.6 -8% | 55.8 ? -17% |
Far Cry 5 | |||
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | 84 | 67 -20% | 66 ? -21% |
Darksiders III | |||
1920x1080 Epic | 84.8 | 64.9 -23% | 81.4 ? -4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-15% | -14% /
-14% |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31 / 33 / 36 dB |
Carga |
| 44 / 45 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 3% | -9% | 0% | 8% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 28.8 1% | 24 ? 17% |
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 32 -3% | 30 3% | 33 -6% | 30 3% | 28.8 7% | 25.4 ? 18% |
Idle Average * | 33 | 34 -3% | 31 6% | 34 -3% | 32 3% | 28.8 13% | 27.1 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 36 | 36 -0% | 34 6% | 40 -11% | 34 6% | 29.4 18% | 30.1 ? 16% |
Load Average * | 44 | 42 5% | 43 2% | 47 -7% | 44 -0% | 35.7 19% | 42.4 ? 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 44 -2% | 42 2% | 51 -19% | 46 -7% | 42.5 1% | |
Load Maximum * | 45 | 48 -7% | 44 2% | 53 -18% | 47 -4% | 45 -0% | 53.4 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 69 °C / 156 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 16% | 6% | 3% | 18% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 64 | 56 12% | 49 23% | 54 16% | 49 23% | 49 23% | 46.2 ? 28% |
Maximum Bottom * | 69 | 66 4% | 63 9% | 60 13% | 58 16% | 49 29% | 49.2 ? 29% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 27 7% | 24 17% | 30 -3% | 33 -14% | 25.4 12% | 31.1 ? -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 27 7% | 25 14% | 30 -3% | 33 -14% | 27.2 6% | 32.2 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.5 / 1.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 17 / 21 / 27 Watt |
Carga |
111 / 183 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 12% | 24% | -6% | -1% | 18% | -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17 | 16 6% | 7 59% | 17 -0% | 16 6% | 10.4 39% | 13.5 ? 21% |
Idle Average * | 21 | 18 14% | 11 48% | 20 5% | 22 -5% | 14.6 30% | 19 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 23 15% | 20 26% | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 16.3 40% | 26.7 ? 1% |
Load Average * | 111 | 88 21% | 98 12% | 112 -1% | 89 20% | 88.5 20% | 106.7 ? 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 130 | 120 8% | 132 -2% | 152 -17% | 147 -13% | 155.4 -20% | |
Load Maximum * | 183 | 167 9% | 182 1% | 211 -15% | 173 5% | 182.4 -0% | 251 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 9% | -12% | -63% | -44% | -3% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 561 | 549 -2% | 507 -10% | 213 -62% | 335 -40% | 682 22% | 565 ? 1% |
H.264 | 332 | 364 10% | 356 7% | 408 ? 23% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 354 | 382 8% | 362 2% | 157 -56% | 190 -46% | 387 9% | 375 ? 6% |
Load | 147 | 174 18% | 81 -45% | 42 -71% | 81 -45% | 88 -40% | 85.3 ? -42% |
Pro
Contra
A unidade na nossa frente hoje, o Aero 15-Y9, representa o modelo carro chefe da gama Aero-15 e, como esperado, o fabricante teve como objetivo impressionar: A Gigabyte usou o melhor para esta configuração. A combinação de uma CPU Core i9-8950HK e GPU GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q permite uma experiência de jogo fluente com resolução FHD e com configurações de detalhes médios a máximos em sua tela 4K mate.
No entanto, o portátil é equipado apenas com uma variante Max-Q (80 W) da RTX 2080.
Como resultado, o Aero 15-Y9 não é realmente capaz de se distanciar do Aero 15-X9 equipado com RTX 2070 Max-Q. Ao executar no mesmo modo de RAM (canal único/canal duplo), os dois dispositivos frequentemente ofereciam taxas de quadros semelhantes. Como resultado, a maioria dos potenciais compradores estaria melhor servida pela versão mais barata do RTX 2070 Max-Q do Aero.
O SSD NVMe incluído oferece não apenas excelentes taxas de transferência, mas também muito espaço de armazenamento (2 TB). Internamente, o portátil também possui um slot adicional para um segundo SSD M.2 2280. Nenhum slot está disponível para uma unidade de 2,5 polegadas no Aero 15.
A tela IPS 4K mate impressionou com bons ângulos de visão, bom brilho e contraste e impressionante reprodução de cores. No entanto, os tempos de reação ficam claramente atrás do Aero 15-X9 equipado com um painel de 144 Hz. A duração da bateria também está um pouco atrás do Aero 15-X9. Isso não é surpresa e é esperado da tela 4K. No entanto, em geral, o desempenho da bateria foi muito bom para um portátil de jogos.
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
-
05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck