Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Name: Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Brand: Gigabyte

Well endowed.

O bem equipado Aero 15-Y9 permite que (quase) todos os jogos sejam rodados fluentemente em sua tela 4K mate. No entanto, a Gigabyte escolheu equipar o portátil apenas com a variante Max-Q da GeForce 2080. Como resultado, não é capaz de oferecer muito mais desempenho de jogos acima dos modelos Aero-15 com GPUs RTX 2070 Max-Q.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Aero 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus

Memória

64 GB

, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, dois bancos (ambos em uso)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB), IPS, 60 Hz, 4K/UHD, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8, 2048 GB

, 2x M.2-2280 (um slot em uso)

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356 x 250

Bateria

94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 15.2 V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo (2x 2W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, XSplit Gamecaster, XSplit Broadcaster, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.118 kg, Suprimento de energia: 718 g

Preço

4999 Euro

Links

Gigabyte página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Triton 500 Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	200 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	191 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -51%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)	120.4 MB/s -50%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	662 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	655 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	673 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	671 MBit/s 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -2%


333 cd/m²	346 cd/m²	343 cd/m²
332 cd/m²	350 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
333 cd/m²	351 cd/m²	322 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 351 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 337.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 350 cd/m²
Contraste: 1207:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.62
ΔE Greyscale 1.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 (AUO31EB), IPS, 3840x2160	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-23%	-22%	-22%	-22%	-21%
Display P3 Coverage	86.8	63.5 -27%	66.2 -24%	66.7 -23%	64.2 -26%	65.3 -25%
sRGB Coverage	100	93.1 -7%	92.1 -8%	91.2 -9%	92.6 -7%	94.9 -5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.7	64.5 -35%	67.2 -33%	66.7 -33%	65.7 -34%	66.3 -34%
Response Times		63%	64%	77%	74%	66%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	60 ?(29.2, 30.8)	16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6) 73%	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) 71%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 88%	8 ?(4, 4) 87%	16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6) 72%
Response Time Black / White *	28.8 ?(13.2, 15.6)	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) 53%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) 56%	10 ?(4.4, 5.6) 65%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 61%	11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4) 60%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-27%	-62%	-75%	-143%	-81%
Brightness middle	350	250 -29%	254 -27%	294 -16%	304 -13%	314.7 -10%
Brightness	337	235 -30%	262 -22%	275 -18%	299 -11%	312 -7%
Brightness Distribution	92	85 -8%	89 -3%	84 -9%	89 -3%	90 -2%
Black Level *	0.29	0.29 -0%	0.22 24%	0.24 17%	0.27 7%	0.38 -31%
Contrast	1207	862 -29%	1155 -4%	1225 1%	1126 -7%	828 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.93	1.46 -57%	2.37 -155%	2.57 -176%	4.66 -401%	2.56 -175%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.43	2.47 -73%	4.71 -229%	4.88 -241%	9.65 -575%	4.89 -242%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.62		1.84 -197%	2.14 -245%	1.72 -177%	1.71 -176%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.21	1.27 -5%	1.58 -31%	2.41 -99%	5.53 -357%	3.4 -181%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.4 ^92%	2.48 ^89%	2.5 ^88%	2.5 ^88%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6672 ^97%	6749 ^96%	6785 ^96%	6370 ^102%	8028 ^81%	6435 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	88	60 -32%	60 -32%	59 -33%	60 -32%	60.7 -31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	93 -7%	92 -8%	91 -9%	93 -7%	94.6 -5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / -14%	-7% / -39%	-7% / -46%	-30% / -93%	-12% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29.2 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1157 (1138.53-1236.86)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)

Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)

CPU clock speed during the Cinebench 15 run

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7089

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37099

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6820

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

193 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1237 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

115.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

2379 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

387 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +44%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	193 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +178%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	1237 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1120 Points -9%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1019 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	999 Points -19%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)	9755 Points +38%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	7089 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	6351 Points -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)	63783 Points +72%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	37099 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	33923 Points -9%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points +88%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	387 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +251%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	2379 Points

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	23881 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	21358 Points -11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	4511 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	3741 Points -17%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)	54312 Points +119%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	24847 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	18716 Points -25%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)	8126 Points +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK	5682 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	4810 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	1138 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	1126 ms * -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)	1014 ms *
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)	502 ms * +50%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=55, last 2 years)	95682 Points +153%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)	37865 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	33659 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	30594 Points -19%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=32, last 2 years)	528 Points +92%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK (Edge 44)	274.9 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)	255.9 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	245.4 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		6905 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3944 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5164 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4775 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5743 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +36%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	5883 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8	5743 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5416 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5170 Points -10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points -11%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4659 - 5937, n=18, last 2 years)	5259 Points +33%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4665 Points +18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4620 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	4338 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4150 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8	3944 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6712, n=16, last 2 years)	6051 Points +27%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5706 Points +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5645 Points +18%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5621 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5607 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8	4775 Points

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8

Sequential Read: 2369 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1450 MB/s

512K Read: 1386 MB/s

512K Write: 1439 MB/s

4K Read: 62.5 MB/s

4K Write: 136.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 590 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 464.6 MB/s

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-8%	-6%	-20%	14%	-6%
Write 4K	109.4	97.1 -11%	95.3 -13%	98.2 -10%	93.6 -14%	93.9 -14%
Read 4K	56.6	53.7 -5%	40.13 -29%	39.43 -30%	38.82 -31%	40.56 -28%
Write Seq	1508	1526 1%	1883 25%	1386 -8%	2455 63%	1468 -3%
Read Seq	2427	2020 -17%	1322 -46%	1100 -55%	2107 -13%	1540 -37%
Write 4K Q32T1	307	285.6 -7%	309.9 1%	270.3 -12%	298.7 -3%	293.5 -4%
Read 4K Q32T1	351.3	321.8 -8%	353.7 1%	340.3 -3%	338.7 -4%	346 -2%
Write Seq Q32T1	1523	1533 1%	1919 26%	1454 -5%	2902 91%	1941 27%
Read Seq Q32T1	2825	2351 -17%	2466 -13%	1681 -40%	3536 25%	3266 16%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		38435 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		19220 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		66387 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		29945 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		16020 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6399 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points +74%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18153 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	18048 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17598 Points -2%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14780 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +103%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6728 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6562 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	6464 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43891 Points +88%
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28083 Points +20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	23386 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22723 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points -6%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points -20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18296 Points -22%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	280.1	197.5	187.8	137.6
GTA V (2015)	140	135.3	115.4	62.6	74
The Witcher 3 (2015)	255	192.7	117.3	65.7	39.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	91	80.5	67.2		51.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	114	94	88	84	34
Darksiders III (2018)	137	103.5	94.3	84.8	29.8
Apex Legends (2019)	143.7	137.1	111.8	109.9	36
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	101	88	82	74	36
Metro Exodus (2019)	116.7	77.7	58.2	47.8	20.9
Anthem (2019)	84.5	73.7	72.1	67.4	26.4
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	157.8	116.1	101.1	66.3	31.2
The Division 2 (2019)	132	97	84	69	26

The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | GTA V | X-Plane 11.11

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +96%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	76.5 (63^min) fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	68.9 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK	65.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	58.3 (48^min) fps -11%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.7 fps -20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	49.2 fps -25%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	152.5 fps +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK	137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	127.7 fps -7%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.8 fps +82%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK	62.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	54.2 fps -13%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)	108.5 fps +61%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK	67.2 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	61.6 fps -8%

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)	137.6	127.7 -7%	118.9 ?(Single-Channel) -14%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)	67.2	61.6 -8%	55.8 ?(Single-Channel) -17%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T	84	67 -20%	66 ?(Single-Channel) -21%
Darksiders III
1920x1080 Epic	84.8	64.9 -23%	81.4 ?(Single-Channel) -4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-15% / -15%	-14% / -14%

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW020T8: Ø59.9 (47-67)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø49.5 (46-53)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø50.3 (45-54)

Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 33 / 36 dB
Carga		44 / 45 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-2%	3%	-9%	0%	8%	9%
off / environment *	29	30 -3%	30 -3%	29 -0%	29 -0%	28.8 1%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	31	32 -3%	30 3%	33 -6%	30 3%	28.8 7%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Average *	33	34 -3%	31 6%	34 -3%	32 3%	28.8 13%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	36	36 -0%	34 6%	40 -11%	34 6%	29.4 18%	30.3 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 16%
Load Average *	44	42 5%	43 2%	47 -7%	44 -0%	35.7 19%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	44 -2%	42 2%	51 -19%	46 -7%	42.5 1%
Load Maximum *	45	48 -7%	44 2%	53 -18%	47 -4%	45 -0%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=154, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


64 °C	63 °C	64 °C
44 °C	48 °C	42 °C
38 °C	40 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 64 °C
Médio: 49 °C


67 °C	69 °C	58 °C
61 °C	61 °C	48 °C
43 °C	44 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 69 °C
Médio: 54.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	29 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25 °C
26 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 26.4 °C


28 °C	29 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 28 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


62 °C	60 °C	59 °C
43 °C	50 °C	43 °C
38 °C	41 °C	39 °C

Máximo: 62 °C
Médio: 48.3 °C


68 °C	67 °C	58 °C
61 °C	61 °C	46 °C
43 °C	44 °C	40 °C

Máximo: 68 °C
Médio: 54.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 69 °C / 156 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Heat		8%	16%	6%	3%	18%	10%
Maximum Upper Side *	64	56 12%	49 23%	54 16%	49 23%	49 23%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=153, last 2 years) 28%
Maximum Bottom *	69	66 4%	63 9%	60 13%	58 16%	49 29%	49 ?(33.6 - 66, n=153, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Upper Side *	29	27 7%	24 17%	30 -3%	33 -14%	25.4 12%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=153, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Bottom *	29	27 7%	25 14%	30 -3%	33 -14%	27.2 6%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=153, last 2 years) -11%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 1.6 Watt
Ocioso	17 / 21 / 27 Watt
Carga	111 / 183 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		12%	24%	-6%	-1%	18%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	17	16 6%	7 59%	17 -0%	16 6%	10.4 39%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	21	18 14%	11 48%	20 5%	22 -5%	14.6 30%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Maximum *	27	23 15%	20 26%	29 -7%	32 -19%	16.3 40%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average *	111	88 21%	98 12%	112 -1%	89 20%	88.5 20%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) 4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	130	120 8%	132 -2%	152 -17%	147 -13%	155.4 -20%
Load Maximum *	183	167 9%	182 1%	211 -15%	173 5%	182.4 -0%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		9h 21min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)		5h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 27min

	Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		9%	-12%	-63%	-44%	-3%	-3%
Reader / Idle	561	549 -2%	507 -10%	213 -62%	335 -40%	682 22%	567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years) 1%
H.264	332	364 10%	356 7%				413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years) 24%
WiFi v1.3	354	382 8%	362 2%	157 -56%	190 -46%	387 9%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 6%
Load	147	174 18%	81 -45%	42 -71%	81 -45%	88 -40%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) -42%

Pro

+ Tela 4K mate

+ X-Rite Pantone

+ Boa reprodução de cores

+ Compacto, construção leve

+ Materiais de alta qualidade

+ Marcos finos da tela

+ Iluminação RGB

+ Design elegante

+ Ferramentas práticas

+ SSD NVMe

+ Slot M.2-2280

+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Variante lenta do RTX 2080 Max-Q

- Altas temperaturas

- O som poderia ser melhor

- Durações da bateria piores que as do seu antecessor

- Extremamente caro

The Gigabyte 15-Y9-9DE4720P, provided for review by Gigabyte Deutschland.

A unidade na nossa frente hoje, o Aero 15-Y9, representa o modelo carro chefe da gama Aero-15 e, como esperado, o fabricante teve como objetivo impressionar: A Gigabyte usou o melhor para esta configuração. A combinação de uma CPU Core i9-8950HK e GPU GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q permite uma experiência de jogo fluente com resolução FHD e com configurações de detalhes médios a máximos em sua tela 4K mate.

No entanto, o portátil é equipado apenas com uma variante Max-Q (80 W) da RTX 2080.

Como resultado, o Aero 15-Y9 não é realmente capaz de se distanciar do Aero 15-X9 equipado com RTX 2070 Max-Q. Ao executar no mesmo modo de RAM (canal único/canal duplo), os dois dispositivos frequentemente ofereciam taxas de quadros semelhantes. Como resultado, a maioria dos potenciais compradores estaria melhor servida pela versão mais barata do RTX 2070 Max-Q do Aero.

O SSD NVMe incluído oferece não apenas excelentes taxas de transferência, mas também muito espaço de armazenamento (2 TB). Internamente, o portátil também possui um slot adicional para um segundo SSD M.2 2280. Nenhum slot está disponível para uma unidade de 2,5 polegadas no Aero 15.

A tela IPS 4K mate impressionou com bons ângulos de visão, bom brilho e contraste e impressionante reprodução de cores. No entanto, os tempos de reação ficam claramente atrás do Aero 15-X9 equipado com um painel de 144 Hz. A duração da bateria também está um pouco atrás do Aero 15-X9. Isso não é surpresa e é esperado da tela 4K. No entanto, em geral, o desempenho da bateria foi muito bom para um portátil de jogos.

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 - 05/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

67 / 80 → 84%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

66 / 95 → 69%

Pantalha

93%

Desempenho do jogos

89%

Desempenho da aplicação

89%

Temperatura

65 / 95 → 69%

Ruído

76 / 90 → 85%

Audio

74%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Médio

74%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Sascha Mölck, 2019-03-25 (Update: 2019-03-26)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9 audio analysis

Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison