Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15 XB: Assumindo a liderança com OLED

Name: Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Brand: Gigabyte

Brilha como um diamante.

Depois que recentemente tivemos o Aero 17 HDR em nosso departamento editorial, agora é hora de que a nova versão do Aero 15 OLED mostre do que é capaz. Ele inclui um processador octa-core, um chip Super Max-Q e uma tela UHD brilhante.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/14/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Aero 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.53, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, Máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, UHD/4K, X-Rite Pantone, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM470

Disco rígido

Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 GB

, Slots: 2x M.2 type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Comet Point-LP PCH - cAVS

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 356 x 250

Bateria

94.2 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo 2x 2-watts, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.175 kg, Suprimento de energia: 690 g

Preço

2600 EUR

Links

Gigabyte página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.4 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.4 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size comparison

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	204 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	195 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78 MB/s -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	243 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	241 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85 MB/s -65%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1330 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1310 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1140 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1360 MBit/s +16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1320 MBit/s +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1170 MBit/s

ColorChecker Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP: 10.3 ∆E min: 3.32 - max: 21.2 ∆E


394 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	377 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	385 cd/m²	384 cd/m²
406 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	390 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Samsung SDCA029 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 390.4 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 385 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-19%		-25%	-25%	-26%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	69.5 -30%		64.6 -35%	66.2 -34%	64 -36%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.6 0%		92.6 -7%	92.3 -8%	90.3 -10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.2	70.8 -28%		66 -33%	67.2 -32%	65.4 -33%
Response Times		-485%	-10%	-329%	-546%	-452%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2.2 ?(1, 1.2)	14 ?(6.8, 7.2) -536%	2.4 ?(1, 1.4) -9%	5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6) -136%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -591%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) -336%
Response Time Black / White *	1.8 ?(1, 0.8)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -433%	2.2 ?(1.2, 1) -22%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -522%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -500%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -567%
PWM Frequency	60 ?(80)		60 ?(80) 0%
Screen		-34%	-31%	-34%	-67%	-31%
Brightness middle	385	316 -18%	373 -3%	288 -25%	324.8 -16%	313 -19%
Brightness	390	311 -20%	375 -4%	265 -32%	316 -19%	295 -24%
Brightness Distribution	93	92 -1%	93 0%	84 -10%	84 -10%	89 -4%
Black Level *		0.21		0.22	0.26	0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.46	3.03 -23%	3.98 -62%	3.22 -31%	4.96 -102%	3.33 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.01	7.32 -83%	6.28 -57%	6.26 -56%	8.95 -123%	6.25 -56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.6	1.1 58%		1.5 42%	3.23 -24%	1.77 32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.39	3.9 -181%	2.81 -102%	3.43 -147%	5 -260%	3.1 -123%
Gamma	2.31 ^95%	2.42 ^91%	2.62 ^84%	2.41 ^91%	2.21 ^100%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	6395 ^102%	7439 ^87%	6434 ^101%	7290 ^89%	7742 ^84%	6930 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	98	65 -34%	78 -20%	60 -39%	59.8 -39%	59 -40%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	100 0%	97 -3%	93 -7%	91.8 -8%	90 -10%
Contrast		1505		1309	1249	1043
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-179% / -95%	-21% / -26%	-129% / -74%	-213% / -126%	-170% / -90%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	511 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	477 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	457 Points -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	442 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points -15%
CPU (Multi Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	3801 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3713 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	2448 Points -36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	2384 Points -37%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	2298 Points -40%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	213 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	201 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	189 Points -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	181 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Intel Core i7-9750H	178 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1818 (1544.4^min - 1818.6^max) Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1635 (1518.31^min - 1635.12^max) Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Intel Core i7-9750H	1253 Points -31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	1188 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	1181 Points -35%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	1057 Points -42%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	295 Seconds * -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	285 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	5457 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5227 MIPS -4%
7z b 4
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	47170 MIPS
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	43786 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	1347 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1283 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	8087 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	7634 Points -6%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	13 fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.2 fps -6%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	52.4 s * -0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	52.4 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.592 sec * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H	0.547 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1818 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

146 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

213 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3801 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

511 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6580 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6490 Points -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5991 Points -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5746 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	5522 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L	5439 Points -17%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1916 μs * -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	1877 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		62%	34%	62%	70%	28%
Write 4K	127.4	131.3 3%	126.7 -1%	108.8 -15%	137.4 8%	108.7 -15%
Read 4K	147.5	45.84 -69%	66.1 -55%	40.31 -73%	41.37 -72%	41.4 -72%
Write Seq	485.9	2370 388%	1538 217%	2488 412%	2500 415%	1083 123%
Read Seq	1352	1509 12%	2269 68%	1916 42%	1576 17%	917 -32%
Write 4K Q32T1	476.5	481.5 1%	456.7 -4%	382.4 -20%	446.7 -6%	468.5 -2%
Read 4K Q32T1	531	560 5%	554 4%	421.8 -21%	522 -2%	530 0%
Write Seq Q32T1	1061	2392 125%	1541 45%	2542 140%	2796 164%	3057 188%
Read Seq Q32T1	2552	3232 27%	2567 1%	3320 30%	3415 34%	3422 34%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2552 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1061 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 531 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 476.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1352 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 485.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 147.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		24383 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		47119 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18947 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8066 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	4693 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	4280 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3738 Points -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3719 Points -21%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3717 Points -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	21121 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	18992 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18117 Points -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18060 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17419 Points -18%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	16483 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7829 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7084 Points -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6748 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6526 Points -17%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6419 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6387 Points -18%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	28900 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	25135 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	23133 Points -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22749 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	21861 Points -24%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18434 Points -36%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	152 (119^min) fps
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	136.6 fps -10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK	131 (109^min) fps -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	116 (97^min) fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	113 (95^min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	79.1 (64^min) fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK	70.5 (55^min) fps -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	69 fps -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64.4 (54^min) fps -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	63.5 fps -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	60.4 (49^min) fps -24%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	182	176	161	91.3		73.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)			152	79.1		52.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	157.8	148.3	140.9	132.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	122	106	89.3			67.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			110	100	68	35
Battlefield V (2018)			139	130	100	58.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)			110	98	80	45
Metro Exodus (2019)			75.4	60.4	46.7	29.1
The Division 2 (2019)			105	77	54	29
Anno 1800 (2019)			84.2	46.8	37	21.5
Control (2019)			60.2		40.6	23.8
Borderlands 3 (2019)			84.4	64.8	45.6	24.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)			92	69	50	29
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)			65.7	42.4	34.3	22

Barulho

Ocioso		34 / 36 / 41 dB
Carga		48 / 54 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise		1%	-1%	5%	9%	3%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	30 -0%	29 3%	31 -3%
Idle Minimum *	34	32 6%	34 -0%	30 12%	30.5 10%	31 9%
Idle Average *	36	34 6%	35 3%	33 8%	31.5 12%	34 6%
Idle Maximum *	41	39 5%	45 -10%	39 5%	31.5 23%	37 10%
Load Average *	48	53 -10%	43 10%	45 6%	40.6 15%	47 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	48 -0%	52 -8%	49 -2%	49.5 -3%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	54	53 2%	54 -0%	51 6%	53.4 1%	54 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45 °C	49 °C	45 °C
38 °C	45 °C	43 °C
35 °C	36 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C


59 °C	61 °C	45 °C
57 °C	58 °C	40 °C
39 °C	38 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 48.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


25 °C	26 °C	25 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 27 °C
Médio: 25.6 °C


26 °C	27 °C	25 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
26 °C	26 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 27.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


43 °C	46 °C	44 °C
38 °C	45 °C	43 °C
31 °C	36 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C


54 °C	56 °C	46 °C
54 °C	53 °C	40 °C
38 °C	36 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 45.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat		-1%	-7%	-0%	-25%	-13%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	53 -8%	49 -0%	49 -0%	48.8 -0%	60 -22%
Maximum Bottom *	61	55 10%	59 3%	59 3%	55 10%	66 -8%
Idle Upper Side *	27	28 -4%	33 -22%	28 -4%	41 -52%	30 -11%
Idle Bottom *	29	29 -0%	32 -10%	29 -0%	45.6 -57%	32 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	18 / 21 / 38 Watt
Carga	113 / 256 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption		15%	-2%	34%	-65%	28%
Idle Minimum *	18	13 28%	23 -28%	7 61%	46 -156%	11 39%
Idle Average *	21	16 24%	25 -19%	12 43%	59 -181%	15 29%
Idle Maximum *	38	27 29%	33 13%	22 42%	65.5 -72%	21 45%
Load Average *	113	109 4%	96 15%	86 24%	99.8 12%	94 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	149	155 -4%	168 -13%	144 3%	154.1 -3%	143 4%
Load Maximum *	256	236 8%	197 23%	177 31%	222.7 13%	173 32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 38min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 46min

	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Battery Runtime		-14%	-1%	6%	-58%	-25%
Reader / Idle	518	505 -3%	591 14%	666 29%	221 -57%	439 -15%
WiFi v1.3	364	364 0%	342 -6%	478 31%	129 -65%	340 -7%
Load	166	102 -39%	149 -10%	96 -42%	80 -52%	79 -52%

Pro

+ Carcaça leve e estável

+ Materiais estáveis e de alta qualidade

+ Qualidade de imagem fantástica

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Bateria potente

Contra

- As funções secundárias não possuem iluminação de fundo (teclado)

- Alto nível de ruído sob uso intenso

- Tela muito refletiva

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB. Review device provided by Gigabyte Germany.

Se você dá muita importância à qualidade da imagem de um portátil, o Aero 15 OLED é exatamente a escolha certa.

Se você excluir a superfície refletiva e a frequência, a tela 4K terá apenas pontos positivos. Além do alto brilho, o ótimo contraste e os curtos tempos de resposta, o amplo espaço de cores, graças ao X-Rite Pantone, também deve ser mencionado no lado positivo.

Como o Aero 15 OLED não se permite outros erros flagrantes, jogadores e criadores que conectam um fone de ouvido no uso 3D (palavra-chave "volume") podem fazê-lo.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

87 / 98 → 89%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

69 / 80 → 87%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria