Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q)

Usina de energia compacta.

O fino portátil para jogos da Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA pode rodar os jogos atuais sem problemas em sua tela de 15,6 polegadas (240 Hz, FHD, IGZO) graças ao processador Core i7-9750H e à GPU GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q. Seus outros componentes também parecem promissores: um SSD NVMe, 16 GB de RAM no modo de dois canais e Thunderbolt 3.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Aero 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 885 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, barramento de 256-bit, ForceWare 430.39, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, duas baias de armazenamento (ambos ocupados), máx 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 240 Hz, X-Rite Pantone, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, 512 GB 
, NVMe, 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (um slot ocupado)
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 356 x 250
Bateria
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 15.2 V
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2 Watt Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de CA de 230 Watts, XSplit Gamecaster Premium (3 month trial), XSplit Broadcaster Premium (3 meses de avaliação), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.122 kg, Suprimento de energia: 724 g
Links
Gigabyte página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.75 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years)
95.4 MB/s -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years)
118.9 MB/s -51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
588 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
596 MBit/s -14%
242
cd/m²		249
cd/m²		241
cd/m²
255
cd/m²		266
cd/m²		248
cd/m²
245
cd/m²		246
cd/m²		236
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 266 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 247.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 858:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.58 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE07AF), IPS, 1920x1080, 		Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080,
Display
-3%
-0%
-1%
-3%
-2%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
63.5
-3%
65.3
0%
65.6
0%
63.5
-3%
64.2
-2%
63.5
-3%
sRGB Coverage
95.5
93.1
-3%
94.9
-1%
92.2
-3%
92.3
-3%
92.6
-3%
92.4
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
64.5
-3%
66.3
0%
66.9
1%
65
-2%
65.7
-1%
64.7
-3%
Response Times
-15%
-8%
34%
-14%
24%
-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
-8%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
-11%
7 ?(3.6, 3.4)
54%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
42%
8 ?(4, 4)
47%
18.8 ?(11.6, 7.2)
-24%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
-21%
11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4)
-4%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
14%
10 ?(6, 4)
11%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-0%
13.2 ?(8, 5.2)
-18%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(24)
1000 ?(99)
-96%
Screen
16%
-4%
-11%
-18%
-18%
-17%
Brightness middle
266
250
-6%
314.7
18%
323.6
22%
268
1%
304
14%
320.4
20%
Brightness
248
235
-5%
312
26%
315
27%
270
9%
299
21%
298
20%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
90
1%
91
2%
84
-6%
89
0%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.38
-23%
0.29
6%
0.24
23%
0.27
13%
0.42
-35%
Contrast
858
862
0%
828
-3%
1116
30%
1117
30%
1126
31%
763
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.78
1.46
47%
2.56
8%
3.31
-19%
4.51
-62%
4.66
-68%
3.21
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.96
2.47
59%
4.89
18%
5.74
4%
9.58
-61%
9.65
-62%
5.54
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.91
1.71
-88%
2.73
-200%
1.57
-73%
1.72
-89%
2.36
-159%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.58
1.27
65%
3.4
5%
2.9
19%
5.36
-50%
5.53
-54%
3.6
-1%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.29 96%
2.51 88%
2.5 88%
2.27 97%
CCT
7186 90%
6749 96%
6435 101%
6765 96%
7826 83%
8028 81%
6503 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60
-3%
60.7
-2%
59.7
-4%
59
-5%
60
-3%
59
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
93
-3%
94.6
-1%
91.8
-4%
92
-4%
93
-3%
92
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 8%
-4% / -4%
7% / -3%
-12% / -15%
1% / -10%
-14% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23580 Hz ≤ 24 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø994 (961.98-1074.38)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1183 (1168.7-1209.56)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6704
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33694
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
9464
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1115 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 3 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)
276 Points +58%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)
3387 Points +204%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H
1238 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
1079 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points -10%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points +46%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
6704 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
6645 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points -5%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points +89%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
33694 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
31800 Points -6%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years)
721 Points +68%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
418 Points -3%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years)
8222 Points +239%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
2340 Points -4%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
23246 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
21659 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points -8%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
4166 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
4139 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points -10%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)
54312 Points +132%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
23396 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
20592 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)
8126 Points +56%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
5218 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H
5123 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138 ms * -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1126 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1122 ms * -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1119 ms * -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1103 ms * -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
1072 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=181, last 2 years)
507 ms * +53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 115768, n=58, last 2 years)
95099 Points +163%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
36178 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
35120 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
34062 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
33637 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points -15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=167, last 2 years)
303 Points +32%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
229 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)
526 Points +111%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.9 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
255.5 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
250.7 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-8750H (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0)
250.2 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44)
249.4 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.4 Points -2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6854 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4851 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5574 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6035 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5697 pontos
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years)
7770 Points +36%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5941 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5651 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5492 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -6%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5115 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4582 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points -14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3979 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5852 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5679 Points -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5289 Points -12%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Sequential Read: 2478 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1190 MB/s
512K Read: 1611 MB/s
512K Write: 1163 MB/s
4K Read: 73.1 MB/s
4K Write: 194.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 611 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 457.1 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-15%
-13%
-33%
-6%
7%
-20%
Write 4K
115.5
97.1
-16%
93.9
-19%
93.9
-19%
92.5
-20%
93.6
-19%
81
-30%
Read 4K
58
53.7
-7%
40.56
-30%
46.29
-20%
40.45
-30%
38.82
-33%
36.03
-38%
Write Seq
1555
1526
-2%
1468
-6%
974
-37%
1197
-23%
2455
58%
1687
8%
Read Seq
2590
2020
-22%
1540
-41%
1425
-45%
1018
-61%
2107
-19%
1835
-29%
Write 4K Q32T1
369.3
285.6
-23%
293.5
-21%
259.4
-30%
288.6
-22%
298.7
-19%
205.3
-44%
Read 4K Q32T1
441.7
321.8
-27%
346
-22%
296.5
-33%
332
-25%
338.7
-23%
229
-48%
Write Seq Q32T1
1547
1533
-1%
1941
25%
977
-37%
3317
114%
2902
88%
1683
9%
Read Seq Q32T1
2969
2351
-21%
3266
10%
1666
-44%
3515
18%
3536
19%
3363
13%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
35193 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
18171 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
113186 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35891 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15494 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6639 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years)
31223 Points +80%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21237 Points +23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16989 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16589 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years)
13010 Points +94%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8171 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6460 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6368 Points -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)
43480 Points +98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28997 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21860 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21723 Points -1%
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Far Cry 5
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
126.6 fps +98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
80.3 fps +25%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
68.9 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
64.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
63.8 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
57 fps -11%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
211 fps +40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
166 fps +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
152.5 fps +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
150.3 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
148.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps -15%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +47%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
89 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
67 fps -25%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8: Ø63 (1-68)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø72.3 (68-77)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø63.9 (59-68)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø56.9 (51-61)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 321.3 279.3 238 150.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 273.1 189.2 113.2 64.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 117.6 87.9 62.9
World of Tanks enCore (2018) 490.3 218.9 129.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 127 100 95 89
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 150 121 118 98
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 113 93 87 79
Metro Exodus (2019) 128.8 79.8 56.3 47.7
The Division 2 (2019) 147 108 87 70
Anno 1800 (2019) 92 82.1 68.1 34

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 34 / 39 dB
Carga
46 / 55 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise
6%
16%
3%
2%
8%
13%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.8
4%
28.7
4%
30
-0%
29
3%
28
7%
Idle Minimum *
31
32
-3%
28.8
7%
29.8
4%
30
3%
30
3%
32.6
-5%
Idle Average *
34
34
-0%
28.8
15%
32.4
5%
32
6%
32
6%
32.7
4%
Idle Maximum *
39
36
8%
29.4
25%
38
3%
35
10%
34
13%
32.7
16%
Load Average *
46
42
9%
35.7
22%
38.2
17%
47
-2%
44
4%
33.3
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
44
17%
42.5
20%
56.6
-7%
53
-0%
46
13%
41.6
22%
Load Maximum *
55
48
13%
45
18%
56.6
-3%
55
-0%
47
15%
45.2
18%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 57 °C58 °C58 °C 
 42 °C50 °C44 °C 
 37 °C40 °C39 °C 
Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 47.2 °C
63 °C64 °C53 °C
57 °C56 °C41 °C
40 °C41 °C37 °C
Máximo: 64 °C
Médio: 50.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat
6%
17%
10%
-2%
2%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
58
56
3%
49
16%
47
19%
58
-0%
49
16%
37.6
35%
Maximum Bottom *
64
66
-3%
49
23%
48.6
24%
68
-6%
58
9%
45.2
29%
Idle Upper Side *
30
27
10%
25.4
15%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
33
-10%
32.2
-7%
Idle Bottom *
31
27
13%
27.2
12%
33.2
-7%
31
-0%
33
-6%
37.2
-20%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.345.52539.640.63132.434.94034.435.55027.228.86329.332.38027.732.210026.832.512523.434.216022.74920022.958.325023.562.131519.962.240019.762.450019.260.263017.967.58001871.9100017.871125018.975.2160017.871.6200017.470.1250017.768.5315017.770.9400017.869.3500017.562.4630017.564.6800017.467.71000017.366.71250017.367.61600017.362.6SPL30.281.9N1.453.1median 17.8median 66.7Delta1.55.538.841.439.537.736.840.33939.938.137.734.638.733.844.233.744.332.246.131.95433.154.530.260.63066.228.670.527.371.626.967.726.566.426.568.726.363.526.265.926.161.226.159.92657.125.95925.859.225.758.325.851.925.64925.646.325.542.438.576.13.438.5median 26.3median 59.21.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XARazer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 21 / 23 / 32 Watt
Carga midlight 97 / 213 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption
21%
26%
6%
23%
9%
5%
Idle Minimum *
21
16
24%
10.4
50%
16.1
23%
13
38%
16
24%
22.9
-9%
Idle Average *
23
18
22%
14.6
37%
20.9
9%
16
30%
22
4%
27.2
-18%
Idle Maximum *
32
23
28%
16.3
49%
27
16%
21
34%
32
-0%
27.5
14%
Load Average *
97
88
9%
88.5
9%
93.4
4%
84
13%
89
8%
83.4
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148
120
19%
155.4
-5%
168.2
-14%
135
9%
147
1%
143.6
3%
Load Maximum *
213
167
22%
182.4
14%
215.3
-1%
183
14%
173
19%
160.5
25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
7h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 01min
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Turing
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62.3 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-6%
18%
-11%
-57%
-32%
-50%
-64%
Reader / Idle
545
549
1%
762
40%
682
25%
412
-24%
335
-39%
235
-57%
H.264
408
364
-11%
504
24%
292
-28%
WiFi v1.3
421
382
-9%
513
22%
387
-8%
181
-57%
304
-28%
190
-55%
166
-61%
Load
181
174
-4%
156
-14%
88
-51%
93
-49%
81
-55%
46
-75%

Pro

+ X-Rite Pantone
+ Tela de 240-Hz
+ Carcaça compacta e leve
+ Materiais de alta qualidade
+ Marcos estreitos
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Design simples
+ Ferramentas úteis
+ SSD NVMe
+ Baia M.2 2280 livre
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Leitor de cartões muito veloz

Contra

- Tela relativamente escura
- Barulhento sob uso intenso
- Padrão incomum de ruído do ventilador
- Altas temperaturas
- Os alto-falantes poderiam ser melhores
- A CPU não alcança o potencial pleno
The Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA-7DE5250P, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
The Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA-7DE5250P, test unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

A julgar pelo exterior, o Aero 15 Classic não mudou muito em relação ao seu antecessor Aero 15-X9. As verdadeiras mudanças não estão no interior ... O portátil está equipado com um novíssimo Core i7-8750H de seis núcleos, o sucessor do Core i7-8750H. 

O novo Core i7-9750H não oferece melhorias reais.

Ele não pode fazer uso real da sua memória de trabalho ligeiramente superior e os resultados são frequentemente parecidos com os do i7-8750H. Além disso, o desempenho cai continuamente sob uso intenso, que medimos com o nosso CineBench R15 loop. Assumimos que o sistema de resfriamento e o processador não estavam muito bem alinhados.

No entanto, a combinação de um Core i7-9750H e um GeForce GTX 2070 Max-Q consegue rodar todos os jogos atuais sem problemas na tela Full HD mate. Os jogos podem ser jogados com configurações altas ou máximas. O rápido SSD NVMe permite um desempenho fluente do sistema e o dispositivo também possui um slot livre para um segundo SSD M.2 2280. 

A outra coisa que foi alterada é a tela do Aero 15 Classic. Enquanto o Aero 15-X9 foi equipado com uma tela IPS de 144 Hz, a Gigabyte forneceu ao AERO 15 Classic o painel IGZO de 240 Hz, fabricado pela Sharp. Este novo painel oferece ângulos de visão estáveis, tempos de resposta curtos e, claro, ótimas cores. No entanto, ficamos decepcionados com a relação de brilho e contraste. Estes eram muito baixos, considerando a faixa de preço do dispositivo. As durações da bateria são excelentes para um portátil de jogos.

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA - 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
68 / 80 → 85%
Peso
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Bateria
71 / 95 → 75%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
88%
Temperatura
71 / 95 → 75%
Ruído
63 / 90 → 70%
Audio
82%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (i7-9750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-05-20 (Update: 2019-05-21)