Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 967:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Gigabyte Aero 14 LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), , 2560x1440, 14" | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG P407 LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), , 1920x1080, 14" | Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), , 3200x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -6% | 4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 65.5 2% | 64.5 0% | 66.9 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 86.4 -6% | 82.1 -11% | 96.8 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 63.1 -4% | 60 -8% | 68.2 4% |
| Response Times | 13% | -12% | -24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 31.6 ? 23% | 47 ? -15% | 41 ? -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 24.4 ? 2% | 27 ? -8% | 37 ? -48% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | 10% | 3% | 30% | |
| Brightness middle | 290 | 288.4 -1% | 298 3% | 328 13% |
| Brightness | 257 | 282 10% | 282 10% | 328 28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 83 5% | 80 1% | 69 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.35 -17% | 0.27 10% | 0.22 27% |
| Contrast | 967 | 824 -15% | 1104 14% | 1491 54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 2.61 43% | 4.42 4% | 1.91 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.68 | 7.34 15% | 8.57 1% | 3.23 63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 1.18 73% | 4.11 5% | 1.69 61% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% | 2.5 88% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7320 89% | 6506 100% | 6329 103% | 6418 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 56.4 -4% | 54 -8% | 63 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 86.4 -6% | 82 -11% | 97 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
8% | -5% /
-1% | 3% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3717 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4702 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 14 LiteOn CX2-8B256 | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | SCHENKER XMG P407 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -68% | 19% | -12% | |
| Read Seq | 1584 | 335.3 -79% | 1345 -15% | 1296 -18% |
| Write Seq | 795 | 299 -62% | 1502 89% | 603 -24% |
| Read 512 | 985 | 223 -77% | 320.3 -67% | 655 -34% |
| Write 512 | 814 | 246.7 -70% | 1276 57% | 604 -26% |
| Read 4k | 44.93 | 17.68 -61% | 58.9 31% | 42.22 -6% |
| Write 4k | 131.2 | 35.31 -73% | 171 30% | 139.6 6% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 602 | 247.4 -59% | 625 4% | 573 -5% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 441 | 156.3 -65% | 539 22% | 480 9% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P407 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11868 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20574 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9778 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 | |
| Razer Blade (2016) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38.3 | |||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 77.5 | 29 | ||
| The Division (2016) | 46.9 | 37.8 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 56 () | 42 () | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 66.2 | 60.1 | 35.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 42 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.3 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
Gigabyte Aero 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 13 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
78 / 146 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -28% | -10% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 12.1 -51% | 10 -25% | 9 -13% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 19 -46% | 15 -15% | 14 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 19.5 2% | 24 -20% | 22 -10% |
| Load Average * | 78 | 106.7 -37% | 82 -5% | 72 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 110 | |||
| Load Maximum * | 146 | 159 -9% | 124 15% | 124 15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94 Wh | MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 61 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -42% | -45% | -54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 909 | 577 -37% | 443 -51% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 524 | 261 -50% | 241 -54% | 243 -54% |
| Load | 129 | 78 -40% | 92 -29% | |
| H.264 | 213 |
Então, está tudo ótimo? Bom, quase. A maioria dos itens em nossa lista de contras provavelmente será irrelevante para o típico consumidor do Aero 14. No entanto, o barulho constante da ventoinha com revoluções médias é muito irritante, e a Gigabyte precisa urgentemente abordar esse problema.
Fora isso, o Aero 14 deixou uma impressão geral muito boa. Apesar de sua massiva bateria, a carcaça de alumínio é compacta e leve; além de seu teclado co layout fora do padrão, os dispositivos de entrada ainda são suficientemente bons inclusive para portáteis de escritório; e existem mais portas das poderíamos desejar, incluindo um adaptador USB-Ethernet já incluída na caixa. Também não temos reclamos sobre o seu desempenho.
Sua enorme bateria e sua duração resultante, certamente são um recurso exclusivo do Gigabyte Aero 14 entre seus irmãos portáteis para jogos. Isto, no entanto, é ofuscado pelo barulho de alta frequência da ventoinha, motivo pelo qual simplesmente não podemos recomendar este portátil.
Pro
Contra
So, is everything hunky-dory? Well, almost. Most of the items on our cons list will probably be irrelevant to the typical Aero 14 consumer. However, the constant fan whining at medium revs is very annoying, and Gigabyte urgently needs to address this issue.
Other than that, the Aero 14 left a very good overall impression. Despite its massive battery the aluminum case is compact and lightweight; apart from its non-standard keyboard layout the input devices, while clearly designed with gamers in mind (re: macro keys), are still decent enough even for office laptops; and there are more ports than we could wish for, including a USB-Ethernet adaptor already included in the box. Also, we have no complaints regarding its performance.
Its enormous battery and the resulting battery life are surely a unique feature of Gigabyte’s Aero 14 among its mobile-gaming laptop brethren. This, however, is overshadowed by the fan’s overly annoying high-frequency whining noise, which is why we simply cannot recommend this laptop.
Gigabyte Aero 14
- 06/30/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
