Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook U748 (i5-8250U, FHD, Touch)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7480 (Toshiba (Exceria Pro SDXC UHS-II 64 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U747 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 335 cd/m²
Contraste: 815:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 LP140QH2-SPB1, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA AUO3B3D, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 LG LP140WF3, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 72.8 | 65.4 | 60.2 | 67.2 | 66.1 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.9 | 92.3 | 88.2 | 90.8 | 84.8 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.1 | 65.8 | 61.3 | 66.4 | 62 | |
| Response Times | -7% | -16% | -19% | 1% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 38.4 ? 2% | 40.8 ? -4% | 42.4 ? -8% | 38 ? 3% | 36 ? 8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.4 ? | 28.4 ? -16% | 31.2 ? -28% | 31.6 ? -30% | 25 ? -2% | 23.2 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -15% | 1% | -17% | -13% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 334 | 352 5% | 344 3% | 414 24% | 275 -18% | 291 -13% |
| Brightness | 313 | 343 10% | 321 3% | 387 24% | 253 -19% | 296 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 85 -4% | 87 -2% | 85 -4% | 84 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.46 -12% | 0.32 22% | 0.25 39% | 0.25 39% | 0.32 22% |
| Contrast | 815 | 765 -6% | 1075 32% | 1656 103% | 1100 35% | 909 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.3 -50% | 2.6 -18% | 5.5 -150% | 3.49 -59% | 4.3 -95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.7 | 7.3 -28% | 7.8 -37% | 9.9 -74% | 6.77 -19% | 7.5 -32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 5.3 -83% | 2.6 10% | 6.4 -121% | 4.91 -69% | 4.3 -48% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.22 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.39 92% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6855 95% | 6452 101% | 7050 92% | 7811 83% | 6271 104% | 6529 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.3 | 68.4 5% | 65.82 1% | 56.9 -13% | 59 -10% | 55.46 -15% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 98 7% | 92.27 1% | 88.1 -4% | 91 -1% | 84.77 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.3 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-14% | -8% /
-2% | -18% /
-18% | -6% /
-10% | -6% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (22075 - 62930, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (11245 - 28932, n=13) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (5904 - 13680, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (5163 - 8153, n=13) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3542 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4631 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4684 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2364 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7480 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 41% | -49% | -30% | -46% | -43% | |
| Read Seq | 1697 | 1540 -9% | 486.5 -71% | 1929 14% | 518 -69% | 504 -70% |
| Write Seq | 932 | 1613 73% | 418.6 -55% | 340 -64% | 267.2 -71% | 497.8 -47% |
| Read 512 | 855 | 835 -2% | 354.3 -59% | 908 6% | 562 -34% | 396.7 -54% |
| Write 512 | 472.9 | 1716 263% | 306.8 -35% | 286.1 -40% | 263.5 -44% | 283.4 -40% |
| Read 4k | 55.4 | 66.9 21% | 29.25 -47% | 30.94 -44% | 32.88 -41% | 35.73 -36% |
| Write 4k | 135.3 | 160.6 19% | 90.5 -33% | 94.5 -30% | 85.6 -37% | 87.8 -35% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 403.2 | 444.9 10% | 280.2 -31% | 244.7 -39% | 351.3 -13% | 399.1 -1% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 621 | 343 -45% | 252.8 -59% | 351.3 -43% | 265.2 -57% | 249.7 -60% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1737 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 59733 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7441 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 926 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 436 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 370 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.9 | 26.5 | 21.9 | 7.5 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 60.1 | 20.9 | 13.2 | |
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 58.4 | 31.8 | 27.5 | 24.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.5 / 36.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 6% | -2% | -2% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 29.3 | 28.9 1% | 28.8 2% | 30.6 -4% | 28.2 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 28.9 1% | 28.6 2% | 28.8 2% | 30.6 -4% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.3 | 28.9 1% | 28.6 2% | 28.8 2% | 30.6 -4% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.9 | 28.9 3% | 28.6 4% | 33.1 -11% | 31 -4% | 28.2 6% |
| Load Average * | 32.5 | 36.9 -14% | 30.2 7% | 35.2 -8% | 34.5 -6% | 31.2 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.6 | 38.9 -6% | 31.2 15% | 35.2 4% | 32.4 11% | 33 10% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.2 °C / 4 F).
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | -6% | 11% | 4% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 45.9 | 50.1 -9% | 39 15% | 36.6 20% | 39.1 15% | 42.6 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.3 | 46.1 -9% | 47.2 -12% | 39.5 7% | 35 17% | 34.4 19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 22.2 16% | 27.6 -5% | 23.8 10% | 29.4 -12% | 25.1 5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.3 | 22.6 14% | 32 -22% | 24.7 6% | 27.8 -6% | 24.6 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Fujitsu LifeBook U748 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.14 / 0.35 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.33 / 6.9 / 8.2 Watt |
| Carga |
29.4 / 43.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | 6% | -16% | -16% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.33 | 3.1 7% | 4.32 -30% | 3.2 4% | 4.8 -44% | 4.11 -23% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.8 1% | 6.27 9% | 6.6 4% | 7.9 -14% | 7.87 -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 10.1 -23% | 6.35 23% | 9.5 -16% | 10.7 -30% | 8.74 -7% |
| Load Average * | 29.4 | 48.4 -65% | 29.82 -1% | 36.2 -23% | 35 -19% | 30.2 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 67.1 -55% | 30.64 29% | 65.6 -51% | 31.6 27% | 32.4 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U747 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | 74% | 21% | 32% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 937 | 1662 77% | 1138 21% | 1087 16% | 782 -17% | |
| H.264 | 397 | 721 82% | 399 1% | 490 23% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 390 | 537 38% | 719 84% | 447 15% | 672 72% | 430 10% |
| Load | 106 | 124 17% | 171 61% | 156 47% | 115 8% | 117 10% |
Pro
Contra
O Fujitsu LifeBook U748 é um portátil empresarial sólido, assim como seu antecessor. A atualização da CPU melhora o desempenho a um custo para a duração da bateria, pois consome mais energia. No geral, o LifeBook U748 é um dispositivo impressionante com uma boa tela multi-touch e um teclado decente que é confortável para trabalhar. O ruído do ventilador é gerenciável, mesmo que às vezes possa ser frustrante, enquanto os alto-falantes e a webcam são bastante comuns. Esses dois componentes são frequentemente ignorados nos dispositivos empresariais.
O Fujitsu LifeBook U748 nos conquista com sua boa tela, SSD rápido e muitos recursos de segurança necessários para dispositivos empresariais. Infelizmente, o TouchPad abaixo da média e desatualizado permanece o mesmo do modelo do ano passado.
A Fujitsu equipou o LifeBook U748 com o mesmo, muito criticado TouchPad do seu antecessor. Em contraste, gostamos do design fino e da base estável, que parece e se sente premium. Uma boa seleção de portas completa o pacote, embora teríamos gostado de uma porta Thunderbolt 3.
O Fujitsu LifeBook U748 recebe uma recomendação nossa, pois oferece um bom pacote geral. No entanto, a concorrência continua a melhorar, e assim o LifeBook muitas vezes terá dificuldade em acompanhar o Lenovo ThinkPad T480s.
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
- 04/28/2018 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
