Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook E746 (i5-6200U, HD520)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP 14-bs007ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
HP 14-bs007ng |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 1032:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 LG Philips LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-bs007ng AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -31% | -32% | -29% | -39% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.1 | 41.04 -36% | 40.55 -37% | 42.21 -34% | 36.53 -43% |
sRGB Coverage | 83.9 | 61.2 -27% | 61 -27% | 62.7 -25% | 54.9 -35% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.3 | 42.47 -31% | 41.89 -32% | 43.71 -29% | 37.74 -38% |
Response Times | -4% | -9% | -38% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 39 ? -15% | 38 ? -12% | 50.4 ? -48% | 39 ? -15% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 28 ? -17% | 26.8 ? -12% | 30.8 ? -28% | 27 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 25000 ? 19% | 20410 ? -3% | ||
Screen | -32% | -42% | -40% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 320 | 271 -15% | 283.9 -11% | 274 -14% | 251 -22% |
Brightness | 315 | 256 -19% | 261 -17% | 256 -19% | 229 -27% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 85 -1% | 85 -1% | 85 -1% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.43 -39% | 0.25 19% | 0.35 -13% | 0.15 52% |
Contrast | 1032 | 630 -39% | 1136 10% | 783 -24% | 1673 62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.44 | 5.03 -46% | 6.4 -86% | 6.1 -77% | 4.67 -36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.39 | 11.9 -27% | 18.7 -99% | 13.8 -47% | 9.4 -0% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.31 | 4.02 -74% | 6.3 -173% | 5.7 -147% | 3.09 -34% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.39 92% | 2.11 104% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6496 100% | 6659 98% | 6511 100% | 6419 101% | 7050 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 39 -29% | 38 -31% | 40.2 -27% | 35 -36% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 61 -27% | 60 -29% | 62.4 -26% | 55 -35% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -22% /
-26% | -28% /
-34% | -36% /
-37% | -20% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 21000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3133 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4288 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | HP 14-bs007ng SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006 | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 80% | 7% | -3% | 6% | |
Read Seq | 490.6 | 1086 121% | 495.2 1% | 456.1 -7% | 510 4% |
Write Seq | 264.8 | 581 119% | 485.7 83% | 457.3 73% | 267.2 1% |
Read 512 | 411.6 | 869 111% | 323.4 -21% | 347 -16% | 347.6 -16% |
Write 512 | 262.3 | 584 123% | 291.5 11% | 277.3 6% | 267.5 2% |
Read 4k | 24.86 | 35.89 44% | 34.2 38% | 28.47 15% | 33.12 33% |
Write 4k | 110.1 | 122.4 11% | 74.3 -33% | 55.4 -50% | 95.9 -13% |
Read 4k QD32 | 383.4 | 462.9 21% | 321.3 -16% | 304.3 -21% | 392.8 2% |
Write 4k QD32 | 198.7 | 370.9 87% | 188 -5% | 158.2 -20% | 266.4 34% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1359 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5202 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 668 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
HP 14-bs007ng | |
Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.9 | 23.02 | 18.87 | 5.88 |
Thief (2014) | 17.7 | 10.4 | 8.9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
Carga |
| 33.5 / 33.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.9 / 9.6 Watt |
Carga |
30.4 / 28.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-bs007ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | 4% | 7% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 4.5 -15% | 5.2 -33% | 2.6 33% | 3.1 21% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 7.1 10% | 6.9 13% | 6.3 20% | 5.5 30% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 10.2 -6% | 7 27% | 7 27% | 6 37% |
Load Average * | 30.4 | 29.8 2% | 24.6 19% | 29.1 4% | 29 5% |
Load Maximum * | 28.2 | 31 -10% | 30.1 -7% | 42.3 -50% | 33.7 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
Fujitsu Lifebook E746 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 63 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP 14-bs007ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -10% | -6% | 25% | 49% | |
Reader / Idle | 1181 | 976 -17% | 876 -26% | 1398 18% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 283 | 341 20% | 357 26% | 480 70% | 423 49% |
Load | 152 | 104 -32% | 126 -17% | 130 -14% |
Pro
Contra
O LifeBook E746 é um sólido portátil empresarial. Oferece aos compradores uma ampla gama de portas e muitas opções de expansão. No entanto, as configurações disponíveis estão um pouco atrasadas em termos de desenvolvimentos técnicos mais recentes, já que a Fujitsu não oferece nenhum processador recente.
Com o LifeBook E746, a Fujitsu está oferecendo aos compradores um dispositivo de negócios caro, mas muito adaptável.
A relação preço-desempenho é outro ponto em contra do LifeBook E746. Muitos fabricantes oferecem dispositivos com melhor hardware e uma gama similar de portas a um preço significativamente menor.
Fujitsu Lifebook E746
-
11/13/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker