Breve Análise do Portátil Fujitsu LifeBook A557 (Core i5, Full-HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287 cd/m²
Contraste: 1305:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.85% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 BOE NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET BOE, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Lenovo LP156WF6-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | 6% | -3% | -8% | -10% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.85 | 39.89 -5% | 44.49 6% | 40.61 -3% | 38.5 -8% | 37.78 -10% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.9 | 59.5 -5% | 66.9 6% | 61.1 -3% | 57.5 -9% | 56.8 -10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.24 | 41.24 -5% | 45.97 6% | 41.96 -3% | 39.8 -8% | 39.04 -10% |
Response Times | -18% | 12% | 14% | 33% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 51 ? 7% | 44 ? 20% | 37 ? 33% | 38.4 ? 30% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 35 ? | 30 ? 14% | 29 ? 17% | 37 ? -6% | 22.4 ? 36% | |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? -75% | 200 ? 0% | |||
Screen | -80% | -74% | -103% | -32% | -72% | |
Brightness middle | 287 | 214 -25% | 248 -14% | 202 -30% | 257 -10% | 205 -29% |
Brightness | 260 | 201 -23% | 230 -12% | 211 -19% | 234 -10% | 210 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 77 -7% | 88 6% | 88 6% | 83 0% | 71 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.43 -95% | 0.56 -155% | 0.62 -182% | 0.27 -23% | 0.4 -82% |
Contrast | 1305 | 498 -62% | 443 -66% | 326 -75% | 952 -27% | 513 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 10.68 -154% | 8.7 -107% | 12.35 -193% | 7.16 -70% | 9.76 -132% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.81 | 18.07 -105% | 14.96 -70% | 19.9 -126% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.68 | 11.32 -322% | 11.48 -328% | 13.46 -402% | 6.28 -134% | 10.47 -291% |
Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.26 97% | 2.38 92% | 2.44 90% | 2.44 90% | 2.56 86% |
CCT | 6066 107% | 12204 53% | 11179 58% | 15217 43% | 6806 96% | 12103 54% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 38 -5% | 42 5% | 39 -2% | 36.6 -8% | 36 -10% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 59 -6% | 67 6% | 61 -3% | 57.3 -9% | 57 -10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -34% /
-55% | -19% /
-43% | -31% /
-67% | -2% /
-18% | -41% /
-57% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 31 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
PCMark 7 | |
Score | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Productivity | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET |
PCMark Vantage Result | 15019 pontos | |
PCMark 7 Score | 5115 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3556 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4375 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4713 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 Samsung MZ7TN512HDHP-00000 | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX Kingston RBU-SC150S37256GD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -91% | -57% | -53% | -20% | |
Read Seq | 504 | 122.1 -76% | 453.2 -10% | 462 -8% | 507 1% |
Write Seq | 503 | 110.7 -78% | 137.7 -73% | 174.5 -65% | 337.5 -33% |
Read 512 | 393.6 | 33.53 -91% | 308.5 -22% | 306.8 -22% | 325 -17% |
Write 512 | 413.6 | 51.3 -88% | 134.1 -68% | 168.6 -59% | 346.8 -16% |
Read 4k | 36.98 | 0.357 -99% | 19.06 -48% | 16.14 -56% | 29.37 -21% |
Write 4k | 92.1 | 0.641 -99% | 21.31 -77% | 36.24 -61% | 93.9 2% |
Read 4k QD32 | 277.6 | 0.778 -100% | 93.5 -66% | 95.7 -66% | 103.8 -63% |
Write 4k QD32 | 250.6 | 0.672 -100% | 23.3 -91% | 36.23 -86% | 217.7 -13% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 | |
HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX |
3DMark 03 Standard | 17137 pontos | |
3DMark 05 Standard | 12775 pontos | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7998 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 5274 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1553 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 50970 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5690 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 750 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 337 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 340 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 43.2 | 25.2 | 20.3 | 6.3 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 33.4 | 26.2 | 17.5 | 6.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.8 | 10.1 | 4.8 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 15.4 | 9.5 | 5.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 32.3 dB |
HDD |
| 31.3 dB |
DVD |
| 54.9 / dB |
Carga |
| 38.5 / 39.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370 | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 3% | 4% | 8% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30.3 | 31.6 -4% | 31.5 -4% | 31 -2% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 32.6 -8% | 31.6 -4% | 31 -2% | 29.2 4% | 31.8 -5% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 32.6 -8% | 31.6 -4% | 31 -2% | 29.2 4% | 31.8 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.3 | 33 -2% | 31.6 2% | 31 4% | 29.2 10% | 31.8 2% |
Load Average * | 38.5 | 38.9 -1% | 33.5 13% | 34.2 11% | 33.6 13% | 35 9% |
Load Maximum * | 39.7 | 38.9 2% | 33.5 16% | 34.3 14% | 35.5 11% | 37.6 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370 | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -19% | -17% | -21% | -13% | -8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 33.3 | 44.3 -33% | 35.8 -8% | 36.1 -8% | 45 -35% | 34.3 -3% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.3 | 46.3 -31% | 37.6 -7% | 47 -33% | 39.8 -13% | 42.1 -19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 27.8 -3% | 33.4 -24% | 31.7 -17% | 26.1 3% | 26.7 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 27.7 -7% | 33.2 -28% | 32.9 -27% | 27.7 -7% | 29.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.15 / 0.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.9 / 6.4 / 6.9 Watt |
Carga |
31.8 / 29 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370 | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -34% | -29% | -14% | -53% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.8 -31% | 5.8 -100% | 4.9 -69% | 4.2 -45% | 3.2 -10% |
Idle Average * | 6.4 | 6.6 -3% | 7.5 -17% | 7.2 -13% | 7.5 -17% | 5.5 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 11.3 -64% | 8.6 -25% | 7.5 -9% | 8.2 -19% | 6.4 7% |
Load Average * | 31.8 | 38 -19% | 31 3% | 25.4 20% | 49.6 -56% | 31.8 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 29 | 45 -55% | 30.5 -5% | 28 3% | 65.8 -127% | 33 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
Fujitsu Lifebook A557 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P257-M-56AX 5200U, HD Graphics 5500, 37 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | -58% | 14% | -16% | -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 992 | 746 -25% | 1024 3% | 884 -11% | 703 -29% | |
H.264 | 456 | 413 -9% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 525 | 513 -2% | 220 -58% | 542 3% | 342 -35% | 321 -39% |
Load | 115 | 123 7% | 157 37% | 104 -10% | 83 -28% |
Com o LifeBook A557 a Fujitsu possui um sistema muito atraente para o seu pequeno pedaço de mercado. O portátil de 15,6-polegadas convence principalmente com um sólido desempenho de sistema, que sustenta a sua implantação como um sistema de escritório. Até a data o Intel Core i5-7200U se tornou um processador comum que é muito capaz de lidar com tarefas mais complexas. Com 8 GB de RAM, nosso sistema está bem equipado. Se isso não for suficiente, pode ser expandido sem dificuldades, dado que as possibilidades de manutenção são exemplares no Fujitsu LifeBook A557. O SSD de 512 GB oferece muito armazenamento e contribui com um boa parte para a fluidez do sistema.
O Fujitsu LifeBook A557 oferece um bom desempenho para orçamento moderados. Aqueles que não dão muita importância ao design estarão contentes com o Fujitsu LifeBook A557.
Não conseguimos encontrar muitas falhas no Fujitsu LifeBook A557. Visualmente, nosso sistema de teste é bastante simples, e no futuro o fabricante poderia melhorar a poluição sonora. Também teríamos desejado um teclado iluminado. Mas com um preço de 649 Euros (~$682) deveríamos esperar o incômodo compromisso. Além disso, a tela oferece somente um a cobertura de cores limitada, embora seus ângulos de visão sejam convincentes. O Fujitsu LifeBook A557 também deixou uma impressão positiva com o seu baixo consumo de energia que, ao mesmo tempo, garante uma longa duração da bateria.
Pro
Contra
With the LifeBook A557 Fujitsu has a very attractive system for the small pocket on the market. The 15.6-inch notebook convinces mainly with a solid system performance, which underpins its deployment as an office system. By now the Intel Core i5-7200U has become a common processor that is quite capable to take on also more complex tasks. With 8 GB of RAM, our system is well equipped. If that is not enough, it can be expanded without difficulties, since the maintenance possibilities are exemplary in the Fujitsu LifeBook A557. The 512 GB SSD offers a lot of storage and contributes a relevant share to the smooth running system.
The Fujitsu LifeBook A557 offers a decent performance for small purses. Those who do not place too much importance on the design will be happy with the Fujitsu LifeBook A557.
We cannot find much fault in the Fujitsu LifeBook A557. Visually, our test system is rather unspectacular, and in the future the manufacturer could improve on the noise pollution. We also would have wished for an optional backlit keyboard. But with a price tag of 649 Euros (~$682) we should expect the odd compromise. Furthermore, the display offers only a limited color space coverage, although its viewing angles are convincing. The Fujitsu LifeBook A557 also left a positive impression with its low power consumption that in turn assures a long battery life.
Fujitsu Lifebook A557
-
03/29/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade