Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X7C (i9-9900K, RTX 2080, FHD 144 Hz) Clevo P775TM1-G

Gaming desktop in disguise.

O Sky X7C de 17,3 polegadas troca o desempenho por Watt pelo desempenho bruto total. Embora o Core i9-9900K seja significativamente mais rápido do que qualquer equivalente com Intel de classe H de 45 W, o delta de desempenho entre o RTX 2080 e o RTX 2080 Max-Q é comparativamente pequeno.
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K (Sky Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9900K 8 x 3.6 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-R
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1380 MHz, Memoría: 1850 MHz, GDDR6, 418.81
Memória
64 GB 
, Kingston DDR4-3200, 15-17-17-32, Dual-channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN03.1, IPS, AUO319D, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headphones, SPDIF, microphone, Line-in, Line-out, Card Reader: 6-em-1, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 41 x 418 x 295
Bateria
82 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Beveled, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
4.3 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.272 kg
Preço
4200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg423 mm 322 mm 40 mm 4.3 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.3 kg424 mm 332 mm 30 mm 4.4 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Connectivity

Left: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader
Left: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, AC adapter
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, AC adapter
Right: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio out, earphones, microphone-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio out, earphones, microphone-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191.1 MB/s
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s -6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -58%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
243 MB/s +20%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202.1 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -56%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -57%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s +5%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
646 MBit/s
Alienware 17 R5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
553 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s +7%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s +5%
Alienware 17 R5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
668 MBit/s +5%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
639 MBit/s
269.5
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
262.1
cd/m²
266.6
cd/m²
276.1
cd/m²
263.6
cd/m²
248.6
cd/m²
235.3
cd/m²
238.1
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 276.1 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 259.5 cd/m² Minimum: 13.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 276.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 767:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Alienware 17 R5
JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
32%
-3%
2%
28%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
64.7
86
33%
63.4
-2%
64.1
-1%
90.9
40%
64
-1%
sRGB Coverage
89.1
99.9
12%
86.1
-3%
93.3
5%
100
12%
90.4
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.2
98.9
52%
62.9
-4%
65.6
1%
86.2
32%
64.8
-1%
Response Times
-131%
14%
36%
52%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(10, 8)
38.4 ?(18, 20.4)
-113%
20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)
-16%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
60%
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
56%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
26.8 ?(15.6, 11.2)
-148%
6 ?(4, 2)
44%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
11%
5.6 ?(3.8, 1.8)
48%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-19%
PWM Frequency
26000 ?(19)
Screen
-8%
-13%
-2%
24%
-15%
Brightness middle
276.1
333
21%
398
44%
296
7%
240
-13%
299.1
8%
Brightness
260
330
27%
367
41%
279
7%
248
-5%
273
5%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
86
1%
85
0%
83
-2%
81
-5%
Black Level *
0.36
0.4
-11%
0.51
-42%
0.25
31%
0.22
39%
0.27
25%
Contrast
767
833
9%
780
2%
1184
54%
1091
42%
1108
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.51
5.87
-67%
5.45
-55%
4.77
-36%
2.14
39%
5.07
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.84
9.74
-42%
10.36
-51%
9.08
-33%
5.04
26%
10.55
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.56
4.59
-29%
2.56
28%
1.46
59%
1.54
57%
3.31
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
4.5
-67%
5.4
-100%
5.83
-116%
1.62
40%
6.8
-152%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.34 94%
2.4 92%
2.47 89%
2.28 96%
2.46 89%
CCT
6947 94%
6384 102%
7453 87%
8076 80%
6846 95%
7805 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.8
88
52%
56
-3%
60
4%
77
33%
58.5
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.8
100
13%
86
-3%
93
5%
100
13%
89.9
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-36% / -16%
-1% / -7%
12% / 4%
35% / 29%
-6% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1887 (1855.46-1948.65)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64, R7 2700X; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1778 (1771.4-1795.01)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
213 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (203 - 218, n=9)
211 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points -2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points -4%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points -10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
176 Points -17%
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
173 Points -18%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points -22%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
157 Points -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Threadripper 2970WX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
4376 Points +122%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K
2040 Points +4%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K
  (1623 - 2040, n=9)
1939 Points -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
1801 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points -26%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points -28%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points -28%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points -30%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1362 Points -31%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points -38%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
821 Points -58%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points -63%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
212 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1968 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
159.4 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7171 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (6599 - 7171, n=4)
6957 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points -9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points -16%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5680 Points -21%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points -28%
Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10356 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (10150 - 10487, n=4)
10345 Points +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
10275 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9776 Points -5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
9775 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points -7%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9041 Points -12%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8277 Points -19%
Productivity
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8968 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
8702 Points
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8657 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8572 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (8068 - 8702, n=4)
8361 Points -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7497 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points -15%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7218 Points -17%
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
11191 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (9239 - 11191, n=4)
10585 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9904 Points -12%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
8786 Points -21%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8732 Points -22%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points -24%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7337 Points -34%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6161 Points -45%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5610 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (4692 - 5610, n=3)
5303 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points -9%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4622 Points -18%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3662 Points -35%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6352 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (5079 - 6352, n=3)
5857 Points -8%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points -9%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5697 Points -10%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5338 Points -16%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5095 Points -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5610 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6352 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
7171 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R5
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Asus ROG G703GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
-69%
-19%
-15%
-33%
-36%
Seq Read
2323
2203
-5%
1632
-30%
3058
32%
2237
-4%
1153
-50%
Seq Write
2887
559
-81%
1767
-39%
2196
-24%
1230
-57%
1328
-54%
4K Read
30.51
38.74
27%
50.4
65%
38.37
26%
37.51
23%
35.05
15%
4K Write
131.8
92.7
-30%
101.9
-23%
97.7
-26%
120.8
-8%
96
-27%
4K-64 Read
1507
447.2
-70%
1196
-21%
1347
-11%
851
-44%
727
-52%
4K-64 Write
1483
279.1
-81%
1631
10%
1236
-17%
646
-56%
1212
-18%
Access Time Read *
0.032
0.091
-184%
0.061
-91%
0.056
-75%
0.052
-63%
0.063
-97%
Access Time Write *
0.028
0.065
-132%
0.037
-32%
0.038
-36%
0.033
-18%
0.04
-43%
Score Read
1770
706
-60%
1410
-20%
1691
-4%
1112
-37%
878
-50%
Score Write
1904
428
-78%
1910
0%
1553
-18%
890
-53%
1441
-24%
Score Total
4602
1424
-69%
4057
-12%
4066
-12%
2547
-45%
2784
-40%
Copy ISO MB/s
3044
2048
-33%
1487
-51%
Copy Program MB/s
574
428.5
-25%
608
6%
Copy Game MB/s
1489
1173
-21%
1162
-22%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3573 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3437 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 686 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 591 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3562 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3030 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 32.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 170.6 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points +7%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
26223 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25440 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (22504 - 27319, n=16)
25211 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
21515 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
20901 Points -18%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
20236 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18153 Points -29%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points -30%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points +13%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
10364 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (9411 - 10992, n=15)
10046 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
9780 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8512 Points -13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
7789 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
6907 Points -29%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6728 Points -31%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5783 Points -41%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -63%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (5377 - 6005, n=14)
5674 Points +4%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
5649 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5463 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4655 Points -15%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
4231 Points -23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
3679 Points -33%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points -45%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points +13%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
36478 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (31826 - 38809, n=17)
35286 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
35224 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
29453 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
28606 Points -19%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
26097 Points -26%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points -34%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22723 Points -35%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points -43%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -64%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
17501 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
16949 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (9038 - 18934, n=17)
14407 Points -18%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points -21%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
11888 Points -32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11825 Points -32%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points -36%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10749 Points -39%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points -48%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
8811 Points -50%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -61%
3DMark 11 Performance
28229 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58727 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22398 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
9890 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)
106.4 fps +18%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (81min - 119max) fps +15%
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
90.3 fps
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.7 (68min) fps -10%
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
80.1 (69min - 87max) fps -11%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
76.8 fps -15%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
73 (60min) fps -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps -24%
Alienware 17 R5
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
60.8 fps -33%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55.1 fps -39%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps -56%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700, AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
37.4 (31min) fps -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27.9 fps -69%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0): Ø92.2 (86-99)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 452.2 368.6 344.1 201.1
The Witcher 3 (2015) 387.2 272.8 174.2 90.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 318.2 225 175.7 140.5
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Noise
-11%
-13%
4%
-7%
-5%
off / environment *
28.9
30
-4%
30
-4%
28.3
2%
28.3
2%
29
-0%
Idle Minimum *
29.7
30
-1%
32
-8%
31.5
-6%
33.5
-13%
29
2%
Idle Average *
29.7
35
-18%
34
-14%
31.6
-6%
33.6
-13%
32
-8%
Idle Maximum *
30
41
-37%
37
-23%
31.6
-5%
35
-17%
33
-10%
Load Average *
36.5
44
-21%
43
-18%
32.3
12%
38
-4%
47
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
57
-16%
43
12%
50
-2%
49
-0%
Load Maximum *
57
52
9%
62
-9%
45.5
20%
56.9
-0%
51
11%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
29.7 / 29.7 / 30 dB
Carga
36.5 / 57 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)
 39 °C34.6 °C28 °C 
 31 °C37 °C26.4 °C 
 20.8 °C22.6 °C20 °C 
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C
31.6 °C29.6 °C33.8 °C
20.8 °C25.6 °C25 °C
19.8 °C20.4 °C21.4 °C
Máximo: 33.8 °C
Médio: 25.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  27 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.141.72538.236.83137.236.74036.937.35035.936.66335.538.28035.535.910032.937.112532.344.616031.552.920031.758.62503064.131530.36940028.974.350028.974.663028.473.48002875.9100027.974.1125027.669.1160027.567.1200027.368.1250027.267.1315027.460.1400026.964.2500026.861.1630026.757800026.553.71000026.551.11250026.552.11600026.351.3SPL39.681.3N49.6median 27.7median 64.2Delta2.19.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Sky X7C i9-9900KApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 5.3 / 7.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 41.3 / 41.8 / 46.1 Watt
Carga midlight 116.6 / 352.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
MSI GE75 8SF
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
23%
3%
27%
38%
37%
Idle Minimum *
41.3
5
88%
31
25%
23
44%
16.4
60%
19
54%
Idle Average *
41.8
24
43%
35
16%
33
21%
21.9
48%
22
47%
Idle Maximum *
46.1
42
9%
45
2%
40
13%
25.4
45%
30
35%
Load Average *
116.6
112
4%
130
-11%
94
19%
90.7
22%
104
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
245.9
284
-15%
268
-9%
177
28%
203.3
17%
167
32%
Load Maximum *
352.6
320
9%
374
-6%
228
35%
222.9
37%
203
42%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
2h 00min
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh
Alienware 17 R5
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Eurocom Sky X7C
i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh
Battery Runtime
82%
98%
58%
19%
WiFi v1.3
120
218
82%
238
98%
190
58%
143
19%
Reader / Idle
268
301
225
Load
64
78
63

Pro

+ GPU MXM removível e CPU LGA1151
+ Poder extremo da CPU e GPU
+ Bateria removível
+ Leitor de cartões SD veloz
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ 4 baias de armazenamento
+ G-Sync opcional

Contra

- Grande adaptador de CA; cabo de energia grosso
- ”Bleeding” da retro iluminação
- Sem RJ-45 de 10 Gbps
- Curta duração da bateria
- Alto ruído da ventoinha
- Marcos grossos
In review: Eurocom Sky X7C. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Sky X7C. Test model provided by Eurocom

A lacuna de desempenho entre um GeForce GTX 2080 e GeForce GTX 2080 Max-Q parece ser mais estreita nesta geração, quando comparado à última. Optar pelo RTX 2080 da Eurocom Sky X7C trará apenas um aumento de 15% a 20% no desempenho da GPU com uma alternativa RTX 2080 Max-Q muito mais fina, mais leve, mais barata, mais durável e mais eficiente em termos de consumo de energia.

As maiores razões para possuir um Sky X7C não são pelo desempenho gráfico ou tela, mas pelo desempenho e capacidade de atualização da CPU. O Core i9-9900K é mais rápido que o Core i7-8750H em 60 por cento para ser uma melhor justificativa para o aumento significativo no tamanho do chassi, no ruído do ventilador e no consumo de energia. Se você depende de tarefas intensivas de CPU em vez dos habituais jogos ligados a GPU, então o Sky X7C deve ser o indicado.

Os usuários que sabem que vão aproveitar ao máximo a CPU Core i9 para desktop tirarão o máximo proveito do Eurocom Sky X7C. Caso contrário, o aumento mínimo no desempenho gráfico em uma RTX 2080 ou RTX 2080 Max-Q soldadas, é muito pequeno para justificar o chassi muito grande, o alto consumo de energia e o volumoso adaptador de CA.

Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K - 03/11/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
79 / 98 → 81%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
75 / 81 → 93%
Peso
46 / 10-66 → 65%
Bateria
63%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Temperatura
92 / 95 → 97%
Ruído
74 / 90 → 82%
Audio
82%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
78%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X7C (i9-9900K, RTX 2080, FHD 144 Hz) Clevo P775TM1-G
Allen Ngo, 2019-03-14 (Update: 2019-03-15)