Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G)

Estreia do Core i7-8086K móvel. O Sky X7C consegue colocar uma CPU Core i7-8086K LGA1151 em um chassi de 15,6 polegadas para torná-lo um dos portáteis de jogos mais rápidos disponíveis. No entanto, os benefícios de desempenho são um pouco marginais. A principal atração do portátil Eurocom continua sendo sua facilidade de manutenção.
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Eurocom Sky X7C (Sky Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8086K 6 x 3.7 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-S
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1657 MHz, Memoría: 10010 MHz, GDDR5X, 398.11
Memória
64 GB 
, PC4-24000 DDR4 Corsair, 1499.6 MHz, 16-18-18-39, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, ID: AUO109B, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm external 7.1CH audio output; headphone out, microphone in, S/PDIF and Line-in port;, Card Reader: Leitor SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 39.9 x 418 x 295
Bateria
82 Wh, 5200 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo 2.2 W + 2.5 W subwoofer, Teclado: Biselado, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Manual de serviço, parafusos extra, disco de controladores, pasta térmica, brackets de unidade de 2,5 polegadas, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
4.44 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.54 kg
Preço
3000 USD
Links
Eurocom página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg430 mm 292 mm 34 mm 3.7 kg418 mm 295 mm 39.9 mm 4.4 kg428 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.4 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader
Left: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD reader
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, AC adapter
Rear: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, AC adapter
Right: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio out, earphones, microphone-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio out, earphones, microphone-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.3 MB/s
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -59%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s +17%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.5 MB/s
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -58%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -58%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
679 MBit/s
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
599 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
655 MBit/s -2%
317.4
cd/m²		326.7
cd/m²		339.9
cd/m²
334.3
cd/m²		333
cd/m²		352
cd/m²
323.3
cd/m²		310.1
cd/m²		333.9
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 352 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 330.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 333 cd/m²
Contraste: 833:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080		Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Aorus X7 DT v8
AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display
-2%
-25%
-21%
-22%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
86
90.9
6%
66.9
-22%
65.8
-23%
65.3
-24%
88.9
3%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
83.9
-16%
92.6
-7%
91.2
-9%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98.9
86.2
-13%
61.4
-38%
67
-32%
66.3
-33%
99.7
1%
Response Times
79%
14%
72%
54%
-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 ?(18, 20.4)
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
79%
33 ?(13, 20)
14%
6.4 ?(3.4, 3)
83%
18 ?(8.8, 9.2)
53%
60.8 ?(28.8, 32)
-58%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 ?(15.6, 11.2)
5.6 ?(3.8, 1.8)
79%
23 ?(5, 18)
14%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
60%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
55%
38.4 ?(22, 16.4)
-43%
PWM Frequency
26000 ?(19)
204.9 ?(20)
Screen
22%
-3%
19%
21%
1%
Brightness middle
333
240
-28%
360
8%
285
-14%
297
-11%
230
-31%
Brightness
330
248
-25%
336
2%
275
-17%
281
-15%
207
-37%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
90
2%
82
-7%
84
-5%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.4
0.22
45%
0.44
-10%
0.22
45%
0.23
42%
0.2
50%
Contrast
833
1091
31%
818
-2%
1295
55%
1291
55%
1150
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.87
2.14
64%
4.76
19%
3.18
46%
2.19
63%
5.62
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.74
5.04
48%
10.8
-11%
5.99
39%
4.81
51%
10.24
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.59
1.54
66%
1.73
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
1.62
64%
3.69
18%
2.93
35%
1.31
71%
4.54
-1%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.42 91%
2.36 93%
CCT
6384 102%
6846 95%
6091 107%
7165 91%
6464 101%
6625 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
77
-12%
55
-37%
60
-32%
59
-33%
88
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
84
-16%
93
-7%
91
-9%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
33% / 25%
-5% / -5%
23% / 18%
18% / 17%
-16% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
199 Points -4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points -8%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points -11%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -16%
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
162 Points -22%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
162 Points -22%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points -28%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points -30%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points -31%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1619 Points +15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
1405 (1375.04min - 1405.28max) Points 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1391 Points -1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1362 Points -3%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
1091 Points -23%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points -36%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
813 Points -42%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
723 Points -49%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
681 Points -52%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
542 Points -62%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.27 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points -5%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.78 Points -19%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.64 Points -25%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points -26%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.62 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points +2%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.64 Points +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points -3%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points -37%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.03 Points -48%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.48 Points -51%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -52%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
39624 Points +20%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points +19%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
39380 Points +19%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points -11%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21883 Points -34%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
21752 Points -34%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20324 Points -39%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points +13%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
7413 Points +13%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points +10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
6978 Points +7%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
6115 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5454 Points -17%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5432 Points -17%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points -34%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
357.5 s * -199%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
229.5 s * -92%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
205.9 s * -72%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.3 s * -47%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.7 s *
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
118.6 s * +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.6 s * +3%
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6831
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33064
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6541
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
92 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.2 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
155.8 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1408 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
207 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6369 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points -37%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points +24%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points +19%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points +17%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4908 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4908 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6369 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Sky X7C
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)		Aorus X7 DT v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)		Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-20%
30%
-43%
-28%
-45%
Write 4K
152.2
111.8
-27%
130.2
-14%
88.6
-42%
124
-19%
104.4
-31%
Read 4K
60.4
42.09
-30%
57.3
-5%
30.76
-49%
40.68
-33%
35.69
-41%
Write Seq
3002
2288
-24%
4049
35%
1340
-55%
618
-79%
1015
-66%
Read Seq
3329
3321
0%
5325
60%
1362
-59%
2446
-27%
1283
-61%
Write 4K Q32T1
432.9
308.3
-29%
383.2
-11%
305.7
-29%
554
28%
308.9
-29%
Read 4K Q32T1
494
364.9
-26%
424.9
-14%
366.8
-26%
627
27%
371.9
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3391
2440
-28%
4316
27%
1562
-54%
620
-82%
1056
-69%
Read Seq Q32T1
3405
3485
2%
8905
162%
2414
-29%
2228
-35%
2204
-35%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3391 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 494 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 432.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3329 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3002 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 152.2 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
46773 Points +71%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
32126 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
  (24868 - 31412, n=26)
28106 Points +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
27275 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
23540 Points -14%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
22072 Points -19%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
21286 Points -22%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18363 Points -33%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
15182 Points -44%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14528 Points -47%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points -54%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
14228 Points
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), i7-8700K
14119 Points -1%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
12215 Points -14%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11498 Points -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
  (7533 - 16949, n=26)
11440 Points -20%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10351 Points -27%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9771 Points -31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
8935 Points -37%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
8693 Points -39%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points -41%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600
7838 Points -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
22653 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 379.5 320.7 303.4 178.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra. Red represents frames per second with Control Center active while Orange is with Control Center disabled. The results mirror our experience on the Eurocom Q8.

Barulho

Ocioso
28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB
Carga
41.8 / 42.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB		Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)		Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Noise
-22%
-9%
-21%
-22%
-15%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29
-3%
29
-3%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
32
-13%
31
-10%
30
-6%
35
-24%
30
-6%
Idle Average *
28.2
34
-21%
32
-13%
34
-21%
36
-28%
31
-10%
Idle Maximum *
29
37
-28%
33
-14%
42
-45%
41
-41%
33
-14%
Load Average *
41.8
43
-3%
38
9%
53
-27%
43
-3%
43
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.2
57
-35%
51
-21%
53
-26%
55
-30%
Load Maximum *
42.2
62
-47%
50
-18%
53
-26%
54
-28%
58
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 35.2 °C38 °C30.2 °C 
 29.8 °C42 °C28.6 °C 
 24.6 °C24.8 °C22.2 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 30.6 °C
37.4 °C33.8 °C40.2 °C
25 °C25.6 °C29 °C
23 °C24.4 °C25.4 °C
Máximo: 40.2 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.9 °C / 7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.940.42536.235.23133.334.44031.933.25032.234.46333.433.98029.636.210029.147.81252952.71602856.520027.153.325026.851.831525.457.940025.255.750024.961.763024.259.980023.960.8100023.759.5125023.563.2160023.260200023.260.7250023.159.9315023.156400023.158.7500023.158.763002359.5800023.158.7100002356.61250022.856.11600022.953.6SPL35.671.8N2.531median 23.5median 58.7Delta12.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Sky X7CApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Sky X7C audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.33 / 1.84 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 33.3 / 40.1 / 42.1 Watt
Carga midlight 95.6 / 220 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X7C
i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Aorus X7 DT v8
i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Transcend TS1TMTE850, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
-28%
35%
-27%
-6%
-9%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
33.3
31
7%
12
64%
29
13%
23
31%
31
7%
28
16%
Idle Average *
40.1
35
13%
18
55%
37
8%
33
18%
36
10%
37
8%
Idle Maximum *
42.1
45
-7%
26
38%
46
-9%
37
12%
44
-5%
40
5%
Load Average *
95.6
130
-36%
95
1%
156
-63%
115
-20%
107
-12%
109
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152.9
268
-75%
252
-65%
225
-47%
212
-39%
256
-67%
Load Maximum *
220
374
-70%
188
15%
314
-43%
281
-28%
258
-17%
353
-60%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
2h 23min
Eurocom Sky X7C
i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh		Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh		Aorus X7 DT v8
i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh		Eurocom Sky X9C
i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-9%
59%
38%
-45%
33%
WiFi v1.3
143
130
-9%
228
59%
197
38%
78
-45%
190
33%
Reader / Idle
225
169
296
253
83
252
Load
63
51
80
81
47
77

Pro

+ Amplas opções de configuração
+ 4 baias de armazenamento interno
+ Boa qualidade de som
+ Bateria removível
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ Conector LGA 1151
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- Software com bugs - não se esqueça de atualizar o sistema!
- Temperaturas aceitáveis durante os jogos
- Sustentabilidade limitada do Turbo Boost
- Pesado e caro
- Curta duração da bateria
In review: Eurocom Sky X7C. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Sky X7C. Test model provided by Eurocom

Antes de dar a nossa opinião sobre o Sky X7C, é imperativo que os proprietários do sistema atualizem seu software para a versão mais recente Aqui. Está confirmado que as versões mais antigas do Centro de Controle têm um bug onde a GPU se afogará sob certos jogos como o Witcher 3. Infelizmente para nós, nossa unidade de teste foi enviada com a versão com bug do software e, portanto, nossos resultados de teste refletem essa configuração de fábrica. Também observamos exatamente os mesmos resultados em nossa recente análise do Eurocom Q8.

Com o nosso alerta antecipado, o Core i7-8086K na Eurocom é, na melhor das hipóteses, 5 a 10% mais rápido no desempenho bruto do que o i7-8700K  no Sky X9C  e i9-8950HK no Aorus X9 DT. A carga pesada com a velocidade de 4,0 GHz já induzirá uma temperatura constante de 83 °C. O desempenho se beneficia quando o jogo é marginal, para dizer o mínimo. 

O melhor aspecto do Sky X7C continua sendo sua modularidade. Os entusiastas que anseiam por cada gota0 de desempenho multi-core podem querer considerar o Ryzen 1800X mais barato do que o i7-8086K. Até que essas opções AMD estejam disponíveis, no entanto, o Sky X7C ainda é o melhor DTR no espaço de 17 polegadas.

O Sky X7C aloja a CPU Intel mais rápida atualmente disponível para um formato móvel. Não obstante, esperamos que as opções do Threadripper sejam disponibilizadas no futuro, simplesmente porque a AMD ultimamente tem sido extremamente competitiva no espaço de desktops.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G)
Allen Ngo, 2018-08-15 (Update: 2018-08-28)