Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Q5 (Clevo P957HR, i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)

Name: Eurocom Q5
Brand: Eurocom

Ainda não otimizado. O Q5 tem mais opções de configuração e de conectividade que o seu portátil Max-Q padrão. Infelizmente, o hardware e o software não estiveram à altura das especificações.

Allen Ngo, Published 09/07/2017 🇺🇸 🇭🇺 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Eurocom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Eurocom Q5

Processador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1101 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 382.05, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 1300 MHz, 14-14-14-35, Dual Channel

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, 512 GB

Conexões

5 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3,5-mm-Kopfhörer + SPDIF, Mikrofon, Card Reader: leitor SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, mini SIM

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.6 x 380 x 249

Bateria

55 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Control Center, Sound Blaster Connect 2, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.18 kg, Suprimento de energia: 798 g

Preço

2100 USD

Links

Eurocom página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.2, 2x USB 3.1 Type-C (Gen. 1), 2x USB 3.0

Right: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, USB 3.0, SDXC card reader, mini SIM, Gigabit RJ-45, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Q5	195.4 MB/s
HP Omen 15-ce002ng	77 MB/s -61%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro	26 MB/s -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Q5	212.3 MB/s
HP Omen 15-ce002ng	87 MB/s -59%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro	28 MB/s -87%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	560 MBit/s +14%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	491 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	456 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alienware 15 R3 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	681 MBit/s +2%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	669 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	652 MBit/s -3%


275.6 cd/m²	284.4 cd/m²	300.4 cd/m²
261.5 cd/m²	287.5 cd/m²	275.8 cd/m²
265.8 cd/m²	275.2 cd/m²	285.4 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2

Máximo: 300.4 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 279.1 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 442:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2)

	Eurocom Q5 ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P56XT LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-4%	2%	7%	-3%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	63	62.1 -1%	65.8 4%	67.8 8%	64.8 3%	66 5%
sRGB Coverage	92.7	85.6 -8%	90.9 -2%	97.4 5%	84.6 -9%	90.5 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.4	62.4 -3%	66.5 3%	69.7 8%	61.8 -4%	66.2 3%
Response Times		1%	-21%	10%	-1%	41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32.4 ?(16, 16.4)	33.2 ?(18.4, 14.8) -2%	43.2 ?(21.2, 22) -33%		37.2 ?(18.4, 18.8) -15%	25 ?(12, 13) 23%
Response Time Black / White *	28.8 ?(18.8, 10)	28 ?(15.6, 12.4) 3%	31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8) -8%	26 ?(8, 18) 10%	24.8 ?(14, 10.8) 14%	12 ?(4, 8) 58%
PWM Frequency				202 ?(100)	20000 ?(95)
Screen		25%	32%	23%	6%	-11%
Brightness middle	287.5	307.1 7%	304 6%	293 2%	301 5%	386 34%
Brightness	279	309 11%	289 4%	279 0%	280 0%	382 37%
Brightness Distribution	87	86 -1%	86 -1%	84 -3%	87 0%	93 7%
Black Level *	0.65	0.35 46%	0.26 60%	0.33 49%	0.32 51%	0.39 40%
Contrast	442	877 98%	1169 164%	888 101%	941 113%	990 124%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	3.4 24%	3.46 23%	3.59 20%	6.21 -38%	10.2 -127%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.9	8.2 8%	7.72 13%	5.79 35%	10.78 -21%	15.81 -78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.6	1.4 70%	2.46 47%	3.86 16%	6.08 -32%	11.28 -145%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.19 ^100%	2.38 ^92%	2.53 ^87%	2.31 ^95%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7393 ^88%	6558 ^99%	6915 ^94%	7229 ^90%	7375 ^88%	11383 ^57%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	55.6 -6%	59 0%	63 7%	55 -7%	59 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92.3	85 -8%	91 -1%	97 5%	84 -9%	90 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 16%	4% / 19%	13% / 19%	1% / 3%	11% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	190 Points +25%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK	160 Points +5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points 0%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	150 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	148 Points -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points -5%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	133 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	897 Points +22%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK	758 Points +3%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points -1%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	721 Points -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	706 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	679 Points -8%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	503 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -34%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	2.19 Points +27%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.81 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.81 Points +5%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.73 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.69 Points -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.68 Points -3%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.54 Points -11%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	1.51 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	9.78 Points +20%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro Intel Core i7-7820HK	8.34 Points +2%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.06 Points -1%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.75 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.47 Points -8%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	6.89 Points -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5.81 Points -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -35%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	28189 Points +29%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	22243 Points +2%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	21824 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	21313 Points -2%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	20801 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20283 Points -7%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	17618 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -34%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	7222 Points +23%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5877 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5860 Points 0%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	5632 Points -4%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5516 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5484 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -15%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN Intel Core i5-7300HQ	4920 Points -16%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -43%
Eurocom Q5 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	225.6 s *
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.7 s * -0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Intel Core i7-7700HQ	211.1 s * +6%
Gigabyte P55 V4 Intel Core i7-5700HQ	205.3 s * +9%
Eurocom Tornado F5 Intel Core i7-7700K	176.3 s * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

11810

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

21824

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5877

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.14 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

64.5 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.73 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

152 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

97.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

738 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	5476 Points +43%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5009 Points +31%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4060 Points +6%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	3829 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	6515 Points +33%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5358 Points +10%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	4891 Points
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4859 Points -1%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	8593 Points +74%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	7653 Points +55%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5171 Points +5%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	4926 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3829 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4926 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4891 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5119 pontos
Ajuda

	Eurocom Q5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
AS SSD		-5%	-22%	17%	-53%
Copy Game MB/s	682	719 5%	1034 52%	1310 92%	574 -16%
Copy Program MB/s	301.5	383.3 27%	470 56%	635 111%	446.1 48%
Copy ISO MB/s	1967	1795 -9%	1337 -32%	1614 -18%	1227 -38%
Score Total	4001	3995 0%	2328 -42%	3943 -1%	2072 -48%
Score Write	1705	1293 -24%	487 -71%	1689 -1%	858 -50%
Score Read	1529	1818 19%	1238 -19%	1512 -1%	831 -46%
Access Time Write *	0.028	0.032 -14%	0.033 -18%	0.024 14%	0.123 -339%
Access Time Read *	0.036	0.047 -31%	0.049 -36%	0.03 17%	0.042 -17%
4K-64 Write	1366	1035 -24%	260.9 -81%	1334 -2%	671 -51%
4K-64 Read	1231	1527 24%	999 -19%	1179 -4%	620 -50%
4K Write	136.2	117.3 -14%	112.1 -18%	150.5 10%	113.4 -17%
4K Read	49.3	50.2 2%	45.64 -7%	51 3%	35.61 -28%
Seq Write	2029	1409 -31%	1144 -44%	2046 1%	735 -64%
Seq Read	2493	2412 -3%	1934 -22%	2819 13%	1752 -30%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3381 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2075 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 575 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 498.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2763 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2073 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 202.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	21366 Points +47%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	18498 Points +27%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	16165 Points +11%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	14557 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	12984 Points -11%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	10349 Points -29%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K	9358 Points -36%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7866 Points -46%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	5895 Points -60%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	4137 Points +27%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	3662 Points +12%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	3262 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	2893 Points -11%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	1810 Points -45%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	1140 Points -65%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	29109 Points +56%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	23314 Points +25%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	20240 Points +8%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	18684 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	17401 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	13279 Points -29%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K	11209 Points -40%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9394 Points -50%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	7982 Points -57%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K	11160 Points +20%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	9878 Points +6%
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4790K	9761 Points +5%
Eurocom Q5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	9319 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	9065 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	8762 Points -6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	8652 Points -7%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7163 Points -23%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	5562 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		14947 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		25659 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12028 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6354 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Fallout 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	118 fps +48%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	105 fps +32%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	102 (95^min - 107^max) fps +28%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe	100.5 fps +26%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	85.9 fps +8%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	79.7 fps
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A	68.8 fps -14%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps -31%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	51.1 fps -36%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -46%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	164.7 fps +26%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	157 fps +20%
Aorus X7 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	145.8 fps +12%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe	141 fps +8%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	131.6 fps +1%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	130.5 fps
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A	105.6 fps -19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps -47%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X7 DT v6 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	124 fps +40%
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	113 (92^min - 145^max) fps +28%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe	103.3 fps +17%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	95.3 fps +8%
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	88.4 fps
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A	71.5 fps -19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps -35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps -51%

	média	alto	ultra	4K
Guild Wars 2 (2012)			62.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)			130.5
Metro: Last Light (2013)			96.5
Thief (2014)			95.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)			46
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)			73	37
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)			60	59
Fallout 4 (2015)			88.4	34.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			79.7	33.6
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	67	65.2
Overwatch (2016)			136.2	70.1
Mafia 3 (2016)		51.6		20.6
Prey (2017)			138.7	48.1
Dirt 4 (2017)			71.8	40.5
F1 2017 (2017)			80	36

The Witcher 3 ultra

Barulho

Ocioso		31.5 / 33.8 / 33.8 dB
Carga		41.7 / 54.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256	Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	EVGA SC15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Noise		9%	-4%	-5%	4%	1%
off / environment *	29	28.5 2%	30 -3%	30 -3%	28 3%	30 -3%
Idle Minimum *	31.5	28.5 10%	34 -8%	31 2%	31.9 -1%	30 5%
Idle Average *	33.8	28.5 16%	35 -4%	32 5%	32 5%	33 2%
Idle Maximum *	33.8	30.1 11%	39 -15%	42 -24%	32 5%	37 -9%
Load Average *	41.7	35.2 16%	39 6%	49 -18%	36.5 12%	41 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41.7	41.7 -0%	48 -15%		40.3 3%	42 -1%
Load Maximum *	54.2	48.8 10%	49 10%	50 8%	53.4 1%	50 8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48.8 °C	56.2 °C	47.2 °C
48 °C	48.6 °C	38.2 °C
38.6 °C	37.2 °C	31.4 °C

Máximo: 56.2 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C


57 °C	61.2 °C	52.2 °C
34.6 °C	53 °C	48.2 °C
31 °C	37.4 °C	37.8 °C

Máximo: 61.2 °C
Médio: 45.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 46.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27.8 °C	27.6 °C	27.2 °C
27.6 °C	27.4 °C	27 °C
27 °C	26.4 °C	25.6 °C

Máximo: 27.8 °C
Médio: 27.1 °C


28.2 °C	27.6 °C	27.4 °C
27.6 °C	28.6 °C	29.6 °C
26.8 °C	27 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 29.6 °C
Médio: 27.8 °C

Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48.8 °C	51.4 °C	47.4 °C
46.4 °C	49.2 °C	35.2 °C
35.4 °C	34.2 °C	29.4 °C

Máximo: 51.4 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C


56.6 °C	59.2 °C	52.4 °C
36.2 °C	47.4 °C	47.4 °C
29.4 °C	34.4 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 59.2 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.2 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.2 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.7 °C / -17.5 F).

Eurocom Q5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (61.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.27 / 0.94 Watt
Ocioso	9 / 13.5 / 13.7 Watt
Carga	87.8 / 158.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Eurocom Q5 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-37%	-54%	-61%	-30%	-43%
Idle Minimum *	9	19.1 -112%	18 -100%	25.8 -187%	13 -44%	18 -100%
Idle Average *	13.5	20.8 -54%	23 -70%	26.6 -97%	17 -26%	23 -70%
Idle Maximum *	13.7	21.8 -59%	31 -126%	26.7 -95%	22 -61%	30 -119%
Load Average *	87.8	73.7 16%	79 10%	80.3 9%	85 3%	85 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	129	130.2 -1%	148 -15%	121.2 6%	154 -19%	96 26%
Load Maximum *	158.6	173.1 -9%	196 -24%	159.3 -0%	208 -31%	158 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 47min

	Eurocom Q5 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh	Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh	HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 91.2 Wh	EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh	Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh
Battery Runtime		-30%	1%	75%	-5%	34%
Reader / Idle	466	229 -51%	256 -45%	568 22%	222 -52%	382 -18%
WiFi v1.3	258	147 -43%	198 -23%	384 49%	167 -35%	264 2%
Load	47	49 4%	80 70%	120 155%	81 72%	102 117%

Pro

+ Duração respeitável da bateria; Optimus incluído

+ Ampla variedade de portas; mini SIM opcional

+ Fácil acesso ao interior

+ Design fino e atraente

+ Preço inicial baixo

+ 2 baias de armazenamento

Contra

- Desempenho mais lento da GTX 1070 Max-Q que o da Zephyrus; velocidades da GPU mais lentas

- Incapaz de manter o desempenho máximo do Turbo Boost da CPU

- As velocidades automáticas da ventoinha não estão otimizadas para o Nvidia Max-Q

- Temperaturas muito quentes das superfícies sob uso intenso

- Contraste mais pobre devido ao RGBW subpixel array

- Optimus forçado; sem opções G-Sync

- Leve rangido do chassi

- Sem opções iluminação RGB por tecla

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

In review: Eurocom Q5. Test model provided by Eurocom

No valor nominal, o Q5 é quase tudo o que queríamos de um portátil de jogos Max-Q. Facilidade de manutenção, perfil fino e atraente, múltiplas opções de tela, duas baías internas de armazenamento, muitas portas, Optimus e até suporte para SIM. No entanto, indo mais fundo nos detalhes, o sistema tem um longo caminho a percorrer contra os modelos de Max-Q concorrentes, como o Zephyrus.

Por um lado, o modo automático predefinido da ventoinha deve ser alterado para atender aos padrões de ruído da ventoinha Max-Q. Os usuários terão que ajustar a velocidade da ventoinha manualmente para 55% para uma experiência "real" de Max-Q. Caso não consiga fazer isso, o Q5 funcionará tão alto quanto os portáteis de jogos que não são Max-Q que não estão equipados com gráficos GTX 1070 ou melhores. Afinal, por que comprar um portátil Max-Q se ele não funcionar mais silencioso do que uma alternativa ultrafina mais poderosa?

Em segundo lugar, as temperaturas do núcleo são mais quentes do que no Zephyrus quando ajustado para a configuração de velocidade do ventilador de 55 por cento. Assim, quando submetidos às mesmas cargas de jogos e leituras de ruído da ventoinha idênticas, o portátil Asus ainda funcionará frio.

Por fim, o GTX 1070 Max-Q no Q5 é consistentemente mais lento que o da mesma GPU na alternativa Asus. Sua velocidade mais lenta, em combinação com temperaturas mais elevadas do núcleo, pode ser um impedimento para os olhos de gamers hardcore. Se você quiser o melhor que a GTX 1070 Max-Q tem para oferecer, o Q5 não é a melhor opção de portátil. Se os amplos recursos auxiliares e as opções de conectividade forem importantes em relação ao barebone Zephyr, no entanto, o Q5 mais econômico ainda poderia ser um portátil Max-Q convincente.

É claro que o Q5 e sua solução de resfriamento ainda não foram totalmente otimizados para o Max-Q, pois as velocidades e as temperaturas são desfavoráveis contra a concorrência. Futuros SKUs equipados com o menos exigente GTX 1060 Max-Q teoricamente seriam uma melhor combinação para este chassi em particular. Além disso, os recursos auxiliares e opções configuráveis fora da CPU e GPU são os mais abundantes ainda para um portátil superfino Max-Q.

Eurocom Q5 - 2017-09-07 09/07/2017 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

67 / 81 → 82%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

77%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

94%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

78 / 95 → 82%

Ruído

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

40%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Médio

74%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Q5 (Clevo P957HR, i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)

Allen Ngo, 2017-09- 7 (Update: 2017-09-12)