Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Q5 (Clevo P957HR, i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Alienware 15 R3 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware 15 R3 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 287.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 442:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
Eurocom Q5 ID: LGD04D4, Name: LG Philips LP156UD1-SPB1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P56XT LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware 15 R3 HPJGK_B156HTN (AUO51ED), TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 2% | 7% | -3% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63 | 62.1 -1% | 65.8 4% | 67.8 8% | 64.8 3% | 66 5% |
sRGB Coverage | 92.7 | 85.6 -8% | 90.9 -2% | 97.4 5% | 84.6 -9% | 90.5 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.4 | 62.4 -3% | 66.5 3% | 69.7 8% | 61.8 -4% | 66.2 3% |
Response Times | 1% | -21% | 10% | -1% | 41% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 32.4 ? | 33.2 ? -2% | 43.2 ? -33% | 37.2 ? -15% | 25 ? 23% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 28 ? 3% | 31.2 ? -8% | 26 ? 10% | 24.8 ? 14% | 12 ? 58% |
PWM Frequency | 202 ? | 20000 ? | ||||
Screen | 25% | 32% | 23% | 6% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 287.5 | 307.1 7% | 304 6% | 293 2% | 301 5% | 386 34% |
Brightness | 279 | 309 11% | 289 4% | 279 0% | 280 0% | 382 37% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 86 -1% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 93 7% |
Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.35 46% | 0.26 60% | 0.33 49% | 0.32 51% | 0.39 40% |
Contrast | 442 | 877 98% | 1169 164% | 888 101% | 941 113% | 990 124% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.4 24% | 3.46 23% | 3.59 20% | 6.21 -38% | 10.2 -127% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.9 | 8.2 8% | 7.72 13% | 5.79 35% | 10.78 -21% | 15.81 -78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 1.4 70% | 2.46 47% | 3.86 16% | 6.08 -32% | 11.28 -145% |
Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.19 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.53 87% | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 7393 88% | 6558 99% | 6915 94% | 7229 90% | 7375 88% | 11383 57% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 55.6 -6% | 59 0% | 63 7% | 55 -7% | 59 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.3 | 85 -8% | 91 -1% | 97 5% | 84 -9% | 90 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
16% | 4% /
19% | 13% /
19% | 1% /
3% | 11% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Gigabyte P55 V4 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Eurocom Q5 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3829 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4926 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4891 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5119 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Eurocom Q5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -5% | -22% | 17% | -53% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 682 | 719 5% | 1034 52% | 1310 92% | 574 -16% |
Copy Program MB/s | 301.5 | 383.3 27% | 470 56% | 635 111% | 446.1 48% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1967 | 1795 -9% | 1337 -32% | 1614 -18% | 1227 -38% |
Score Total | 4001 | 3995 0% | 2328 -42% | 3943 -1% | 2072 -48% |
Score Write | 1705 | 1293 -24% | 487 -71% | 1689 -1% | 858 -50% |
Score Read | 1529 | 1818 19% | 1238 -19% | 1512 -1% | 831 -46% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.032 -14% | 0.033 -18% | 0.024 14% | 0.123 -339% |
Access Time Read * | 0.036 | 0.047 -31% | 0.049 -36% | 0.03 17% | 0.042 -17% |
4K-64 Write | 1366 | 1035 -24% | 260.9 -81% | 1334 -2% | 671 -51% |
4K-64 Read | 1231 | 1527 24% | 999 -19% | 1179 -4% | 620 -50% |
4K Write | 136.2 | 117.3 -14% | 112.1 -18% | 150.5 10% | 113.4 -17% |
4K Read | 49.3 | 50.2 2% | 45.64 -7% | 51 3% | 35.61 -28% |
Seq Write | 2029 | 1409 -31% | 1144 -44% | 2046 1% | 735 -64% |
Seq Read | 2493 | 2412 -3% | 1934 -22% | 2819 13% | 1752 -30% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
Eurocom P5 Pro Extreme | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14947 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25659 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12028 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6354 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
Aorus X7 v7 | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Aorus X7 DT v6 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
Eurocom Q5 | |
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US | |
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 62.2 | ||||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 130.5 | ||||
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 96.5 | ||||
Thief (2014) | 95.1 | ||||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 46 | ||||
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 73 | 37 | |||
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 59 | |||
Fallout 4 (2015) | 88.4 | 34.3 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 79.7 | 33.6 | |||
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 67 | 65.2 | |||
Overwatch (2016) | 136.2 | 70.1 | |||
Mafia 3 (2016) | 51.6 | 20.6 | |||
Prey (2017) | 138.7 | 48.1 | |||
Dirt 4 (2017) | 71.8 | 40.5 | |||
F1 2017 (2017) | 80 | 36 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 33.8 / 33.8 dB |
Carga |
| 41.7 / 54.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Eurocom Q5 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Alienware 15 R3 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | EVGA SC15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | -4% | -5% | 4% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 28.5 2% | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 28 3% | 30 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 28.5 10% | 34 -8% | 31 2% | 31.9 -1% | 30 5% |
Idle Average * | 33.8 | 28.5 16% | 35 -4% | 32 5% | 32 5% | 33 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.8 | 30.1 11% | 39 -15% | 42 -24% | 32 5% | 37 -9% |
Load Average * | 41.7 | 35.2 16% | 39 6% | 49 -18% | 36.5 12% | 41 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 41.7 -0% | 48 -15% | 40.3 3% | 42 -1% | |
Load Maximum * | 54.2 | 48.8 10% | 49 10% | 50 8% | 53.4 1% | 50 8% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.2 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.2 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.7 °C / -17.5 F).
Eurocom Q5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.27 / 0.94 Watt |
Ocioso | 9 / 13.5 / 13.7 Watt |
Carga |
87.8 / 158.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Eurocom Q5 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -37% | -54% | -61% | -30% | -43% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9 | 19.1 -112% | 18 -100% | 25.8 -187% | 13 -44% | 18 -100% |
Idle Average * | 13.5 | 20.8 -54% | 23 -70% | 26.6 -97% | 17 -26% | 23 -70% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.7 | 21.8 -59% | 31 -126% | 26.7 -95% | 22 -61% | 30 -119% |
Load Average * | 87.8 | 73.7 16% | 79 10% | 80.3 9% | 85 3% | 85 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 129 | 130.2 -1% | 148 -15% | 121.2 6% | 154 -19% | 96 26% |
Load Maximum * | 158.6 | 173.1 -9% | 196 -24% | 159.3 -0% | 208 -31% | 158 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Eurocom Q5 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 91.2 Wh | EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Alienware 15 R3 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -30% | 1% | 75% | -5% | 34% | |
Reader / Idle | 466 | 229 -51% | 256 -45% | 568 22% | 222 -52% | 382 -18% |
WiFi v1.3 | 258 | 147 -43% | 198 -23% | 384 49% | 167 -35% | 264 2% |
Load | 47 | 49 4% | 80 70% | 120 155% | 81 72% | 102 117% |
Pro
Contra
No valor nominal, o Q5 é quase tudo o que queríamos de um portátil de jogos Max-Q. Facilidade de manutenção, perfil fino e atraente, múltiplas opções de tela, duas baías internas de armazenamento, muitas portas, Optimus e até suporte para SIM. No entanto, indo mais fundo nos detalhes, o sistema tem um longo caminho a percorrer contra os modelos de Max-Q concorrentes, como o Zephyrus.
Por um lado, o modo automático predefinido da ventoinha deve ser alterado para atender aos padrões de ruído da ventoinha Max-Q. Os usuários terão que ajustar a velocidade da ventoinha manualmente para 55% para uma experiência "real" de Max-Q. Caso não consiga fazer isso, o Q5 funcionará tão alto quanto os portáteis de jogos que não são Max-Q que não estão equipados com gráficos GTX 1070 ou melhores. Afinal, por que comprar um portátil Max-Q se ele não funcionar mais silencioso do que uma alternativa ultrafina mais poderosa?
Em segundo lugar, as temperaturas do núcleo são mais quentes do que no Zephyrus quando ajustado para a configuração de velocidade do ventilador de 55 por cento. Assim, quando submetidos às mesmas cargas de jogos e leituras de ruído da ventoinha idênticas, o portátil Asus ainda funcionará frio.
Por fim, o GTX 1070 Max-Q no Q5 é consistentemente mais lento que o da mesma GPU na alternativa Asus. Sua velocidade mais lenta, em combinação com temperaturas mais elevadas do núcleo, pode ser um impedimento para os olhos de gamers hardcore. Se você quiser o melhor que a GTX 1070 Max-Q tem para oferecer, o Q5 não é a melhor opção de portátil. Se os amplos recursos auxiliares e as opções de conectividade forem importantes em relação ao barebone Zephyr, no entanto, o Q5 mais econômico ainda poderia ser um portátil Max-Q convincente.
É claro que o Q5 e sua solução de resfriamento ainda não foram totalmente otimizados para o Max-Q, pois as velocidades e as temperaturas são desfavoráveis contra a concorrência. Futuros SKUs equipados com o menos exigente GTX 1060 Max-Q teoricamente seriam uma melhor combinação para este chassi em particular. Além disso, os recursos auxiliares e opções configuráveis fora da CPU e GPU são os mais abundantes ainda para um portátil superfino Max-Q.
Eurocom Q5
- 09/07/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo