Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB70RC/PB71RC)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Q8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Q8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 995:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Q8 AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -5% | -2% | -12% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 60.6 -8% | 62.9 -5% | 63.6 -4% | 58.7 -11% | 64 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.1 | 89 -4% | 87.8 -6% | 95.4 2% | 81 -13% | 90.4 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 62.1 -8% | 63.9 -5% | 65.5 -3% | 58.9 -12% | 64.8 -4% |
| Response Times | 34% | 32% | 846% | -10% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 6.8 ? 59% | 7.2 ? 56% | 7.6 ? 54% | 21.6 ? -32% | 15.6 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 9.6 ? 8% | 9.6 ? 8% | 9.6 ? 8% | 9 ? 13% | 12.8 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency | 990 ? | 25510 ? 2477% | ||||
| Screen | 4% | 17% | 26% | -74% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 298.4 | 299.3 0% | 288 -3% | 355 19% | 367.9 23% | 299.1 0% |
| Brightness | 287 | 294 2% | 287 0% | 327 14% | 346 21% | 273 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 91 1% | 85 -6% | 84 -7% | 81 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.2 33% | 0.26 13% | 0.55 -83% | 0.27 10% |
| Contrast | 995 | 1032 4% | 1440 45% | 1365 37% | 669 -33% | 1108 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.58 | 2.55 29% | 2.33 35% | 1.54 57% | 9.86 -175% | 5.07 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.29 | 4.73 25% | 5.34 15% | 3 52% | 17.56 -179% | 10.55 -68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.82 | 2.9 -3% | 2.47 12% | 0.77 73% | 4.43 -57% | 3.31 -17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 3.5 -13% | 1.19 62% | 2.19 29% | 12.4 -300% | 6.8 -119% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.42 91% | 2.09 105% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7064 92% | 7101 92% | 6710 97% | 6893 94% | 11064 59% | 7805 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.2 | 57 -5% | 57 -5% | 61 1% | 52.5 -13% | 58.5 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.7 | 88.7 -4% | 88 -5% | 95 2% | 80.5 -13% | 89.9 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
6% | 15% /
15% | 290% /
166% | -32% /
-54% | -11% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 990 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 990 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 990 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4402 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5721 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5982 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Eurocom Q8 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -12% | -2% | -11% | -26% | |
| Seq Read | 2297 | 1831 -20% | 3005 31% | 2481 8% | 1153 -50% |
| Seq Write | 2860 | 1744 -39% | 2668 -7% | 1869 -35% | 1328 -54% |
| 4K Read | 52.2 | 45.16 -13% | 40.89 -22% | 35.57 -32% | 35.05 -33% |
| 4K Write | 125.8 | 107.1 -15% | 94.4 -25% | 107.9 -14% | 96 -24% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1412 | 1240 -12% | 1366 -3% | 1232 -13% | 727 -49% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1228 | 1695 38% | 1197 -3% | 1285 5% | 1212 -1% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.064 -60% | 0.055 -38% | 0.043 -8% | 0.063 -58% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.09 | 0.037 59% | 0.039 57% | 0.035 61% | 0.04 56% |
| Score Read | 1694 | 1468 -13% | 1708 1% | 1515 -11% | 878 -48% |
| Score Write | 1640 | 1977 21% | 1558 -5% | 1579 -4% | 1441 -12% |
| Score Total | 4235 | 4197 -1% | 4123 -3% | 3840 -9% | 2784 -34% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2514 | 2086 -17% | 1596 -37% | 1487 -41% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 592 | 425.5 -28% | 406.7 -31% | 608 3% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1494 | 555 -63% | 958 -36% | 1162 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21509 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 40478 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18195 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7863 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile (64 - 82.1, n=21) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Eurocom Q8 | |
| Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T | |
| Asus G752VY-GC110T | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 355 | 305.3 | 272.2 | 172.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 317.7 | 245.5 | 145.1 | 73.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 218.2 | 201.7 | 148.5 | 122 |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Eurocom Q8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -2% | -5% | -1% | -12% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 29 -4% | 30 -7% | 28 -0% | 29 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 29 -4% | 31 -11% | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 28.2 1% | 32 -13% | 32 -13% | 31.8 -12% | 37 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.9 | 30.8 6% | 33 -0% | 41 -25% | 36.3 -10% | 39 -19% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 42 7% | 47 -4% | 47 -4% | 46.7 -4% | 54 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.2 | 51 4% | 49 8% | 47 12% | 46.9 12% | 54 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.2 | 53 -0% | 51 4% | 48 10% | 49.7 7% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28 / 28.4 / 32.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 53.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 18.6 / 22.6 / 23 Watt |
| Carga |
93.4 / 233.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Q8 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL73 8SE-010US i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | -12% | 18% | 25% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18.6 | 16.2 13% | 26.3 -41% | 9.5 49% | 8.8 53% | 37.5 -102% |
| Idle Average * | 22.6 | 20.4 10% | 29 -28% | 16.2 28% | 16.2 28% | 37.6 -66% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26.1 -13% | 32.3 -40% | 23.8 -3% | 18.3 20% | 37.6 -63% |
| Load Average * | 93.4 | 96.5 -3% | 82.4 12% | 101.7 -9% | 86.1 8% | 122.4 -31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 186.4 | 182.9 2% | 192 -3% | 155 17% | 146.7 21% | 180.3 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 233.6 | 214.3 8% | 170.2 27% | 172.2 26% | 186.4 20% | 277.4 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | MSI GS75 8SG Stealth i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Eurocom Q8 i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 59% | 29% | 75% | 28% | 58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 251 | 295 18% | 298 19% | 464 85% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 120 | 280 133% | 230 92% | 316 163% | 153 28% | 190 58% |
| Load | 69 | 86 25% | 52 -25% | 54 -22% |
Pro
Contra
Sempre citamos a facilidade de manutenção como a principal razão para possuir um portátil baseado em Clevo sobre opções mais populares da Asus, Alienware, Acer ou MSI. Infelizmente, este não é o caso do Eurocom Nightsky RX17. O fato de haver de duas a três vezes mais parafusos para serem removidos e de que o teclado precisa ser desconectado apenas para atualizar algo tão simples quanto RAM ou armazenamento é um passo na direção oposta. Os projetos da Clevo sempre foram bem-sucedidos em conectar o usuário aos componentes principais de um portátil mais do que os concorrentes, mas não sentimos o mesmo vínculo com a natureza fechada do Nightsky RX17. Quando se torna mais rápido e fácil adicionar uma barra de RAM a um Razer Blade Pro 17 do que a um barebone maior Clevo, então você sabe que fez algo errado em algum ponto.
Além da decepcionante capacidade de manutenção, o Nightsky RX17 não faz o suficiente para se destacar no mar de alternativas de jogos de 17 polegadas. Sim, o desempenho é excelente, mas o ruído do ventilador, a duração da bateria, a superfície do clickpad e a rigidez do chassi podem ser melhorados. O Asus ROG Strix Hero III G731GW pode ser encontrado on-line com a mesma CPU Core i7-9750H, GPU RTX 2070 e tela de 144 Hz como nossa configuração Eurocom por cerca de US $200 a US $300 a menos. Se você está insistindo em ter o melhor que o Clevo tem para oferecer, então o Eurocom Sky X4C ou X7C será uma melhor compra que o Nightsky RX17.
O Nightsky RX17 funciona um pouco mais rápido do que um portátil concorrente com o mesmo Core i7-9750H e GeForce RTX 2070. Infelizmente, é provável que também seja significativamente mais difícil fazer a manutenção ou atualizar.
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
- 07/01/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
