Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB70RC/PB71RC)

Um Clevo de manutenção difícil.

O Nightsky RX17 de tamanho médio oferece um desempenho de jogos de alta qualidade, como seria de esperar de um produto da Eurocom. Infelizmente, ele deixa de lado o único recurso que torna outros portáteis de jogos da Eurocom tão atraentes para os entusiastas e criadores.
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1315 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR4-3000, PC4-24000, 18-18-18-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, BOE07B6, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: Leitor SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.9 x 399 x 275
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo de 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Control Center 3.0, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.9 kg, Suprimento de energia: 826 g
Preço
2900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

418 mm 287 mm 24.9 mm 3 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 275 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: SD card reader (underneath)
Front: SD card reader (underneath)
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A
Right: USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.3, USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-A, AC adapter
Rear: Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, mDP 1.3, USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-A, AC adapter
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.5 MB/s
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
183 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s -12%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.6 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
219.1 MB/s
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -64%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s +10%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
634 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s +12%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s
282.1
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
278.3
cd/m²
290.2
cd/m²
298.4
cd/m²
287.8
cd/m²
272.3
cd/m²
303.4
cd/m²
285.4
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV173FHM-N44 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 303.4 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 287 cd/m² Minimum: 18.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 995:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.82
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Eurocom Q8
AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-7%
-5%
-2%
-12%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
66.1
60.6
-8%
62.9
-5%
63.6
-4%
58.7
-11%
64
-3%
sRGB Coverage
93.1
89
-4%
87.8
-6%
95.4
2%
81
-13%
90.4
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.2
62.1
-8%
63.9
-5%
65.5
-3%
58.9
-12%
64.8
-4%
Response Times
34%
32%
846%
-10%
-9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 ?(8.4, 8)
6.8 ?(3.4, 3.4)
59%
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
56%
7.6 ?(3.8, 3.8)
54%
21.6 ?(12.4, 9.2)
-32%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
8%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
8%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
8%
9 ?(6.8, 2.2)
13%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-23%
PWM Frequency
990 ?(99)
25510 ?(17)
2477%
Screen
4%
17%
26%
-74%
-22%
Brightness middle
298.4
299.3
0%
288
-3%
355
19%
367.9
23%
299.1
0%
Brightness
287
294
2%
287
0%
327
14%
346
21%
273
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
91
1%
85
-6%
84
-7%
81
-10%
Black Level *
0.3
0.29
3%
0.2
33%
0.26
13%
0.55
-83%
0.27
10%
Contrast
995
1032
4%
1440
45%
1365
37%
669
-33%
1108
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.58
2.55
29%
2.33
35%
1.54
57%
9.86
-175%
5.07
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.29
4.73
25%
5.34
15%
3
52%
17.56
-179%
10.55
-68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.82
2.9
-3%
2.47
12%
0.77
73%
4.43
-57%
3.31
-17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
3.5
-13%
1.19
62%
2.19
29%
12.4
-300%
6.8
-119%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.41 91%
2.42 91%
2.09 105%
2.46 89%
CCT
7064 92%
7101 92%
6710 97%
6893 94%
11064 59%
7805 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.2
57
-5%
57
-5%
61
1%
52.5
-13%
58.5
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.7
88.7
-4%
88
-5%
95
2%
80.5
-13%
89.9
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 6%
15% / 15%
290% / 166%
-32% / -54%
-11% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1137 (1123.56-1298.49)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Medion Erazer X15805 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1197 (1182.87-1216.55)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points +22%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points +19%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points +17%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
202 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
191 Points +10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points -2%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points +55%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +32%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H
1306 Points
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points -10%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1099 Points -16%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points -34%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
815 Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
0.65 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
7.4 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
36591 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
26081 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
23118 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7735 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6566 Points
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
2682 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.1 s *
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
179.4 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  ()
154.4 s *
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.7 s *
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.7 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1306 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
148.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6331 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5982 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5013 - 5982, n=5)
5622 Points -6%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5605 Points -6%
Essentials
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
9972 Points +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
9812 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9607 Points -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8912 - 9812, n=5)
9375 Points -4%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
9233 Points -6%
Productivity
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8515 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7457 - 7987, n=5)
7633 Points +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7554 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points -1%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7462 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7397 Points -2%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8470 Points +8%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
8110 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
7838 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points -8%
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
6938 Points -11%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4791 - 7838, n=5)
6801 Points -13%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5111 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5107 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4402 - 4860, n=3)
4574 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4402 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5882 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5697 - 5764, n=3)
5727 Points 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
5721 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4402 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5721 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5982 pontos
Ajuda
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Eurocom Q8
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
-12%
-2%
-11%
-26%
Seq Read
2297
1831
-20%
3005
31%
2481
8%
1153
-50%
Seq Write
2860
1744
-39%
2668
-7%
1869
-35%
1328
-54%
4K Read
52.2
45.16
-13%
40.89
-22%
35.57
-32%
35.05
-33%
4K Write
125.8
107.1
-15%
94.4
-25%
107.9
-14%
96
-24%
4K-64 Read
1412
1240
-12%
1366
-3%
1232
-13%
727
-49%
4K-64 Write
1228
1695
38%
1197
-3%
1285
5%
1212
-1%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.064
-60%
0.055
-38%
0.043
-8%
0.063
-58%
Access Time Write *
0.09
0.037
59%
0.039
57%
0.035
61%
0.04
56%
Score Read
1694
1468
-13%
1708
1%
1515
-11%
878
-48%
Score Write
1640
1977
21%
1558
-5%
1579
-4%
1441
-12%
Score Total
4235
4197
-1%
4123
-3%
3840
-9%
2784
-34%
Copy ISO MB/s
2514
2086
-17%
1596
-37%
1487
-41%
Copy Program MB/s
592
425.5
-28%
406.7
-31%
608
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1494
555
-63%
958
-36%
1162
-22%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3296 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 654 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 571 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3118 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2935 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 61.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 133 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points +29%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
24623 Points +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points +9%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
21846 Points +3%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
21138 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
21104 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=19)
20123 Points -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18443 Points -13%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points -16%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points -37%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9537 Points -55%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
5622 Points -73%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points +39%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9754 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points +11%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
8000 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=18)
7651 Points -4%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
7105 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6977 Points -13%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5783 Points -28%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points -39%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2805 Points -65%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
5538 Points +28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
5148 Points +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
4323 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (3958 - 4627, n=13)
4294 Points -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
3896 Points -10%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points -30%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points +48%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
34050 Points +27%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
28621 Points +7%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
27275 Points +2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
26752 Points
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
26438 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27298, n=21)
25775 Points -4%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
23819 Points -11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points -12%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
21286 Points -20%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points -36%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12193 Points -54%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
7016 Points -74%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
16523 Points +32%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8086K
14228 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
12643 Points +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=21)
12534 Points 0%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
12512 Points
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
12215 Points -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points -3%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11573 Points -8%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points -10%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10349 Points -17%
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9459 Points -24%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points -27%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
6774 Points -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
21509 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
40478 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18195 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7863 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (81min - 119max) fps +40%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
100 fps +36%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=21)
74.3 fps +1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
73.8 fps
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
72 fps -2%
Dell G7 17 7790
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.7 fps -12%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55.1 fps -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps -34%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
48.2 fps -35%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34.2 fps -54%
Asus G752VY-GC110T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
33.2 fps -55%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
30 fps -59%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0): Ø72 (65-79)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 355 305.3 272.2 172.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 317.7 245.5 145.1 73.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 218.2 201.7 148.5 122
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Noise
2%
-2%
-5%
-1%
-12%
off / environment *
28
28.2
-1%
29
-4%
30
-7%
28
-0%
29
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28
28.2
-1%
29
-4%
31
-11%
28.2
-1%
30
-7%
Idle Average *
28.4
28.2
1%
32
-13%
32
-13%
31.8
-12%
37
-30%
Idle Maximum *
32.9
30.8
6%
33
-0%
41
-25%
36.3
-10%
39
-19%
Load Average *
45
42
7%
47
-4%
47
-4%
46.7
-4%
54
-20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.2
51
4%
49
8%
47
12%
46.9
12%
54
-2%
Load Maximum *
53.2
53
-0%
51
4%
48
10%
49.7
7%
54
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 28.4 / 32.9 dB
Carga
45 / 53.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
 46 °C46.8 °C48.6 °C 
 37.4 °C41.8 °C45 °C 
 31.2 °C29 °C30.8 °C 
Máximo: 48.6 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
43.4 °C46.8 °C42.2 °C
40.4 °C46 °C35.6 °C
29.8 °C35.4 °C30.4 °C
Máximo: 46.8 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.249.22543.150.1314552.84042.851.65041.353.76338.255.68038.357.310037.458.112535.660.11603563.220035.665.525034.367.1315337140031.973.250032.275.463031.278.880030.682.3100029.981.1125029.680.3160029.177200028.777250028.672.1315028.469.3400028.171.1500027.970.9630027.772.8800027.472.41000027.572.71250027.373.21600027.370.1SPL41.588.6N4.480.3median 29.6median 72.7Delta2.3435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Nightsky RX17Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 18.6 / 22.6 / 23 Watt
Carga midlight 93.4 / 233.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Eurocom Q8
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Alienware 17 R4
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Power Consumption
3%
-12%
18%
25%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
18.6
16.2
13%
26.3
-41%
9.5
49%
8.8
53%
37.5
-102%
Idle Average *
22.6
20.4
10%
29
-28%
16.2
28%
16.2
28%
37.6
-66%
Idle Maximum *
23
26.1
-13%
32.3
-40%
23.8
-3%
18.3
20%
37.6
-63%
Load Average *
93.4
96.5
-3%
82.4
12%
101.7
-9%
86.1
8%
122.4
-31%
Witcher 3 ultra *
186.4
182.9
2%
192
-3%
155
17%
146.7
21%
180.3
3%
Load Maximum *
233.6
214.3
8%
170.2
27%
172.2
26%
186.4
20%
277.4
-19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 11min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 9min
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Eurocom Q8
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
59%
29%
75%
28%
58%
Reader / Idle
251
295
18%
298
19%
464
85%
WiFi v1.3
120
280
133%
230
92%
316
163%
153
28%
190
58%
Load
69
86
25%
52
-25%
54
-22%

Pro

+ Desempenho da CPU e GPU acima da média
+ Geralmente silencioso durante cargas leves
+ Leitor de digitais integrado no trackpad
+ Qualidade de áudio decente
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla
+ Bateria removível

Contra

- PWM em todos os níveis de brilho até 99 por cento
- Tempo de recarga lento quando sob cargas de processamento extremas
- Propriedades de deslizamento inconsistentes no trackpad de vidro
- Posição inconveniente do leitor SD
- Manutenção ou atualização inconvenientes
- Barulhento durante os jogos
- Sem RJ-45 de 2,5 Gbit
- Duração de bateria pobre
In review: Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Test model provided by Eurocom
In review: Eurocom Nightsky RX17. Test model provided by Eurocom

Sempre citamos a facilidade de manutenção como a principal razão para possuir um portátil baseado em Clevo sobre opções mais populares da Asus, Alienware, Acer ou MSI. Infelizmente, este não é o caso do Eurocom Nightsky RX17. O fato de haver de duas a três vezes mais parafusos para serem removidos e de que o teclado precisa ser desconectado apenas para atualizar algo tão simples quanto RAM ou armazenamento é um passo na direção oposta. Os projetos da Clevo sempre foram bem-sucedidos em conectar o usuário aos componentes principais de um portátil mais do que os concorrentes, mas não sentimos o mesmo vínculo com a natureza fechada do Nightsky RX17. Quando se torna mais rápido e fácil adicionar uma barra de RAM a um Razer Blade Pro 17 do que a um barebone maior Clevo, então você sabe que fez algo errado em algum ponto.

Além da decepcionante capacidade de manutenção, o Nightsky RX17 não faz o suficiente para se destacar no mar de alternativas de jogos de 17 polegadas. Sim, o desempenho é excelente, mas o ruído do ventilador, a duração da bateria, a superfície do clickpad e a rigidez do chassi podem ser melhorados. O Asus ROG Strix Hero III G731GW pode ser encontrado on-line com a mesma CPU Core i7-9750H, GPU RTX 2070 e tela de 144 Hz como nossa configuração Eurocom por cerca de US $200 a US $300 a menos. Se você está insistindo em ter o melhor que o Clevo tem para oferecer, então o Eurocom Sky X4C ou X7C será uma melhor compra que o Nightsky RX17.

O Nightsky RX17 funciona um pouco mais rápido do que um portátil concorrente com o mesmo Core i7-9750H e GeForce RTX 2070. Infelizmente, é provável que também seja significativamente mais difícil fazer a manutenção ou atualizar.

Eurocom Nightsky RX17 - 07/01/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 73%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
73 / 81 → 90%
Peso
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Bateria
63%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
70%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
77%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Eurocom Nightsky RX17 (Clevo PB70RC/PB71RC)
Allen Ngo, 2019-07- 3 (Update: 2019-07- 6)