Breve Análise do Portátil Empresarial HP ProBook 640 G3 (7200U, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET (jseb) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 497:1 (Preto: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.46% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET TN LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET TN-Panel, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 TN, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 22% | -19% | -15% | -28% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 49.46 | 49.54 0% | 64.8 31% | 40.06 -19% | 42.2 -15% | 35.53 -28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 74.5 | 74.6 0% | 84.8 14% | 60.3 -19% | 62.3 -16% | 53.3 -28% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 51.1 | 51.2 0% | 62 21% | 41.42 -19% | 43.72 -14% | 36.72 -28% |
| Response Times | 6% | 9% | -18% | -4% | 5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 43.2 ? -5% | 39 ? 5% | 56.8 ? -39% | 44.4 ? -8% | 44 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 24 ? 20% | 26 ? 13% | 28.8 ? 4% | 29.6 ? 1% | 25 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 192 ? | 200 ? 4% | ||||
| Screen | 1% | 21% | -19% | 11% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 343 | 315 -8% | 323 -6% | 229 -33% | 245 -29% | 254 -26% |
| Brightness | 332 | 304 -8% | 316 -5% | 207 -38% | 225 -32% | 243 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 79 -10% | 80 -9% | 83 -6% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.69 | 0.61 12% | 0.57 17% | 0.69 -0% | 0.24 65% | 0.19 72% |
| Contrast | 497 | 516 4% | 567 14% | 332 -33% | 1021 105% | 1337 169% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.06 | 8.8 3% | 3.68 59% | 10.16 -12% | 6.89 24% | 4.93 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.84 | 15.03 -1% | 8.33 44% | 17.18 -16% | 17.62 -19% | 10.14 32% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.87 | 9.44 4% | 2.99 70% | 10.87 -10% | 6.45 35% | 2.71 73% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.53 87% | 2.49 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 11115 58% | 11794 55% | 6572 99% | 12881 50% | 6857 95% | 6914 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 47.37 1% | 55 17% | 38.4 -18% | 40.1 -15% | 34 -28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 75 | 74.78 0% | 85 13% | 60.4 -19% | 61.8 -18% | 53 -29% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
2% | 17% /
20% | -19% /
-19% | -3% /
4% | 2% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 192 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 192 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 192 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5067 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3414 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4274 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4545 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Liteon L8H-256V2G | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Lite-On CV1-8B256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -22% | -34% | -26% | -31% | -25% | |
| Read Seq | 1285 | 492.8 -62% | 465.4 -64% | 508 -60% | 480.9 -63% | 531 -59% |
| Write Seq | 283.6 | 303.2 7% | 363.1 28% | 360.6 27% | 426.4 50% | 358.8 27% |
| Read 512 | 679 | 417.4 -39% | 338.4 -50% | 374.1 -45% | 361.8 -47% | 384.8 -43% |
| Write 512 | 300.8 | 301.5 0% | 246.1 -18% | 300.2 0% | 220.9 -27% | 363 21% |
| Read 4k | 41.79 | 33.28 -20% | 25.83 -38% | 31.98 -23% | 21.51 -49% | 31.3 -25% |
| Write 4k | 138.6 | 84.6 -39% | 80.3 -42% | 93.1 -33% | 71.5 -48% | 80.3 -42% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 507 | 394.2 -22% | 246.1 -51% | 274.7 -46% | 277.6 -45% | 239.4 -53% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 293.3 | 295.5 1% | 197.7 -33% | 205.6 -30% | 230.4 -21% | 225.3 -23% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7879 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1541 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 52206 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5693 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 754 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 337 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 65.6 | 33.4 | 19.2 | 9.7 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 39.9 | 24.5 | 20.2 | 7.1 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 30.7 | 24.5 | 15.9 | 5.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 31.5 dB |
| DVD |
| 35.7 / dB |
| Carga |
| 31.4 / 31.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330 | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -1% | 0% | -0% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 29 6% | 30.3 1% | 29.2 5% | 29.2 5% | 31.2 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.7 | 29 6% | 30.3 1% | 29.2 5% | 29.2 5% | 31.2 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 30.7 | 29.8 3% | 30.3 1% | 29.2 5% | 29.2 5% | 31.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 30.2 4% | 30.3 4% | 29.2 7% | 29.2 7% | 31.6 -0% |
| Load Average * | 31.4 | 30.2 4% | 31.6 -1% | 32.1 -2% | 32.5 -4% | 33.3 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.1 | 33.9 -9% | 35 -13% | 36.8 -18% | 37.2 -20% | 32.4 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330 | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -21% | -25% | -17% | -20% | -15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 34 | 40.7 -20% | 43 -26% | 41.5 -22% | 40.8 -20% | 38.5 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 33.2 | 42.6 -28% | 43 -30% | 41.4 -25% | 51.9 -56% | 36.7 -11% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.6 | 29.9 -17% | 31.2 -22% | 26.9 -5% | 25.2 2% | 31.5 -23% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 30.3 -17% | 31.3 -20% | 29.6 -14% | 27.6 -6% | 29.6 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.46 / 0.77 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.3 / 5.2 / 5.6 Watt |
| Carga |
27.2 / 28.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330 | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -66% | -17% | -41% | -68% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.3 | 3.3 -43% | 4.1 -78% | 3.5 -52% | 3.1 -35% | 5.3 -130% |
| Idle Average * | 5.2 | 6 -15% | 8.1 -56% | 5.3 -2% | 6.3 -21% | 9.3 -79% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.6 | 6.9 -23% | 11.4 -104% | 6 -7% | 7.9 -41% | 11.5 -105% |
| Load Average * | 27.2 | 27.7 -2% | 33.5 -23% | 26.3 3% | 29.5 -8% | 30.8 -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.7 | 36.6 -28% | 49 -71% | 36.6 -28% | 57.3 -100% | 32 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530, 62 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | -32% | 9% | -26% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1477 | 997 -32% | 913 -38% | 1304 -12% | 1153 -22% | 1083 -27% |
| H.264 | 519 | 411 -21% | 645 24% | 431 -17% | 545 5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 523 | 573 10% | 432 -17% | 667 28% | 425 -19% | 543 4% |
| Load | 177 | 173 -2% | 85 -52% | 172 -3% | 97 -45% | 110 -38% |
Graças ao processador Kaby Lake, o ProBook oferece alto desempenho nos aplicativos. No entanto, a vantagem sobre o seu predecessor Skylake é pouca. O portátil funcionou silenciosamente durante quase todo o uso intenso e não esquenta muito - qualidades muito positivas para um aparelho de trabalho. O SSD NVMe integrado garante um sistema fluente e breves tempos de espera. Seria possível substituir o SSD removendo a placa inferior do portátil, o qual pode ser feito rapidamente.
A carcaça e os dispositivos de entrada não apresentam modificações; a HP utiliza os do predecessor. Nada contra isso, dado que ambos os componentes deixaram uma boa impressão. A duração da bateria é muito boa, bem como foi o caso do predecessor, por isso deveria bastar para um dia de trabalho. Um modem LTE/HSPA+ permite que você acesse a internet ou uma rede via comunicações móveis.
A HP faz muitas coisas bem com este portátil, porém, ainda recebe algumas críticas.
Nossa crítica se relaciona, mais uma vez, com a tela: Possui ângulos de visão estreitos e baixo contraste. Isto não é aceitável. A faixa de preços de mais de 1.000 Euros demanda a integração de uma tela excelente. Outro ponto de crítica é o teclado, que esperávamos que seja iluminado nesta faixa de preços. E por último, mas não menos importante: A HP somente outorga uma garantia de um ano.
Pro
Contra
Thanks to the Kaby Lake processor, the ProBook offers high application performance. However, the advantage over its Skylake predecessor is slim. The laptop runs noiselessly or at least quietly over the entire load range and has low heat development - very positive qualities for a work device. The built-in NVMe SSD ensures a swiftly running system and short loading times. Replacing the SSD would be possible by removing the bottom shell of the notebook, which is quickly accomplished.
The case and input devices show no modifications; HP brings them over from the predecessor. Nothing speaks against this, since both components left a good impression. The battery life is very good, as was the case with the predecessor, so it should suffice for a workday. An LTE/HSPA+ modem enables you to access the internet or a company network via mobile communications.
HP does many things right with this notebook, yet still manages to collect criticism.
Our criticism relates once again to the display: It has narrow viewing angles and low contrast. This is not acceptable. The price range above 1,000 Euros demands the integration of an excellent display. Another point of critique is the keyboard that we expect to be backlit in this price range. And last but not least: HP only includes a one-year warranty.
HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET
- 02/27/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
