Breve Análise do Portátil Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7: Praticamente um MacBook Pro 17
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.9 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 19.5 mm | 17.00" | 3840x2400 | |
82.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
80.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330 | 2.7 kg | 19.3 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 21 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 539.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1686:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
90.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 17", 3840x2400 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS B173ZAN05.0 (AUO278E), Mini-LED IPS-Level, 17.3", 3840x2160 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 AU Optronics AUO168E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 16", 3072x1920 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -9% | -2% | -1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 90.5 | 72.2 -20% | 82 -9% | 86.2 -5% | 86.5 -4% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.5 -1% | 97.5 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.8 | 73 -27% | 84 -16% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | |
Response Times | 80% | 72% | 10% | 6% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51.2 ? | 5.6 ? 89% | 45.2 ? 12% | 55.2 ? -8% | 52.4 ? -2% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 9.6 ? 70% | 8.8 ? 72% | 29.6 ? 7% | 26 ? 19% | 34.9 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | 26600 ? | 131700 | ||||
Screen | -46% | -6% | -46% | 17% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 539.4 | 328 -39% | 996 85% | 383.4 -29% | 487 -10% | 519 -4% |
Brightness | 494 | 329 -33% | 952 93% | 382 -23% | 475 -4% | 477 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 78 -7% | 93 11% | 86 2% | 95 13% | 86 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.35 -9% | 0.68 -113% | 0.34 -6% | 0.38 -19% | 0.39 -22% |
Contrast | 1686 | 937 -44% | 1465 -13% | 1128 -33% | 1282 -24% | 1331 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.12 | 4.74 -15% | 4.21 -2% | 6.24 -51% | 1.19 71% | 2.28 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.65 | 8.99 -18% | 6.79 11% | 10.18 -33% | 2.43 68% | 6.54 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.91 | 2.12 46% | 2.03 48% | 3.7 5% | 0.5 87% | 0.86 78% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 6.8 -353% | 4.1 -173% | 6.6 -340% | 1.45 3% | 0.9 40% |
Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.207 100% | 2.272 97% | 2.21 100% | 2145 0% |
CCT | 6438 101% | 6446 101% | 7491 87% | 5973 109% | 6557 99% | 6572 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 90.4 | 64.8 -28% | 84 -7% | 88 -3% | 88 -3% | 78 -14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 97 -3% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-24% | 19% /
-1% | -13% /
-31% | 7% /
12% | 3% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
51.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3649 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4385 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5672 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512 | HP Envy 17t-cg000 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 19% | 20% | 79% | 39% | 104% | |
Seq Read | 1141 | 2019 77% | 1161 2% | 1762 54% | 2531 122% | 2958 159% |
Seq Write | 994 | 1314 32% | 809 -19% | 2309 132% | 2289 130% | 2350 136% |
4K Read | 31.98 | 46.61 46% | 40.63 27% | 49.45 55% | 15.85 -50% | 56.6 77% |
4K Write | 61 | 90.2 48% | 138.6 127% | 117.1 92% | 39.88 -35% | 106.1 74% |
4K-64 Read | 790 | 665 -16% | 857 8% | 1237 57% | 1267 60% | 1836 132% |
4K-64 Write | 845 | 813 -4% | 1041 23% | 1986 135% | 1749 107% | 1789 112% |
Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.058 8% | 0.067 -6% | 0.076 -21% | 0.122 -94% | 0.061 3% |
Access Time Write * | 0.679 | 0.167 75% | 0.026 96% | 0.032 95% | 0.095 86% | 0.036 95% |
Score Read | 966 | 913 -5% | 1013 5% | 1463 51% | 1536 59% | 2189 127% |
Score Write | 1005 | 1034 3% | 1260 25% | 2334 132% | 2018 101% | 2130 112% |
Score Total | 2448 | 2392 -2% | 2783 14% | 4581 87% | 4317 76% | 5411 121% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1732 | 1715 -1% | 1350 -22% | 1995 15% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 717 | 622 -13% | 766 7% | 584 -19% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1343 | 1506 12% | 1190 -11% | 1135 -15% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 48% | 11% | 53% | 22% | 53% | |
Write 4K | 64.1 | 119 86% | 124.2 94% | 123.4 93% | 55.5 -13% | 147.6 130% |
Read 4K | 39.93 | 51.9 30% | 46.11 15% | 45.59 14% | 16.21 -59% | 47.57 19% |
Write Seq | 1191 | 2258 90% | 2320 95% | 1959 64% | 2222 87% | |
Read Seq | 1418 | 2283 61% | 2013 42% | 1763 24% | 2543 79% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.3 | 491 9% | 447 -1% | 489.3 9% | 398.5 -12% | 459.2 2% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 365 | 540 48% | 350.1 -4% | 559 53% | 648 78% | 515 41% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1563 | 2253 44% | 1463 -6% | 2979 91% | 2727 74% | 2167 39% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2683 | 3172 18% | 1751 -35% | 3432 28% | 3242 21% | 3430 28% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 445.5 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 926 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
29% | 16% /
17% | 66% /
68% | 31% /
33% | 79% /
83% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (14129 - 15650, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (5357 - 5914, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (5390 - 6171, n=4) | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (18863 - 21105, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI Creator 17 A10SGS | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (12071 - 15054, n=4) | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18021 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31845 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13173 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5637 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (51.2 - 62.9, n=4) | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
Asus TUF FX705GM |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q (65 - 74, n=2) | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 284.8 | 182.1 | 109 | 56.1 | 24.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152 | 140 | 131 | 123 | 75.5 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 111 | 97.8 | 79.8 | 63.7 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 118 | 84 | 75 | 65 | 20 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 105 | 75 | 70 | 63 | |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 276.7 | 125.3 | 105.3 | 60.5 | 24.4 |
Control (2019) | 183.7 | 67.1 | 50.4 | ||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 157.4 | 109.4 | 103.4 | 73.5 | 33.1 |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 92.9 | 88 | 77.8 | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 257.9 | 120.4 | 76.4 | 56.9 | 18.9 |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | HP Envy 17t-cg000 GeForce MX330, i7-1065G7, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -11% | 2% | -16% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% | 28.2 -1% | 30 -7% | 25 11% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 32 -14% | 28.2 -1% | 35 -25% | 32 -14% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 33 -18% | 28.2 -1% | 36 -29% | 35 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 30.5 -9% | 40 -43% | 29.5 -5% | 38 -36% | 43 -54% |
Load Average * | 43.2 | 42.2 2% | 47 -9% | 43.9 -2% | 47 -9% | 44 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 53 -8% | 46 6% | 43.9 10% | 49 -0% | 41 16% |
Load Maximum * | 50.5 | 55.5 -10% | 48 5% | 43.9 13% | 54 -7% | 45 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28 / 28 / 28 dB |
Carga |
| 43.2 / 50.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.4 °C / -9.8 F).
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.29 / 6.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.8 / 20.6 / 21 Watt |
Carga |
104.7 / 107.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Micron 2200S 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TCK, IPS, 3840x2400, 17" | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, Mini-LED IPS-Level, 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -78% | 24% | -69% | 18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.8 | 3.9 33% | 15 -159% | 6.1 -5% | 16 -176% | 3.7 36% |
Idle Average * | 20.6 | 8.9 57% | 20 3% | 13 37% | 19 8% | 12.1 41% |
Idle Maximum * | 21 | 12.2 42% | 42 -100% | 13.5 36% | 30 -43% | 17 19% |
Load Average * | 104.7 | 83 21% | 150 -43% | 72.7 31% | 109 -4% | 91.5 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 99.2 | 130 -31% | 170 -71% | 62.2 37% | 167 -68% | 103 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 107.6 | 168 -56% | 210 -95% | 97.1 10% | 246 -129% | 102.3 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 97 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh | MSI Creator 17 A10SGS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 82 Wh | HP Envy 17t-cg000 i7-1065G7, GeForce MX330, 55 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -49% | -56% | -39% | -26% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1425 | 434 -70% | 924 -35% | 592 -58% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 296 -49% | 266 -54% | 275 -53% | 372 -36% | 718 24% |
Load | 120 | 67 -44% | 85 -29% | 140 17% | 58 -52% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 54 |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto — Sem igual
Elogiamos o XPS 17 por ampliar ainda mais os limites do que a maioria dos outros fabricantes oferece. Ninguém mais possui um portátil ultra-fino de 17,0 polegadas com 16:10 e uma CPU Core i7 de 8 núcleos (que em breve será Core i9) rodando a 99 °C em carga máxima, juntamente com uma GPU GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q equipada com adaptador USB-C. Ele até consegue integrar um resfriador de câmara de vapor - um recurso encontrado principalmente em portáteis de jogos selecionados. Os riscos e o hardware envolvidos são bastante insanos em relação às alternativas que geralmente são mais seguras.
Do nosso tempo com o sistema, achamos que poderia se beneficiar dando um passo atrás e concentrando-se em alguns dos princípios básicos novamente. Fortalecer as dobradiças, tornar as teclas do clickpad mais firmes, integrar um obturador de webcam e melhorar a taxa de carregamento - todos os aspectos que muitos portáteis que custam metade do preço já acertaram em cheio.
Os usuários que pretendem usar o XPS 17 com cargas pesadas de trabalho por longos períodos devem estar cientes de algumas desvantagens. Em primeiro lugar, a bateria pode não recarregar, pois o adaptador USB-C é limitado a 130 W. Há uma razão pela qual a maioria dos outros portáteis equipados com GeForce RTX não funciona com adaptadores USB-C e isso ocorre porque os carregadores proprietários são capazes de fornecer muita mais energia para o exigente sistema. Em segundo lugar, o desempenho sustentado nos jogos pode não ser constante, pois registramos quedas recorrentes na taxa de quadros. Quando combinados com os fantasmas visíveis, os usuários não devem encarar isso como uma máquina de jogos, apesar dos ótimos recursos sem fio e gráficos GeForce RTX.
O XPS 17 é o melhor para operações "explosivas", como navegação ou edição de vídeo, nas quais o sistema não está em alta utilização por horas a fio. A tela, o design e o desempenho por volume são o que torna o sistema mais atraente do que a maioria das outras soluções de 15,6 e 17,3 polegadas.
Um potente portátil sem igual de 17 polegadas, sem concorrente direto. O hardware impressionante e o design atraente chamarão a atenção, mas alguns aspectos básicos precisam de mais atenção.
Dell XPS 17 9700 Core i7 RTX 2060 Max-Q
- 07/15/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo