Breve Análise do Portátil Dell XPS 15 7590: O modelo básico com Core i5 e painel FHD é suficiente?
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 586 cd/m²
Contraste: 1470:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 23% | 12% | 12% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 88.1 32% | 79.6 20% | 79.1 19% | 68.9 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98 | 99.6 2% | 98.4 0% | 98.8 1% | 98.9 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.4 | 91.8 34% | 79.7 17% | 79.2 16% | 70.9 4% |
| Response Times | 31% | 0% | 3% | -33% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.8 ? | 2.3 ? 96% | 52.4 ? 1% | 46.4 ? 12% | 54 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 2.4 ? 92% | 31.6 ? 1% | 32 ? -0% | 52.4 ? -64% |
| PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | 59.5 ? -94% | 1000 ? -2% | 980 ? -4% | |
| Screen | -26% | -71% | -25% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 588 | 421.2 -28% | 451.9 -23% | 494 -16% | 400 -32% |
| Brightness | 555 | 417 -25% | 414 -25% | 457 -18% | 392 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 94 6% | 81 -9% | 88 -1% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.36 10% | 0.34 15% | 0.26 35% | |
| Contrast | 1470 | 1255 -15% | 1453 -1% | 1538 5% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 6.06 -142% | 5.62 -125% | 5.2 -108% | 4.9 -96% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.3 | 11.89 -89% | 19.1 -203% | 17.5 -178% | 11 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 2.69 -348% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 2.8 38% | 6.9 -53% | 2.7 40% | 7.2 -60% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 6836 95% | 6235 104% | 6254 104% | 7038 92% | 6911 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.2 | 81 28% | 71.8 14% | 71.2 13% | 64.2 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 99.6 2% | 98.5 1% | 98.8 1% | 98.9 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
-3% | -20% /
-43% | -3% /
-13% | -18% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1020 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1020 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1020 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4175 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5022 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5070 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4105 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1989 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9545 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1100 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 441 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 58.7 | 34.7 | 29.9 | 9.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 78 | 49.5 | 20.2 | 17.9 | 6.5 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 24.5 | 15.1 | 13.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.4 / 37.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -5% | -5% | -18% | |
| off / environment * | 29.3 | 28.2 4% | 29.9 -2% | 28.2 4% | 30.3 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 28.2 4% | 29.9 -2% | 28.5 3% | 31.6 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 29.3 | 28.2 4% | 29.9 -2% | 28.6 2% | 31.6 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 30.4 -2% | 30.3 -2% | 28.8 3% | 33.4 -12% |
| Load Average * | 32.4 | 43.8 -35% | 36.5 -13% | 36.2 -12% | 47.8 -48% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 47.2 -27% | 40.4 -9% | 47.6 -28% | 47.8 -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.2 | 40.4 | 47.6 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.9 °C / 84 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.39 / 0.62 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.79 / 6.9 / 9.2 Watt |
| Carga |
62 / 108 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, OLED, 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, IPS, 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, IPS, 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -65% | -87% | -65% | -33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.79 | 6.2 -64% | 9.48 -150% | 7.1 -87% | 6.6 -74% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 9.6 -39% | 16.1 -133% | 13.6 -97% | 9 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 21.2 -130% | 16.9 -84% | 14.1 -53% | 10.7 -16% |
| Load Average * | 62 | 104.3 -68% | 90.8 -46% | 103.9 -68% | 77.5 -25% |
| Load Maximum * | 108 | 135.3 -25% | 134.4 -24% | 130.9 -21% | 130 -20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 91.7 | 103 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 27% | -29% | -39% | -38% | -17% | |
| H.264 | 1053 | 738 -30% | 821 ? -22% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 844 | 467 -45% | 576 -32% | 514 -39% | 334 -60% | 625 ? -26% |
| Load | 100 | 199 99% | 76 -24% | 62 -38% | 84 -16% | 97.8 ? -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 62 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
Contra
Mesmo sem uma placa gráfica GeForce dedicada, o Dell XPS 15 é um bom portátil multimídia. Aqueles que não querem jogar jogos para celular ou planejam usar uma placa de vídeo externa em sua mesa em casa estão melhor servidos com a versão iGPU. Particularmente em termos de emissões (temperatura e ruído) e preço, existem algumas vantagens claras. Para a maioria dos usuários, o restante do equipamento da configuração básica é certamente suficiente no uso diário.
Aqueles que não jogam jogos para celular e apenas querem um portátil multimídia de alta qualidade com uma muito boa tela de 1080p definitivamente não errarão com a versão básica do atual Dell XPS 15 7590. Existem ainda algumas vantagens, como a melhor usabilidade em exteriores e a excelente duração da bateria que você não obterá com as versões 4K do XPS 15.
A tela Full HD mate é uma opção muito boa e ainda possui vantagens em comparação com os painéis 4K em termos de brilho máximo. Em combinação com a superfície mate e o baixo consumo de energia, é claramente a melhor opção se você costuma trabalhar em movimento. Você também pode se beneficiar da duração extremamente longa da bateria, que não é possível com as versões 4K (independentemente do IPS ou OLED) do XPS 15.
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD
- 09/26/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
