Breve Análise do Portátil Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD)
XPS 15 2017 9560 (XPS 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 4 x 2.5 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1354 MHz, Memoría: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 373.06, Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, DDR4, 2x 4 GB SK Hynix DDR4-2400/PC4-19200
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, 1000 GB
, +32 GB SSD Cache
peso
1.95 kg, Suprimento de energia: 430 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 416 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 392.1 cd/m² Minimum: 33.2 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 400 cd/m²
Contraste: 1538:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 SHARP LQ156D1JX01 Dell PN: 7PHPT, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -28% | 23% | -16% | -1% | 23% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.9 | 48.94 -29% | 99 44% | 61.5 -11% | 68.5 -1% | 87.8 27% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 73.3 -26% | 100 1% | 80.4 -19% | 97.2 -2% | 100 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.9 | 50.5 -29% | 87.3 23% | 58.8 -17% | 70.4 -1% | 99.4 40% |
| Response Times | 38% | 4% | 38% | -7% | 13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 54 ? | 32.8 ? 39% | 46 ? 15% | 40 ? 26% | 64 ? -19% | 58 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 52.4 ? | 33.2 ? 37% | 56 ? -7% | 26 ? 50% | 50 ? 5% | 35 ? 33% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -6% | 16% | -14% | -3% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 400 | 351.2 -12% | 420 5% | 326 -18% | 371.5 -7% | 361 -10% |
| Brightness | 392 | 325 -17% | 401 2% | 316 -19% | 356 -9% | 344 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 90 1% | 80 -10% | 92 3% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.195 25% | 0.3 -15% | 0.35 -35% | 0.252 3% | 0.38 -46% |
| Contrast | 1538 | 1801 17% | 1400 -9% | 931 -39% | 1474 -4% | 950 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.4 -51% | 3.33 32% | 5.49 -12% | 5.55 -13% | 5.34 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 9.08 17% | 5.11 54% | 11.36 -3% | 10.95 -0% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.2 | 6.71 7% | 2.73 62% | 4.84 33% | 7.1 1% | 4.84 33% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.74 80% | 2.48 89% | 2.23 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6911 94% | 7222 90% | 6457 101% | 5971 109% | 7395 88% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.2 | 50.48 -21% | 78.09 22% | 53 -17% | 63.4 -1% | 89 39% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.9 | 73.31 -26% | 99.97 1% | 80 -19% | 97.9 -1% | 100 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-5% | 14% /
15% | 3% /
-7% | -4% /
-3% | 10% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple SSD SM1024L | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 4538% | 7627% | 3855% | 6213% | 4766% | |
| Read Seq | 123 | 1233 902% | 1458 1085% | 459.3 273% | 1291 950% | 1274 936% |
| Write Seq | 74.2 | 733 888% | 1440 1841% | 325.5 339% | 590 695% | 594 701% |
| Read 512 | 101.7 | 1036 919% | 914 799% | 279.2 175% | 632 521% | 674 563% |
| Write 512 | 42.51 | 439.9 935% | 1058 2389% | 280.1 559% | 588 1283% | 596 1302% |
| Read 4k | 10.84 | 29.31 170% | 9.786 -10% | 22.43 107% | 41.4 282% | 37.02 242% |
| Write 4k | 1.021 | 116.9 11350% | 10.9 968% | 74.9 7236% | 132.4 12868% | 129.7 12603% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 69.8 | 479.2 587% | 679 873% | 149 113% | 542 677% | 457.9 556% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.057 | 218.3 20553% | 562 53069% | 234 22038% | 343.8 32426% | 225.4 21225% |
WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache
Sequential Read:
123 MB/s
Sequential Write:
74.2 MB/s
512K Read:
101.7 MB/s
512K Write:
42.51 MB/s
4K Read:
10.84 MB/s
4K Write:
1.021 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
69.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
1.057 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7504 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14758 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2715 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.6 / 31.6 / 33.4 dB |
| HDD |
| 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 47.8 / 47.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.36 / 0.55 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.6 / 9 / 10.7 Watt |
| Carga |
77.5 / 130 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, Apple SSD SM1024L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IGZO WLED 330 cd/m² 1000:1 Hard Coating 3H, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 58% | 13% | 14% | -67% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 6.6 | 4.1 38% | 3 55% | 5 24% | 12.5 -89% | |
| Idle Average * | 9 | 4.2 53% | 9.9 -10% | 8.9 1% | 19.6 -118% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 5.1 52% | 12.5 -17% | 11.8 -10% | 22.8 -113% | |
| Load Average * | 77.5 | 22.1 71% | 70.6 9% | 55 29% | 102 -32% | |
| Load Maximum * | 130 | 29.4 77% | 90.8 30% | 93 28% | 107 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Price comparison
