Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell XPS 13 9300 – Menor, mas CPU mais lenta
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 87 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 90.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 528 cd/m²
Contraste: 1769:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD SHP14CB, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 APPA03D, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 17% | -2% | -7% | -9% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 71.5 | 96.1 34% | 70.1 -2% | 65.3 -9% | 64.7 -10% | 69.9 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.4 0% | 99.8 0% | 95.9 -4% | 93.1 -6% | 99.2 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.5 | 85.6 16% | 71.2 -3% | 66.6 -9% | 65.3 -11% | 71.5 -3% |
| Response Times | 1521% | -26% | 1% | -3% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 50.4 ? 16% | 55 ? 8% | 57.6 ? 4% | 58 ? 3% | 47.6 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 35.2 ? -6% | 31 ? 7% | 34 ? -2% | 36 ? -8% | 29.2 ? 12% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 116300 ? 4552% | 208 ? -92% | 2500 ? 0% | ||
| Screen | 18% | -13% | -1% | -22% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle | 619 | 603 -3% | 474 -23% | 356 -42% | 404 -35% | 549.8 -11% |
| Brightness | 591 | 577 -2% | 426 -28% | 336 -43% | 389 -34% | 520 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 82 -10% | 88 -3% | 85 -7% | 86 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.35 -0% | 0.29 17% | 0.16 54% | 0.37 -6% | 0.39 -11% |
| Contrast | 1769 | 1723 -3% | 1634 -8% | 2225 26% | 1092 -38% | 1410 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.7 43% | 2.38 21% | 3.6 -20% | 3.72 -24% | 2.12 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 3.1 62% | 5.88 28% | 5.5 33% | 7.38 10% | 3.66 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 0.7 30% | 2.69 -169% | 1.1 -10% | 2.06 -106% | 1.37 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.1 60% | 3.75 28% | 4.7 10% | 4.44 15% | 2.6 50% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.18 101% | 2.37 93% | 2.48 89% | 2.34 94% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 6340 103% | 6843 95% | 6466 101% | 6374 102% | 7095 92% | 6884 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.9 | 76.7 15% | 65 -3% | 61.3 -8% | 60 -10% | 65.4 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.3 | 99.4 0% | 100 1% | 95.7 -4% | 93 -6% | 99.7 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 519% /
283% | -14% /
-13% | -2% /
-2% | -11% /
-17% | 4% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3988 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5194 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4832 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4122 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2875 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 60637 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11119 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1673 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 542 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 74.3 | 46.8 | 40.4 | 14.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 35 | 21.6 | 11.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.4 | 49.7 | 26.2 | 24.2 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.9 | 14.7 | 14.2 | |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 43 | 17 | 15 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 30 / 32.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 645, i5-8257U, Apple SSD AP0256 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -3% | -4% | -7% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.3 | 29.5 -1% | 30.3 -3% | 29.2 -0% | 30.4 -4% | 28.1 4% |
| Load Average * | 30 | 31.1 -4% | 31.7 -6% | 34.8 -16% | 31.7 -6% | 31.7 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.4 | 39.3 -21% | 32.7 -1% | 34.8 -7% | 38.1 -18% | 43.4 -34% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 6 / 10.2 Watt |
| Carga |
36.6 / 49.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | 36% | -6% | -18% | 10% | 1% | -24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 2.1 38% | 1.8 47% | 3.4 -0% | 4.8 -41% | 2.6 24% | 4.13 ? -21% | 4.49 ? -32% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 6.9 -15% | 4.6 23% | 5.6 7% | 8.6 -43% | 5.3 12% | 7.07 ? -18% | 7.66 ? -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 7.8 24% | 6.1 40% | 8.7 15% | 10.4 -2% | 7 31% | 8.36 ? 18% | 9.56 ? 6% |
| Load Average * | 36.6 | 42 -15% | 27.4 25% | 43.6 -19% | 37.9 -4% | 43.1 -18% | 30.6 ? 16% | 46.6 ? -27% |
| Load Maximum * | 49.3 | 64.5 -31% | 27 45% | 65 -32% | 48.5 2% | 49 1% | 45.6 ? 8% | 68.6 ? -39% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 2TB3 i5-8257U, Iris Plus Graphics 645, 58.2 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | -24% | -32% | -30% | -24% | -13% | |
| H.264 | 866 | 627 -28% | 764 -12% | 896 ? 3% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 703 | 777 11% | 620 -12% | 499 -29% | 498 -29% | 537 -24% | 719 ? 2% |
| Load | 205 | 139 -32% | 94 -54% | 141 -31% | 116.6 ? -43% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 1281 | 1032 | 1750 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – O XPS 13 9300 é melhor do que antes, mas também mais caro
No geral, o novo XPS 13 9300 deixa uma impressão muito boa em nossa análise. A carcaça é bem construída, extremamente compacta e resistente ao mesmo tempo. A tela mate 16:10 pode nos convencer a esperar pelos tempos de resposta lentos, mas recomendamos calibrá-la. Os dois alto-falantes também são completamente suficientes.
O desempenho é uma faca de dois gumes, porque o desempenho da CPU é mais baixo em comparação com o antecessor. Esse certamente não é um desenvolvimento ideal, mas, para ser justo, o desempenho do Core i5 ainda será mais do que suficiente para muitos usuários, especialmente em combinação com o rápido SSD. O desempenho da iGPU também aumentou, para que você possa jogar alguns jogos. Isso nos leva ao Core i7 opcional com a iGPU ainda mais rápida. Não deve haver uma vantagem em termos de desempenho bruto da CPU, mas a iGPU é uma atualização significativa e vale a pena dar uma olhada.
O novo XPS 13 9300 da Dell é um sucessor muito bom para o popular subportátil. Não encontramos nenhuma desvantagem séria durante nossa análise, mas o novo modelo não é uma pechincha a um preço básico de 1.500 Euros (~$ 1.614).
O retorno à tela 16:10 é um movimento valorizado e também gostamos do rápido leitor de cartão, mas gostaríamos de ver mais uma porta USB. Também analisaremos o XPS 13 9300 com o Core i7 mais rápido e o painel UHD, em breve.
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD
- 03/19/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
