Breve Análise do Portátil Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7: O novo design do Chassi é mais emocionante que a nova CPU
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
85.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86.6 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150 | 1.1 kg | 12.9 mm | 13.90" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 607.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U AU Optronics B133ZAN, Dell P/N: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.5", 2256x1504 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | 4% | -1% | 0% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 63.4 -4% | 69.9 5% | 65.9 -1% | 67.5 2% | 65.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.3 | 93.7 -4% | 99.2 2% | 95.2 -2% | 95.8 -2% | 98.6 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.5 | 64.3 -6% | 71.5 4% | 67.6 -1% | 69 1% | 67.8 -1% |
Response Times | -2% | 6% | 21% | 16% | 242% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50 ? | 51.6 ? -3% | 47.6 ? 5% | 40.4 ? 19% | 47.2 ? 6% | 59.2 ? -18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 33.6 ? -1% | 29.2 ? 12% | 25.6 ? 23% | 24.8 ? 25% | 41.6 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 2500 ? 0% | 21740 ? 770% | |||
Screen | -30% | 7% | -9% | 2% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 607.6 | 408.2 -33% | 549.8 -10% | 442.7 -27% | 466 -23% | 403.4 -34% |
Brightness | 595 | 399 -33% | 520 -13% | 428 -28% | 462 -22% | 397 -33% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 89 -7% | 86 -10% | 84 -12% | 90 -6% | 89 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.39 2% | 0.39 2% | 0.31 22% | 0.33 17% | 0.34 15% |
Contrast | 1519 | 1047 -31% | 1410 -7% | 1428 -6% | 1412 -7% | 1186 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.23 | 4.6 -42% | 2.12 34% | 2.24 31% | 1.93 40% | 0.94 71% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.67 | 11.84 -37% | 3.66 58% | 7.19 17% | 4.26 51% | 2.92 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.01 | 2.03 -101% | 1.37 -36% | 1.11 -10% | 1.99 -97% | 0.99 2% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 7.5 -36% | 2.6 53% | 9.7 -76% | 1.7 69% | 0.9 84% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.12 104% | 2.3 96% | 1.42 155% | 2.15 102% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 6413 101% | 7966 82% | 6884 94% | 6227 104% | 6382 102% | 6620 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 59.5 -6% | 65.4 4% | 61.6 -2% | 62.2 -1% | 62.3 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 93.5 -4% | 99.7 2% | 95 -3% | 95.7 -2% | 98.7 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-22% | 6% /
6% | 4% /
-4% | 6% /
3% | 85% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 28 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (16551 - 26481, n=4) | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7083 - 7390, n=4) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3 | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (233 - 354, n=3) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3825 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5039 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4154 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 30% | -20% | -23% | 39% | |
Seq Read | 1956 | 1804 -8% | 1801 -8% | 1387 -29% | 1224 -37% |
Seq Write | 1227 | 1000 -19% | 1125 -8% | 504 -59% | 907 -26% |
4K Read | 63 | 45.1 -28% | 39.7 -37% | 42.35 -33% | 41.46 -34% |
4K Write | 156.6 | 115 -27% | 67 -57% | 120 -23% | 126.2 -19% |
4K-64 Read | 475.6 | 893 88% | 1253 163% | 497.4 5% | 1021 115% |
4K-64 Write | 539 | 732 36% | 209 -61% | 354.9 -34% | 1251 132% |
Access Time Read * | 0.042 | 0.044 -5% | 0.069 -64% | 0.055 -31% | 0.053 -26% |
Access Time Write * | 0.105 | 0.095 10% | 0.625 -495% | 0.093 11% | 0.027 74% |
Score Read | 734 | 1119 52% | 1472 101% | 678 -8% | 1185 61% |
Score Write | 818 | 947 16% | 388 -53% | 525 -36% | 1468 79% |
Score Total | 1915 | 2608 36% | 2583 35% | 1520 -21% | 3250 70% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1022 | 1515 48% | 1293 27% | 764 -25% | 1404 37% |
Copy Program MB/s | 302.8 | 535 77% | 560 85% | 256.1 -15% | 402.4 33% |
Copy Game MB/s | 491.4 | 1211 146% | 927 89% | 368.4 -25% | 902 84% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | -13% | -35% | -9% | |
Write 4K | 186.8 | 134 -28% | 106.7 -43% | 112.3 -40% | 149.2 -20% |
Read 4K | 71.4 | 42.91 -40% | 49.94 -30% | 42.13 -41% | 47.18 -34% |
Write Seq | 1203 | 1841 53% | 1223 2% | 630 -48% | 750 -38% |
Read Seq | 2600 | 1707 -34% | 1801 -31% | 1023 -61% | 1137 -56% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 514 | 394.7 -23% | 325.3 -37% | 336.6 -35% | 749 46% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 570 | 398.5 -30% | 551 -3% | 399.6 -30% | 478.7 -16% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 786 | 2250 186% | 1224 56% | 821 4% | 1453 85% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2947 | 3265 11% | 2350 -20% | 2030 -31% | 1713 -42% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
24% | -17% /
-18% | -29% /
-28% | 15% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 4866 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 67829 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14272 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2753 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 937 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Desktop PC | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (15.6 - 33, n=13) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (20.8 - 36.8, n=18) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (10.9 - 20.1, n=18) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 104.2 | 66.8 | 56.7 | 21.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 50.7 | 33.5 | 18.4 | 9.1 |
Rocket League (2017) | 85.5 | 53.6 | 38.3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 28 |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | -2% | -5% | 0% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 28.1 1% | 27.9 1% | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 28.1 1% | 27.9 1% | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% |
Idle Average * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 28.1 1% | 27.9 1% | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 28 1% | 28.1 1% | 27.9 1% | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% |
Load Average * | 32.5 | 33.7 -4% | 31.7 2% | 36.2 -11% | 28.5 12% | 30 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.3 | 43.4 -10% | 45 -15% | 40.4 -3% | ||
Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 46.5 -18% | 43.4 -10% | 45.2 -15% | 40.4 -3% | 32.4 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB |
Carga |
| 32.5 / 39.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
desligado | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.2 / 6.9 / 7.5 Watt |
Carga |
33.3 / 48.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | 4% | -27% | -17% | -14% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.7 -12% | 2.6 38% | 3.5 17% | 3.4 19% | 4.4 -5% | 3.4 19% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 8.3 -20% | 5.3 23% | 8.9 -29% | 6.3 9% | 7.5 -9% | 6 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 9 -20% | 7 7% | 12.3 -64% | 10.4 -39% | 7.8 -4% | 10.2 -36% |
Load Average * | 33.3 | 42 -26% | 43.1 -29% | 54.2 -63% | 51 -53% | 41.9 -26% | 36.6 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.1 | 43.1 -16% | 42.4 -14% | 39 -5% | 40.8 -10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 48.4 | 49 -1% | 49 -1% | 52.1 -8% | 62.7 -30% | 63.9 -32% | 49.3 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 52 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -34% | -30% | -27% | -34% | -35% | -8% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 763 | 501 -34% | 537 -30% | 557 -27% | 506 -34% | 495 -35% | 703 -8% |
Reader / Idle | 1243 | 1710 | 2064 | ||||
Load | 133 | 99 | 112 | 205 |
Pro
Contra
O salto do SKU Core i5-1035G1 para o SKU Core i7-1065G7 trará um desempenho de CPU aproximadamente 23% mais rápido e um desempenho da GPU 70% mais rápido, sem custo adicional de energia. Portanto, a maior razão para possuir o SKU Core i7 sobre o SKU Core i5 seria a vantagem gráfica em aplicativos como edição leve de fotos ou jogos ocasionais do Rocket League ou LoL. Porém, se suas atividades principais envolvem processamento de texto, navegação na Web ou streaming de vídeo, a configuração Core i5 será mais que suficiente. De fato, você também pode considerar um modelo Whiskey Lake-U Core i5-8265U ou Core i7-8565U mais antigo, pois o Core i5-1035G1 funciona de maneira muito semelhante a essas CPUs de última geração.
O desempenho da CPU começa a diminuir ao executar cargas extremas por longos períodos. Provavelmente, isso não se aplicará ao público-alvo do subportátil, pois qualquer usuário avançado deve considerar portáteis mais potentes, como o XPS 15 ou Asus ZenBook Pro.
O aspecto mais atraente do XPS 13 9300 é sua tela no formato maior 16:10, que trará benefícios mais óbvios para o usuário quando comparado às atualizações de desempenho relativamente menores. Essa é provavelmente uma das medidas mais inteligentes da Dell se eles quiseram atrair mais usuários do MacBook Air ou MacBook Pro 13 que desfrutam de monitores 16:10 há anos. Consideramos a relação de aspecto um bom meio termo entre os portáteis tradicionais 16:9 e os portáteis de escritório completos 3:2, como o Huawei MateBook X Pro ou a série Microsoft Surface.
O XPS 13 está se tornando uma alternativa melhor ao MacBook a cada ano. Seu novo design adiciona uma tela 16:10 e um clickpad maiores, sem sacrificar nenhum dos principais recursos do modelo do ano passado.
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7
- 03/25/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo