Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Vostro 15 3568 (7200U, 256GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 195 cd/m²
Contraste: 443:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 BOE0690 / NT15N41 / Dell C1JFR, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Lenovo NT156WHM-N42, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA ID: LGD0573, Name: LG Display LP156WF9-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -9% | -7% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.39 | 35.97 -9% | 36.79 -7% | 39.9 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 54.1 -9% | 55.4 -7% | 59.5 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.69 | 37.17 -9% | 38.01 -7% | 41.11 1% |
| Response Times | -11% | -45% | -69% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 44 ? -13% | 46 ? -18% | 38.4 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 12 ? -9% | 13 ? -18% | 26.4 ? -140% |
| PWM Frequency | 28410 ? | 200 ? -99% | ||
| Screen | 26% | -2% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle | 195 | 241 24% | 242 24% | 277.5 42% |
| Brightness | 195 | 229 17% | 233 19% | 265 36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 73 -18% | 89 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.46 -5% | 0.59 -34% | 0.35 20% |
| Contrast | 443 | 524 18% | 410 -7% | 793 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.23 | 3.4 72% | 10.9 11% | 4.8 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.85 | 7.61 64% | 20.84 -0% | 17.8 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.39 | 1.7 87% | 13.07 2% | 3 78% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.36 93% | 2.37 93% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 15759 41% | 6750 96% | 13123 50% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 34 -11% | 35 -8% | 37.7 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 54 -8% | 55 -7% | 69.3 17% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
14% | -18% /
-11% | -11% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 28410 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 28410 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 28410 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3417 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4544 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 53% | 237% | 21% | |
| Read Seq | 469.3 | 485.8 4% | 1589 239% | 503 7% |
| Write Seq | 179.7 | 456.1 154% | 1217 577% | 396 120% |
| Read 512 | 359.6 | 328 -9% | 1155 221% | 417.7 16% |
| Write 512 | 183.7 | 446.8 143% | 783 326% | 342 86% |
| Read 4k | 26.01 | 26.95 4% | 59.7 130% | 19.48 -25% |
| Write 4k | 68.7 | 86.7 26% | 148.8 117% | 64.6 -6% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 242.4 | 245.9 1% | 473.6 95% | 250.3 3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 147.1 | 300.2 104% | 428.7 191% | 94.3 -36% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1532 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5611 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.3 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 13.1 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 42.7 | 16.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB |
| DVD |
| 35.2 / dB |
| Carga |
| 36.4 / 36.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Dell Vostro 15 3568 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.24 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 5.5 / 5.7 Watt |
| Carga |
27 / 27.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -6% | -38% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 4.1 -37% | 2.9 3% | 4.6 -53% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 7.5 -36% | 5.8 -5% | 7.6 -38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 8.9 -56% | 6.6 -16% | 7.7 -35% |
| Load Average * | 27 | 28.1 -4% | 29 -7% | 35.1 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 27.4 | 28.3 -3% | 29.4 -7% | 36.2 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Vostro 15 3568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-55E4 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 37 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S02M00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S510UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 8% | -33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 874 | 855 -2% | 1083 24% | 614 -30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 379 | 350 -8% | 430 13% | 259 -32% |
| Load | 109 | 81 -26% | 95 -13% | 70 -36% |
| H.264 | 387 |
Pro
Contra
A tela realmente mesquinha com seu matiz azul extremo no estado de entrega, como não vimos anteriormente, é o único componente do novo Dell Vostro 15 3568 que podemos reclamar contra o fabricante, mesmo considerando o preço muito baixo da configuração de nível de entrada. A melhor parte da tela é realmente a superfície mate. Todas as outras desvantagens que coletamos em nossa lista de contras carrega muito menos peso.
Se você pode ignorar a tela(como surpreendentemente muitos usuários podem fazer), obtém um portátil de escritório simples com mobilidade limitada, que lida com suas tarefas adequadamente. A bateria pode ser facilmente trocada, um módulo TPM está integrado para segurança e o Windows 10 Pro nivela o caminho para a criptografia do disco rígido e as opções administrativas expandidas na rede da empresa. Do lado positivo, devemos também mencionar os dispositivos de entrada decentes e a operação fria e normalmente silenciosa.
Os destaques da nossa versão do Dell Vostro 15 3568, que é em grande medida bem sucedida, são seus 256 GB do SSD e W10 Pro, que podem compensar a tela ruim aos olhos de alguns usuários.
Um SSD e a versão Pro do Windows 10 só estão disponíveis com uma taxa extra, o que eleva o preço mais para o nível dos concorrentes no teste. Qualquer um que escolha a variante mínima ainda terá desempenho suficiente para o escritório. Somente por causa da tela, não conseguimos dar uma recomendação de compra.
Dell Vostro 15 3568
- 12/12/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
