Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 7310 Core i7: Melhor aparência, mesmo desempenho
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
92.1 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1331:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.09
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Dell Latitude 7310 AU Optronics B133HAN, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7300-P99G B133HAK, IPS LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA CMN139E, IPS LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen APPA03D, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -9% | -5% | -8% | -40% | 19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.8 | 64.6 -10% | 67.5 -6% | 64.1 -11% | 41.53 -42% | 98.8 38% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 91.5 -8% | 95.8 -4% | 95.2 -4% | 61.7 -38% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.4 | 65.5 -10% | 69 -5% | 65.8 -9% | 43 -41% | 86.4 19% |
Response Times | 5% | -1% | -23% | 8% | -13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 39 ? 4% | 47.2 ? -16% | 55 ? -35% | 38 ? 7% | 46 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 27 ? 6% | 24.8 ? 14% | 32 ? -11% | 26.4 ? 8% | 32.4 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 | 113600 ? | ||||
Screen | -66% | -0% | -9% | -114% | 17% | |
Brightness middle | 332.7 | 341 2% | 466 40% | 356 7% | 294 -12% | 512 54% |
Brightness | 329 | 306 -7% | 462 40% | 336 2% | 277 -16% | 491 49% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 79 -11% | 90 1% | 88 -1% | 87 -2% | 91 2% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.31 -24% | 0.33 -32% | 0.16 36% | 0.18 28% | 0.32 -28% |
Contrast | 1331 | 1100 -17% | 1412 6% | 2225 67% | 1633 23% | 1600 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.15 | 6.43 -199% | 1.93 10% | 3.6 -67% | 6.8 -216% | 1.7 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.89 | 10.33 -166% | 4.26 -10% | 5.5 -41% | 23.8 -512% | 3.4 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.09 | 2.36 -117% | 1.99 -83% | 1.11 -2% | 4.8 -340% | 1 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 6.9 -176% | 1.7 32% | 4.7 -88% | 5.9 -136% | 1.9 24% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.92 75% | 1.96 112% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6347 102% | 8338 78% | 6382 102% | 6222 104% | 6979 93% | 6817 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.1 | 59 -8% | 62.2 -3% | 61 -5% | 39.6 -38% | 77.4 21% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 91 -8% | 95.7 -4% | 96 -3% | 61.5 -38% | 99.9 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-47% | -2% /
-1% | -13% /
-10% | -49% /
-85% | 8% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (548 - 738, n=6) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (133 - 200, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1155 - 1261, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3731 - 4622, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (56.1 - 106, n=6) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (0.637 - 0.855, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3783 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5232 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4437 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 4K UHD | |
HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Dell Latitude 7410 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 7310 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 7300-P99G Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Apple SSD SM0512F | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 21% | -4% | -53% | -70% | |
Seq Read | 2054 | 2749 34% | 1224 -40% | 1499 -27% | 1300 -37% |
Seq Write | 1575 | 1367 -13% | 907 -42% | 1172 -26% | 1518 -4% |
4K Read | 52.1 | 49.94 -4% | 41.46 -20% | 35.42 -32% | 14.09 -73% |
4K Write | 137.3 | 137.6 0% | 126.2 -8% | 77.2 -44% | 24.25 -82% |
4K-64 Read | 618 | 987 60% | 1021 65% | 463.6 -25% | 725 17% |
4K-64 Write | 1317 | 1465 11% | 1251 -5% | 413.3 -69% | 169.6 -87% |
Access Time Read * | 0.044 | 0.042 5% | 0.053 -20% | 0.133 -202% | 0.172 -291% |
Access Time Write * | 0.083 | 0.029 65% | 0.027 67% | 0.049 41% | 0.155 -87% |
Score Read | 876 | 1312 50% | 1185 35% | 649 -26% | 869 -1% |
Score Write | 1611 | 1739 8% | 1468 -9% | 608 -62% | 346 -79% |
Score Total | 2927 | 3662 25% | 3250 11% | 1582 -46% | 1667 -43% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2297 | 2761 20% | 1404 -39% | 1249 -46% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 540 | 622 15% | 402.4 -25% | 53.5 -90% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1288 | 1584 23% | 902 -30% | 201.3 -84% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 2% | -14% | -41% | -38% | |
Write 4K | 135.2 | 141.1 4% | 149.2 10% | 116 -14% | 28.16 -79% |
Read 4K | 50.7 | 46.37 -9% | 47.18 -7% | 39.81 -21% | 17.5 -65% |
Write Seq | 2155 | 1994 -7% | 750 -65% | 1300 -40% | 1195 -45% |
Read Seq | 2504 | 2275 -9% | 1137 -55% | 803 -68% | 1470 -41% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 395.6 | 493.3 25% | 749 89% | 187.6 -53% | 205 -48% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 394.5 | 429 9% | 478.7 21% | 305.9 -22% | 692 75% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2987 | 2992 0% | 1453 -51% | 1299 -57% | 1475 -51% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3564 | 3562 0% | 1713 -52% | 1741 -51% | 1920 -46% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 409.1 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1137 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
14% | -9% /
-8% | -47% /
-48% | -54% /
-56% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 2197 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8989 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1209 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 476 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.7 | 10.9 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 84.5 | 49.3 | 22.8 | 20.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 13.2 | 10.7 | 11.2 |
Dell Latitude 7310 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 7300-P99G UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA Vega 8, R5 PRO 3500U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -5% | -2% | -1% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 28.1 3% | 30.2 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 29.6 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 30 -3% | 28.1 3% | 30.2 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 29.6 -2% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 30 -3% | 28.1 3% | 30.2 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 29.6 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 30.2 -4% | 30.9 -7% | 29.6 -2% |
Load Average * | 30.1 | 35 -16% | 41.1 -37% | 34.3 -14% | 33.9 -13% | 34.4 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 41.3 | 35 15% | 41.1 -0% | 34.3 17% | 33.9 18% | 42.1 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.1 | 36.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
Carga |
| 30.1 / 41.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.8 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
Dell Latitude 7310 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 1.07 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.7 / 4.4 / 4.8 Watt |
Carga |
33.4 / 69.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Apple SSD SM0512F, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -26% | -46% | -29% | -53% | -60% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 2.5 7% | 3.4 -26% | 4 -48% | 5.6 -107% | 3.8 -41% |
Idle Average * | 4.4 | 6.6 -50% | 6.3 -43% | 6.3 -43% | 8.1 -84% | 8.6 -95% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.8 | 8.7 -81% | 10.4 -117% | 9.3 -94% | 9.6 -100% | 10.3 -115% |
Load Average * | 33.4 | 35.4 -6% | 51 -53% | 34 -2% | 34.3 -3% | 52.1 -56% |
Load Maximum * | 69.7 | 68.1 2% | 62.7 10% | 42 40% | 48.6 30% | 65.2 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39 | 48.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 735 G6 7KN29EA R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen i5-1038NG7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 58 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -21% | 16% | -35% | -4% | |
Reader / Idle | 2246 | 1710 -24% | 1103 -51% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 758 | 650 -14% | 506 -33% | 655 -14% | 492 -35% | 728 -4% |
Load | 106 | 115 8% | 99 -7% | 227 114% |
Pro
Contra
Como se o Latitude 7300 do ano passado não fosse compacto o suficiente, o Latitude 7310 agora é ainda menor, mais leve e mais discreto para caber em praticamente qualquer ambiente de escritório ou trabalho. Além do clickpad esponjoso, não há muito a não gostar do mais recente subportátil de gama alta da Dell.
O que mais nos incomoda é a falta de certos recursos. O TrackPoint e os botões dedicados do mouse vêm à mente, o que tornaria absolutamente mais fácil e preciso o controle e clique do cursor. Os usuários que prefiram ter botões táctis do mouse e RAM e WLAN atualizáveis ainda terão fortes razões para preferir o Latitude 7300 ao 7310. Além disso, uma opção de tela de 500 nits ou mais brilhante teria tornado o portátil um companheiro ainda melhor para atividades em exteriores ou em viagens.
A falta de melhores opções de processador fora do Comet Lake-U quad-core também está se tornando mais óbvia. Embora o portátil não esteja direcionado a usuários de alto desempenho, os concorrentes estão começando a oferecer CPUs AMD Ryzen muito mais rápidas, sob o mesmo envelope de potência ou similar, para um desempenho superior por Watt. O fato de que o Latitude 7300 possa se desempenhar quase igual ao Latitude 7310 também não ajuda.
O Latitude 7310 é uma versão mais refinada do Latitude 7300. Ele perde alguns recursos ao longo do caminho, mas o design mais elegante e portátil pode valer a pena para viajantes ou usuários coorporativos em constante movimento.
Dell Latitude 7310
- 07/13/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo