Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 7300: subportátil de negócios aquém dos seus objetivos de desempenho
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 341 cd/m²
Contraste: 1100:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G B133HAK, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA IVO M133NVF3-R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD AUO5B2D B133HAN Dell P/N: 06VG6 , , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 3% | -1% | 9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.6 | 67.8 5% | 65.3 1% | 64.2 -1% | 69.7 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.5 | 95.1 4% | 95.9 5% | 89.2 -3% | 99.4 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 67.8 4% | 66.6 2% | 65.2 0% | 71.1 9% |
| Response Times | -4% | -37% | 8% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 36.8 ? 6% | 57.6 ? -48% | 36 ? 8% | 54 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 30.4 ? -13% | 34 ? -26% | 24.8 ? 8% | 33 ? -22% |
| PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | 33% | 10% | 41% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 303.8 -11% | 356 4% | 316 -7% | 428 26% |
| Brightness | 306 | 289 -6% | 336 10% | 326 7% | 408 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 86 9% | 88 11% | 85 8% | 84 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.31 -0% | 0.16 48% | 0.19 39% | 0.26 16% |
| Contrast | 1100 | 980 -11% | 2225 102% | 1663 51% | 1646 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.43 | 2.9 55% | 3.6 44% | 4.5 30% | 1.16 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.33 | 5.79 44% | 5.5 47% | 12.1 -17% | 2.19 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.36 | 1.72 27% | 1.1 53% | 2.9 -23% | 0.9 62% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 3.7 46% | 4.7 32% | 5 28% | 1.23 82% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.118 104% | 2.48 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 8338 78% | 6323 103% | 6374 102% | 6018 108% | 6648 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 63 7% | 61.3 4% | 57.9 -2% | 65 10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 95 4% | 95.7 5% | 87.3 -4% | 99 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
11% | -0% /
18% | 6% /
8% | 7% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4211 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5417 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5093 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4208 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -16% | -24% | -15% | |
| Write 4K | 141.1 | 139.4 -1% | 120.7 -14% | 108.5 -23% | 126.7 ? -10% |
| Read 4K | 46.37 | 43.18 -7% | 58.5 26% | 40.53 -13% | 44 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 1994 | 1075 -46% | 1491 -25% | 1026 -49% | 1617 ? -19% |
| Read Seq | 2275 | 1639 -28% | 2760 21% | 2080 -9% | 1716 ? -25% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 493.3 | 662 34% | 237.5 -52% | 451 -9% | 413 ? -16% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 429 | 413.9 -4% | 336.1 -22% | 269.7 -37% | 420 ? -2% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2992 | 1195 -60% | 1512 -49% | 1770 -41% | 2076 ? -31% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3562 | 3116 -13% | 3154 -11% | 3214 -10% | 3130 ? -12% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2046 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8916 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1183 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 77.2 | 41.5 | 34.6 | 10.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.8 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 35 / 35 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.65 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.5 / 6.6 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
35.4 / 68.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -8% | -16% | -2% | -5% | -29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.5 | 3.3 -32% | 3.4 -36% | 4.5 -80% | 3.6 -44% | 3.81 ? -52% | 4.54 ? -82% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 5.9 11% | 5.6 15% | 6.4 3% | 5.7 14% | 6.94 ? -5% | 7.75 ? -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 6.2 29% | 8.7 -0% | 9.2 -6% | 7.4 15% | 8.75 ? -1% | 9.65 ? -11% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 43.2 -22% | 43.6 -23% | 35.7 -1% | 44 -24% | 35 ? 1% | 46.7 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 68.1 | 45.2 34% | 65 5% | 65.4 4% | 48.1 29% | 47.5 ? 30% | 68.8 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 7300-P99G i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 FHD i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | -9% | -13% | 19% | 15% | |
| H.264 | 663 | 764 15% | 481 -27% | 896 ? 35% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 650 | 664 2% | 499 -23% | 424 -35% | 790 22% | 710 ? 9% |
| Load | 115 | 94 -18% | 140 22% | 133 16% | 116 ? 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 766 | 1914 | 1599 ? |
Pro
Contra
A Dell redesenhou seu Latitude de 13,3 polegadas sem mudar muito. Pelo menos no mais escuro dos dois modelos, com sua carcaça de fibra de carbono que tivemos em análise. O SKU de alumínio parece muito diferente do seu antecessor.
A carcaça compacta de alta qualidade é um dos destaques do Latitude, assim como o teclado confortável. A tela está equipada com uma camada de toque que permite entradas adicionais. O leitor de cartões microSD é facilmente acessível e incrivelmente rápido. Além disso, o Latitude possui várias portas e recursos de segurança. Também é facilmente atualizável graças a dois slots de RAM, um slot WWAN livre e um modem Wi-Fi com soquete. Ele vem com 3 anos de garantia no local/em casa e funcionou por quase 11 horas com bateria em nosso teste de Wi-Fi.
Uma de suas principais ressalvas é o touchpad. Se sente barato e não gostamos ou desfrutamos de sua superfície plástica áspera. Dado que o Latitude não possui um TrackPoint, os usuários serão forçados a recorrer a mouses externos. Também não gostamos muito da porta de carregamento proprietária e teríamos preferido uma segunda porta USB-C ou Thunderbolt 3 com fornecimento de energia. A Ethernet está ausente, e a tela supostamente mate acabou sendo sendo semi refletiva. Esperávamos que a Dell fosse mais precisa em suas especificações em relação a esses detalhes.
O desempenho da CPU foi bastante ruim e pior do que no próprio antecessor do Latitude 7300. Aqueles com a CPU i7 não estão obtendo o desempenho esperado. Um problema inaceitável para um portátil desse preço.
O ruído agudo do ventilador foi outra desvantagem, embora o ventilador não tenha sido particularmente alto em geral. E por último, mas não menos importante, teria sido bom ter uma opção de tela mais brilhante disponível.
Um desempenho geral sólido com um ponto crucial: A CPU Whiskey Lake acabou sendo mais lenta que o processador do antecessor.
Se você deve considerar isso como um obstáculo para a compra, depende de você. No lado positivo, o portátil empresarial Dell Latitude 7300 oferece uma excelente duração da bateria e excelente capacidade de atualização.
Dell Latitude 7300-P99G
-
09/09/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
