Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 5490 (Core i7-8650U, Touchscreen)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE |
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 5480 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5480 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) | |
Dell Latitude 5480 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
Dell Latitude 5480 | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 200.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1254:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
54.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
34.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.773
Dell Latitude 5490 AUO133D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X AU Optronics AUO263D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 5480 LG Philips LGD0553, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, TN, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 Lenovo LP140WF6-SPB7, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 12% | 51% | 8% | 14% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 36.42 | 36.28 0% | 40.62 12% | 55.8 53% | 39.24 8% | 41.6 14% |
sRGB Coverage | 54.6 | 54.6 0% | 61.2 12% | 80.7 48% | 58.8 8% | 61.9 13% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.62 | 37.48 0% | 41.96 12% | 57.7 53% | 40.56 8% | 43.06 14% |
Response Times | -35% | -3% | -7% | -4% | -31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.4 ? | 46.9 ? -54% | 32.8 ? -8% | 39 ? -28% | 35.6 ? -17% | 41.6 ? -37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 31.2 ? -15% | 26.4 ? 3% | 23 ? 15% | 24.8 ? 9% | 34 ? -25% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 11% | 11% | -28% | 14% | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 200.6 | 227 13% | 215.9 8% | 346 72% | 307 53% | 306 53% |
Brightness | 204 | 211 3% | 205 0% | 317 55% | 295 45% | 287 41% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 90 3% | 86 -1% | 90 3% | 88 1% |
Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.19 -19% | 0.22 -38% | 0.86 -438% | 0.25 -56% | 0.3 -88% |
Contrast | 1254 | 1195 -5% | 981 -22% | 402 -68% | 1228 -2% | 1020 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.36 | 5.6 33% | 5.1 39% | 8.64 -3% | 5.7 32% | 6.2 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 25.63 | 22.4 13% | 15.6 39% | 13.58 47% | 21.3 17% | 13.6 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 4.7 -2% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.7 | 2.4 69% | 4 48% | 11.24 -46% | 3.7 52% | 5.8 25% |
Gamma | 2.773 79% | 2.44 90% | 2.41 91% | 2.62 84% | 2.11 104% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6397 102% | 6506 100% | 6856 95% | 12530 52% | 7353 88% | 6277 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 34.5 | 34.5 0% | 41.96 22% | 52 51% | 37.4 8% | 39.62 15% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 54.2 | 54.4 0% | 61.15 13% | 80 48% | 58.7 8% | 61.44 13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
3% | 7% /
10% | 5% /
-9% | 6% /
11% | -2% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Average of class Office (194.4 - 2103, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 5480 | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8650U (268 - 335, n=3) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 5490 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2403 - 4078, n=10) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4065 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5225 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5200 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4066 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell Latitude 5490 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -20% | 64% | -457% | -33% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 273.6 | 505 85% | 355.1 30% | 676 147% | 537 ? 96% |
Copy Program MB/s | 214 | 213 0% | 269.7 26% | 254.8 19% | 343 ? 60% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 514 | 426.6 -17% | 735 43% | 921 79% | 1004 ? 95% |
Score Total | 1834 | 1067 -42% | 3006 64% | 2348 28% | 2565 ? 40% |
Score Write | 449 | 381 -15% | 767 71% | 147 -67% | 587 ? 31% |
Score Read | 916 | 455 -50% | 1524 66% | 1480 62% | 1378 ? 50% |
Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.052 -41% | 0.027 27% | 2.515 -6697% | 0.4637 ? -1153% |
Access Time Read * | 0.067 | 0.07 -4% | 0.044 34% | 0.041 39% | 0.06777 ? -1% |
4K-64 Write | 300.9 | 259.5 -14% | 510 69% | 96.2 -68% | 419 ? 39% |
4K-64 Read | 793 | 383.6 -52% | 1215 53% | 1278 61% | 1112 ? 40% |
4K Write | 93.6 | 91.7 -2% | 140.2 50% | 1.76 -98% | 91.6 ? -2% |
4K Read | 45.99 | 23.75 -48% | 49.21 7% | 58 26% | 45.1 ? -2% |
Seq Write | 541 | 300.6 -44% | 1167 116% | 487.1 -10% | 960 ? 77% |
Seq Read | 768 | 473.1 -38% | 2603 239% | 1441 88% | 2019 ? 163% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 11732 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1989 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8914 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1062 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 64 | 35 | 29 | 10 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 27.8 / 27.8 / 31 dB |
Carga |
| 34.2 / 42.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) |
Dell Latitude 5490 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | Dell Latitude 5480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -8% | -2% | 1% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 27.8 | 28.8 -4% | 31 -12% | 29 -4% | 28 -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 28.8 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -12% | 29 -4% | 28 -1% |
Idle Average * | 27.8 | 28.8 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -12% | 29 -4% | 28 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 30.9 -0% | 29.6 5% | 31 -0% | 29 6% | 29.4 5% |
Load Average * | 34.2 | 35.6 -4% | 42 -23% | 33.5 2% | 35.6 -4% | 31.4 8% |
Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 41.4 3% | 47.1 -10% | 33.7 21% | 35.6 17% | 34.6 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.5 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
Dell Latitude 5490 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 0.74 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.9 / 6.2 / 7.7 Watt |
Carga |
43.9 / 47.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -3% | 19% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.3 15% | 6.64 -70% | 2.9 26% | 3.21 18% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 5.54 11% | 6.67 -8% | 5.6 10% | 6.15 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.59 14% | 7.78 -1% | 8.15 -6% | 6.82 11% |
Load Average * | 43.9 | 42.4 3% | 30.83 30% | 30.6 30% | 28.5 35% |
Load Maximum * | 47.7 | 67.6 -42% | 31.7 34% | 31 35% | 34.5 28% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 5490 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 29% | 39% | -18% | -37% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 695 | 897 29% | 964 39% | 571 -18% | 438 -37% |
Reader / Idle | 1556 | 1448 | 1155 | ||
Load | 97 | 159 | 184 | 110 |
Pro
Contra
Para uma máquina centrada na produtividade, o Latitude 5490 certamente atende a maioria dos requisitos. Ele apresenta um forte desempenho de aplicativos, uma carcaça robusta e bem construída, ampla seleção de portas, excelentes dispositivos de entrada e bateria de duração excepcionalmente longa. Também é bastante silencioso e discreto durante o uso típico, por isso é adequado para um ambiente de escritório. As vantagens que esta configuração de $1.788 traz sobre o dispositivos que avaliamos em março são: o seu muito mais rápido, desempenho de múltiplos núcleos e single-core marginalmente mais rápido, um SSD NVMe de melhor desempenho, mais recursos de segurança, um teclado retroiluminado e uma tela táctil. Tudo isso é bem-vindo (apesar do custo - que discutiremos em um momento), exceto pela tela táctil, que torna a tela ruim ainda pior, convertendo-a de um painel antirreflexo escuro para um painel sombrio, escuro, e altamente refletivo que às vezes é quase inutilizável. Já dissemos isso antes, mas o 5490 precisa desesperadamente de uma tela muito mais brilhante com um acabamento antirreflexo.
Nenhuma máquina é perfeita e, pelo menos em termos de desempenho e duração da bateria, o Latitude 5490 tem poucos concorrentes em sua classe. Se apenas a tela fosse melhor, poderíamos recomendá-lo de todo coração.
Além desta queixa principal, existem alguns outros problemas: a máquina é bastante pesada, falta Thunderbolt 3 e o consumo de energia e as temperaturas da superfície não são ideais. Alguns concorrentes—como o HP EliteBook 840 G4 e Lenovo ThinkPad T480—lidam com esses itens de forma mais efetiva. O próprio Latitude 7490 e 7390 da Dell, também são excelentes alternativas (embora mais caras) para este dispositivo, que possuem muito poucas falhas. No entanto, nenhuma máquina é perfeita e, pelo menos em termos de desempenho e duração da bateria, o Latitude 5490 tem poucos concorrentes em sua classe. Se apenas a tela fosse melhor, poderíamos recomendá-lo de todo coração.
Dell Latitude 5490
- 05/12/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein