Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Latitude 13 7380 (i7-7600U, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 1057:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.81
Dell Latitude 13 7380 LGD0589, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 LP133WF2-SPL78, IPS, LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD AUO123D, TN, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -37% | -5% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 66.4 1% | 40.16 -39% | 61.6 -6% | 55.8 -15% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 93.5 2% | 60 -35% | 87.6 -5% | 80.7 -12% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.6 1% | 41.54 -37% | 62.6 -5% | 57.7 -12% |
Response Times | -4% | -7% | -22% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 36.8 ? -8% | 43.6 ? -28% | 48 ? -41% | 39 ? -15% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 29.6 ? -0% | 25.2 ? 15% | 30.4 ? -3% | 23 ? 22% |
PWM Frequency | 30860 ? | ||||
Screen | 20% | -7% | 19% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 317 | 332.6 5% | 306 -3% | 278 -12% | 346 9% |
Brightness | 295 | 323 9% | 307 4% | 271 -8% | 317 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 91 5% | 86 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.28 7% | 0.36 -20% | 0.16 47% | 0.86 -187% |
Contrast | 1057 | 1188 12% | 850 -20% | 1738 64% | 402 -62% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 2.6 59% | 5.1 19% | 4.5 29% | 8.64 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.4 | 6.7 36% | 13.3 -28% | 8.4 19% | 13.58 -31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 2.5 68% | 3.9 50% | 3.2 59% | 11.24 -44% |
Gamma | 1.81 122% | 2.12 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.62 84% |
CCT | 7120 91% | 6720 97% | 6829 95% | 7042 92% | 12530 52% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 62 2% | 38.24 -37% | 57 -7% | 52 -15% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 94 2% | 59.75 -35% | 87.5 -5% | 80 -13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
13% | -17% /
-13% | -3% /
9% | -15% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3872 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4958 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5060 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3711 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -676% | -35% | -48% | -3% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 664 | 447.8 -33% | 229 -66% | 355.1 -47% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 451 | 316.3 -30% | 172.4 -62% | 269.7 -40% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1250 | 382.9 -69% | 623 -50% | 735 -41% | |
Score Total | 4063 | 2687 -34% | 1256 -69% | 1398 -66% | 3006 -26% |
Score Write | 690 | 162 -77% | 557 -19% | 337 -51% | 767 11% |
Score Read | 2251 | 1723 -23% | 481 -79% | 726 -68% | 1524 -32% |
Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 2.01 -7079% | 0.033 -18% | 0.034 -21% | 0.027 4% |
Access Time Read * | 0.045 | 0.05 -11% | 0.076 -69% | 0.102 -127% | 0.044 2% |
4K-64 Write | 484.5 | 125.8 -74% | 361.5 -25% | 149.6 -69% | 510 5% |
4K-64 Read | 2072 | 1483 -28% | 264.7 -87% | 526 -75% | 1215 -41% |
4K Write | 125.1 | 1.2 -99% | 101.9 -19% | 109.4 -13% | 140.2 12% |
4K Read | 45.59 | 42.8 -6% | 38.7 -15% | 34.34 -25% | 49.21 8% |
Seq Write | 805 | 352.7 -56% | 935 16% | 775 -4% | 1167 45% |
Seq Read | 1330 | 1972 48% | 1775 33% | 1649 24% | 2603 96% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 | |
Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) | |
Dell Latitude 13 7370 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8937 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1762 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46459 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6363 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 853 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 388 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44 | 27 | 22 | 7 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28 / 28 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 30.6 / 35.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -1% | -7% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 29.6 -6% | 31 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 28.4 4% | 29.1 2% | 32.2 -9% | 31 -5% |
Load Average * | 30.6 | 33.2 -8% | 31.9 -4% | 34.2 -12% | 33.5 -9% |
Load Maximum * | 35.4 | 37.9 -7% | 31.9 10% | 36.1 -2% | 33.7 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
Dell Latitude 13 7380 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 5.5 / 6.1 Watt |
Carga |
29.5 / 32 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Latitude 13 7380 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -17% | -6% | -27% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.6 -44% | 3.16 1% | 3.8 -19% | 2.9 9% |
Idle Average * | 5.5 | 7.6 -38% | 5.9 -7% | 7.1 -29% | 5.6 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 8.2 -34% | 6.5 -7% | 8.3 -36% | 8.15 -34% |
Load Average * | 29.5 | 23.8 19% | 30.6 -4% | 34.2 -16% | 30.6 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 32 | 28 12% | 35.8 -12% | 43.3 -35% | 31 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Latitude 13 7380 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Toshiba Portege X30-D (PT274U-01N001) i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13-20J2S00G00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 13 7370 6Y57, HD Graphics 515, 34 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -30% | -36% | -25% | -2% | -27% | |
Reader / Idle | 1594 | 898 -44% | 904 -43% | 819 -49% | 1155 -28% | 588 -63% |
WiFi v1.3 | 630 | 430 -32% | 475 -25% | 547 -13% | 571 -9% | 367 -42% |
Load | 141 | 121 -14% | 85 -40% | 122 -13% | 184 30% | 176 25% |
Pro
Contra
O Dell Latitude 7380 divide a diferença no tamanho da tela entre os carros-chefes existentes da série Latitude 7000, o 7280 e 7480—mas, em muitos aspectos, é menos um compromisso e mais uma evolução intra geracional. Arrancando uma página do livro do XPS 13, o 7380 coloca uma tela de 13,3 polegadas (e, em sua maior parte, todo o corpo) do existente 7280 de 12,5 polegadas—por isso, de muitas maneiras, o substitui. O melhor de tudo, realmente não há grandes pontos negativos para esta abordagem: a estabilidade da carcaça ainda é muito boa em geral e, embora a tampa da tela não possa igualar a rigidez da estrutura de alumínio do XPS 13, a construção de magnésio do Latitude não é nada frágil.
O Dell Latitude 7380 divide a diferença no tamanho da tela - mas de muitas maneiras, é menos um compromisso e mais uma evolução intra geracional. Começa com a base estabelecida pelo XPS 13 de nível consumidor, mas fornece todas as sensibilidades empresariais implicadas pela marca Latitude.
Também ficamos satisfeitos com o excelente desempenho do sistema do 7380 e as velocidades da CPU na maior parte consistentes sob carga; junto com as baixas temperaturas da superfície e o ruído do ventilador bastante discreto, os resultados são impressionantes para uma máquina desse tamanho. Ainda mais impressionantes foram nossos testes de bateria, onde conseguimos mais de dez horas de navegação na web com uma única carga. Além disso, a tela IPS de 1080p também está acima da média, embora exija uma calibração profissional para ter algum grau de precisão de cores.
Nossas únicas queixas são o ruído eletrônico/de bobina moderadamente perceptível, a imprecisão da tla no estado de fábrica e o alto preço acima mencionado de $2.178. Também é um pouco decepcionante que apenas a memória de um canal seja suportada, embora a capacidade total de 16 GB seja mais que suficiente para esta classe de portátil. Os concorrentes interessantes de outros fabricantes incluem o Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, HP EliteBook 840 G4 e Toshiba Portege X30-D, alguns dos quais são mais econômicos que o Latitude, mas todos os quais são acompanhados por seus próprios conjuntos de prós e contras.
Por que escolher o Latitude 7380 quando a Dell já produz um portátil ultraportátil de excelente qualidade com o seu XPS 13? Principalmente devido às sensibilidades de negócio que são implicadas pela marca Latitude. Além do seu estilo preto, elegante e discreto, o 7380 oferece um teclado superior, um touchpad com botões físicos separados, uma porta Ethernet, uma garantia mais longa e opções de manutenção muito mais flexíveis. Custa um pouco mais do que o XPS, mas é um pequeno preço a pagar se o trabalho for feito.
Dell Latitude 13 7380
-
12/06/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein