Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 (i7-8565U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 227 cd/m²
Contraste: 1081:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.61
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.17% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.66
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 AU Optronics AUO22ED, B156HAK, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB BOE HF NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Innolux JMC9X 156BGA, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 89% | 60% | 1% | 64% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.17 | 79.1 102% | 67.2 72% | 40.02 2% | 68.7 75% | 40.02 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 98.8 68% | 88.1 50% | 58.5 -1% | 90 53% | 59.8 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.48 | 79.2 96% | 64.4 59% | 41.34 2% | 65.8 63% | 41.37 2% |
| Response Times | -3% | 7% | -3% | 22% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.8 ? | 46.4 ? 5% | 43 ? 12% | 45 ? 8% | 34 ? 30% | 50 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 32 ? -10% | 29 ? 1% | 33 ? -13% | 25 ? 14% | 24 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 980 ? | 208 ? | 250 ? | 961 ? | 250 ? | |
| Screen | 44% | 26% | 13% | 20% | -34% | |
| Brightness middle | 227 | 494 118% | 320 41% | 278 22% | 309 36% | 197 -13% |
| Brightness | 230 | 457 99% | 293 27% | 271 18% | 299 30% | 195 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 86 -7% | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 78 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.34 -62% | 0.26 -24% | 0.26 -24% | 0.29 -38% | 0.43 -105% |
| Contrast | 1081 | 1453 34% | 1231 14% | 1069 -1% | 1066 -1% | 458 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.55 | 5.2 21% | 4.5 31% | 4.73 28% | 3.9 40% | 10.35 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.45 | 17.5 25% | 8.81 62% | 8.38 64% | 7.5 68% | 16.02 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.61 | 5.17 -12% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.7 48% | 4.71 9% | 2.59 50% | 4.58 12% | 11.25 -116% |
| Gamma | 2.66 83% | 2.1 105% | 2.45 90% | 2.38 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 6434 101% | 7038 92% | 7085 92% | 6160 106% | 7344 89% | 11592 56% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 71.2 92% | 58 57% | 36 -3% | 39 5% | 38 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.2 | 98.8 70% | 88 51% | 58 0% | 90 55% | 60 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 43% /
47% | 31% /
30% | 4% /
9% | 35% /
29% | -8% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (0.65 - 2.16, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (4.09 - 7.4, n=11) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (13806 - 23118, n=16) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (2682 - 8906, n=16) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-55-31N8 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8565U (263 - 420, n=7) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3386 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4540 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4060 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS512G | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -69% | 47% | 16% | 92% | |
| Seq Read | 1115 | 1153 3% | 1557 40% | 2158 94% | 1320 18% |
| Seq Write | 841 | 736 -12% | 1237 47% | 680 -19% | 1500 78% |
| 4K Read | 46.39 | 46.51 0% | 42.56 -8% | 44.74 -4% | 30.73 -34% |
| 4K Write | 87.6 | 114.1 30% | 127.2 45% | 123 40% | 94.4 8% |
| 4K-64 Read | 904 | 618 -32% | 1034 14% | 623 -31% | 1453 61% |
| 4K-64 Write | 326.5 | 461.4 41% | 1186 263% | 486 49% | 1815 456% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.048 | 0.421 -777% | 0.077 -60% | 0.044 8% | 0.061 -27% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.24 | 0.233 3% | 0.028 88% | 0.051 79% | 0.044 82% |
| Score Read | 1062 | 780 -27% | 1233 16% | 884 -17% | 1616 52% |
| Score Write | 498 | 649 30% | 1437 189% | 677 36% | 2059 313% |
| Score Total | 2100 | 1822 -13% | 3291 57% | 1951 -7% | 4507 115% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1090 | 1313 20% | 1641 51% | 2577 136% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 618 | 334.6 -46% | 390 -37% | 515 -17% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 750 | 684 -9% | 574 -23% | 1120 49% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1993 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8174 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1077 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS512G | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Vega 3, R3 2200U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -18% | -13% | -10% | -11% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 30.5 -7% | 29.9 -5% | 28.2 1% | 30.4 -7% | 28.1 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 31.5 -11% | 29.9 -5% | 28.5 -0% | 31.4 -11% | 28.1 1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 31.5 -11% | 29.9 -5% | 28.6 -1% | 31.4 -11% | 28.1 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 31.5 -11% | 29.9 -5% | 28.8 -1% | 31.6 -11% | 28.1 1% |
| Load Average * | 28.9 | 42.5 -47% | 41.7 -44% | 36.2 -25% | 31.9 -10% | 35 -21% |
| Load Maximum * | 36 | 42.5 -18% | 41.7 -16% | 47.6 -32% | 40.9 -14% | 37.4 -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 28.9 / 36 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.4 °C / 6.1 F).
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.32 / 0.53 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 7.4 / 8.3 Watt |
| Carga |
38 / 47.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -22% | -42% | -119% | -141% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.9 -36% | 4.4 -22% | 4.8 -33% | 7.1 -97% | 9.48 -163% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.9 -7% | 6.9 7% | 10.1 -36% | 13.6 -84% | 16.1 -118% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.3 | 10.1 -22% | 9.9 -19% | 10.7 -29% | 14.1 -70% | 16.9 -104% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 60 -58% | 55 -45% | 44 -16% | 103.9 -173% | 90.8 -139% |
| Load Maximum * | 47.9 | 38 21% | 63.4 -32% | 94.7 -98% | 130.9 -173% | 134.4 -181% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 103 |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51.5 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | 45% | 6% | 41% | 67% | |
| Reader / Idle | 918 | 480 -48% | 773 -16% | 697 -24% | 899 -2% | 970 6% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 212 | 297 40% | 414 95% | 370 75% | 514 142% | 430 103% |
| Load | 75 | 79 5% | 117 56% | 50 -33% | 62 -17% | 145 93% |
Pro
Contra
Elogiamos o Inspiron 15 5584 por aumentar o padrão do que todos os portáteis de orçamento devem ter. O SSD primário, a tela IPS 1080p e o design estreito dos marcos devem ser o mínimo para qualquer portátil multimídia lançado em 2019, e por isso é ótimo ver a Dell pular os HDDs padrão e os painéis de 768p.
Há algumas desvantagens a ter em mente. Além da porta USB Type-C opcional, o sistema é um mau companheiro para os viajantes devido à sua tela escura, clickpad esponjoso, duração da bateria curta a média e perfil mais grosso do que o Pavilion 15 e Aspire 5. Este é mais um portátil de interiores com viagens ocasionais entre destinos. Enquanto isso, os jogadores casuais terão que procurar em outro lugar ou considerar os SKUs AMD Ryzen, já que o sistema não oferece opções de GPU distintas, ao contrário das alternativas mencionadas da HP ou da Acer. Esperamos que as revisões futuras tornem padrão o USB Type-C para dados e carga, melhore a resposta do teclado e aumente o tamanho das teclas numéricas e setas, sem afetar o preço atraente da série.
Uma solução acessível para a reprodução multimídia em casa ou processamento de texto. Recomendamos optar pelo SKU Core i5-8265U em vez do SKU i7-8565U, pois a vantagem de desempenho do Core i7 será mínima, na melhor das hipóteses, para esse chassi. O dinheiro economizado pode ser gasto em RAM ou armazenamento adicional.
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5584
- 05/25/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
