Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (i5-8250U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 246 cd/m²
Contraste: 912:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 BOE071A / NV13FHM / Dell G64PY, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 ID: MEI96A2, Name: Panasonic VVX14T092N00, , 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -34% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 64.6 -3% | 40.55 -39% | 67.8 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.2 | 88.8 3% | 61 -29% | 94.3 9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63 | 64.8 3% | 41.89 -34% | 69.5 10% |
| Response Times | 0% | 3363% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 46 ? -0% | 38 ? 17% | 50.8 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33 ? | 33 ? -0% | 26.8 ? 19% | 37.2 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 201 ? | 20410 ? 10054% | ||
| Screen | 8% | -17% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 301 | 404 34% | 283.9 -6% | 384.2 28% |
| Brightness | 291 | 382 31% | 261 -10% | 378 30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 85 -2% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.35 -6% | 0.25 24% | 0.36 -9% |
| Contrast | 912 | 1154 27% | 1136 25% | 1067 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.39 | 5.37 -0% | 6.4 -19% | 1.8 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.56 | 9.46 -11% | 18.7 -118% | 4.2 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.93 | 6.44 -9% | 6.3 -6% | 1.2 80% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.52 87% | 2.39 92% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6358 102% | 6738 96% | 6511 100% | 6708 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 58 4% | 38 -32% | 63.7 14% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 89 3% | 60 -30% | 94.2 10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
5% | 1104% /
613% | 8% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 201 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3902 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4786 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 153% | -40% | |
| Read Seq | 476.8 | 1090 129% | 425.6 -11% |
| Write Seq | 458.3 | 1088 137% | 128.2 -72% |
| Read 512 | 351 | 753 115% | 278.5 -21% |
| Write 512 | 298.2 | 911 205% | 126.7 -58% |
| Read 4k | 20.79 | 57.5 177% | 22.15 7% |
| Write 4k | 65.8 | 140.2 113% | 40.45 -39% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 172.8 | 497.1 188% | 77.8 -55% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 160.3 | 416 160% | 41.18 -74% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1935 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8527 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1059 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.1 | |||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 16.8 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 95.9 | 63.3 | 25.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.6 / 36.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
Dell Inspiron 13 7370 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Tecra X40-D audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 6.8 / 8.9 Watt |
| Carga |
36 / 36.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSN0128GTYA, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 5% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 3.6 -0% | 5.2 -44% | 3.2 11% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 6.4 6% | 6.9 -1% | 6.5 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.2 -3% | 7 21% | 6.8 24% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 34 6% | 24.6 32% | 28.2 22% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.5 | 34.4 6% | 30.1 18% | 36 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 26% | 69% | |
| Reader / Idle | 772 | 718 -7% | 876 13% | 1351 75% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 345 | 394 14% | 357 3% | 602 74% |
| Load | 78 | 77 -1% | 126 62% | 124 59% |
| H.264 | 367 |
Pro
Contra
Ignorando a duração da bateria um pouco curta, a reflexão da tela e a baixa frequência PWM de 200 Hz, o Dell Inspiron 13 7370, construído de forma limpa e elegante, não possui grandes fraquezas em geral.
Os quatro núcleos com Hyperthreading podem definitivamente ser vistos como uma melhoria com relação aos modelos anteriores, pois não há problemas térmicos e não há um aumento considerável do consumo de energia em nosso dispositivo de teste. No entanto, também somos da opinião que a maioria dos usuários de escritório não encontrará nenhum uso apreciável para os oito threads e podem trabalhar tão bem quanto com os processadores ULV Dual-core tradicionais com Hyperthreading. Este, naturalmente não é o caso se usar software bem otimizado para ser executado em paralelo.
Exatamente por que a Dell escolheu usar um acabamento brilhante para a sua tela, provavelmente permanecerá um mistério, embora não tivemos grandes problemas com reflexos na tela. A tela pode ser um pouco mais clara e exibir uma melhor variedade de cores, o leitor de cartões SD tortura os fotógrafos com seu processo de cópia desnecessariamente longo, e isso não parece bom quando se trata de facilidade de reparo.
No lado positivo, está a carcaça bem construída, sólida e impressionante, o design leve e compacto, a operação normalmente fria e silenciosa, bem como os excelentes dispositivos de entrada. O Inspiron 7370 apenas perdeu uma avaliação de "muito bom", embora nada esteja impeça uma recomendação de compra. O dispositivo mais comparável em termos de design compacto é o HP Specter 13, que é um pouco mais fino, tem uma tela mais brilhante, um SSD NVMe mais rápido e oferece portas tipo USB tipo C de segunda geração com Thunderbolt. No entanto, ele também tem uma ventoinha barulhenta e irritante, não conta com um leitor de cartões SD e não consegue aproveitar o modo turbo.
Dell Inspiron 13 7370
- 11/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
