Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G7 15 7590: Desempenho Alienware por menos
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell G7 7590 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.5 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 24.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v6 (old) | 08/2018 | Dell G7 15-7588 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | 2.6 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL65 9SEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G7 7590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G7 7590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL65 9SEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Dell G7 7590 | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell G7 7590 | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
Dell G3 3590 |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 330.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 465:1 (Preto: 0.71 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.63
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Dell G7 7590 AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G3 3590 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G7 15-7588 LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 3% | 5% | -36% | 3% | -40% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 63.5 -1% | 66.2 3% | 66.2 3% | 40.13 -38% | 65.3 1% | 37.82 -41% |
sRGB Coverage | 90 | 92.4 3% | 92.3 3% | 97.1 8% | 59.8 -34% | 95.1 6% | 56.2 -38% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 64.7 -1% | 67.2 3% | 67.6 4% | 41.47 -36% | 65.9 1% | 39.2 -40% |
Response Times | -26% | -3% | 7% | -209% | 2% | -158% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 18.8 ? -34% | 15.2 ? -9% | 15 ? -7% | 46 ? -229% | 16.4 ? -17% | 38.8 ? -177% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 13.2 ? -18% | 10.8 ? 4% | 9 ? 20% | 32.4 ? -189% | 8.8 ? 21% | 26.8 ? -139% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 200 ? | 23810 ? | ||||
Screen | 24% | 26% | 21% | 0% | 14% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 330.5 | 320.4 -3% | 324.8 -2% | 309 -7% | 276.2 -16% | 324.2 -2% | 250.9 -24% |
Brightness | 324 | 298 -8% | 316 -2% | 284 -12% | 261 -19% | 304 -6% | 246 -24% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 85 -7% | 84 -8% | 88 -3% | 86 -5% | 90 -1% | 89 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.71 | 0.42 41% | 0.26 63% | 0.42 41% | 0.24 66% | 0.38 46% | 0.34 52% |
Contrast | 465 | 763 64% | 1249 169% | 736 58% | 1151 148% | 853 83% | 738 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 3.21 40% | 4.96 7% | 3.99 25% | 5.56 -4% | 5.01 6% | 7.34 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.08 | 5.54 50% | 8.95 19% | 8.3 25% | 23.45 -112% | 12.7 -15% | 28.66 -159% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.63 | 2.36 35% | 3.23 11% | 1.12 69% | 5.23 -44% | 1.64 55% | 4.42 -22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 3.6 46% | 5 25% | 5.43 19% | 2.8 58% | 7.9 -18% | 6.8 -1% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.57 86% | 2.37 93% | 2.35 94% | 2.164 102% |
CCT | 8035 81% | 6503 100% | 7742 84% | 7767 84% | 6710 97% | 8455 77% | 6780 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.3 | 59 1% | 59.8 3% | 63 8% | 37.8 -35% | 60.8 4% | 36 -38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.5 | 92 3% | 91.8 3% | 97 8% | 59 -34% | 95.5 7% | 56 -37% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
13% | 9% /
18% | 11% /
16% | -82% /
-33% | 6% /
11% | -73% /
-42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4317 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5558 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5368 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell G7 7590 Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell G3 3590 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 301% | 436% | 118% | -26% | |
Seq Read | 1013 | 1953 93% | 2105 108% | 1163 15% | 1174 16% |
Seq Write | 203.8 | 1629 699% | 2493 1123% | 919 351% | 186 -9% |
4K Read | 29.57 | 33.2 12% | 25.01 -15% | 48.88 65% | 34.01 15% |
4K Write | 71.4 | 88.1 23% | 108.7 52% | 90.1 26% | 69.4 -3% |
4K-64 Read | 332.1 | 757 128% | 1604 383% | 323.8 -2% | 424 28% |
4K-64 Write | 152.9 | 1501 882% | 1593 942% | 403.8 164% | 68.8 -55% |
Access Time Read * | 0.183 | 0.077 58% | 0.046 75% | 0.24 -31% | 0.168 8% |
Access Time Write * | 0.248 | 0.043 83% | 0.102 59% | 0.046 81% | 0.94 -279% |
Score Read | 463 | 985 113% | 1840 297% | 489 6% | 575 24% |
Score Write | 245 | 1752 615% | 1951 696% | 586 139% | 157 -36% |
Score Total | 913 | 3230 254% | 4743 419% | 1332 46% | 987 8% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 263.6 | 1872 610% | 2250 754% | 1269 381% | 215.7 -18% |
Copy Program MB/s | 213.8 | 478.2 124% | 896 319% | 452.8 112% | 108.2 -49% |
Copy Game MB/s | 188 | 1165 520% | 1854 886% | 755 302% | 165.9 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 17814 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36639 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14249 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6192 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Alienware m15 P79F | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
MSI GL65 9SEK | |
Dell G7 7590 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG G703GXR | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Alienware m17 P37E | |
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Alienware m15 P79F | |
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
Dell G7 7590 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40) | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
MSI GL65 9SEK | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 323.1 | 285.3 | 266.3 | 141.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 288 | 185.7 | 113.4 | 62.4 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 126 | 91 | 84 | 75 |
Dell G7 7590 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell G3 3590 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | -1% | -2% | 4% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 28 1% | 29 -2% | 30 -6% | 28.4 -0% | 28.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.5 | 32.6 -11% | 30.5 -3% | 30.6 -4% | 29.2 1% | 28.5 3% |
Idle Average * | 29.6 | 32.7 -10% | 31.5 -6% | 30.6 -3% | 29.4 1% | 28.5 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 32.7 -10% | 31.5 -6% | 37.7 -27% | 29.4 1% | 49 -66% |
Load Average * | 45 | 33.3 26% | 40.6 10% | 36.5 19% | 39 13% | 49 -9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.5 | 41.6 19% | 49.5 4% | 52.1 -1% | 49.5 4% | 49 5% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 45.2 15% | 53.4 -1% | 48.1 9% | 49.7 6% | 55 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 45 / 53 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.4 °C / 95.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
Dell G7 7590 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.05 / 1.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 11.2 / 16.3 / 46.2 Watt |
Carga |
123.3 / 181.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell G7 7590 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL65 9SEK i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -49% | -22% | -22% | 32% | -75% | |
Idle Minimum * | 11.2 | 19 -70% | 18.7 -67% | 22 -96% | 4.9 56% | 41 -266% |
Idle Average * | 16.3 | 40.5 -148% | 30.7 -88% | 26 -60% | 8.1 50% | 45.3 -178% |
Idle Maximum * | 46.2 | 52 -13% | 33.9 27% | 33 29% | 16.5 64% | 47.1 -2% |
Load Average * | 123.3 | 132.3 -7% | 93.4 24% | 86 30% | 109.2 11% | 94.9 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 135.6 | 183.3 -35% | 158.9 -17% | 159 -17% | 124.6 8% | 149.4 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 181.5 | 217.2 -20% | 195.3 -8% | 215 -18% | 175.2 3% | 214.2 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell G7 7590 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -54% | -48% | 21% | 16% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 666 | 235 -65% | 221 -67% | 810 22% | 554 -17% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 275 | 166 -40% | 129 -53% | 333 21% | 403 47% | 332 21% |
Load | 106 | 46 -57% | 80 -25% | 85 -20% | 44 -58% |
Pro
Contra
O G7 15 7590 se posiciona em um lugar interessante. Ele aloja opções similares de Core i9, GeForce RTX e IPS/OLED como o Alienware m15 R2 de gama mais alta, mas por um preço inicial baixo. Se você deseja o poder de um portátil Alienware mas não se sente atraido pelos designs extravagantes da Alienware, o G7 15 7590, mais despretensioso e visualmente básico, pode economizar seu dinheiro sem sacrificar desempenho ou qualidade do chassi.
Há muito espaço para melhorias. Enquanto o desempenho do CPU Turbo Boost está acima da média e a manutenção é fácil, o SSD Toshiba é lento para uma unidade NVMe, a reprodução de graves é mediana e a tela está mal calibrada. Essas falhas são mais fáceis de serem perdoadas em máquinas de jogos de nível básico, como as das séries Dell G3 ou G5, mas não há desculpa para sistemas na série G7 de gama média. A tampa pode ser mais rígida e o ruído do ventilador durante os jogos também é bastante alto, mesmo para sua categoria, dado que concorrentes como o Lenovo Legion Y740 ou HP Pavilion 15 Gaming são notoriamente mais baixas.
O G7 15 7590 da Dell é uma excelente alternativa ao Alienware m15 R2, especialmente porque oferece RAM atualizável e as mesmas opções de CPU, GPU e telas. A sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost da CPU é uma das melhores que já vimos em qualquer portátil para jogos desse tamanho e categoria; esteja preparado para os ventiladores muito barulhentos durante os jogos.
Dell G7 7590
- 05/15/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo