Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G5 15 5590: Rei do preço/desempenho e problemas de principiante
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ (G5 15 5500 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-9300H 4 x 2.4 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1395 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 431.22, Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, 2x 4 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, Full HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
KBG30ZMS128G, 128 GB
, Toshiba NVMe-SSD + MQ04ABF100, 1 TB, Toshiba 5.400er-HDD, Slots: 1x M.2 & 1x 2.5-inch
peso
2.712 kg, Suprimento de energia: 500 g
Preço
1000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.7 kg | 23.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.5 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 234 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 215.9 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 234 cd/m²
Contraste: 1064:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.52 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale 5.33 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
96.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.86
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -52% | -52% | -20% | -21% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 83.1 | 38.37 -54% | 37.97 -54% | 64.2 -23% | 63.6 -23% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 57.6 -42% | 57 -43% | 95.1 -5% | 91.7 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.8 | 39.69 -59% | 39.23 -59% | 65.8 -32% | 65.2 -33% |
| Response Times | 9% | 12% | 66% | 71% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 40 ? 17% | 42 ? 12% | 16.4 ? 66% | 8.8 ? 82% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 29.6 ? 1% | 26.8 ? 11% | 10.4 ? 65% | 12 ? 60% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -2% | 9% | 38% | 27% | |
| Brightness middle | 234 | 251 7% | 238 2% | 345 47% | 299 28% |
| Brightness | 216 | 232 7% | 226 5% | 324 50% | 290 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 76 -13% | 83 -5% | 86 -1% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.17 23% | 0.27 -23% | 0.42 -91% | 0.29 -32% |
| Contrast | 1064 | 1476 39% | 881 -17% | 821 -23% | 1031 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.52 | 6.2 5% | 4.11 37% | 1.3 80% | 3.7 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.58 | 18.6 -76% | 6.89 35% | 2.8 74% | 7 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.56 | 4.8 -35% | 3.76 -6% | 1.1 69% | 2 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 4.2 21% | 1.78 67% | 1.2 77% | 4.1 23% |
| Gamma | 2.86 77% | 2.32 95% | 2.41 91% | 2.31 95% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 5983 109% | 7454 87% | 6311 103% | 6476 100% | 7166 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 36.5 1% | 36 0% | 60.5 68% | 59.3 65% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 57.4 1% | 57 0% | 94.9 66% | 91.5 61% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-10% | -10% /
-2% | 28% /
30% | 26% /
24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø771 (679.21-818)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ KBG30ZMS128G | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 502% | 314% | 316% | 489% | |
| Write 4K | 65.3 | 112.1 72% | 109.1 67% | 100 53% | 158.8 143% |
| Read 4K | 29.71 | 42.01 41% | 42.05 42% | 31.39 6% | 29.11 -2% |
| Write Seq | 128.8 | 1964 1425% | 1457 1031% | 1308 916% | 1584 1130% |
| Read Seq | 859 | 2065 140% | 1421 65% | 1083 26% | 1694 97% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 95.8 | 318.2 232% | 287.8 200% | 362.9 279% | 536 459% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 197.6 | 406.7 106% | 317.9 61% | 425.7 115% | 363.9 84% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 132.5 | 2534 1812% | 1455 998% | 1411 965% | 2536 1814% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1208 | 3438 185% | 1739 44% | 3240 168% | 3458 186% |
KBG30ZMS128G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1208 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
132.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
197.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
95.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
859 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
128.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
29.71 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
65.3 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11926 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 96370 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25549 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8059 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3616 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, KBG30ZMS128G: Ø35.8 (32-38)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G: Ø37.2 (33-41)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø36.9 (34-39)
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø49.5 (44-53)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø53.1 (50-58)
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 266 | 230 | 209 | 86.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 176 | 110 | 59.8 | 34.4 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 249 | 204 | 136 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 98 | 57 | 48 | 43 |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 71 | 56 | 48 | 30 |
| Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 81.7 | 66.5 | 65.4 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 85.3 | 41 | 30.8 | 25.1 |
| Anthem (2019) | 62.7 | 56.8 | 47.3 | 44.9 |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 203 | 89.3 | 71 | 41.8 |
| The Division 2 (2019) | 114 | 63 | 50 | 37 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 74.9 | 64.5 | 40.1 | 19.4 |
| Rage 2 (2019) | 117 | 54.5 | 46 | 45.1 |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 166 | 63.9 | 38.5 | 24.4 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 172 | 102 | 85 | 59 |
| Control (2019) | 129 | 44.2 | 32.1 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 98.9 | 58.3 | 39 | 29.5 |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 188 | 154 | 148 | 137 |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 85 | 48 | 44 | 30 |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 123 | 76.2 | 59.7 | 41.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 35 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 15% | 4% | 17% | 11% | 13% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 29.3 2% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28.8 7% | 30 3% | 29.3 5% | 29.3 5% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 29.5 8% | 31 3% | 29.3 8% | 29.3 8% | 27.3 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 31.1 11% | 33 6% | 29.3 16% | 29.3 16% | 30.3 ? 13% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 35.2 28% | 46 6% | 32.3 34% | 35.7 27% | 42.5 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 35.2 25% | 46 2% | 34 28% | 44.2 6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 41 23% | 49 8% | 41.2 22% | 45.6 14% | 53.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 5% | 5% | -18% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 40.3 18% | 47 4% | 46.7 5% | 42.7 13% | 46.2 ? 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 48.5 12% | 50 9% | 53.7 2% | 52.7 4% | 49.2 ? 11% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 23.9 4% | 24 4% | 23.8 5% | 33.1 -32% | 31.2 ? -25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 24.6 5% | 25 4% | 23.7 9% | 41 -58% | 32.2 ? -24% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.5 / 1.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 7 / 12 Watt |
| Carga |
95 / 135 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | -2% | -34% | -98% | -125% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 4.04 -1% | 5 -25% | 6.8 -70% | 14.5 -263% | 13.5 ? -238% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 7.2 -3% | 7 -0% | 10.7 -53% | 18.5 -164% | 18.9 ? -170% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12 | 11.4 5% | 11 8% | 12.5 -4% | 20 -67% | 26.6 ? -122% |
| Load Average * | 95 | 80.8 15% | 89 6% | 87.2 8% | 81.6 14% | 106.7 ? -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 86 | 93.6 -9% | 90 -5% | 121 -41% | 132 -53% | |
| Load Maximum * | 135 | 144.5 -7% | 132 2% | 191.4 -42% | 208.1 -54% | 249 ? -84% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 60 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 57 Wh | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -4% | -41% | -61% | -31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 867 | 951 10% | 1044 20% | 522 -40% | 240 -72% | 566 ? -35% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 482 | 385 -20% | 486 1% | 290 -40% | 145 -70% | 376 ? -22% |
| Load | 131 | 71 -46% | 88 -33% | 76 -42% | 76 -42% | 85.6 ? -35% |
| H.264 | 482 | 317 | 408 ? | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 59 | 60 | 78.3 ? |
Pro
+ Baixo consumo de energia para um portátil de jogos
+ Bom valor
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Design luxuoso
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Optimus
Contra
- Tela medíocre (brilho, espaço de cor, tempo de resposta, etc.)
- Afogamento da CPU em muitos aplicativos 3D
- Emissões alta sob uso intenso
- Lento leitor de cartões
- SSD com velocidade de escritura pobres
- Apenas um ano de garantia
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Chassi barulhento
No papel, o Dell G5 5590-PCNJJ parece excelente. Por 1.000 Euros (~$1.112), os compradores recebem um elegante portátil de 15 polegadas que está preparado para jogos com uma CPU quad-core e uma GPU DirectX 12 da última geração de hardware.
Infelizmente, o dispositivo sofre de algumas deficiências que prejudicam a boa impressão geral. Para reduzir o preço e os custos de fabricação, a Dell fez alguns recortes. Como resultado, os usuários precisam enfrentar desvantagens, como um leitor de cartão lento, um chassi barulhento, uma tela mal iluminada com cores ruins e um SSD com baixas velocidades de gravação.
Nosso principal problema está no comportamento da CPU em relação à velocidade durante o uso de aplicativos 3D (como jogos), que é caracterizada por vários graus de otimização - isso é difícil de aceitar em um portátil para jogos, embora uma atualização do BIOS possa corrigir isso em o futuro
No geral, os compradores preocupados com os preços seriam melhor atendidos pelo HP Omen 15 ou o Acer Nitro 5, os quais não apresentam tantas desvantagens. Nota: Vamos dar uma olhada em outro G5 que, com um Core i7-9750H e uma GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, está melhor equipado, mas também significativamente mais caro no futuro próximo.
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
