Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G5 15 5590: Portátil de jogos de 15 polegadas com uma GPU Max-Q
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (G5 15 5500 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 885 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 431.22, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, 512 GB
, NVMe-SSD + TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100, HD de 1TB, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 & 1x 2.5-inch
peso
2.755 kg, Suprimento de energia: 602 g
Preço
2000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 23.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 294.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.05
ΔE Greyscale 3.82 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 1% | 1% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.7 | 64.6 -2% | 65.3 -1% | 66.2 1% | 64.9 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.2 | 92.6 2% | 95.5 5% | 92.3 1% | 91 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.7 | 66 -1% | 66.5 0% | 67.2 1% | 65.9 -1% |
| Response Times | 40% | 10% | 12% | 44% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 5.2 ? 68% | 15.2 ? 7% | 15.2 ? 7% | 7.2 ? 56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 11.2 ? 12% | 11.2 ? 12% | 10.8 ? 16% | 8.8 ? 31% |
| PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | ||||
| Screen | 6% | 3% | -12% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 291 | 288 -1% | 266 -9% | 324.8 12% | 286 -2% |
| Brightness | 295 | 265 -10% | 248 -16% | 316 7% | 275 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 89 7% | 84 1% | 90 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.31 -41% | 0.26 -18% | 0.37 -68% |
| Contrast | 1323 | 1309 -1% | 858 -35% | 1249 -6% | 773 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.95 | 3.22 18% | 2.78 30% | 4.96 -26% | 2.19 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.46 | 6.26 16% | 5.96 20% | 8.95 -20% | 4.4 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.05 | 1.5 27% | 0.91 56% | 3.23 -58% | 2.27 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.82 | 3.43 10% | 3.58 6% | 5 -31% | 2.2 42% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 7317 89% | 7290 89% | 7186 90% | 7742 84% | 6405 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 62 5% | 59.8 1% | 59 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 93 2% | 96 5% | 91.8 1% | 91 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
9% | 5% /
3% | 0% /
-7% | 15% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1151 (1096.16-1258.33)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 92% | 76% | 105% | 71% | |
| Write 4K | 64.6 | 108.8 68% | 115.5 79% | 137.4 113% | 97 50% |
| Read 4K | 35.64 | 40.31 13% | 58 63% | 41.37 16% | 49.58 39% |
| Write Seq | 748 | 2488 233% | 1555 108% | 2500 234% | 1838 146% |
| Read Seq | 1039 | 1916 84% | 2590 149% | 1576 52% | 2421 133% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 435.7 | 382.4 -12% | 369.3 -15% | 446.7 3% | 326.9 -25% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 292.4 | 421.8 44% | 441.7 51% | 522 79% | 372.9 28% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 870 | 2542 192% | 1547 78% | 2796 221% | 1894 118% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1557 | 3320 113% | 2969 91% | 3415 119% | 2828 82% |
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
870 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
292.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
435.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1039 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
748 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
35.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
64.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18202 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36724 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15046 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6557 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG: Ø62 (57-66)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø65.5 (59-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8: Ø63 (1-68)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00: Ø63.3 (57-70)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø70 (63-76)
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 111 | 61.5 | ||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 106 | 105 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 86 | 78 | ||
| Anthem (2019) | 71.9 | 67.8 | ||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 112 | 68.8 | ||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 74.8 | 71.5 | ||
| F1 2019 (2019) | 130 | 97 | ||
| Control (2019) | 57.4 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 65.3 | 51.1 | ||
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 180 | 179 | ||
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 70 | 52 | ||
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 92.6 | 67 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 50 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -3% | 5% | -3% | 13% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 31 3% | 30.5 5% | 31 3% | 25.5 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 34 -3% | 31.5 5% | 33 -0% | 27.3 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 39 -15% | 39 -15% | 31.5 7% | 38 -12% | 30.4 ? 11% |
| Load Average * | 50 | 45 10% | 46 8% | 40.6 19% | 50 -0% | 42.8 ? 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 49 2% | 53 -6% | 49.5 1% | 53 -6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 51 2% | 55 -6% | 53.4 -3% | 56 -8% | 53.4 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -13% | -30% | -10% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 49 9% | 58 -7% | 48.8 10% | 54 -0% | 46.2 ? 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 61 | 59 3% | 64 -5% | 55 10% | 47 23% | 49.1 ? 20% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 28 -12% | 30 -20% | 41 -64% | 33 -32% | 31.3 ? -25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 29 -12% | 31 -19% | 45.6 -75% | 34 -31% | 32.3 ? -24% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 13 / 23 Watt |
| Carga |
121 / 184 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -74% | -230% | -98% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 7 -40% | 21 -320% | 46 -820% | 24 -380% | 13.6 ? -172% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 12 8% | 23 -77% | 59 -354% | 27 -108% | 19 ? -46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 22 4% | 32 -39% | 65.5 -185% | 33 -43% | 26.8 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 121 | 86 29% | 97 20% | 99.8 18% | 129 -7% | 106.3 ? 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 133 | 144 -8% | 148 -11% | 154.1 -16% | 176 -32% | |
| Load Maximum * | 184 | 177 4% | 213 -16% | 222.7 -21% | 216 -17% | 249 ? -35% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 23% | 40% | -45% | -34% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 513 | 666 30% | 545 6% | 221 -57% | 353 -31% | 565 ? 10% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 478 39% | 421 22% | 129 -62% | 220 -36% | 375 ? 9% |
| Load | 95 | 96 1% | 181 91% | 80 -16% | 62 -35% | 85.6 ? -10% |
| H.264 | 408 | 409 ? |
Pro
+ Comutador gráfico automático
+ Bom painel IPS
+ Porta Thunderbolt 3
+ Tela de 144 Hz
Contra
- Barulhento e quente sob uso intenso
- Afogamento da CPU em aplicativos 3D
- Apenas 24 meses de garantia
- Lento leitor de cartões
Com exceção da duração da bateria, o Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW de 2.000-Euros(~$2.229) não é muito melhor do que o G5 15 1000-PCNJJ de 1.000 Euros (~ $1.115).
Além do melhor desempenho (processador, placa gráfica, SSD etc.) e uma porta Thunderbolt 3, o 5590-P8RVW possui uma tela muito mais rápida. Diferentemente da versão básica, a tela de 144 Hz do modelo topo de linha possui um brilho adequado, reprodução de cores utilizável e tempos de resposta mais curtos.
No entanto, o modelo de 2000-Euros (~$2.229) possui as mesmas falhas da variante de orçamento, como o leitor de cartão lento e a otimização da CPU em aplicativos 3D. Essas falhas impedem que o portátil de 15 polegadas alcance uma classificação mais alta.
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
