Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G3 15 3590: Barato com atualizações fáceis
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.5 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 24.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 20.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 15 3579 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell G3 15 3579 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Dell G3 15 3579 | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Aorus 15-SA | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
Dell G3 15 3579 |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 172 cd/m²
Contraste: 1151:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 5.23
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Dell G3 3590 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G3 15 3579 LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus 15-SA LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng LG Philips LGD05FE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 56% | 58% | 60% | 59% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.13 | 38.48 -4% | 63.6 58% | 64.3 60% | 65.3 63% | 64.2 60% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.8 | 57.9 -3% | 91.7 53% | 93.6 57% | 95.1 59% | 95.1 59% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.47 | 39.75 -4% | 65.2 57% | 65.6 58% | 65.9 59% | 65.8 59% |
Response Times | 29% | 72% | 63% | 3981% | 66% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46 ? | 32.4 ? 30% | 8.8 ? 81% | 15.6 ? 66% | 16.4 ? 64% | 16.4 ? 64% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.4 ? | 23.2 ? 28% | 12 ? 63% | 12.8 ? 60% | 8.8 ? 73% | 10.4 ? 68% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 23810 ? 11805% | ||||
Screen | -11% | 20% | 21% | 2% | 33% | |
Brightness middle | 276.2 | 208.2 -25% | 299 8% | 266 -4% | 324.2 17% | 345 25% |
Brightness | 261 | 203 -22% | 290 11% | 254 -3% | 304 16% | 324 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 81 -6% | 89 3% | 90 5% | 90 5% | 86 0% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.34 -42% | 0.29 -21% | 0.28 -17% | 0.38 -58% | 0.42 -75% |
Contrast | 1151 | 612 -47% | 1031 -10% | 950 -17% | 853 -26% | 821 -29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.56 | 4.65 16% | 3.7 33% | 3.11 44% | 5.01 10% | 1.3 77% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.45 | 15.99 32% | 7 70% | 5.84 75% | 12.7 46% | 2.8 88% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.23 | 3.84 27% | 2 62% | 1.37 74% | 1.64 69% | 1.1 79% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 4.1 -46% | 3.94 -41% | 7.9 -182% | 1.2 57% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.53 87% | 2.35 94% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6710 97% | 7352 88% | 7166 91% | 6210 105% | 8455 77% | 6476 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.8 | 36.7 -3% | 59.3 57% | 60 59% | 60.8 61% | 60.5 60% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 57.9 -2% | 91.5 55% | 93 58% | 95.5 62% | 94.9 61% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-4% | 49% /
33% | 47% /
33% | 1348% /
714% | 53% /
42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 24 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 98 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Alienware m17 P37E | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (169 - 176, n=11) | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
Dell G3 15 3579 | |
Dell G7 17 7790 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Alienware m17 P37E | |
Dell G7 17 7790 | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Dell G3 15 3579 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (717 - 850, n=11) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti) |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (21798 - 25656, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i5-9300H (6421 - 6677, n=5) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3792 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5088 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4798 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dell G3 3590 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | Dell G7 17 7790 Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Aorus 15-SA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 26% | 361% | 387% | 466% | 226% | |
Seq Read | 1174 | 1033 -12% | 2601 122% | 1829 56% | 2357 101% | 907 -23% |
Seq Write | 186 | 218.3 17% | 1507 710% | 1315 607% | 1235 564% | 926 398% |
4K Read | 34.01 | 24.12 -29% | 56.3 66% | 51.3 51% | 43.29 27% | 47.26 39% |
4K Write | 69.4 | 55 -21% | 110.3 59% | 106 53% | 99.7 44% | 98.7 42% |
4K-64 Read | 424 | 330.3 -22% | 877 107% | 917 116% | 1020 141% | 321.5 -24% |
4K-64 Write | 68.8 | 155.8 126% | 914 1228% | 1212 1662% | 1502 2083% | 736 970% |
Access Time Read * | 0.168 | 0.18 -7% | 0.05 70% | 0.063 62% | 0.07 58% | 0.064 62% |
Access Time Write * | 0.94 | 0.314 67% | 0.034 96% | 0.104 89% | 0.039 96% | 0.045 95% |
Score Read | 575 | 458 -20% | 1193 107% | 1152 100% | 1299 126% | 459 -20% |
Score Write | 157 | 233 48% | 1175 648% | 1450 824% | 1726 999% | 927 490% |
Score Total | 987 | 891 -10% | 2938 198% | 3177 222% | 3640 269% | 1641 66% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 215.7 | 382.9 78% | 2104 875% | 1539 613% | 2145 894% | 905 320% |
Copy Program MB/s | 108.2 | 234.9 117% | 387.7 258% | 513 374% | 565 422% | 496.9 359% |
Copy Game MB/s | 165.9 | 218.7 32% | 1021 515% | 1150 593% | 1320 696% | 819 394% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 11845 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24291 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8081 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3608 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Alienware m15 P79F | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Dell G3 3590 | |
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (38 - 53, n=15) | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
Asus GL753VD |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 259.9 | 221.8 | 193.6 | 85.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 175.1 | 115.8 | 65.9 | 36.2 |
Rocket League (2017) | 247 | 188.7 | 137.2 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 61 | 51 |
Dell G3 3590 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G | Dell G3 15 3579 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Aorus 15-SA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | 3% | -18% | -14% | 9% | |
off / environment * | 28.4 | 28 1% | 29.3 -3% | 29 -2% | 28.3 -0% | 28.2 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 29.8 -2% | 29.3 -0% | 32 -10% | 28.5 2% | 29.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 29.4 | 29.8 -1% | 29.3 -0% | 35 -19% | 28.5 3% | 29.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.4 | 30 -2% | 29.3 -0% | 41 -39% | 49 -67% | 29.3 -0% |
Load Average * | 39 | 38.6 1% | 35.7 8% | 54 -38% | 49 -26% | 32.3 17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 46.9 5% | 44.2 11% | 52 -5% | 49 1% | 34 31% |
Load Maximum * | 49.7 | 49.4 1% | 45.6 8% | 56 -13% | 55 -11% | 41.2 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.4 / 29.4 dB |
Carga |
| 39 / 49.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Dell G3 3590 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.53 / 0.68 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.2 / 8.4 / 27.7 Watt |
Carga |
91 / 131.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G3 15 3579 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -79% | -147% | -9% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.2 | 7.9 -27% | 20 -223% | 19 -206% | 6.8 -10% | 8.7 -40% |
Idle Average * | 8.4 | 9.6 -14% | 23 -174% | 40.5 -382% | 10.7 -27% | 13 -55% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.7 | 13 53% | 29 -5% | 52 -88% | 12.5 55% | 14.3 48% |
Load Average * | 91 | 93 -2% | 87 4% | 132.3 -45% | 87.2 4% | 107.4 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 94.4 | 100.6 -7% | 136 -44% | 183.3 -94% | 121 -28% | 129 -37% |
Load Maximum * | 131.5 | 132.7 -1% | 173 -32% | 217.2 -65% | 191.4 -46% | 151.5 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell G3 3590 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | Dell G3 15 3579 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | -48% | -29% | -33% | -25% | |
Reader / Idle | 810 | 240 -70% | 208 -74% | 554 -32% | 522 -36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 403 | 392 -3% | 145 -64% | 169 -58% | 332 -18% | 290 -28% |
Load | 85 | 130 53% | 76 -11% | 122 44% | 44 -48% | 76 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 60 |
Pro
Contra
O aspecto mais forte do Dell G3 3590 é sua capacidade de manutenção. Ao contrário do HP Pavilion Gaming 15 ou do MSI GP65, o sistema da Dell é mais fácil de atualizar e não exige o rompimento de nenhum selo de garantia. O desempenho está onde esperamos, considerando que o hardware e o baixo preço de entrada torna o sistema atraente para os usuários que desejam uma máquina de jogos decentemente poderosa e sem frescuras.
A lista de fraquezas é maior do que gostaríamos. A tela, em particular, sofre de muito com recortes, incluindo cores fracas, bleeding irregular da luz de fundo moderadamente pesado, tempos de resposta mais lentos, sobreposição mate granulada e uma luz de fundo fraca. Embora seja perfeitamente aceitável para a maioria dos jogos, os concorrentes HP Gaming Pavilion 15 e o Lenovo Legion Y540 oferecem paineis muito melhores que são mais adequados para jogos de ritmo rápido. Você precisará atualizar para a série Dell G7 ou superior se desejar uma melhor experiência visual, pois o G3 3590 não oferece outras opções de painel.
O restante do sistema é típico de sua faixa de preço. O chassi de plástico, os alto-falantes agudos pesados, o leitor SD lento, a WLAN 1x1 e o SSD NVMe econômico são comuns em portáteis de jogos econômicos.
Se você tiver US$ 1.000 para gastar em um portátil para jogos, pode querer considerar o HP Pavilion Gaming 15, mais silencioso, ou o Asus Zephyrus G GA502 mais sofisticado, com tecnologia AMD. O Dell G3 3590 pode ser um pouco mais barato, mas é difícil recomendar seus ventiladores mais barulhentos e sua tela mais fraca.
Dell G3 3590
- 10/11/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo